Sarah Huckabee Sanders is terrible at this job

[Brisketexan 105347]

I saw that and it cracked me up.  My wife went to Washington and Lee.  That is not exactly a liberal haven.  That owner has balls.
next time an administration official goes to a restaurant, they should seat the kids and adults at opposite ends of the restaurant.

Excellent.

Shame these people. Everywhere. All the time.

[Js1 85579]

3 hours ago, Washpark said:

Lulz. Kicked out of a restaurant
 

 

Don’t make a weight joke, don’t make a weight joke

 

So much bitching. Isn’t this just free market that they argue for refusing to serve LGBT and minorities? 

[Turkleton 145]

This is priceless. This just assures me that there will be no blue wave in November. Please keep this shit up!

[RomaVicta 30023]

I don't know anything about approaching waves, but I don't see how this helps the GOPs. They're already fully ignited and spewing spittle at the perceived injustice to poor, good Donald and his merry men/women.

[Underdog 28773]

You go Now!!  You eat like eat like killer whale!  You scare my wife.

[Dr. Teeth 5845]

The only way for her to ever be able to eat food without spit in it ever again is to deport all the country’s kitchen staff. 

[David Dennison 18947]

20 minutes ago, Turkleton said:

This is priceless. This just assures me that there will be no blue wave in November. Please keep this shit up!

Smell that?

That's fear.

[Brisketexan 105347]

Smell that?
That's fear.

Yep.

[jimmyjazz 46138]

I didn't realize that there was a movement underfoot to declare "fat, ugly lying bitch" as a protected class.  Huh.  Learn something every day.

[Dr. Teeth 5845]

If we can shame enough overweight, white women that voted for Trump into thinking they will never be able to eat out again, I think that is exactly how you win in November. 

[Hank Scorpio 17731]

Lionel Hutz: Mr. Huckabee, what did you and your wife do after you were ejected from the restaurant.

Mr. Huckabee: We... pretty much went straight home.

Lionel Hutz: Mr. Huckabee, you're under oath.

Mr. Huckabee: We drove around until 3 AM looking for another all-you-can-eat fish restaurant.

Lionel Hutz: And when you couldn't find one?

Mr. Huckabee: We went... fishing.

[conVINCEd 21469]

Now imagine McDonalds refusing to sell Big Macs to dotus.

[6th Street 6508]

6 minutes ago, Hank Scorpio said:

Lionel Hutz: Mr. Huckabee, what did you and your wife do after you were ejected from the restaurant.

Mr. Huckabee: We... pretty much went straight home.

Lionel Hutz: Mr. Huckabee, you're under oath.

Mr. Huckabee: We drove around until 3 AM looking for another all-you-can-eat fish restaurant.

Lionel Hutz: And when you couldn't find one?

Mr. Huckabee: We went... fishing.

Tis no woman. Tis a remorseless eating machine. 

[David Dennison 18947]

8 minutes ago, Hank Scorpio said:

Lionel Hutz: Mr. Huckabee, what did you and your wife do after you were ejected from the restaurant.

Mr. Huckabee: We... pretty much went straight home.

Lionel Hutz: Mr. Huckabee, you're under oath.

Mr. Huckabee: We drove around until 3 AM looking for another all-you-can-eat fish restaurant.

Lionel Hutz: And when you couldn't find one?

Mr. Huckabee: We went... fishing.

 

2 minutes ago, 6th Street said:

Tis no woman. Tis a remorseless eating machine. 

[Hugo Stiglitz 23367]

Family Values 

 

 

[David Dennison 18947]

I hope they let me join the cool side during the race war.

[jimmyjazz 46138]

Is that a legit Huckabee tweet?  Bloody hell, how about you act the part?

[burntorangebongos 10752]

5 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Family Values 

 

 

 

[Pancho 44996]

4 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Is that a legit Huckabee tweet?  Bloody hell, how about you act the part?

Yes it’s real

[Homercles 10206]

So much bitching. Isn’t this just free market that they argue for refusing to serve LGBT and minorities? 

That @TexasVengeance smells like a trollbot.

[Native Horn 3515]

So is the new plan to shame these idoits out of restaurants?  Gonna starve 'em?  Works for me.

[4th&Five 41590]

Any person in this administration should feel uncomfortable every time they go in public. You work for and lie for a racist shitbag you get to deal with the consequences. 

[Post Oak 20276]

Good. Fuck her.  Figuratively not literally

[Jive Turkey 12644]

 

1 hour ago, Hank Scorpio said:

Lionel Hutz: Mr. Huckabee, what did you and your wife do after you were ejected from the restaurant.

Mr. Huckabee: We... pretty much went straight home.

Lionel Hutz: Mr. Huckabee, you're under oath.

Mr. Huckabee: We drove around until 3 AM looking for another all-you-can-eat fish restaurant.

Lionel Hutz: And when you couldn't find one?

Mr. Huckabee: We went... fishing.

 

1 hour ago, 6th Street said:

Tis no woman. Tis a remorseless eating machine. 

Fucking classic. 

 

Edited June 23, 2018 by Jive Turkey

[kevwun 15905]

Working for a horrible person should have consequences. These people need to be ostracized by decent people.

[Hugo Stiglitz 23367]

 

[Patrick Bateman 3932]

While funny and I applaud the owner for their courage, this probably won't work out for them in the long run..... That's a red part of the state which has only gotten redder.  It'll be interesting to see the fallout for them.

[Hugo Stiglitz 23367]

 

[Hugo Stiglitz 23367]

Racist pieces of shit vs Gay couples

I think it’s pretty easy to see who should not be tolerated.

But both sides!

Edited June 23, 2018 by Hugo Stiglitz

[Mojo Hand 4580]

3 minutes ago, OatmealRaisinCookie said:

Funny how the same people having a cow about the cake maker refusing LGBT decorations are applauding not serving someone because of their political beliefs/ideas/job. It’s either you are okay with it in a vacuum or you aren’t, because then you are just rooting for a “team” as you decry the other guys with doing.

That's a false choice that ignores the grounds for the refusal to serve.   I'd be fine with a restaurant refusing to serve David Duke based on his actions to promote evil, but against them refusing to serve him on the basis that he's a white person.    Same thing applies here.  I know it's much easier to view the world as a set of binary choices based on inflexible principles, but that's not the only way to view it. 

[ChiTownDoc 21155]

3 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Racist pieces of shit vs Gay couples

I think it’s pretty easy to see who should not be tolerated.

But both sides!

You don't get it, ostracizing people because they're bigots and ostracizing them because they're gay is the same thing.  Wake up Hugo!

[Hugo Stiglitz 23367]

SHS wasn’t denied service due to team.

She was denied service because of the harm she causes our society.

Its a right vs wrong thing.

 not a right vs left.

[bad_teammate 13224]

Kicking Trump officials out of restaurants is cool and good.

Yelling at them on dating apps is cool and good.

I really like where all this is heading.

[WhatTheBuck 28798]

2 minutes ago, ChiTownDoc said:

You don't get it, ostracizing people because they're bigots and ostracizing them because they're gay is the same thing.  Wake up Hugo!

In both cases the Republicans are on the side of the bigots. 

[bad_teammate 13224]

Just now, WhatTheBuck said:

In both cases the Republicans are on the side of the bigots. 

This is, always, a coincidence. lol

[ChiTownDoc 21155]

1 minute ago, WhatTheBuck said:

In both cases the Republicans are on the side of the bigots. 

Yeah, I always bought into the fiscal conservative shit and voted mostly R.  Now the party has been fully hijacked by the nutjobs I've always despised on the far right.  They've also bailed on fiscally conservative policies.  Kind of a no brainer for R's like me to leave the party.  Au revoir, assholes.

[EMAWesome 101]

11 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Racist pieces of shit vs Gay couples

I think it’s pretty easy to see who should not be tolerated.

But both sides!

It's even easier to see who thinks they are the sole arbitrator of tolerance.

 

Four points to make about the restaurant incident.

 

1.  Businesses have the right to refuse service to anyone they want for whatever reason they want.

2.  Would be customers have the right to refuse to spend their money at any business they want for whatever reason they want.

3.  Customers who are refused service by businesses have the right to go on social media and raise as big of a shitstorm over the situation as they feel like raising.

4.  A wise business owner would carefully evaluate whether points 2 and 3 make pursuing point 1 a good idea or not.

 

This restaurant will be out of business in six months because of this.

[ChiTownDoc 21155]

3 minutes ago, EMAWesome said:

It's even easier to see who thinks they are the sole arbitrator of tolerance.

 

Four points to make about the restaurant incident.

 

1.  Businesses have the right to refuse service to anyone they want for whatever reason they want.

2.  Would be customers have the right to refuse to spend their money at any business they want for whatever reason they want.

3.  Customers who are refused service by businesses have the right to go on social media and raise as big of a shitstorm over the situation as they feel like raising.

4.  A wise business owner would carefully evaluate whether points 2 and 3 make pursuing point 1 a good idea or not.

 

This restaurant will be out of business in six months because of this.

I'll be happy to take that bet.  I say they're not out of business in 6 months.  They may suffer a bit in the short term but it will likely be a wash with those on the left supporting in larger numbers. 

[Michael Knight 12995]

10 minutes ago, OatmealRaisinCookie said:

So explain to me, because I’m an ignorant dummy, how refusal to serve someone based on their political philosophy and legal actions to promote their philosophy is different than refusing service based on anything else? The answer might simply be that political status/identity/affiliation is not a legally protected class and you can theoretically have “Red restaurants only” or “Blue restaurants only” if you wanted (though who would as all money is green  )

She wasn't denied service because she's a Republican, she wasn't denied service because shes fat, she wasn't denied service because shes a woman. She was denied service because shes Sarah Huckabee Sanders and shes terrible at her job

[Mojo Hand 4580]

18 minutes ago, OatmealRaisinCookie said:

So explain to me, because I’m an ignorant dummy, how refusal to serve someone based on their political philosophy and legal actions to promote their philosophy is different than refusing service based on anything else? The answer might simply be that political status/identity/affiliation is not a legally protected class and you can theoretically have “Red restaurants only” or “Blue restaurants only” if you wanted (though who would as all money is green  )

I'm not sure what needs to be explained.   People can hold viewpoints as to acceptable grounds for refusing to serve someone and unacceptable grounds without the sort of inconsistency you are claiming.  

Personally, I believe private businesses should generally have the right to refuse service to individuals.  I think there are certain broad classes that should be exceptions to that general right based on my evaluation of various factors.   And when a business does have the right to refuse, I'll applaud the use of that right if I think that person deserved it, and disagree with the decision if they didn't, while nonetheless recognizing the right.  And I'm open to changing my opinion when presented with a persuasive argument. 

Or you can go with "Mongo think refuse never OK or always OK!" 

Edited June 23, 2018 by Mojo Hand

[TexLonghorn 5671]

So which one are some people on here pretending: that this restaurant refused service that night to every member of the Repulsive Party and everyone in the restaurant was a proven Democrat/Independent, or that HuckaSanders is now a protected class?

[ChiTownDoc 21155]

4 minutes ago, Mojo Hand said:

Or you can go with "Mongo think refuse never OK or always OK!" 

Listen here asshole, you leave Steve McMichael out of this!

[ndawg 1242]

20 minutes ago, OatmealRaisinCookie said:

So explain to me, because I’m an ignorant dummy, how refusal to serve someone based on their political philosophy and legal actions to promote their philosophy is different than refusing service based on anything else? The answer might simply be that political status/identity/affiliation is not a legally protected class and you can theoretically have “Red restaurants only” or “Blue restaurants only” if you wanted (though who would as all money is green  )

Do you know the saying, when someone tells you who the are, believe 'em? Well, in this case, I am forced to buy in to your self assessment. You are indeed an ignorant dummy.

SHS attacks our freedom and our democracy every time she stands up in front of her podium and ejaculates lie after lie. She's the principal apologist of our liar-in-chief, and an accomplished liar in her own right. That's why she has garnered such scorn, not because of her "political philosophy."

[Bama Chick 28596]

Well, according to the Twitter machine, the restaurant in question now has a 3 month waiting list for reservations lol.

[ChiTownDoc 21155]

2 minutes ago, Bama Chick said:

Well, according to the Twitter machine, the restaurant in question now has a 3 month waiting list for reservations lol.

Yes, I'm sure everyone is either booking and planning to no show or looking to support the place.  Easy fix - ask for a small credit card deposit with reservations and they'll weed out the nutjobs on the right and prosper for years. 

[jimmyjazz 46138]

27 minutes ago, OatmealRaisinCookie said:

So explain to me, because I’m an ignorant dummy, how refusal to serve someone based on their political philosophy and legal actions to promote their philosophy is different than refusing service based on anything else? The answer might simply be that political status/identity/affiliation is not a legally protected class and you can theoretically have “Red restaurants only” or “Blue restaurants only” if you wanted (though who would as all money is green  )

Hey, do your own fucking homework.  Maybe one day you'll wake up.

[Pods 7586]

She was denied service, because she's an unlikable Baghdad Bob and is an active participant in the erosion of civil norms and the rule of law in this country.

I'm not exactly thrilled with the precedent this is setting. The GOP has destroyed civil discourse and completely abdicated their responsibility to replace Trump with someone reasonable and patriotic. The citizens are starting to push back in any way they can. Public scorn is appropriate here, but the method will be used later by both sides indiscriminately in the future. 

This is going to get a lot worse and it's one of the many consequences of the GOP allowing a traitorous, narcissistic buffoon to run a train on the USA.

[Hugo Stiglitz 23367]

The Nazis are far too persecuted in this country.

[HenryJames 66178]

Can’t the owner of the restaurant just hold a press conference and deny that it happened?

[Aqua Buddha 14610]

Too bad she wasn't wanting a gay wedding cake or something.  Then, public shame is perfectly fine.