2020 Presidential Election -- Biden v Trump: Sleepy Joe vs Dopey Don [Results begin on page 409]

[Pig Bellmont 8,712]

14 minutes ago, JFKFC said:

 

On the bright side, he’s not getting pardoned for obstructing justice

[RDCanecutter 26,395]

On 11/30/2020 at 10:55 AM, bolverk said:

How influential is Bill Buckley's National Review in Republican circles these days? I'm asking because this OpEd is rather scathing.

 

National Review's shit's all retarded and they talk like fags.

[Js1 85,286]

 

['stache 21,797]

22 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Barr should already be packing his bags based on Trump's assertion that the DOJ/FBI committed election fraud.  This might just ice it.  Deep state, motherfuckers.

I can't think of a better career move for a trump appointee than to be fired for not doing his bidding. Of course Barr has done plenty of his bidding and should be blackballed for life, but this is a last ditch effort to save face as something other than part of the treasonous regime. I hope it doesn't work. He needs to carry this stain for eternity.

[Pescado_Rojo 19,416]

1 hour ago, Neonmoon said:

I'm watching this cornucopia of snowflake testimony at the Michigan Senate "hearing". 

- This one bearded pussy read a statement saying he saw a van of ballots be delivered that he estimated to be 50K ballots. There was no chain of custody seen by him. They were brought in at 3:00am when no ballots should have been received after 8pm, so where have these ballots been between 8pm and 3am? No explanation has been given to him. He accused Attorney General Nessel of whisteblower intimidation. He further said they were not allowed to videotape in the TCF building, saying they were told it was potentially criminal. He wants a full independent investigation and for them to stop this fraud. 

- I experienced the chain of custody being broken. She explained that they were asked how many republicans poll watchers were there, and it was announced two, but she didn't see anyone raise their hands. I was threatened and intimidated by Democrat poll watchers. 

Witness after Witness are republican poll observer/challengers "just asking questions". As in things don't make sense to them and it's not fair they lost so it must be fraud. 

It would be fun to see where this guys cell phone was pinging when he saw this going on at 3:00 AM. 

[Js1 85,286]

 

[Pig Bellmont 8,712]

30 minutes ago, 'stache said:

I can't think of a better career move for a trump appointee than to be fired for not doing his bidding. Of course Barr has done plenty of his bidding and should be blackballed for life, but this is a last ditch effort to save face as something other than part of the treasonous regime. I hope it doesn't work. He needs to carry this stain for eternity.

Some big law firm will hire him as partner, and bill out his time as $1500 per hour 

[Pato del Muerto 52,486]

43 minutes ago, Js1 said:

 

Witnesses swearing under oath?  Really?  Where?

[Pato del Muerto 52,486]

35 minutes ago, Pescado_Rojo said:

It would be fun to see where this guys cell phone was pinging when he saw this going on at 3:00 AM. 

He was obviously standing near the building doing his duty as a citizen. But didn’t take his phone out to video this fraud happening right in front of him because he was told it might be wrong to do so. Can’t be risking a small fine just to record evidence of a presidential election being stolen. 

[Walden Ponderer 12,639]

William F. Buckley famously stated late in his life that had he been born 20 years earlier or 20 years later, he would have been a socialist. Say what you will about him, his whole schtick was the need for an intellectual contrarian in political commentary, and that's exactly what he was.

[Texaspython 231]

37 minutes ago, Pig Bellmont said:

Some big law firm will hire him as partner, and bill out his time as $1500 per hour 

Much more than that.

[mchookem 16,322]

1 hour ago, JFKFC said:

 

buddy, you just made the list!

[JFKFC 4,878]

 

[Beau Vine 54,208]

1 hour ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Witnesses swearing under oath?  Really?  Where?

All those affidavits Rudy keeps waving around.  Aren't affidavits supposed to be sworn under oath?

[henrygandorf 29,189]

1 hour ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Witnesses swearing under oath?  Really?  Where?

well they were using profanity under the sign for oath fine wine and spirits on the ne corner of fuck off and go home.

[BehoId, The Underminer! 11,669]

1 hour ago, Walden Ponderer said:

William F. Buckley famously stated late in his life that had he been born 20 years earlier or 20 years later, he would have been a socialist. Say what you will about him, his whole schtick was the need for an intellectual contrarian in political commentary, and that's exactly what he was.

he also said he'd rather be governed by the first 300 names in the phone book.  boy, did the last few years point out how wrong he was on that one.

[Neonmoon 38,129]

Lou Dobbs says AG Barr is perhaps compromised. I mean...the simulation is lit

 

[Kyrie Eleison 9,312]

Barr's intended audience is the Federal judiciary.

[Bojack 2,074]

7 minutes ago, Neonmoon said:

Lou Dobbs says AG Barr is perhaps compromised. I mean...the simulation is lit

 

[Js1 85,286]

NYC vote drop

 

[JimmyJames 12,271]

41 minutes ago, Neonmoon said:

Lou Dobbs says AG Barr is perhaps compromised. I mean...the simulation is lit

 

Well Lou is right, Barr is compromised. Just not in the insane Q way that Lou is intending there. 

[henrygandorf 29,189]

1 hour ago, Neonmoon said:

Lou Dobbs says AG Barr is perhaps compromised. I mean...the simulation is lit

 

in just over 2 minutes of nonstop talking, i'm not sure lou dobbs hit on one fact other than the notion that the fbi is an actual organization that does exist.

his entire monologue would be tagged on twitter as "outright lies" or whatever 180 degrees is from the truth.  at what point does fox actually, you know, do something about this?

[LonghornSean 3,989]

 

[4th&Five 41,519]

Good. Nobody wants his fat ass there.

[JimmyJames 12,271]

2 minutes ago, 4th&Five said:

Good. Nobody wants his fat ass there.

Exactly. Fuck that worthless piece of shit. He shouldn’t even be invited to the inauguration. 

[HOOKEM4 5,036]

5 hours ago, jimmyjazz said:

Barr should already be packing his bags based on Trump's assertion that the DOJ/FBI committed election fraud.  This might just ice it.  Deep state, motherfuckers.

Serious long game shit Barr. Well played. Deep state is superb.

[HOOKEM4 5,036]

5 hours ago, jimmyjazz said:

Barr should already be packing his bags based on Trump's assertion that the DOJ/FBI committed election fraud.  This might just ice it.  Deep state, motherfuckers.

Serious long game shit Barr. Well played. Deep state is superb.

[Beau Vine 54,208]

 

[Bevo14 8,303]

10 minutes ago, Beau Vine said:

 

I feel like this dude could do a solid Mack Brown impersonation. 

[Shaddie 1,651]

9 minutes ago, Beau Vine said:

 

I will give him a 8.5 for effort. However he needs to dial it down about 2 octaves and then the trumpkins would have believed it completely. 

[Texaspython 231]

1 hour ago, LonghornSean said:

 

He wouldn’t act like an adult anyway. I never expected him to show up if a Dem won either after 4 or 8 years. He’s a child.

Edited December 2, 2020 by Texaspython

[Ghost of LL 15,531]

 

When did I first predict this? About 9 months ago?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Biff Tannen 45,665]

1 hour ago, Texaspython said:

He wouldn’t act like an adult anyway. I never expected him to show up if a Dem won either after 4 or 8 years. He’s a child.

God, I can hardly imagine.  He'd probably run up like Kanye and smack the bible away as the oath was being administered.

[grazinhorn 472]

40 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

God, I can hardly imagine.  He'd probably run up like Kanye and smack the bible away as the oath was being administered.

I think the Kanye quote was along the lines of "I'm really happy for you, Imma let you finish"

Happy for ya?  Let ya finish?  Bah... whatever, it all sucks.  Let's move on.

Edited December 2, 2020 by grazinhorn

[Pato del Muerto 52,486]

3 hours ago, Texaspython said:

He wouldn’t act like an adult anyway. I never expected him to show up if a Dem won either after 4 or 8 years. He’s a child.

At what point during this hypothetical second term would we be dealing with outlandish lawsuits trying to maneuver around or declare unconstitutional the 22nd amendment?

[Born to Run 6,569]

he also said he'd rather be governed by the first 300 names in the phone book.  boy, did the last few years point out how wrong he was on that one.

Yeah that whole assualt on institutional govt was a bit misguided and killed thousands

[washparkhorn 9,939]

4 hours ago, LonghornSean said:

 

What a disgrace he has been to the Office of the President. 

[A-Tex Devil 2,446]

13 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

At what point during this hypothetical second term would we be dealing with outlandish lawsuits trying to maneuver around or declare unconstitutional the 22nd amendment?

I chuckled at declaring a constitutional amendment unconstitutional.  He would try though.  Fuck him.  

Call Cornyn, Cruz and your GOP House rep daily telling them to speak up and tell Trump to cut this shit out.  I’ve gotten my dad calling Kevin Brady twice a week.  

[tx 3 putt 76,873]

1 hour ago, washparkhorn said:

What a disgrace he has been to the Office of the President. 

 

he came in as ignorant trash, he'll leave as ignorant trash 

[Js1 85,286]

1 hour ago, Pato del Muerto said:

At what point during this hypothetical second term would we be dealing with outlandish lawsuits trying to maneuver around or declare unconstitutional the 22nd amendment?

January 20, 2021

[NWBuck 8,552]

6 hours ago, LonghornSean said:

 

He announced for 2020 the day after the 2016 election. 

It allows him to continue to fundraise and fleece the rubes. It's not like he has any other meaningful sources of income. All he has is his name... Shitty as that may be. 

[Tom 2,959]

6 hours ago, LonghornSean said:

 

 

I'm holding out hope that we might get lucky and he'll have one too many Big Macs and won't be around to run in 2024.

[Horn Dogg 3,874]

6 hours ago, LonghornSean said:

 

Take the loss pussy!

[closetohumping 17,435]

So even Barr has said he can’t find any evidence of wrongdoing 

[Bozo_Casanova 26,437]

11 minutes ago, closetohumping said:

So even Barr has said he can’t find any evidence of wrongdoing 

No, what he said was that they have not found fraud on a scale that would change the outcome of the election, and this is an important distinction.

Fraud, human error, logistical issues and both inadvertent and intentional procedural violations happen in every election. The Trump campaign is largely taking that fact and through the addition of fantasy trying to alchemically transform it into evidence of a massive, coordinated fraud conspiracy. 
 

So that’s what Barr is saying- not that there is no evidence of at least some wrongdoing, because we can assume there is the usual amount or perhaps even much more because of the unique circumstances of massive turnout and a pandemic, but that they haven’t found either the scale or coordination required to turn the loser into the winner 

[Aqua Buddha 14,582]

13 hours ago, LonghornSean said:

 

He's treating it like all of his failed businesses and bankruptcies.  Just act like it never happened and keep talking big.

[Pescado_Rojo 19,416]

I do like that his strategy of burying the other guy in litigation until they go away doesn't really work when the other guy is the United States Govt. I just wish he wasn't able to use other people's money to keep it going. 

[Guest Lobo]

46 minutes ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

No, what he said was that they have not found fraud on a scale that would change the outcome of the election, and this is an important distinction.

Fraud, human error, logistical issues and both inadvertent and intentional procedural violations happen in every election. The Trump campaign is largely taking that fact and through the addition of fantasy trying to alchemically transform it into evidence of a massive, coordinated fraud conspiracy. 
 

So that’s what Barr is saying- not that there is no evidence of at least some wrongdoing, because we can assume there is the usual amount or perhaps even much more because of the unique circumstances of massive turnout and a pandemic, but that they haven’t found either the scale or coordination required to turn the loser into the winner 

And I think Barr realizes that focusing on trying to manufacture widespread, intentional fraud in PA and GA are fool's errands.  If he'd put back his evil genius hat back on, Barr would pull a "Fail Safe" and go uncover a similar plot in some state that Trump won close, but not too close so as to actually jeopardize the EC votes from there (some place like Iowa or Ohio).  It would add some legitimacy to the rest of their Witch Hunt.  I know Trump couldn't withstand the ego blow though.  

The real question looming over all this to me, is while this whole shitshow has obviously casted a lot of doubt onto our elections in the minds of a lot of Trump supporters.....isn't it at least a little tempting to let that skepticism linger in their minds for a long while so as to keep them away from the polls in 2022/2024?  Most Trump voters are going to remain loyal Republicans and turn out regardless of who runs and regardless of this "Stolen Election" charade.  But there's 20 million dipshits in that mix who will think everything will go back to being rigged against them and just sit out voting in 2022 and in 2024, if Trump is not on that ticket.  Isn't that a net good?  I won't lie, I will go back to voting mainly Libertarian and Republican after adamantly supporting a number of Democrats in 2020.  But keeping that psychotic fuckery-filled wing of Trumpdom from the polls in 2022/2024 is a real plus for America.  Sure a handful of them are gonna shoot up some polling places in the next few years out of frustration, but the constitution does say, "interesting trades considered."  

[Brisketexan 105,074]

20 minutes ago, Pescado_Rojo said:

I do like that his strategy of burying the other guy in litigation until they go away doesn't really work when the other guy is the United States Govt. I just wish he wasn't able to use other people's money to keep it going. 

An even dumber strategy: the other guy isn't just the US government.  It's multiple state governments as well.  He's foolishly fighting a multi-front war.  And losing badly on every front.

Shit, he's even more like Hitler than we thought.

[Bozo_Casanova 26,437]

15 minutes ago, Lobo said:

And I think Barr realizes that focusing on trying to manufacture widespread, intentional fraud in PA and GA are fool's errands.  If he'd put back his evil genius hat back on, Barr would pull a "Fail Safe" and go uncover a similar plot in some state that Trump won close, but not too close so as to actually jeopardize the EC votes from there (some place like Iowa or Ohio).  It would add some legitimacy to the rest of their Witch Hunt.  I know Trump couldn't withstand the ego blow though.  

The real question looming over all this to me, is while this whole shitshow has obviously casted a lot of doubt onto our elections in the minds of a lot of Trump supporters.....isn't it at least a little tempting to let that skepticism linger in their minds for a long while so as to keep them away from the polls in 2022/2024?  Most Trump voters are going to remain loyal Republicans and turn out regardless of who runs and regardless of this "Stolen Election" charade.  But there's 20 million dipshits in that mix who will think everything will go back to being rigged against them and just sit out voting in 2022 and in 2024, if Trump is not on that ticket.  Isn't that a net good?  I won't lie, I will go back to voting mainly Libertarian and Republican after adamantly supporting a number of Democrats in 2020.  But keeping that psychotic fuckery-filled wing of Trumpdom from the polls in 2022/2024 is a real plus for America.  Sure a handful of them are gonna shoot up some polling places in the next few years out of frustration, but the constitution does say, "interesting trades considered."  

Here’s the question for 2022: will Trumpy low propensity voters come out without Trump on the ticket? They stayed home in 2018.

Will core Democrats stay motivated for 2022? If not, they could very well lose 20-30 seats in the house.

Edited December 2, 2020 by Bozo_Casanova