Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

He was executed in 2017 after the state refused to test DNA.  I've been following this case for a while and can't believe the council agreed to the test.  These things almost never happen once someone has been executed, but the reasonable doubt is pretty overwhelming here.  If it comes back and exonerates him, every state has to look at ending the death penalty immediately.

 

JACKSONVILLE (AP) — The Jacksonville City Council voted Friday to allow new tests on fingerprints and DNA evidence relating to the case of a man the state put to death in 2017.

The council voted to allow the tests that Ledell Lee's family contends could exonerate Lee of the 1993 slaying of Debra Reese.

Patricia Young, Lee's sister, had sued the city to allow the new tests. Representing the family were the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Arkansas and the Innocence Project.

The groups said they plan to have the DNA evidence tested at a nationally accredited laboratory at Young's expense and to upload the fingerprints to a national database.

Lee was the first of four inmates Arkansas executed in April 2017 before its supply of a lethal injection drug expired. The state had originally planned to execute eight inmates, but four were spared by court rulings.

The groups submitted affidavits from forensic experts questioning other evidence that was used to convict Lee, including claims that partial shoe prints found at the scene of Reese's murder matched Lee's shoe size.

Twenty-one death row inmates have been exonerated since the early 1990s through DNA evidence. If Lee is ultimately cleared, he could be the first person who has been executed to later be proven innocent with DNA and fingerprint evidence, the Innocence Project said.

“This lawsuit was always about finding the truth, and we're glad the Jacksonville City Council has decided to do the right thing and allow this evidence to be tested,” said Holly Dickson, legal director and interim executive director of the ACLU of Arkansas. “While nothing can undo the injustice of Ledell Lee's execution, tonight's vote is is a positive and long-overdue step that could well identify the real perpetrator of the crime.”

https://katv.com/news/local/arkansas-city-agrees-to-tests-of-evidence-on-executed-inmate

 

And here's the IP's reasoning and listing of evidence and why they're still pursuing this after his execution.

https://www.innocenceproject.org/ledell-lee-what-you-should-know-about-his-case-and-execution/

Posted

Good thing they used up that poison before it went bad. Just like milk, you see that date and think we better get busy before it goes bad

  • Like 1
Posted

That judge and DA and the assistant DA need to be strapped in the gurney, methodically euthanized, and then buried in a landfill.

If I were a child of that man it would be my life's mission to make sure none would ever kill again,

Or breathe for that matter.

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)

Why does the City Council have any jurisdiction to test DNA?  They would have had zero input on his prosecution or execution.  I suppose they could have ordered the Chief of Police to order his minions not to give evidence on pain of termination.

I suppose it's because the judicial system considers the entire case mooted by his execution.

Edited by TwiceHorn
Posted
21arkansas-02-articleLarge.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp&disable=upscale

If he’s one of the guys on the left side then I think he is indeed black.

Maybe the time to do DNA testing would be before executing the guy.
  • Like 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, Lhorn said:


If he’s one of the guys on the left side then I think he is indeed black.

Maybe the time to do DNA testing would be before executing the guy.

I think he's the one with Lee on his shirt

  • Like 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, Cajun said:

All those opposing retesting should be given lethal injection if he's exonnerated.

Every single one.

Why do they oppose getting it right?  If I pop on a drug test, I get a retest.  If my life is at stake, regardless of the possibility of me being a total shitbag; why are people opposed to retesting?

  • Like 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, Iceman said:

Why do they oppose getting it right?  If I pop on a drug test, I get a retest.  If my life is at stake, regardless of the possibility of me being a total shitbag; why are people opposed to retesting?


I’ve had this explained to me by several Bell co. and Bexar co. Judges. It’s not about if someone is guilty, it’s weather on not one side can win.  One of the older Judges my dad knew straight up said if it’s an election year he would sentence everyone he could to death.

Posted

The hundreds of people who have been released from death row make it a statistical certainty that we've executed many innocent people. I've been somewhat surprised that they haven't identified an actual innocent victim yet, but it won't change the argument all that much.

A significant percentage of people who get convicted of all crimes are innocent.

  • Like 1
Posted

@Doc Reeves

Yep.  And yet they sit atop imaginary self-righteous mountaintops pretending they they aren't above murdering people in the interest of their own benefit.

And society pretends they're all "Heros" and really great people.

DAs (not all, but a whole shit-ton of them) are about the lowest form of life on the planet.  Many Judges give them quite the run for their money, however.

Posted

Had a Judge in the Hill Country not far from here lecture us during a custody hearing about how we "...need to understand that this isn't about you!  It's about the best interest of the child!".  On and on and on he went.

Finally, he paused, looked at the clock and said, "We're going to have to wrap this up and reschedule, I have Permian Pipeline cases to hear".

Court adjourned.  

I shit you not.  And this guy is "Highly Respected" around those parts.  People fawn all over how fair and wonderful he is.  

Yeah, no.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

The ostensible reason for not reinvestigating and relitigating is the finality of judgments, which is a rule that basically says its gotta end somewhere and sometime. 

I never found that rule particularly convincing, even in civil cases. Its is especially difficult to swallow in criminal cases and impossible in death penalty cases. 

  • Like 3
Posted
1 hour ago, Cajun said:

Murderers of an innocent man, potentially.

But, hey, they all get a Mulligan because they meant well.

No it’s that the guy probably did something g else at least anyway. That’s always the excuse.

Posted

Yep, they'll go straight to that one.

Dude's wife who was murdered was probably a cunt and had it coming to her too, is what I'd reply back to them.

Such a fun game!

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Cajun said:

Looks bad for reelections to take a "W" off the board.

Which is a damn shame, because it seems to me that, "I will not wrongfully murder you or your innocent loved ones" would be a hell of a campaign slogan.

It's unfortunate that positions of power, however minor or major, naturally attract power hungry people, who are absolutely the last folks who should be trusted in positions of power.

You shouldn't get to be a cop or a judge or a mayor or a DC politician, etc. unless unless you're adamantly reluctant to do those jobs.

It would make hiring tough, but sure would improve the quality of our government.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Augustus said:

Which is a damn shame, because it seems to me that, "I will not wrongfully murder you or your innocent loved ones" would be a hell of a campaign slogan.

It's unfortunate that positions of power, however minor or major, naturally attract power hungry people, who are absolutely the last folks who should be trusted in positions of power.

You shouldn't get to be a cop or a judge or a mayor or a DC politician, etc. unless unless you're adamantly reluctant to do those jobs.

It would make hiring tough, but sure would improve the quality of our government.

Or just start killing the power hungry people who kill innocent people.

They're murderers and this is about the welfare of society.

You are complicit in the institunionalized murder of an innocent citizen?  Well, your "Honor", Mr. DA, Captain LEO, Mr. Warden, step this way into the Death Chamber.  We're going to send your soul, assuming you have one, to meet up with Lee's so you can make amends in person, so to speak.  Don't be upset.  Think of it as society doing you a favor.

Do you have anything you'd like to say before we proceed?

I'd need a trash can of popcorn for that.

Edited by Cajun
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

That'll never happen, but there's still hope that one or two of them will follow Heath Ledger's character's lead...

hqdefault.jpg

Edited by Cajun
Posted

i grew up with a guy who was given life in high school. he was in a different county/area code when the murder was committed. they snatched him out of school never to see freedom again. i bet these cases are more frequent than we would like to think. there has been a bit of a ground swell to free Bud, but it all boils down to exposure and media to shine a light. i hate this shit.

Posted (edited)

The state should not be in the business of killing it's citizens.  This isn't hard.

 

Also, Cameron Todd Willingham called. Wait, no he didn't, because he's dead.  Executed for a non-crime he didn't commit

Edited by Bateshorn
Posted
2 hours ago, riloh05 said:

i grew up with a guy who was given life in high school. he was in a different county/area code when the murder was committed. they snatched him out of school never to see freedom again. i bet these cases are more frequent than we would like to think. there has been a bit of a ground swell to free Bud, but it all boils down to exposure and media to shine a light. i hate this shit.

Wow. I can’t imagine having to spend the rest of my life in high school. 

  • Like 4
Posted
22 hours ago, Cajun said:

Had a Judge in the Hill Country not far from here lecture us during a custody hearing about how we "...need to understand that this isn't about you!  It's about the best interest of the child!".  On and on and on he went.

Finally, he paused, looked at the clock and said, "We're going to have to wrap this up and reschedule, I have Permian Pipeline cases to hear".

Court adjourned.  

I shit you not.  And this guy is "Highly Respected" around those parts.  People fawn all over how fair and wonderful he is.  

Yeah, no.

What county?  Because if it's the one I'm thinking of, then there are two judges, not sure if they're still sitting, who have daughters.  And I've been inside both of them.  PM me to verify.

Posted
16 hours ago, Homesickhorn said:

What county?  Because if it's the one I'm thinking of, then there are two judges, not sure if they're still sitting, who have daughters.  And I've been inside both of them.  PM me to verify.

What was it like being inside those judges?

  • Like 3
Posted

 

On 2/3/2020 at 3:56 AM, Augustus said:

Which is a damn shame, because it seems to me that, "I will not wrongfully murder you or your innocent loved ones" would be a hell of a campaign slogan.

Sure. Great for whoever runs against you. But taking a W off the board makes it kinda hard to use that slogan for yourself.

Posted (edited)
On 2/2/2020 at 4:49 PM, Deej said:

Of course he was. 

I saw some stats a few years ago examining a then-recent time period of 5 or ten years. While almost 50% of murderers were black, less than 40% of those given death sentences were black, and less than 30% of the actual executions were of convicted blacks.

The author argued that the real racial bias was not towards black perpetrators, but towards the killers of white females. Most of those executed were murderers of white females, and juries find that the most grievous of crimes. Since most people kill people of their own race, white men are more likely to be given death sentences, and they are likely to be executed.

I think other factors may be more at play, like gang violence and familiarity between victim and perpetrator. Or perhaps towards killers of females and children, regardless of race. It’s an interesting theory, to me, anyway. 

Edited by ImissWallyPryor
Posted
1 hour ago, ImissWallyPryor said:

I saw some stats a few years ago examining a then-recent time period of 5 or ten years. While almost 50% of murderers were black, less than 40% of those given death sentences were black, and less than 30% of the actual executions were of convicted blacks.

The author argued that the real racial bias was not towards black perpetrators, but towards the killers of white females. Most of those executed were murderers of white females, and juries find that the most grievous of crimes. Since most people kill people of their own race, white men are more likely to be given death sentences, and they are likely to be executed.

I think other factors may be more at play, like gang violence and familiarity between victim and perpetrator. Or perhaps towards killers of females and children, regardless of race. It’s an interesting theory, to me, anyway. 

Women commit about 11 percent of murders.  And account for less than 1 percent of executions.

Posted

While we are on statistics, executions are becoming very rare in the US.  Since 2016, the annual number of executions in the US has been 20, 23, 25, and 22, respectively.  

Posted
While we are on statistics, executions are becoming very rare in the US.  Since 2016, the annual number of executions in the US has been 20, 23, 25, and 22, respectively.  
Yee Haw! TEXAS for the ratio!!

/Sarcasm

Sent from my SM-G950U1 using Tapatalk

Posted
3 hours ago, Johnny Sack said:

Women commit about 11 percent of murders.  And account for less than 1 percent of executions.

I think you misread my post. I was referring to murderers OF women, not women murderers. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, ImissWallyPryor said:

I think you misread my post. I was referring to murderers OF women, not women murderers. 

I got that.  Sorry.  Wasn’t clear.  The biggest sentencing biases in our country aren’t racial.  They are gender based.  
 

ive seen studies where men and women committing similar crimes with similar criminal histories get 63 percent more time.  It’s 6x the disparity between blacks and whites.  

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...