Jump to content

Rush Limbaugh's corpse continues to rot

Gil Bang

By Gil Bang
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

Okie Lite in Zapata

Okie Lite in Zapata 143

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, RomaVicta said:

Negged for ignoring the main point about the pussy grabber. Negged because my tolerance for unconsidered regurgitation of talking points is depleted. Negged for being an NFL political entity. Negged just because.

Fuck you for dancing in oblivious delight around the bonfire of what was once a pretty fucking good idea for a country. By all means, don't trip and fall into the flames.

Negged for being a ignorant piece of shit and not open to anyone else's opinion or idea's.

You'r what's wrong with this country and why we're divided, you're no better than the right wing pieces of shit I hear all day.

 

  • Fuck You 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Turkleton
Turkleton

I see the snowflakes are out today.  Always said this on the Shag, you neg in the CR you are a complete pussy. This is how I know if the civil war ever gets hot, it will be a short one.

UpperWestside
UpperWestside

Carson made a generation laugh late at night. Stewart got a generation of people to laugh by pointing out the lunacy of elected officials through the use of humor. Limbaugh got millions of A

Turkleton
Turkleton

That guy on the radio doesn't have my narrative so I want him to die...... "When they go low, we go high"  

Posted Images

RomaVicta

RomaVicta 29802

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Okie Lite in Zapata said:

Negged for being a ignorant piece of shit and not open to anyone else's opinion or idea's.

You'r what's wrong with this country and why we're divided, you're no better than the right wing pieces of shit I hear all day.

 

Okie dokie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Okie Lite in Zapata

Okie Lite in Zapata 143

Posted
Posted (edited)
37 minutes ago, Ted Lange said:

Who is the equivalent of Rush on the left?

I don't listen to Rush so I will venture an educated guess. 

I know he's a right wing syndicated radio host, so if there's an equivalent I would have to say NBC, ABC and CBS. Thats the traditional liberal broadcasting networks, I won't delve into the cable news networks. 

We could probably argue TV>Radio but fuck equivalent's you have a point to prove, right? 

Edited by Okie Lite in Zapata
  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ted Lange

Ted Lange 16054

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Okie Lite in Zapata said:

I don't listen to Rush so I will venture an educated guess. 

I know he's a right wing syndicated radio host, so if there's an equivalent I would have to say NBC, ABC and CBS. Thats the traditional broadcasting networks, I won't delve into the cable news networks. 

We could probably argue TV>Radio but fuck equivalent's you have a point to prove, right? 

Yes.  Just give me the most far left radio personality.  That’s it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ted Lange

Ted Lange 16054

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Okie Lite in Zapata said:

Television>Radio? 

How many viewers do liberal news stations have?

How many listeners does  right wing Rush have?

Thats the, let's use your word, equivalent.....correct? 

 

I said radio, so not sure why the question unless you are unable to read.  But to make it easier, give me a radio Or TV host who you think is on par with Rush. Go 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TDunk

TDunk 590

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Okie Lite in Zapata said:

Negged for being a ignorant piece of shit and not open to anyone else's opinion or idea's.

You'r what's wrong with this country and why we're divided, you're no better than the right wing pieces of shit I hear all day.

 

 

You don't listen to Rush, but you do listen to right wing pieces of shit all day...  Troll

  • Like 2
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Okie Lite in Zapata

Okie Lite in Zapata 143

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Ted Lange said:

I said radio, so not sure why the question unless you are unable to read.  But to make it easier, give me a radio Or TV host who you think is on par with Rush. Go 

I guess you're unable to read also. I told you im not familiar with Rush, I just know he's a right wing radio jockey.

I cant give you a person who is on par with him but if were considering right wing vs left wing I guess anyone on MSNBC who is left wing would be on par?

This is your argument, not mine. 

 

 

  • Fuck You 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ted Lange

Ted Lange 16054

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Okie Lite in Zapata said:

 

I cant give you a person who is on par with him 

 

 

That’s exactly what I expected, there is no BOTH SIDES, to Rush. Yet somehow Trump degraded the Medal of Freedom.   I’m sure you are fine with that though. Sad!.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TDunk

TDunk 590

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Okie Lite in Zapata said:

I work for a lot of right wing pieces of shit and no I don't listen to Rush but I did fuck your mom last night and damn that shit is tight, I  know you have a small hat size. 

 

She's 71.  It should be tight and dry.  So thanks for visiting her in Colorado.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ted Lange

Ted Lange 16054

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Okie Lite in Zapata said:

Yes its sad!

You're the one who doesn't see both sides Ted. 

 

 

 

 

So both sides... who did Obama or Clinton give a MEDAL OF FREEDOM to that is on par with Rush?  
 
it’s ok to admit one side is worse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bullneck

Bullneck 18995

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, Jiggy-Z said:

Yeah the shtick is take complex issues (economic, weather, medical) which have decades of peer reviewed science behind them and come up with a homespun, folksy,  or derogatory counter phrase to sum it all up for your position.  You end having to explain things which need no explanation.

Yes.  Another explanation is that you take statistically tested, vast reserves of carefully compiled and examined data and counter that with, "It was 46 degrees yesterday in Tulsa, so how can there be such thing as global warming?  What happened to the next Ice Age they were predicting?  Scientists don't really know anything."

20150226_inhofe_snowball.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bullneck

Bullneck 18995

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Okie Lite in Zapata said:

I don't listen to Rush so I will venture an educated guess. 

I know he's a right wing syndicated radio host, so if there's an equivalent I would have to say NBC, ABC and CBS. Thats the traditional liberal broadcasting networks, I won't delve into the cable news networks. 

We could probably argue TV>Radio but fuck equivalent's you have a point to prove, right? 

For a guy who doesn't listen to Rush you seem uncommonly invested in this thread.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
hpslugga

hpslugga 4046

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, Okie Lite in Zapata said:

Negged for being a ignorant piece of shit and not open to anyone else's opinion or idea's.

You'r what's wrong with this country and why we're divided, you're no better than the right wing pieces of shit I hear all day.

I realize this person's been banned, but he's completely wrong about everything he says:

What's wrong with this country is that in intellectual discourse, we've become too permissive and sympathetic towards other people's opinions for the mere sake of it. This is straight out of the Fox News playbook. To borrow a quote from David Brock when he was interviewed for Glenn Greenwald's Outfoxed when he was actually speaking of Roger Ailes but the same holds true for the right wing in general: [they] want all [discussion] to be a matter of opinion because opinion can't be proven false. I think that is very dangerous because if people don't have a set of facts that they can agree upon, I think it's difficult to reach a consensus on what's correct public policy."

Again, Limbaugh is Exhibit A of this vulgar behavior. And again, it's not just him. It's his entire genre. They want all discourse to be a matter of straight out fucking make believe and pretend, and Science forbid if you challenge them on that because if you do, you're slandered and projected with lazy, rubber-stamped accusations of being close-minded, intolerant, and ignorant. For example, saying "trickle down economics works and is a societal good" isn't an opinion; it's a straight up lie that has been exposed over and over again without exception or interruption. But challenge that? Oh boy, here comes the S-word, not that they who use it as a pejorative ever even knew what the fuck it means.

This is postmodernism gone absolutely berserk. According to spineless pieces of shit like this one, there are not supposed to be any facts, there is not supposed to be any truth; all discourse is supposed to come down to your "narrative" vs. my "narrative." It's disgusting, and the person who posted the quoted passage is disgusting for promoting it.

Also, we are not divided because people insist on establishing basic facts/truths upon which to base public policy, either. We're divided because there's a very small segment of the population that wants to divide us and keep us divided so as to distract us from the fact that we're constantly being fucked over by them. The Koch Brothers, Sheldon Adelson, Tom Steyer, the Uihleins, etc? Divide and conquer isn't a hypothesis; it's a historic truism that's as old as nation states themselves. They who promote it don't care about ideology, and they sure as fuck don't give a shit about any of us posting here or anywhere else. They care about fattening their own pocketbooks even if it means pouring tens of millions of dollars to political campaigns. As long as it benefits them to stoke the flames of divisiveness via screaming about "socialism/communism" or "fascism," that's what they're going do regardless of its accuracy.

Edited by hpslugga
  • Like 14
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hpslugga

hpslugga 4046

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Bullneck said:

Yes.  Another explanation is that you take statistically tested, vast reserves of carefully compiled and examined data and counter that with, "It was 46 degrees yesterday in Tulsa, so how can there be such thing as global warming?  What happened to the next Ice Age they were predicting?  Scientists don't really know anything."

It's funny that you mentioned that because just yesterday I was watching John Oliver's segments on Brexit. One of them contained a clip from a televised interview with Michael Gove, the UK Justice Secretary. The interviewer pointed out that literally every single UK-based and global economic policy groups who studied the inescapable effects of Brexit pointed out that it was going to have a very adverse consequence for the UK and the world, to which Gove said "I think the people in this country have had enough of experts with organizations from acronyms."

Yes, why bother paying attention to findings from people/organizations whose job it is to research and discover those findings when one can simply rectally derive fairy tales and dreams of make believe "prosperity" via posting bullshit on the sides of buses? And just as a side note, what the fuck does "organizations from acronyms" even mean?

Edited by hpslugga
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mrs Whiggins

Mrs Whiggins 13049

Posted
Posted
50 minutes ago, hpslugga said:

It's funny that you mentioned that because just yesterday I was watching John Oliver's segments on Brexit. One of them contained a clip from a televised interview with Michael Gove, the UK Justice Secretary. The interviewer pointed out that literally every single UK-based and global economic policy groups who studied the inescapable effects of Brexit pointed out that it was going to have a very adverse consequence for the UK and the world, to which Gove said "I think the people in this country have had enough of experts with organizations from acronyms."

Yes, why bother paying attention to findings from people/organizations whose job it is to research and discover those findings when one can simply rectally derive fairy tales and dreams of make believe "prosperity" via posting bullshit on the sides of buses? And just as a side note, what the fuck does "organizations from acronyms" even mean?

Preach!

I absolutely loved my tax dollars going to NOAA. Those folks with their obsession over ocean currents, GOES maps, and all things weather and climate have done so much for our country. It has been a wonderful example of a government public service benefiting citizens, businesses, and the world through shared data.

Not happy that they are trying to privatize it (who cares about lives lost due to tornadoes when we can make money!!!) But what is especially galling is listening/watching people that have about the same amount of knowledge as I do (little to none) pronounce all of the climate data and science as flawed and not worthy of discussion and therefore nothing should be done. Scientists are not perfect communicators, and they do need to have clear examples when talking to lay people about what is FACT and what is not fact or is being debated w/respect to trends, etc. But the politicians have grabbed ahold of science and experts in a variety of fields and are holding them hostage, IMO.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pacman

pacman 7331

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Bullneck said:

Yes.  Another explanation is that you take statistically tested, vast reserves of carefully compiled and examined data and counter that with, "It was 46 degrees yesterday in Tulsa, so how can there be such thing as global warming?  What happened to the next Ice Age they were predicting?  Scientists don't really know anything."

20150226_inhofe_snowball.jpg

EVERY. TIME. IT. SNOWS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jiggy-Z

Jiggy-Z 3432

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, hpslugga said:

I realize this person's been banned, but he's completely wrong about everything he says:

What's wrong with this country is that in intellectual discourse, we've become too permissive and sympathetic towards other people's opinions for the mere sake of it. This is straight out of the Fox News playbook. To borrow a quote from David Brock when he was interviewed for Glenn Greenwald's Outfoxed when he was actually speaking of Roger Ailes but the same holds true for the right wing in general: [they] want all [discussion] to be a matter of opinion because opinion can't be proven false. I think that is very dangerous because if people don't have a set of facts that they can agree upon, I think it's difficult to reach a consensus on what's correct public policy."

Again, Limbaugh is Exhibit A of this vulgar behavior. And again, it's not just him. It's his entire genre. They want all discourse to be a matter of straight out fucking make believe and pretend, and Science forbid if you challenge them on that because if you do, you're slandered and projected with lazy, rubber-stamped accusations of being close-minded, intolerant, and ignorant. For example, saying "trickle down economics works and is a societal good" isn't an opinion; it's a straight up lie that has been exposed over and over again without exception or interruption. But challenge that? Oh boy, here comes the S-word, not that they who use it as a pejorative ever even knew what the fuck it means.

This is postmodernism gone absolutely berserk. According to spineless pieces of shit like this one, there are not supposed to be any facts, there is not supposed to be any truth; all discourse is supposed to come down to your "narrative" vs. my "narrative." It's disgusting, and the person who posted the quoted passage is disgusting for promoting it.

Also, we are not divided because people insist on establishing basic facts/truths upon which to base public policy, either. We're divided because there's a very small segment of the population that wants to divide us and keep us divided so as to distract us from the fact that we're constantly being fucked over by them. The Koch Brothers, Sheldon Adelson, Tom Steyer, the Uihleins, etc? Divide and conquer isn't a hypothesis; it's a historic truism that's as old as nation states themselves. They who promote it don't care about ideology, and they sure as fuck don't give a shit about any of us posting here or anywhere else. They care about fattening their own pocketbooks even if it means pouring tens of millions of dollars to political campaigns. As long as it benefits them to stoke the flames of divisiveness via screaming about "socialism/communism" or "fascism," that's what they're going do regardless of its accuracy.

Yes and the notion that Rush (conservatives) put forth with regards to climate change, that our influence is not large enough, nor could ever be large enough to cause man made global warming/climate change because of God or convenience is a dangerous opinion, or more of a notion really.

I was watching a documentary on Teflon last night (The Devil We Know). Aside from yet again showing corporate bad behavior with human interest stories there was an interesting point that was illustrated and backed up with actual science: That the fluorine compounds and their waste  that form the working parts of teflon and other related non stick compounds are so persistent and pervasive and have been discarded and used so universally that 99% of all humans have these compounds in their bodies, where they did not exist before.

We also know about plastic showing up in the bodies of people living in the isolated portions of the European Alps as well as just about everybody else.

..or about Mercury showing up in almost all pelagic species.

What the fuck is wrong with people?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bullneck

Bullneck 18995

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, hpslugga said:

It's funny that you mentioned that because just yesterday I was watching John Oliver's segments on Brexit. One of them contained a clip from a televised interview with Michael Gove, the UK Justice Secretary. The interviewer pointed out that literally every single UK-based and global economic policy groups who studied the inescapable effects of Brexit pointed out that it was going to have a very adverse consequence for the UK and the world, to which Gove said "I think the people in this country have had enough of experts with organizations from acronyms."

Yes, why bother paying attention to findings from people/organizations whose job it is to research and discover those findings when one can simply rectally derive fairy tales and dreams of make believe "prosperity" via posting bullshit on the sides of buses? And just as a side note, what the fuck does "organizations from acronyms" even mean?

I actually forgot the main point I wanted to make: anecdotal information is now just as good as the Law of Large Numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hpslugga

hpslugga 4046

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Bullneck said:

I actually forgot the main point I wanted to make: anecdotal information is now just as good as the Law of Large Numbers.

Oh you already made that point with that fucking Inhoffe pic. “Global climate change isn’t happening!!! I have a snowball!!!

Edited by hpslugga
Link to comment
Share on other sites
EMAWesome

EMAWesome 101

Posted
Posted
On 2/6/2020 at 10:27 AM, Pig Bellmont said:

There is no equivalent to Rush, Michael Savage or Laura Ingraham on the left. 

Actually this is pretty hilarious.  I could make a list of at least two dozen posters in this thread alone whose behavior towards anyone who doesn't agree with them is exactly the same as their perceived behavior from Limbaugh that they claim to detest.

  • Like 2
  • Fuck You 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hobbes2702

hobbes2702 12849

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, EMAWesome said:

Actually this is pretty hilarious.  I could make a list of at least two dozen posters in this thread alone whose behavior towards anyone who doesn't agree with them is exactly the same as their perceived behavior from Limbaugh that they claim to detest.

Which of those two dozen posters has a national radio broadcast?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 45565

Posted
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, EMAWesome said:

Actually this is pretty hilarious.  I could make a list of at least two dozen posters in this thread alone whose behavior towards anyone who doesn't agree with them is exactly the same as their perceived behavior from Limbaugh that they claim to detest.

Really?  I'm sure I'm on your list.  Have I ever called you a "nigga", or told you to take the bone out of your nose, or suggested that a gay man walking away is inviting me to fuck him, or suggested that sometimes "no" really means "yes"?

No?  Fuck you and your lame-ass equivocation.  You're a worthless shitstain troll whom the world would be better off without.  You know, like Rush.  

How's that for "behavior"?

Edited by jimmyjazz
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bolverk

bolverk 29413

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, EMAWesome said:

Actually this is pretty hilarious.  I could make a list of at least two dozen posters in this thread alone whose behavior towards anyone who doesn't agree with them is exactly the same as their perceived behavior from Limbaugh that they claim to detest.

I'm sure we have some racists on this board, but I can't think of any that would be so brazen as to tell a black man to take a bone of out his nose. If you could point me in the direction of those two dozen, I'd be obliged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gil Bang

Gil Bang 25899

Posted
  • Author
Posted
12 minutes ago, EMAWesome said:

Actually this is pretty hilarious.  I could make a list of at least two dozen posters in this thread alone whose behavior towards anyone who doesn't agree with them is exactly the same as their perceived behavior from Limbaugh that they claim to detest.

go fuck yourself dickhead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DDD Dad

DDD Dad 14255

Posted
Posted
Actually this is pretty hilarious.  I could make a list of at least two dozen posters in this thread alone whose behavior towards anyone who doesn't agree with them is exactly the same as their perceived behavior from Limbaugh that they claim to detest.

This doesn’t prove anything because it’s all based on circumstantial evidence.
  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ted Lange

Ted Lange 16054

Posted
Posted
55 minutes ago, EMAWesome said:

Actually this is pretty hilarious.  I could make a list of at least two dozen posters in this thread alone whose behavior towards anyone who doesn't agree with them is exactly the same as their perceived behavior from Limbaugh that they claim to detest.

tenor.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Larry T. Spider

Larry T. Spider 1743

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, hpslugga said:

It's funny that you mentioned that because just yesterday I was watching John Oliver's segments on Brexit. One of them contained a clip from a televised interview with Michael Gove, the UK Justice Secretary. The interviewer pointed out that literally every single UK-based and global economic policy groups who studied the inescapable effects of Brexit pointed out that it was going to have a very adverse consequence for the UK and the world, to which Gove said "I think the people in this country have had enough of experts with organizations from acronyms."

Yes, why bother paying attention to findings from people/organizations whose job it is to research and discover those findings when one can simply rectally derive fairy tales and dreams of make believe "prosperity" via posting bullshit on the sides of buses? And just as a side note, what the fuck does "organizations from acronyms" even mean?

There was a great article that came out in the Atlantic a few years ago about “the death of expertise”. We now distrust people that have devoted their life to a field of study to instead listen to a political hack with a catchy phrase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SaucyJack

SaucyJack 3487

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, EMAWesome said:

Actually this is pretty hilarious.  I could make a list of at least two dozen posters in this thread alone whose behavior towards anyone who doesn't agree with them is exactly the same as their perceived behavior from Limbaugh that they claim to detest.

 

2 hours ago, hobbes2702 said:

Which of those two dozen posters has a national radio broadcast?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bolverk

bolverk 29413

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, SaucyJack said:

 

 

So, neither EMAW — nor you — can produce an example of a single poster who exhibits the same sort of racist rhetoric Limbaugh used against a political opponent (bones in noses), but you still decided it’s a good idea to respond with a random video clip of a black sports fanatic making funny animal sounds to prove some point.

Be direct and use the lesson your momma taught you about using words to express yourself. I know you’re capable of speech and don’t have to rely on non sequitur video clips.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Born to Run

Born to Run 6568

Posted
Posted
There was a great article that came out in the Atlantic a few years ago about “the death of expertise”. We now distrust people that have devoted their life to a field of study to instead listen to a political hack with a catchy phrase.
Well yeah, you can google anything and feign a level of extreme confidence and yet not know or learn anything.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...