Thing$ $till not going well for Joe Rogan, I $ee.

[wildcat09 29382]

52-80 seems really upset that people don't like a guy he likes.

[Nivek 16984]

7 minutes ago, hpslugga said:

Right, but did you tell someone who was an expert in their field that s/he was a dumbass idiot retard that didn't know what the fuck they were talking about when they clearly did and you clearly didn't? 

I believe on a podcast I recently heard with Robert Cialdini, he mentioned that as people see greater consequences they are more likely to double down.   It seems to explain quite a bit of behavior.   

[hobbes2702 13071]

3 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

52-80 seems really upset that people don't like a guy he likes.

No shit. Real weird

[Immaculate Vibes 114]

So if the N word thing doesn’t stick, how long until the supercut of him making jokes about women? This is all planned. 
 

 

[kevwun 15887]

I don't know, we'll have to consult with The Queen, the Vatican, the Gettys, the Rothschilds and Col. Sanders to get the latest details on the conspiracy against Joe Rogan and everything else you hold dear.

Edited February 7, 2022 by kevwun

[Captainant 27764]

15 minutes ago, Immaculate Vibes said:

So if the N word thing doesn’t stick, how long until the supercut of him making jokes about women? This is all planned. 

aw poor widdle victim GRUhorn and his victimized thought leader joe rogan

[Hefeweizen 5333]

Is Joe Rohan a crypto fan?  Because that would explain a lot.

[Nivek 16984]

6 minutes ago, Hefeweizen said:

Is Joe Rohan a crypto fan?  Because that would explain a lot.

sporidia?

 

[TurkeyChew 383]

2 hours ago, Mole said:

 

Such a great scene and movie. + rep

[Nivek 16984]

Take all the time you need Johnny Sack.   

[Mdhorn 5987]

47 minutes ago, Immaculate Vibes said:

So if the N word thing doesn’t stick, how long until the supercut of him making jokes about women? This is all planned. 
 

 

What do you mean if it doesn't stick?  He said it and has admitted to it.  I didn't really listen to his show much aside from specific guests--like Sturgill Simpson.  But I'm just not into his podcast which is fine.  But the other isn't a fabricated gotcha moment--he is an asshole who only apologized because people dug into his catalog and released his acting like a racist asshole.  Otherwise, he would have just sat on it. 

And the huge different between he and the regular person is that he has a large audience and following.  Do you have a following?  If you did, why would you waste your time on a message board when you're not benefitting from advertising? 

I'm fine with vetting candidates, every candidate and not just smear jobs.  But her emails--really should make that my signature line.  

Edited February 7, 2022 by Mdhorn

[hpslugga 4062]

45 minutes ago, Immaculate Vibes said:

So if the N word thing doesn’t stick, how long until the supercut of him making jokes about women? This is all planned. 

 Even if you totally cast aside what @Mdhorn just said, who are the planners and what is the plan?

[fattyflattie 4638]

2 hours ago, wildcat09 said:

52-80 seems really upset that people don't like a guy he likes.

33 minutes ago, Captainant said:

aw poor widdle victim GRUhorn and his victimized thought leader joe rogan

This is a bit right?   

[Bullneck 19206]

3 hours ago, 52-80 said:

"all you have is a puny little 'gotcha'" --> "you misspelled a word"! 

very cute!

if you don't like him or his guests, change the channel.  move on.

the saddest thing is you don't have the reflection and honesty to accept that the political rot causes you to harbor reflexive, seething hatred for anything and anyone not aligned with you. 

Did you vote for Hillary?

[Hefeweizen 5333]

47 minutes ago, Nivek said:

sporidia?

 

Works for both, bro.

[Pig Bellmont 8738]

1 hour ago, kevwun said:

I don't know, we'll have to consult with The Queen, the Vatican, the Gettys, the Rothschilds and Col. Sanders to get the latest details on the conspiracy against Joe Rogan and everything else you hold dear.

They put an addictive chemical in the chicken to make you crave it fortnightly!

[JimmyJames 12271]

34 minutes ago, fattyflattie said:

This is a bit right?   

If it is it’s a good one. 

[Immaculate Vibes 114]

42 minutes ago, Mdhorn said:

What do you mean if it doesn't stick?  He said it and has admitted to it.  I didn't really listen to his show much aside from specific guests--like Sturgill Simpson.  But I'm just not into his podcast which is fine.  But the other isn't a fabricated gotcha moment--he is an asshole who only apologized because people dug into his catalog and released his acting like a racist asshole.  Otherwise, he would have just sat on it. 

And the huge different between he and the regular person is that he has a large audience and following.  Do you have a following?  If you did, why would you waste your time on a message board when you're not benefitting from advertising? 

I'm fine with vetting candidates, every candidate and not just smear jobs.  But her emails--really should make that my signature line.  

 

38 minutes ago, hpslugga said:

 Even if you totally cast aside what @Mdhorn just said, who are the planners and what is the plan?

I’m not sure who the planners are, who tweeted the video first? Some entity went through all the footage and created the supercut. Add to that the timing of it coming out several days after the push against Rogan Covid misinformation is suspicious. The goal is to slowly build outrage. He’s obviously been targeted for “canceling”. That he hasn’t yet Is what I mean by it hasn’t stuck. More well produced attack videos would not be surprising. At this point I hope he gets dropped from Spotify. It would be interesting to see what happens. 
 

I’m not aware of him having any major stance on crypto. 

Edited February 7, 2022 by Immaculate Vibes

[RomaVicta 30016]

3 hours ago, 52-80 said:

the political rot causes you to harbor reflexive, seething hatred for anything and anyone not aligned with you. 

I've worn out the film projector gif. This time let's go with, "every accusation is a confession." Yep, that fits.

The irony deafness of the right becomes rapidly more acute. 

[mchookem 16382]

wtf this thread has added like 20+ pages in the last week! i keep thinking Joe has finally done something interesting...but no, just the same discussion of what a meathead douche-bro he is 😆 

[RomaVicta 30016]

13 minutes ago, Immaculate Vibes said:

The goal is to slowly build outrage. He’s obviously been targeted for “canceling”. That he hasn’t yet Is what I mean by it hasn’t stuck. More well produced attack videos would not be surprising.

Is American Spectator still publishing? I figured you would know. TIA

[henrygandorf 29194]

10 minutes ago, Immaculate Vibes said:

I’m not sure who the planners are, who tweeted the video first? Some entity went through all the footage and created the supercut. Add to that the timing of it coming out several days after the push against Rogan Covid misinformation is suspicious.

he started getting heat for some of his stances and some of his guests.  then some people (who likely knew some of the shit they would find) began to do a deeper dive into shit he has said in the past.  the timing is not suspicious, the timing is logical.  if it "leaked" right before some spotify shareholder meeting or right before one of his bosses was announcing a run for office, that would be suspicious.  this is not that.

12 minutes ago, Immaculate Vibes said:

He’s obviously been targeted for “canceling”.

i think the original question which has not been answered is, "by who".

and is this cancel culture or consequence culture?  because they are two different things.

[hpslugga 4062]

17 minutes ago, Immaculate Vibes said:

I’m not sure who the planners are, who tweeted the video first?

So you don't know who the planners are, nor who tweeted the video first...

17 minutes ago, Immaculate Vibes said:

Some entity went through all the footage and created the supercut.

and you say this...

17 minutes ago, Immaculate Vibes said:

The goal is to slowly build outrage.

and this...

17 minutes ago, Immaculate Vibes said:

 He’s obviously been targeted for “canceling.”

and this...all as if it was "obviously" a matter of fact. 

So you don't know who the planners are, you don't know who's behind releasing all these videos, but you know that there's a plan involved and it has to do with "cancelling" him...as if it's all an obvious matter of fact.

You don't know who released it, yet you know why they did it...

Ok.

['stache 21864]

8 minutes ago, henrygandorf said:

he started getting heat for some of his stances and some of his guests.  then some people (who likely knew some of the shit they would find) began to do a deeper dive into shit he has said in the past.  the timing is not suspicious, the timing is logical.  if it "leaked" right before some spotify shareholder meeting or right before one of his bosses was announcing a run for office, that would be suspicious.  this is not that.

i think the original question which has not been answered is, "by who".

and is this cancel culture or consequence culture?  because they are two different things.

The doctors who are overwhelmed, overworked, and unable to keep up with covid management and deaths started this by begging and pleading that he stop promoting covid and vaccine lies, and he was specifically targeted because of his massive fanbase and influence. They are overwhelmed to the brim each time a new wave hits. In any other modern generation they would be given the utmost respect and empathy, things the right today considers weaknesses.  

Edited February 7, 2022 by 'stache

[Beau Vine 54423]

2 minutes ago, hpslugga said:

So you don't know who the planners are, nor who tweeted the video first...

and you say this...

and this...

and this...all as if it was "obviously" a matter of fact. 

So you don't know who the planners are, you don't know who's behind releasing all these videos, but you know that there's a plan involved and it has to do with "cancelling" him...as if it's all an obvious matter of fact.

You don't know who released it, yet you know why they did it...

Ok.

Obviously some nefarious cabal is to blame.  I'll bet George Soros is funding them.

[52-80 19245]

1 hour ago, fattyflattie said:

This is a bit right?   

if you write enough things other people disagree with, maybe they'll make a long thread about you as well!

[Nivek 16984]

Do you even Deep State bro? Remember next time you order a senor pizza with anchovies you are getting the dick.

[52-80 19245]

59 minutes ago, Bullneck said:

Did you vote for Hillary?

i liked bernie in that race, which apparently makes me a rightist.

Edited February 7, 2022 by 52-80

[mchookem 16382]

6 minutes ago, Beau Vine said:

Obviously some nefarious cabal is to blame.  I'll bet George Soros is funding them.

ding! Soros mention!

 

[henrygandorf 29194]

7 minutes ago, 52-80 said:

i liked bernie in that race, which apparently makes me a rightist.

not sure how this works.

when i point out that rogan went from bernie -> trump in 2020, i don't consider him a progressive or a rightist.  i consider him a full-of-shit panderer.

[Biff Tannen 45733]

14 minutes ago, Beau Vine said:

Obviously some nefarious cabal is to blame.  I'll bet George Soros is funding them.

And let's not forget a Mr. Ronan Sinatra!

[Post Oak 20266]

13 minutes ago, Nivek said:

Do you even Deep State bro? Remember next time you order a senor pizza with anchovies you are getting the dick.

Nicely done. 

[hobbes2702 13071]

2 hours ago, Immaculate Vibes said:

So if the N word thing doesn’t stick, how long until the supercut of him making jokes about women? This is all planned. 
 

 

It’s all planned? They forced him to say those things only to wait years for Spotify to sign him, pay him $100m, Covid to show up, and then him to spout anti vax stuff. Only then could they unleash their dastardly plan of a compilation video of things he said.

[aggie08 21531]

Oh shut the fuck up with your "targeted cancel culture" bullshit you whiny titty babies. People have a right to call out Rogan for saying (or allowing) stupid shit, dig up other times that he's said stupid shit, or pull their music off a platform that they share with him. Just as Spotify has a right, if they so desire, to say, "Fuck off. He makes us a ton of money. Go pound sand." As soon as the bean counters formulate the most profitable path forward to best appease the most amount of people, everyone will move on to the next thing. 

Odd that the same people who will go to bat for Joe Rogan and decry, "Censorship!" are remarkably silent when books and aspects of our history are legitimately being banned from being taught by actual government entities.

[TurkeyChew 383]

34 minutes ago, mchookem said:

wtf this thread has added like 20+ pages in the last week! i keep thinking Joe has finally done something interesting...but no, just the same discussion of what a meathead douche-bro he is 😆 

So much this.

Joe Rogan is winning, except he’s kinda in the Twittersphere dog house right now, and he’s not going anywhere because he is way too important to Spotify’s business model. Anyone getting worked up, one way or another, is just a dog looking to chase a car for a while.

Quote

 

“The Joe Rogan Experience” is the No. 1 show in 93 markets, Mr. Ek said during the interview Wednesday. In 2021, Mr. Rogan’s show was the most-listened-to podcast every month in more than 30 markets, including in the U.S., said a person familiar with the matter. Mr. Rogan’s listeners have grown by 75% from the time he joined Spotify’s platform in September 2020 to December 2021, this person said.

Importantly for Spotify’s business, Mr. Rogan’s listeners are highly engaged—they return to Spotify to listen more, and tend to listen to other content beyond his show, the company has said. In short, Mr. Rogan’s show has been crucial to making Spotify the top U.S. podcast platform by listeners, according to audio data provider Edison Research.

 

 

[Nivek 16984]

4 minutes ago, TurkeyChew said:

So much this.

Joe Rogan is winning, except he’s kinda in the Twittersphere dog house right now, and he’s not going anywhere because he is way too important to Spotify’s business model. Anyone getting worked up, one way or another, is just a dog looking to chase a car for a while.

 

McDonald's sells the most hamburgers.   It doesn't make it less crappy of a product.

[WhatTheBuck 28798]

3 hours ago, hpslugga said:

Right, but did you tell someone who was an expert in their field that s/he was a dumbass idiot retard that didn't know what the fuck they were talking about when they clearly did and you clearly didn't? "Asshole" doesn't accurately describe that. That's what I'd call "ultracrepidarians with an attitude."

[TurkeyChew 383]

3 minutes ago, Nivek said:

McDonald's sells the most hamburgers.   It doesn't make it less crappy of a product.

McDonalds is a real estate company and franchise cartel who also sells crappy hamburgers.

Spotify is (trying to be, at least) an advertising company who also streams artists music for fractions of a penny. JRE is way too important to the strategy than any single artist or Twitter dogpile short of a body being found.

Edited February 7, 2022 by TurkeyChew

[Poe It Up 126]

I mean the clip being used is obviously out of context and a hit job after the Covid argument was lost. Still, he should be embarrassed at how many times he casually dropped the N word in these conversations. That was pretty uncomfortable to watch. 

[Hefeweizen 5333]

It will be interesting to see what they do.  From a financial standpoint it’s clear they are better off just weathering this and keeping Joe Brogan on.  But they may decide it’s just too much brain damage.

[Captainant 27764]

43 minutes ago, 52-80 said:

i liked bernie in that race, which apparently makes me a rightist.

FWIW, that's a strange and common characteristic of many of the current trumpists and qanon loonies. Seriously it's not the prevailing demo, but it's there and quantifiable.

And I say that as a guy who was a full-tilt Bernie supporter that voted for Gary Johnson in 2016 - I was so pissed off and scorned by the democratic party's treatment of Bernie (and frankly, their ongoing dismissal of actually progressive policy and politicians) that I was primed to internalize any absurd conspiracy against them. 

You really do yourself a disservice by consistently jumping to to the most absurd obfuscation of your opposition's argument. It makes you seem like bitchassedness is your only argument.

[52-80 19245]

40 minutes ago, henrygandorf said:

not sure how this works.

when i point out that rogan went from bernie -> trump in 2020, i don't consider him a progressive or a rightist.  i consider him a full-of-shit panderer.

The only ones ive heard explicit support for is Tulsi Gabbard. He’s never gone to Trump.  

People may want to assume he’s for Trump, because whatever tenuous connections they want to draw, because he’s not a team player. Which is why this topic is here now. 

Thats fine. He’s gonna say what he’s gonna say, and some people will assume what they assume, and others will gnash their teeth and angrily demand he go off the air. Whats new. 
 

[Longhorn_Fan68 33899]

1 minute ago, 52-80 said:

The only ones ive heard explicit support for is Tulsi Gabbard. He’s never gone to Trump.  

People may want to assume he’s for Trump, because whatever tenuous connections they want to draw, because he’s not a team player. Which is why this topic is here now. 

Thats fine. He’s gonna say what he’s gonna say, and some people will assume what they assume, and others will gnash their teeth and angrily demand he go off the air. Whats new. 
 

as of this moment, ~901k dead people. that's what's new

[hobbes2702 13071]

4 minutes ago, 52-80 said:

The only ones ive heard explicit support for is Tulsi Gabbard. He’s never gone to Trump.  

People may want to assume he’s for Trump, because whatever tenuous connections they want to draw, because he’s not a team player. Which is why this topic is here now. 

Thats fine. He’s gonna say what he’s gonna say, and some people will assume what they assume, and others will gnash their teeth and angrily demand he go off the air. Whats new. 
 

“People may want to assume he’s for Trump…”

Quite the assumption.

[52-80 19245]

1 minute ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

as of this moment, ~901k dead people. that's what's new

Biden said Trump was responsible for 200k death under his watch.

So now we got 700k remaining to apportion between the 2 Joes, right?  Thats how the math works? 

[henrygandorf 29194]

15 minutes ago, Captainant said:

consistently jumping to to the most absurd obfuscation of your opposition's argument

welcome to the cloak room.

[Longhorn_Fan68 33899]

6 minutes ago, 52-80 said:

Biden said Trump was responsible for 200k death under his watch.

So now we got 700k remaining to apportion between the 2 Joes, right?  Thats how the math works? 

sure, if that helps you sleep at night

[Gourmand 7774]

10 minutes ago, Poe It Up said:

I mean the clip being used is obviously out of context and a hit job after the Covid argument was lost

I mean, yeah it's obviously a coordinated and concentrated attack on him using old clips we all knew were there, but ya know what? Good, fuck him.

I'm not entirely comfortable with this kind of mashed up takedown where it's easy to clip someone out of general context BUT both Rogan and Spotify shit in their bed, now they have to clean their mess. It's literally in THE FIRST POST IN THIS THREAD. Everyone knew this was out there, including Spotify so they were on notice and they knew what they were buying when they agreed to pay to be his exclusive provider. Rogan wouldn't be raked over the coals right now if Spotify had simply responded properly to his rampant covid disinformation and anti-vaxx garbage instead of doubling down and letting their subscribers know they weren't going to do anything at all to rein him in.

My issue with Rogan goes beyond covid. He has long been an enabler of some of the worst personalities and some of the most bad faith political actors of our time and his podcast became an essential gateway into the alt right with his constant normalizing of vile charlatans pandering to incel culture. He's sanitized transphobia, misogyny, white nationalism, and genetic determinism by regularly allowing people like Molyneux, Peterson, Doug Murray, Alex Jones, Milo Y, Ben Shapiro, Tim Pool, Gavin McInnes, Chuck Johnson  etc. He has habitually platformed reactionaries, conspiracy theorists, racists, and countless hours of despicable garbage, and those of us who hate him for it have a right to point it out and hammer Spotify for enabling and amplifying crazy ideas far outside the norm of acceptability. Crybaby libertarian/idw chuds/conservatives don't like seeing their #1 guy get slammed for sanitizing their abhorrent beliefs and can't distinguish true government censorship (banning books like Maus from school libraries/curriculum) with capitalism at work (private company facing customer revolt).

 

[fattyflattie 4638]

24 minutes ago, 52-80 said:

o now we got 700k remaining to apportion between the 2 Joes, right?

ok.jlaw.gif

[WhatTheBuck 28798]

12 minutes ago, Captainant said:

I was so pissed off and scorned by the democratic party's treatment of Bernie

Maybe Bernie should’ve joined the party. Bernie didn’t get screwed, he wasn’t cheated, the super delegates didn’t cost him the nomination, he had no one to blame but himself and should’ve endorsed Hillary strenuously as soon as he lost. He should’ve dropped out earlier and done so because it was clear he was never going to win. Oh boo hoo hoo, the party treated him unfairly. That’s b.s. Suck it up, Bernie. What’s weird is that the Russians, Trumpkins, and Bernie bros alike were happy to peddle that message and it helped give us Trump. If any of that isn’t true then why did Bernie get beat again in 2020 just like he did in 2016 and for exactly the same reasons? Bernie would’ve lost to Trump. Handily.

When I hear Bernie supporters complain about how unfairly he was treated by the Democratic Party it reminds me of Trump supporters who say they aren’t really Trump supporters but they think there are legitimate questions about election security in 2020. In neither case is there any evidence to support their suspicions. Boy, did Trump want to run against the avowed democratic socialist Sanders. Their campaign ads were already written. Bernie should’ve been a good soldier and backed Hillary. But if he did that then he probably couldn’t run again in 2020 so he was willing to risk subjecting us to four years of rule by an incompetent authoritarian. He has blood on his hands (hidden by those nice homemade mittens).