Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 4/15/2020 at 1:46 AM, mdmost said:
What a sad, look at me type asshole. By that same rational, every member of Congress who authorized the stimulus checks should get to put their names in the memo area. 
It's such a fucking aggy thing to do. He is an unbelievably small man.
  On 4/15/2020 at 1:29 AM, conVINCEd said:
It sucks.  She was a recluse.  Not in the best of health, not terrible either,  but not that old (mid 60’s).  It appears, and we’ll never know any different, that she drowned in her own bodily fluids, by herself, alone.
It's a terrible way to go, and a terrible way to lose someone. It must be even more difficult with the issues surrounding gathering as a family. Again, I'm really sorry.
Posted (edited)

Negative results from open-label randomized trial of HCQ. (note pre-print, this is not peer reviewed.)

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.10.20060558v1

Participants 150 patients hospitalized with COVID-19. 75 patients were assigned to HCQ plus SOC and 75 were assigned to SOC alone (control group).

Interventions HCQ was administrated with a loading dose of 1, 200 mg daily for three days followed by a maintained dose of 800 mg daily for the remaining days (total treatment duration: 2 or 3 weeks for mild/moderate or severe patients, respectively). 

Main outcome measures The primary endpoint was the 28-day negative conversion rate of SARS-CoV-2. The assessed secondary endpoints were negative conversion rate at day 4, 7, 10, 14 or 21, the improvement rate of clinical symptoms within 28-day, normalization of C-reactive protein and blood lymphocyte count within 28-day. Primary and secondary analysis was by intention to treat. Adverse events were assessed in the safety population.

Results The overall 28-day negative conversion rate was not different between SOC plus HCQ and SOC group (Kaplan-Meier estimates 85.4% versus 81.3%, P=0.341). Negative conversion rate at day 4, 7, 10, 14 or 21 was also similar between the two groups. No different 28-day symptoms alleviation rate was observed between the two groups.

daily @triplehorn well check. 

Edited by Anastasis
  • Like 1
Posted
  On 4/15/2020 at 1:55 PM, Anastasis said:

Negative results from open-label randomized trial of HCQ.

Participants 150 patients hospitalized with COVID-19. 75 patients were assigned to HCQ plus SOC and 75 were assigned to SOC alone (control group).

Interventions HCQ was administrated with a loading dose of 1, 200 mg daily for three days followed by a maintained dose of 800 mg daily for the remaining days (total treatment duration: 2 or 3 weeks for mild/moderate or severe patients, respectively). 

Main outcome measures The primary endpoint was the 28-day negative conversion rate of SARS-CoV-2. The assessed secondary endpoints were negative conversion rate at day 4, 7, 10, 14 or 21, the improvement rate of clinical symptoms within 28-day, normalization of C-reactive protein and blood lymphocyte count within 28-day. Primary and secondary analysis was by intention to treat. Adverse events were assessed in the safety population.

Results The overall 28-day negative conversion rate was not different between SOC plus HCQ and SOC group (Kaplan-Meier estimates 85.4% versus 81.3%, P=0.341). Negative conversion rate at day 4, 7, 10, 14 or 21 was also similar between the two groups. No different 28-day symptoms alleviation rate was observed between the two groups.

daily @triplehorn well check. 

Expand  

At least no one died from it in that study, so that's progress I guess

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 4/15/2020 at 1:57 PM, DixonHur said:

At least no one died from it in that study, so that's progress I guess

Expand  

Take it to the shart thread.

Adverse events were found in 8.8% of SOC and 30% of HCQ recipients with two serious adverse events. The most common adverse event in the HCQ recipients was diarrhea (10%). 

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 4/15/2020 at 1:58 PM, Anastasis said:

Take it to the shart thread.

Adverse events were found in 8.8% of SOC and 30% of HCQ recipients with two serious adverse events. The most common adverse event in the HCQ recipients was diarrhea (10%). 

Expand  

That's probably a lower rate than Trump Steaks caused.

  • Like 6
  • Haha 1
Posted
  On 4/15/2020 at 1:40 PM, Francisco 2.0 said:

Oh for fucks sake:

 

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/15/us/trump-radio-show-rush-limbaugh.html?action=click&module=Top Stories&pgtype=Homepage

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Expand  

I mentioned it here or on the Trump thread.  In the Dirty Money episode about Kushner, it said when he bought the NY Observer, it became clear that he viewed the paper and media in general as nothing more than personal advertising.  It could either help your image or hurt it, nothing more.  It was mentioned that this was something he and his FIL had strongly in common.

Posted
  On 4/15/2020 at 2:52 PM, Fozzz said:

So maybe the decline in new positive cases is really being driven by the decline in testing?  lol

Expand  

Then start watching the death toll. The country experienced a spike yesterday and that is still the case without the 3700 deaths NY added that were presumed COVID+ but unable to be verified. It doesn't matter how Trump and his crony grifters try to adjust the optics, it will be a long time before the country reaches a semblance of normalcy, and it's all on Trump. Couldn't have happened to a nicer President.

Posted (edited)
  On 4/15/2020 at 3:03 PM, Hank Kingsley said:

 

Expand  

as long as were monday morning quarterbacking why chart how many more deaths would have occurred if Trump would have listened to the feckless democrats about the China travel ban being racist and xenophobic.   Oh thats right , none of this predictions have been close to right so I'll just make it up and say 60 thousand. 60 thousand peoples blood on the hands of pelosi and biden

You people are fucking ghouls

Edited by SneezyB
  • Fuck You 40
Posted
  On 4/15/2020 at 1:29 AM, conVINCEd said:

It sucks.  She was a recluse.  Not in the best of health, not terrible either,  but not that old (mid 60’s).  It appears, and we’ll never know any different, that she drowned in her own bodily fluids, by herself, alone.

Expand  

That's rough. GF had an aunt that died in a similar fashion.  She lived in the middle of NYC.   The coroner estimated that she'd been dead 6 weeks before her body was discovered. 

 

 

 

Posted
  On 4/15/2020 at 3:35 PM, SneezyB said:

as long as were monday morning quarterbacking why chart how many more deaths would have occurred if Trump would have listened to the feckless democrats about the China travel ban being racist and xenophobic.   Oh thats right , none of this predictions have been close to right so I'll just make it up and say 60 thousand. 60 thousand peoples blood on the hands of pelosi and biden

You people are fucking ghouls

Expand  

Please list all the dem politicians who called it racist? 

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 4/15/2020 at 3:41 PM, SimonBolivar said:

Stimulus checks have officially hit here and it's a shit show with so many people wondering why they didn't get it and we have no answers. We are having fun.

Expand  

Our $2,400 showed up in my checking account overnight.

Posted
  On 4/15/2020 at 2:29 AM, conVINCEd said:

Well, the Collin County ME doesn’t want to do one, and my father and uncle aren’t likely to press the issue.  Do with that what you will.  They are in the process of transporting her directly to the funeral home.

Expand  

Damnit. So sorry for your family's loss. Thank you very much though for sharing the story. It's important to remember that behind each of the "numbers", so many are impacted. RIP.

 

 

Posted
  On 4/15/2020 at 3:34 PM, Biff Tannen said:

Wait, she's trying to convince people this is the 19th iteration of it or what?  I refuse to watch those clips.

Expand  

Yes.  If she can convince the Fox News watchers, and Gary Johnson voters, that this is the 19th iteration of COVID - it makes it much more likely that they'd have no problem accepting that this is Obama's fault for not having enough tests ready. 

Posted (edited)
  On 4/15/2020 at 3:44 PM, Hiphopopotamos said:

Yes.  If she can convince the Fox News watchers, and Gary Johnson voters, that this is the 19th iteration of COVID - it makes it much more likely that they'd have no problem accepting that this is Obama's fault for not having enough tests ready. 

Expand  

I love the Obama angle...Trump's been president for over 3 years yet it's Obama's fault for not creating a test to detect a virus strain that didn't exist until the end of 2019.

Edited by DixonHur
Posted
  On 4/15/2020 at 3:46 PM, DixonHur said:

I love the Obama angle...Trump's been president for over 3 years yet it's Obama's fault for not creating a test to detect a virus strain that didn't exist until the end of 2019.

Expand  

But we're still supposed to give Trump credit for the greatest economy we've ever seen.

They accept all credit and deflect all blame. It's the Republican creed.

Posted
  On 4/15/2020 at 3:43 PM, kevwun said:

Our $2,400 showed up in my checking account overnight.

Expand  

Same with us and it looks like the vast majority did get them, but we have quite a few people that are ACH deposits on their IRS refund that haven't gotten their's and they were really relying on getting it today. Overall it seems like a mess with a lack of communication from the government on these checks and their timing. I work in an impoverished side of town so it gets a bit chaotic when checks don't hit as expected.

Posted
  On 4/15/2020 at 3:35 PM, SneezyB said:
as long as were monday morning quarterbacking why chart how many more deaths would have occurred if Trump would have listened to the feckless democrats about the China travel ban being racist and xenophobic.   Oh thats right , none of this predictions have been close to right so I'll just make it up and say 60 thousand. 60 thousand peoples blood on the hands of pelosi and biden
You people are fucking ghouls

Aggy anger manifesting here after not being able to claim spring game national championship
  • Like 3
Posted
  On 4/15/2020 at 3:35 PM, SneezyB said:

as long as were monday morning quarterbacking why chart how many more deaths would have occurred if Trump would have listened to the feckless democrats about the China travel ban being racist and xenophobic.   Oh thats right , none of this predictions have been close to right so I'll just make it up and say 60 thousand. 60 thousand peoples blood on the hands of pelosi and biden

You people are fucking ghouls

Expand  

It never happened.  Find me a single Pelosi or Biden statement that said it.  Don't post that Biden tweet because if that is what you are referring to, you have zero reading comprehension or understanding of context.  The democrats (at least among leadership, maybe a Rep here or there) did not criticize the travel restrictions (it wasn't a ban, either, and 10s of thousands continued to pour in from China).  The more you idiots say it doesn't somehow make it come true.  

  • Like 9
Posted
  On 4/15/2020 at 3:50 PM, Grade of D as in David said:

But we're still supposed to give Trump credit for the greatest economy we've ever seen.

They accept all credit and deflect all blame. It's the Republican creed.

Expand  

That may be GOP SOP, but Trump is the absolute master of gaslighting.  Every failure is someone else’s fault.  Every success is his own.  And oh, how they persecute him!  All those meanies jealous of his genius and his munificence. They just want to see him fail.  If his followers suffer, it is only because Trump’s detractors want them to suffer and not because he’s robbing them blind and fucking them over to satisfy his own narcissistic lust for power, adulation, and money.  No, no.  It is the critics’ fault! The heretics! The unbelievers!

We elected Jim Jones to the presidency.  It’s a sad fact of human nature that so many of us are so fucking stupid and gullible that we routinely fall prey to obvious con artists.  

  • Like 3
Posted
  On 4/15/2020 at 3:53 PM, 4th&Five said:

We got ours Monday and a decent chunk will go to defeating Dotard in November. 

Expand  

Yeah, I'm not sure what the optics would be...but there's gotta be some kinda way without giving up personal tax information...where Americans could post that they turned around their stimulus check and used it to oppose Trump in 2020, be it to Biden directly, or a PAC, or to oppose McConnell or something like that.  But some sorta little asterisk where next to your donations on the FEC sites, you can sorta indicate it was only because of the money you got with Trump's signature on it to be used against him.  There's gotta be a way to do that. 



×
×
  • Create New...