Jump to content

Sarah Huckabee Sanders is terrible at this job

retread

By retread
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

NAVY
NAVY

Omg  

Chrispy_
Chrispy_

Oh bullshit, there’s a reason she could barely choke out the joke. 

Chrispy_
Chrispy_

The comment is irrelevant to me. The selective outrage is what bothers me. 

Posted Images

jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 46138

Posted
Posted

It seems this doesn't matter:

Quote

I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

When Trump attacks the press, as he has done willfully and without any pretense of equivocation, he violates his oath of office.  Every single time.  For this alone he should be impeached, not to mention his utter refusal to support the laws of the land on dozens of other fronts, each time violating his oath.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23367

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

It seems this doesn't matter:

When Trump attacks the press, as he has done willfully and without any pretense of equivocation, he violates his oath of office.  Every single time.  For this alone he should be impeached, not to mention his utter refusal to support the laws of the land on dozens of other fronts, each time violating his oath.

One of the articles of impeachment already introduced was his attacks on the free press, along with emoluments.

 

Edited by Hugo Stiglitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Js1

Js1 85579

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, retread said:

Only press sec. to require secret service protection!!! SAD!

I figured they're there to clear out the Golden Corral so there's no competition at feeding time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gooby

Gooby 640

Posted
Posted

The enemy of the people should quit attending these press conferences.  Send one camera to record it, fact check every fucking word out of their mouths, then re-broadcast it with the fact checks popping up all over the screen...like "Pop Up Video"

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
UTEX_ME

UTEX_ME 4766

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

One of the articles of impeachment already introduced was his attacks on the free press, along with emoluments.

 

Crazy how the party not in power always clings to the constitution. Once they are in power it's a "fuck it" mentality. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
EMAWesome

EMAWesome 101

Posted
Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, Pancho Negro said:

 

Says the biggest attention whore in Washington D.C. which is akin to being the biggest rat in the New York City sewer system.  The next time Jim Acosta does something at the White House press briefing that does not make Jim Acosta the primary focus of the White House press briefing will be the first time.

Edited by EMAWesome
  • Fuck You 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hobbes2702

hobbes2702 13074

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, EMAWesome said:

Says the biggest attention whore in Washington D.C. which is akin to being the biggest rat in the New York City sewer system.  The next time Jim Acosta does something at the White House press briefing that does not make Jim Acosta the primary focus of the White House press briefing will be the first time.

Shut the fuck up. You didn’t give two shits about Acosta or any other White House reporter until the dotus called him out by name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, jimmyjazz said:

It seems this doesn't matter:

When Trump attacks the press, as he has done willfully and without any pretense of equivocation, he violates his oath of office.  Every single time.  For this alone he should be impeached, not to mention his utter refusal to support the laws of the land on dozens of other fronts, each time violating his oath.

He doesn't violate the 1st Amendment.  He is imploring the press to be responsible.

 

They ain't even remotely close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
EMAWesome

EMAWesome 101

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, hobbes2702 said:

Shut the fuck up. You didn’t give two shits about Acosta or any other White House reporter until the dotus called him out by name.

Acosta has been an asshat who has tried to make everything about him ever since he started covering the Trump administration's press briefings.  

  • Fuck You 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
EMAWesome

EMAWesome 101

Posted
Posted

If Jim Acosta and all the other shitslingers at CNN think Trump is trying to destroy the press they should take their act to Cuba or Iran and see what happens to them under a regime that does not have a First Amendment.  It wouldn't be their feelings that would be getting hurt.

  • Fuck You 20
Link to comment
Share on other sites
J.R.

J.R. 150

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, EMAWesome said:

If Jim Acosta and all the other shitslingers at CNN think Trump is trying to destroy the press they should take their act to Cuba or Iran and see what happens to them under a regime that does not have a First Amendment.  It wouldn't be their feelings that would be getting hurt.

Post less asshat

Link to comment
Share on other sites
brown water

brown water 3778

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, EMAWesome said:

If Jim Acosta and all the other shitslingers at CNN think Trump is trying to destroy the press they should take their act to Cuba or Iran and see what happens to them under a regime that does not have a First Amendment.  It wouldn't be their feelings that would be getting hurt.

So we are fine as long as there is an example elsewhere that is as bad or worse. That's a hell of a standard.

#Be Best Not Worst

#Make America Great Again Not as Shitty as Iran 

Edited by brown water
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SubliminalHorn

SubliminalHorn 6811

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, slorch said:

He doesn't violate the 1st Amendment.  He is imploring the press to be responsible.

 

They ain't even remotely close.

Did anyone say he was violating the 1st Amendment, or attacking the press? For not being a supporter of the traitor, you sure do run to defend him every chance you get. Weird. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tantric superman

tantric superman 4667

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, slorch said:

He doesn't violate the 1st Amendment.  He is imploring the press to be responsible. 

 

And your statement that he is "imploring the press to be responsible" is laughable.

He's using words to intimidate and harass the press and is encouraging violence against them. 

Looking at it another way, the more nuanced argument is that the 1st Amendment does not protect his speech when he encourages harassment and intimidation of the press. 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Celery Man said:

son, they's as close as stink is on a pig tail

“The president should be more responsible with his freedom.”

 

”The press can call it how they see it.”

Edited by slorch
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Underdog

Underdog 28773

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, Jograves said:

I always wonder what notes she's looking at. Even when she's asked a somewhat personal question, she can't make eye contact for very long. 

Not notes, think it's a menu from some nearby eating establishment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, SubliminalHorn said:

Did anyone say he was violating the 1st Amendment, or attacking the press? For not being a supporter of the traitor, you sure do run to defend him every chance you get. Weird. 

What other laws would he be violating? I quoted another poster’s post, so you tell me what it might be.

 

I am not defending the Potus.  I am asking for the outrage to be substantiated.

 

It has not been.

Edited by slorch
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SubliminalHorn

SubliminalHorn 6811

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, slorch said:

What other laws would he be violating? I quoted another poster’s post, so you tell me what it might be.

 

I am not defending the Potus.  I am asking for the outrage to be substantiated.

 

It has not been.

The whole point is that he is attacking the press and instigating violence against reporters, refuses to tamp down his deplorables when they attack the media. He borrows slogans from both the Nazis and Soviets regarding the media. 

Are you really not seeing this? Is it only wrong if there’s an actual law passed against the media? Fuck. You trump supporters are just ridiculous 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 46138

Posted
Posted

I never said he violated the First Amendment.  He swore to UPHOLD the Constitution, which in my view doesn't include condemning the press, the freedom of which is quite literally a cornerstone of our democracy.

I am not surprised you don't understand this.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, tantric superman said:

You believe it is acceptable for the President to lie about the press, and berate them in the way he has?

It's outrageous that any Americans accept this kind of behavior. 

 

He’s giving what he’s getting.

 

Should he sit there and take it?

 

I wouldn’t begin to defend Trump’s character, but the ‘free pass’ for the press is bullshit.  They have zero accountability.

 

People are sick of it.  Some of y’all seem to embrace it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, SubliminalHorn said:

The whole point is that he is attacking the press and instigating violence against reporters, refuses to tamp down his deplorables when they attack the media. He borrows slogans from both the Nazis and Soviets regarding the media. 

Are you really not seeing this? Is it only wrong if there’s an actual law passed against the media? Fuck. You trump supporters are just ridiculous 

So he hasn’t prosecuted or jailed anyone, but he’s restricting their speech how?

 

He ‘s not allowed to comment on the press’ bullshittery?

Edited by slorch
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 46138

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, slorch said:

He’s giving what he’s getting.

 

Should he sit there and take it?

 

I wouldn’t begin to defend Trump’s character, but the ‘free pass’ for the press is bullshit.  They have zero accountability.

 

People are sick of it.  Some of y’all seem to embrace it.

Fuck YES he should sit there and take it.  Jesus.  You're unbelievable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SubliminalHorn

SubliminalHorn 6811

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

I never said he violated the First Amendment.  He swore to UPHOLD the Constitution, which in my view doesn't include condemning the press, the freedom of which is quite literally a cornerstone of our democracy.

I am not surprised you don't understand this.

But what laws has he violated?!!?1 /slorched

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SubliminalHorn

SubliminalHorn 6811

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, slorch said:

He’s giving what he’s getting.

 

Should he sit there and take it?

 

I wouldn’t begin to defend Trump’s character, but the ‘free pass’ for the press is bullshit.  They have zero accountability.

 

People are sick of it.  Some of y’all seem to embrace it.

Poor trump, he’s having to deal with the media reporting on things he says and does. Unfair!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SubliminalHorn

SubliminalHorn 6811

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, slorch said:

So he hasn’t prosecuted or jailed anyone, but he’s restricting their speech how?

 

He ‘s not allowed to comment on the press’ bullshittery?

Please quote me where I said he’s restricting their speech. 

You have thoroughly defeated your straw man

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Fuck YES he should sit there and take it.  Jesus.  You're unbelievable.

It might not be ‘ presidential,’ and that we agree.

 

He’s not violating his oath.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, SubliminalHorn said:

Please quote me where I said he’s restricting their speech. 

You have thoroughly defeated your straw man

You conveniently ignored the post to which I was responding.

 

It ain’t your world bro.  Read the fucking thread...then comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, SubliminalHorn said:

Watch out everyone, this thread is being slorched. What a fucking moron

You have nothing..

 

 

so call names.

 

fuck off

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 46138

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, slorch said:

It might not be ‘ presidential,’ and that we agree.

 

He’s not violating his oath.

Yes he is.  He has two choices when it comes to the press with regards to his oath:  say nothing, or defend the press.  He is attacking the press, and questioning the legitimacy of a free press.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...