Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, jimmyjazz said:

It is not lost on me that these people, who have willfully entered into the national political arena, are getting fussy about blowback from private citizens.  Jesus Christ.  LBJ would have laughed and then mocked them.  Reagan would have cracked some homey witticism.  Trump just cries like the little bitch he is.

LBJ would have destroyed Trump in a single debate.  

He would have made Trump deny the rumors about videotapes, the affairs, etc. right there on stage.  Hell, he would have played a recording of Trump’s pussy grabbing comments right there in front of Trump. 

Posted
4 hours ago, jimmyjazz said:

If what I've read is correct, didn't the whole thing go down without much drama?  Owner asked SHS to leave, SHS said "OK", owner comped whatever had already been served.  Right?

If so, I love that it's getting blown way farther out of proportion by a bunch of people who had nothing to do with it.  Yay, drama.  Restaurants kick people out for not wearing shoes . . . often.  Nobody cares.  Seems like nobody really cares here unless it's a useful talking point.

No shirt, no shoes, no soul...no service. 

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)

End Times broadcaster Rick Wiles used his “TruNews” program on Friday to warn his viewers that liberals may begin to assassinate Republican candidates before the 2018 midterm elections in preparation for civil war.

“When they get rid of Donald Trump, they are going to crush the people who voted for him,” Wiles said. “Your country is being taken away from you.”

“This is a revolution,” he added. “It is a communist/Marxist/socialist/leftist revolution and it has the potential to turn bloody. I would say that we need to be prepared for this fall. Be prepared. I pray to God that the leftists/Marxists/socialists/communists do not assassinate Republican candidates for the House and Senate and governor and other positions. But be prepared that as we go in to October, that they will carry out targeted killings of Republicans.”

“If that happens, then you know that a violent revolution has now begun,” he warned, adding that if Democrats win control of Congress in the midterms, “this country is going to be ripped to pieces.”

“We’re that close to civil war,” Wiles said. “We’re that close to violent, bloody revolution in this country.”

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/rick-wiles-leftists-will-carry-out-targeted-killings-of-republicans-in-preparation-for-civil-war/

 

But...both sides.

Edited by Hugo Stiglitz
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

End Times broadcaster Rick Wiles used his “TruNews” program on Friday to warn his viewers that liberals may begin to assassinate Republican candidates before the 2018 midterm elections in preparation for civil war.

“When they get rid of Donald Trump, they are going to crush the people who voted for him,” Wiles said. “Your country is being taken away from you.”

“This is a revolution,” he added. “It is a communist/Marxist/socialist/leftist revolution and it has the potential to turn bloody. I would say that we need to be prepared for this fall. Be prepared. I pray to God that the leftists/Marxists/socialists/communists do not assassinate Republican candidates for the House and Senate and governor and other positions. But be prepared that as we go in to October, that they will carry out targeted killings of Republicans.”

“If that happens, then you know that a violent revolution has now begun,” he warned, adding that if Democrats win control of Congress in the midterms, “this country is going to be ripped to pieces.”

“We’re that close to civil war,” Wiles said. “We’re that close to violent, bloody revolution in this country.”

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/rick-wiles-leftists-will-carry-out-targeted-killings-of-republicans-in-preparation-for-civil-war/

 

 

So you're telling me that someone who is described as "End Times broadcaster" is predicting an apocalypse?  Interesting.

Edited by Chuckie Finster
Posted
2 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

"Civility" = capitulation

 

CNN went "both sides" in this.  Well the GOP might be racist white supremacists, but the Dems. are just being rude. #bothsides

Posted (edited)

Spoiler alert: there will be blood.

Both sides will blame the other and more violence will follow escalating to worse shit.

It’s going to really suck.

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSwQBP0d2hWmOslQEposyp

Edited by Hugo Stiglitz
  • Like 1
Posted

This kind of culture war BS is Trump's wet dream.  It's oxygen to the flame of energizing his base.  Anything to divide the country involving:

  • immigration
  • race
  • religion
  • liberals
  • media
  • guns

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Press should ask nothing but questions about the missing kids.

Absolutely this.  Don't go off it until there's a real answer.

Spoiler: there won't be.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

She got her bullshit turned up to 11 today.

She knows she’s in a safe zone today. Acosta will probably apologize on behalf of the Red Hen. 

Posted
43 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

"Civility" = capitulation

 

What issue does she have with it? It’s not exactly outlandish to call the Santa Monica fascist a white national

Posted
15 minutes ago, retread said:

"Ds love open borders and don't care about how much crime the immigrants bring" - rinse and repeat

And there are millions of people in this country dumb enough to believe the rhetoric. 

Posted
1 hour ago, WhatTheBuck said:

No shirt, no shoes, no soul...no service. 

No truth, no service

Know truth, know service

Posted
6 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

Add Schumer to the list.  The entire old guard needs to be voted out of office. 

 

It's the smart move.  Trump WANTS his people persecuted out in public.  He hopes this stuff happens every day. 

Knowing this, what was Schumer supposed to say? 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

It's the smart move.  Trump WANTS his people persecuted out in public.  He hopes this stuff happens every day. 

Knowing this, what was Schumer supposed to say? 

Nothing.   He shouldn't engage in this petty bullshit from the Trump administration.  The proper response from people in power, including Senators and the media is to refocus the debate on the 3000 missing children.  The rest of this is all irrelevant noise.  And if he's specifically asked about it, answer that he's more concerned about the 3000 children than where an administration spokeswoman who repeatedly lies to the American people who pay her salary ate dinner.

  • Like 3
Posted
4 minutes ago, lemonlime said:

Nothing.   He shouldn't engage in this petty bullshit from the Trump administration.  The proper response from people in power, including Senators and the media is to refocus the debate on the 3000 missing children.  The rest of this is all irrelevant noise.  And if he's specifically asked about it, answer that he's more concerned about the 3000 children than where an administration spokeswoman who repeatedly lies to the American people who pay her salary ate dinner.

I actually agree with this.

Posted

Driving voter turnout in November is all that matters, it's the only cause worth expending energy on. While I personally don't give a shit about the emotional well being of Huckabeef or any other reject from Trump's admin, calling for public harrassment of these people seems more likely to galvanize the GOP than it is to drive votes to the Dems. 

 

November is huge for many reasons, and the Dems better not fuck this up. Escalating rhetoric and calls for public harrassment seem like pretty good ways to manage to fuck up. Trump loves the mud and dividing the country. Following him down that path is a mistake and I can guarantee that the dotard is jerking off his cheeto dick over this weekends events. 

Posted
26 minutes ago, Blotto said:

Driving voter turnout in November is all that matters, it's the only cause worth expending energy on. While I personally don't give a shit about the emotional well being of Huckabeef or any other reject from Trump's admin, calling for public harrassment of these people seems more likely to galvanize the GOP than it is to drive votes to the Dems. 

 

November is huge for many reasons, and the Dems better not fuck this up. Escalating rhetoric and calls for public harrassment seem like pretty good ways to manage to fuck up. Trump loves the mud and dividing the country. Following him down that path is a mistake and I can guarantee that the dotard is jerking off his cheeto dick over this weekends events. 

This

Posted
4 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

Citizens feeling empowered to hold politicians accountable for their actions can help voter turnout. It’s not an either/or situation.  

 

I think citizens acting out in peaceful objection is appropriate.  I also think the elected officials have a responsibility to not stoke the fire and incite violence.

  • Like 2
Posted
44 minutes ago, Blotto said:

November is huge for many reasons, and the Dems better not fuck this up. Escalating rhetoric and calls for public harrassment seem like pretty good ways to manage to fuck up. Trump loves the mud and dividing the country. Following him down that path is a mistake and I can guarantee that the dotard is jerking off his cheeto dick over this weekends events. 

I believe this is exactly the mindset that has gotten the Dems in trouble, over and over.  They are more concerned about incenting Republicans to vote than they are incenting their own.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

I think citizens acting out in peaceful objection is appropriate.  I also think the elected officials have a responsibility to not stoke the fire and incite violence.

Completely agree. 

Posted
4 hours ago, Thermos H. Christ said:

I don't condone violence against Trump collaborators. In addition to just being wrong, violence would be counterproductive. This is right out of the Ghandi/MLK playbook. The blueprint for (a) winning hearts and minds and (b) effectively compelling social change is not violence but simply refusing to participate in or go along with something that one believes is wrong, and emboldening others to join in taking that stand. If someone is acting as a force against what is right, you don't buy from them, you don't sell to them, you don't work for them, you don't fuck them, and you stand in their way loud and proud at every opportunity. It's a lot harder than it sounds, but in the big picture it can be extremely effective.

So yeah, I absolutely condone shunning, shaming, boycotting, and all-around excommunicating Trump collaborators from the society of decent human beings. They should not be able to get a meal at a nice restaurant or a drink at a nice bar in any major city in America. They should not be able to shop, or go to the movies, or walk down the street in peace without being told very clearly WE SEE YOU, AND YOU ARE NOT WELCOME HERE. They should dread at all times showing their faces in public. They have more than earned it. The idea that they can expect to do everything they do with impunity and everyone's just going to sit there politely waiting for them to tell us when it's OK to respectfully request that they stop... THAT is insanity.

It's also insane to think that they face so few consequences for their actions through official channels that not getting to eat at a farm-to-table restaurant is being portrayed as some whole new level of bridge-too-far leftist insanity. It's nothing, and yet it seems to be the closest we've come to actually hitting them where it hurts. It's working, this is really getting to them. It must not stop, it must grow, it must become their day-to-day and hour-to-hour reality.

Do you think restaurants and other service businesses should refuse service only to people directly working for/collaborating with Trump or does this extend to anyone who supports Trump or the republicans in any capacity (e.g. those who vote R)?  

Posted
10 hours ago, Chad Fuck said:

 


You’re confusing who the bullies are here. They had to go eat somewhere else. They didn’t get taken from their family and put in a cage.

 

I'm not confusing one damn thing.  The default setting for idiot leftist is to assume that anyone who doesn't agree with them must be racist, xenophobic, white nationalist, neo-Nazi, etc.  The concept that someone disagrees with them just because someone disagrees with them or has a different point of view or interpretation of a matter never goes into their head.  If everyone who called someone racist had to actually know the definition of racism there would be a shit load less people calling other people racist.

  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 3
Posted
3 minutes ago, EMAWesome said:

I'm not confusing one damn thing.  The default setting for idiot leftist is to assume that anyone who doesn't agree with them must be racist, xenophobic, white nationalist, neo-Nazi, etc.  The concept that someone disagrees with them just because someone disagrees with them or has a different point of view or interpretation of a matter never goes into their head.  If everyone who called someone racist had to actually know the definition of racism there would be a shit load less people calling other people racist.

People on the right should probably stop being racist and xenophobic.

Just a thought.

  • Like 1
Posted

Nope.  John Kasich doesn't agree with me on any political issues.  I wouldn't call him any of those things, because they don't apply.  Trump people are getting called those things because it's accurate, not because of mere political disagreement. 

  • Like 3


×
×
  • Create New...