Jump to content

Donald Trump 2020

Francisco 2.0

By Francisco 2.0
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 43.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Mrs Whiggins

    1391

  • Biff Tannen

    1374

  • 4th&Five

    1222

  • WhatTheBuck

    910

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Thatguy
Thatguy

Let me be candid and honest here my man. I cannot be sympathetic to your comments because this is how adult life has always been. From the moment I stepped out of my home and headed off to college I h

Francisco 2.0
Francisco 2.0
henrygandorf
henrygandorf

it won't matter if his taxes ever come out.  it won't matter if his taxes don't ever come out.  you wanna know why?  because we already know what's in them. since early 2017 when people starting

Posted Images

Brisketexan

Brisketexan 107096

Posted
Posted
No idea who the guy is, but he's an asshoe.

He’s a guy who the president. Of the fucking UNITED STATES. Has chosen to amplify, over and over. We’re governed by a cocksucker asshole. And enough of us love it so that he’s going to remain president.
A plague is better than we deserve.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
triplehorn

triplehorn 2664

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, LonghornSean said:

https://twitter.com/JohnKStahlUSA

Trump just retweeted this guy 8 times. To see this kind of trash coming directly from the President of the United States, it's still stunning. And yet, Trump has made it feel ordinary.

For some reason this evening, it feels like the hologram is actually, finally glitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Eskimohorn

Eskimohorn 5684

Posted
Posted
Looking forward to taking my daughter one day to whatever Florida golf course is his final resting place. I’ll wait until she’s old enough...to watch for cops while I piss on his fucking grave.

You’re gonna need a boat

4da9ea4b9a6cc00d6e7354a8763cc4b0.jpg

And be sure to keep a space dry for dancing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
yoladu

yoladu 4205

Posted
Posted (edited)

So a flurry of tweets this evening after a mostly quiet day on twitter...

  • his golf game didn't take him away from focusing on the ills this country faces (as some cried all day about) 
  • his golf game took him away from tweeting political/personal greviences and retweeting racist fuckheads (for most the day).

but don't worry America, he got 'em in this evening after his golf game.

this guy doesn't give two shits.

Edited by yoladu
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Burt

Burt 4150

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Message Board User said:

 

Can someone message/tweet Rex and tell him to unblock me? The only thing that cocksuckser has ever blocked in his life is me. On Twitter!

And why can I see his tweets on here if I can't see them on Twitter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Jack Straw

Jack Straw 2955

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

When I see the President of the United States spending his days engaging in juvenile name calling and accusing others of crimes with no factual basis whatsoever while tens of thousands of people die on his watch, there’s really only one thing that comes to mind: 

Donald Trump is doing a great job.
 

Signed, 

@Johnny Sack, and 100% of Republicans 

  • Like 26
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Francisco 2.0

Francisco 2.0 32688

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/24/us/politics/trump-2020-election-voting-rights.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur

 

Quote

In October, President Trump declares a state of emergency in major cities in battleground states, like Milwaukee and Detroit, banning polling places from opening.

A week before the election, Attorney General William P. Barr announces a criminal investigation into the Democratic presidential nominee, Joseph R. Biden Jr.

After Mr. Biden wins a narrow Electoral College victory, Mr. Trump refuses to accept the results, won’t leave the White House and declines to allow the Biden transition team customary access to agencies before the Jan. 20 inauguration.

 

Quote

Far-fetched conspiracy theories? Not to a group of worst-case scenario planners — mostly Democrats, but some anti-Trump Republicans as well — who have been gaming out various doomsday options for the 2020 presidential election. Outraged by Mr. Trump and fearful that he might try to disrupt the campaign before, during and after Election Day, they are engaged in a process that began in the realm of science fiction but has nudged closer to reality as Mr. Trump and his administration abandon longstanding political norms.

 

Quote

The anxiety has intensified in recent weeks as the president continues to attack the integrity of mail voting and insinuate that the election system is rigged, while his Republican allies ramp up efforts to control who can vote and how. Just last week, Mr. Trump threatened to withhold funding from states that defy his wishes on expanding mail voting, while also amplifying unfounded claims of voter fraud in battleground states. 

“In the eight to 10 months I’ve been yapping at people about this stuff, the reactions have gone from, ‘Don’t be silly, that won’t happen,’ to an increasing sense of, ‘You know, that could happen,’” said Rosa Brooks, a Georgetown University law professor. Earlier this year, Ms. Brooks convened an informal group of Democrats and never-Trump Republicans to brainstorm about ways the Trump administration could disrupt the election and to think about ways to prevent it.

Spoiler

But the anxiety is hardly limited to outside groups.

Marc Elias, a Washington lawyer who leads the Democratic National Committee’s legal efforts to fight voter suppression measures, said not a day goes by when he doesn’t field a question from senior Democratic officials about whether Mr. Trump could postpone or cancel the election. Prodded by allies to explain why not, Mr. Elias wrote a column on the subject in late March for his website — and it drew more traffic than anything he’d ever published.

But changing the date of the election is not what worries Mr. Elias. The bigger threat in his mind is the possibility that the Trump administration could act in October to make it harder for people to vote in urban centers in battleground states — possibilities, he said, that include declaring a state of emergency, deploying the National Guard or forbidding gatherings of more than 10 people.

Such events could serve to depress or discourage turnout in pockets of the country that reliably vote for Democrats.

“That to me is that frame from which all doomsday scenarios then go,” he said.

To ward off such a scenario, Mr. Elias is engaged in multiple lawsuits aimed at making it easier to cast absentee ballots by mail and making in-person voting more available, either on Election Day or in the preceding weeks.

Mr. Biden, for his part, has suggested more than once that Mr. Trump might try to disrupt or delay the election. And his campaign grew very concerned this month when it was announced that election security briefings, which in past cycles had been delivered to candidates by the F.B.I. and the Department of Homeland Security, would now be the province of the director of national intelligence. That post is currently held by John Ratcliffe, a Trump ally who was confirmed to the position on Thursday. Mr. Ratcliffe was among the president’s chief Fox News defenders during the Russia investigation and has been a sharp critic of the F.B.I.

“Since 2016, Donald Trump has shown that he is always ready to sacrifice our basic democratic norms for his personal and political interests,” said Bob Bauer, a Biden senior adviser who is the campaign’s chief lawyer. “We assume he may well resort to any kind of trick, ploy or scheme he can in order to hold onto his presidency. We have built a strong program to plan for and address every possibility to ensure that he does not succeed.”

Mr. Trump has said he expects the election to be held on Nov. 3 as scheduled, and under federal law he does not have the power to unilaterally postpone it. But a recent comment by the president’s son-in-law and adviser Jared Kushner about whether the election would be held as scheduled — “I’m not sure I can commit one way or another,’’ he said — renewed fears that Mr. Trump would try to move the election, or discredit the balloting process, if he thought he was going to lose.

Mr. Trump’s campaign derided the anxiety over the election as irrational hand-wringing driven by Democrats’ inability to accept his victory four years ago.

“Hillary Clinton, Stacey Abrams and the entire Democratic Party refused to accept the results of their elections and pushed the Russia collusion conspiracy theory for years,” said Tim Murtaugh, the communications director for Mr. Trump’s re-election campaign. “Now Joe Biden’s allies have formed actual conspiracy committees where they’ll work up new hoaxes to further undermine our democracy. They are wasting their time. As President Trump has repeatedly said, the election will happen on Nov. 3.”

The president attacked mail balloting again Sunday morning, with a baseless claim that it would lead to “the greatest Rigged Election in history.’’

Some Democrats have been cautious about voicing their warnings about potential electoral calamities too loudly, for fear that even the suggestion of a tainted election would depress turnout.

“You don’t want to set up a perception based on the theory that elections don’t matter,” said Ari Rabin-Havt, who was a deputy campaign manager for Senator Bernie Sanders. “You don’t want to tell supporters that nothing you do matters because this guy is going to screw it up.”

Ms. Brooks’s group at Georgetown is not the only one forecasting doomsday scenarios for the election. Ian Bassin, the executive director of Protect Democracy, a nonprofit group dedicated to resisting authoritarian government, last year convened the National Task Force on Election Crises, a bipartisan 51-member group that includes Republicans such as Michael Chertoff, the former homeland security secretary. The group is dedicated to envisioning and presenting plans for scenarios that could wreck the 2020 presidential election.

The task force began with 65 possibilities before narrowing the list early this year to eight potential calamities, including natural disasters, a successful foreign hack of voting machines, a major candidate’s challenging the election and seeking to delegitimize the results, and a president who refuses to participate in a peaceful transfer of power.

Among the scenarios they eliminated when making final cuts in January, ironically, was a killer pandemic that ravaged the country and kept people homebound before Election Day. After the coronavirus struck, the group reconstituted to publish pandemic-related recommendations for state governments to follow.

The group also produced a 200-page document, which has not been made public. Several members said they had worked on specific scenarios but had not seen the complete draft. They said that while many of the possibilities envisioned an incumbent president’s using the forces of government to his advantage, the report’s authors had been careful not to make the document explicitly about Mr. Trump.

“We hope there are safeguards in place,” said Norman J. Ornstein, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute who participated in the task force. “Let’s face it, those safeguards ought to include the Senate of the United States and the Justice Department. There’s reason to be nervous.”

Edward B. Foley, a law professor at Ohio State University who participated in the task force, said the 2020 election could resemble the contest of 1876, which nearly split the country a decade after the Civil War.

That election was not decided until Gov. Samuel J. Tilden of New York conceded to Gov. Rutherford B. Hayes of Ohio two days before the inauguration. The outgoing president, Ulysses S. Grant, had made contingency plans for martial law because he was concerned there would be simultaneous competing inaugurations.

“We’re setting ourselves up for an election where neither side can concede defeat,” Professor Foley said. “That suggests that the desire to dispute the outcome is going to be higher than ever.”

 

Edited by Francisco 2.0
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brandywine

Brandywine 1330

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, mchookem said:

i still just don't understand HOW ANYBODY CAN DEFEND THIS SHITBAG.

i mean, aggy i understand. but people here, we all know who they are...my god 😖

Tump and John K Stahl, obviously, are navel lint, the lowest level of slim. And I can see the Reps laughing and laughing. Pathetic. It's high school antics. They never grew up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RomaVicta

RomaVicta 30679

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, Bruh Man said:

He is the worst human being on earth. 

Okay. We ask Trump if he's the greatest escape artist in history. Are you better than Houdini, Mr. President?

Of course, he says yes. 

Will you prove it, Mr. President, sir, your grace?

Anytime.

Profit.

3c12435r.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mrs Whiggins

Mrs Whiggins 13052

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

pretty sure if I follow through with the mechanics of that swing and the position of the scythe, I think he either ends up cutting off his own head or splitting his torso in half diagonally.

I wasn't a physics major but....

giphy.gif

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RomaVicta

RomaVicta 30679

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Message Board User said:

Holy crap the replies on this tweet by a Fox News contributor.  

 

My goodness, you're right. The libs are very evil in making conservatism seem evil. They're very mean to conservatives who must counterpunch to survive the attacks of Fake News, academia, and Murderin' Joe Scarborough.

Such a pathetic self-image alongside a self-image of manly manfullness. They are aggy through and through. A remarkable ability to hold two opposing untruths in their little heads at the same time. And doing so with such great pride!

Sorta like being proud of juggling dog turds and cat hairballs at the same time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bama Chick

Bama Chick 28596

Posted
Posted

Trumpkins are totally fine with Trump calling one black woman “shamu” and another black woman “Willie’s Ho”.

But lost their minds when Nancy Pelosi said the president was “morbidly obese”.

I wish hypocrisy was physically painful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...