Jump to content

Donald Trump 2020

Francisco 2.0

By Francisco 2.0
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

WhatTheBuck

WhatTheBuck 28,777

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, burntorangebongos said:

Look, the party fatcats have a right to pick their candidate. They have done so since the beginning of this country. I get that and understand that is the reason they exist. They are charged with running the BEST candidate but that candidate is IN THEIR OPINION  and doesn't necessarily reflect what is what we the people want or need.. For some reason, they don't think LIz can win. Maybe it's because they think she can't help the down ballot candidates or more likely because she has a pussy and they agree with Bernie and think a woman can't beat Trump due to Hillary. That is what I mean by my pointing out the collusion that I think I see.

I'm not seeing it. Can you help me out by naming these "fatcats" and pointing in the direction of evidence that supports your assertion? Is that also why Biden fell out of the lead and Kamala Harris fell out of the race?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 43.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Mrs Whiggins

    1391

  • Biff Tannen

    1374

  • 4th&Five

    1222

  • WhatTheBuck

    910

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Thatguy
Thatguy

Let me be candid and honest here my man. I cannot be sympathetic to your comments because this is how adult life has always been. From the moment I stepped out of my home and headed off to college I h

Francisco 2.0
Francisco 2.0
henrygandorf
henrygandorf

it won't matter if his taxes ever come out.  it won't matter if his taxes don't ever come out.  you wanna know why?  because we already know what's in them. since early 2017 when people starting

Posted Images

burntorangebongos

burntorangebongos 10,710

Posted
Posted

Are you serious? Just look up who is in the leadership. I'm saying that these people are beholden to those who want to control the candidate nominated and have the connections within the media to make that happen.

Current leadership[edit]

In addition, a National Advisory Board exists for purposes of fundraising and advising the executive. The present chair is Elizabeth Frawley Bagley, former U.S. Ambassador to Portugal.

===========

These are the connected and involved people that think they know better than us as to whom to choose at best or maybe influenced by oligarchs at worst. If they want to enhance the chances of a candidate or control media access to another then I absolutely think they can because that is why they were made the leaders. I'm not conspiracy talking about who might be pulling any of their strings...just that these folks opinions matter more than ours as to who the candidate should be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhatTheBuck

WhatTheBuck 28,777

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, burntorangebongos said:

Are you serious? Just look up who is in the leadership. I'm saying that these people are beholden to those who want to control the candidate nominated and have the connections within the media to make that happen.

Current leadership[edit]

In addition, a National Advisory Board exists for purposes of fundraising and advising the executive. The present chair is Elizabeth Frawley Bagley, former U.S. Ambassador to Portugal.

===========

These are the connected and involved people that think they know better than us as to whom to choose at best or maybe influenced by oligarchs at worst. If they want to enhance the chances of a candidate or control media access to another then I absolutely think they can because that is why they were made the leaders. I'm not conspiracy talking about who might be pulling any of their strings...just that these folks opinions matter more than ours as to who the candidate should be. 

How are they restricting media access to Warren? I see her all the time. Who are they favoring over her? Bernie? He just won the New Hampshire primary. I'm pretty sure the voters made that happen, not the party leadership. They didn't rig it against him last time and they're not rigging it for him now. You can't say they're colluding for Biden. Bloomberg? Please. He's just got more money than everyone else and can run an ad blitz to dwarf all the rest.  

Sounds like a conspiracy theory to me. Maybe it's because she seems meek and people think she can't stand up to Trump. Maybe it's because her only campaign wardrobe is the black leotard and the brightly colored blouse. (Yes, I know it's not a leotard but it may as well be.) Policy wise I'd take her over Bernie but since she decided to adopt the Medicare For All platform, it makes her and Bernie seem more interchangeable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
burntorangebongos

burntorangebongos 10,710

Posted
Posted

The leadership has a stable of candidates and some perform better than others, right? Bernie has a ton of followers and is doing great in fund raising and generating interest among the young. But notice how hesitant they are about touting him and putting more backing of him to win? They are doing that because he can be labeled the worst thing imaginable....socialist.  He is an admitted socialist and that doesn't sell in our country. Haha, I know right? But as much of that as exists here and we even enjoy, we just are programed to hate the word. So they aren't backing him fully and they aren't backing Liz (imo because she is a woman) and are leaving her to her own devices to get to the media and get positive exposure.  I didn't mean to high jack the Trump thread but I do lament that Liz' road to nomination is mostly non-existent. 

I'm fixin to neg myself so I won't respond here about the dem nominees and their chances here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
staboner

staboner 4,969

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Tom said:

https://www.businessinsider.sg/trump-us-isolated-europe-rejects-america-first-policy-munich-conference-2020-2/?#

Thank God America is finally respected again after eight years of bow and apologize.

I just wish Tahoe Horn were still around so he could take his victory lap.

oh that dipshit is here. i twatwaffle on if its gr horn (most likely) or Johnny Sack (The Sock of Suck). or maybe both?

giphy.gif

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tx 3 putt

tx 3 putt 76,908

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Tom said:

https://www.businessinsider.sg/trump-us-isolated-europe-rejects-america-first-policy-munich-conference-2020-2/?#

Thank God America is finally respected again after eight years of bow and apologize.

I just wish Tahoe Horn were still around so he could take his victory lap.

 

foreign policy handled by complete idiots #IMpotus

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmokeyTheBear

SmokeyTheBear 5,562

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, DixonHur said:

On a positive note, if it's this fucked up under Trump, just imagine how bad it would be had Corrupt Hilary won.  I mean, she has the word "corrupt" right in her name.

Something to think about.

You're not wrong though. Trump would still be relevant, using his newly formed media company to inject his vitriol into our politics. However as a private citizen so not subject to the scrutiny of working within a machine that SHOULD be transparent. This is oddly the best case scenario for us. Yay. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Francisco 2.0

Francisco 2.0 32,389

Posted
  • Author
Posted
9 minutes ago, High Plains Drifter said:

 

Yeah, but twitter banning him would have been glorious.

Twitter:  The absolute best thing, and worst thing, to have ever happened to Trump.

Forget sparing the rest of the world; Twitter banning him would be the best thing for him.  I'm glad they haven't, for him operating as President without any filter (personal or otherwise) in place shows just how fucked up he really is, how easily he is triggered and insecure he is almost daily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89,654

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

Twitter:  The absolute best thing, and worst thing, to have ever happened to Trump.

Forget sparing the rest of the world; Twitter banning him would be the best thing for him.  I'm glad they haven't, for him operating as President without any filter (personal or otherwise) in place shows just how fucked up he really is, how easily he is triggered and insecure he is almost daily.

Just imagine what Howard Hughes would have been like on Twitter in his last few years.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tx 3 putt

tx 3 putt 76,908

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mrs Whiggins said:

Reinforcing the narrative of REAL so that on November 3, REAL election results would prove that he won regardless of truth and reality. This drum will get louder.

He’s past due for a blast regarding 50 million illegals voting in the upcoming election 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
F250

F250 28,768

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, BLKNSTY said:

 


Yup. The “this ad was paid for donnys dead dad who’s looking up at him from hell with tears in his eyes” or something along those lines disclaimer with the double birds is simply, beautiful.

That last part was awesome.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...