Jump to content

2020 Presidential Election -- Biden v Trump: Sleepy Joe vs Dopey Don [Results begin on page 409]

Patrick Bateman

By Patrick Bateman
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 39k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Bama Chick
Bama Chick

I am so thrilled tonight! I spoke with my mom and asked her how my dad was taking the election. She said after every network declared Biden the winner, he turned off Fox News and said “Well, glad t

HenryJames
HenryJames
Thatguy
Thatguy

This was my experience in Galveston County, except for one thing. I came in and presented my ID to the geriatric at the front who printed out my pin number. I took my pin number to a table where two B

Posted Images

SydneyCarton

SydneyCarton 47872

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Hank Kingsley said:

 

 

1 hour ago, Hank Kingsley said:

 

 

1 hour ago, Hank Kingsley said:

 

I couldn't snap a picture of my polling place in Timbergrove, because it's a drive through location. But the line of cars at 7:45 this morning was probably half a mile back from the entrance to the church.  I'd estimate there were easily about 100-150 cars inline. I *think* there's also a walk in polling spot as well, but I'm going to have to investigate, maybe at lunch.. I drive by it every morning on the way to work, so I am happy to keep folks updated on how it looks the next couple weeks.

I'm assuming this is going to all die down in  a few days when the diehards finish voting. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 45554

Posted
Posted

How refreshing to see that the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting a three-man slate of Trump appointees, reversed a lower court ruling, thus reinstating Greg Abbott's "one dropoff box per county" rule in Texas.  One judge even pointed out that Abbott shouldn't have made the call, and that it's the legislature's job to set election law.  So, he acknowledges the impropriety of the action but supports it.  Cool.  They're not even trying to hide it.

Ah well, nevertheless

  • Rage+1 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
gmr548

gmr548 16501

Posted
Posted
Do you honestly believe the numbers being reported worldwide as the numerator?  China at less than 100k dead?  No way man. 
They're decent for the US and the rest of the west, which was the comparison you made made and continue to just ignore data on.
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SydneyCarton

SydneyCarton 47872

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, gmr548 said:
12 hours ago, Wulaw Horn said:
Do you honestly believe the numbers being reported worldwide as the numerator?  China at less than 100k dead?  No way man. 

They're decent for the US and the rest of the west, which was the comparison you made made and continue to just ignore data on.

Don't forget that he's ignoring the data in favor of a completely improvable supposition on his part. "Listen, the China numbers aren't real."

Maybe they are, maybe they aren't, but you dont know it, you can't prove it, and citing it as some kind of bedrock or foundational truth is fucking absurd. 

 

"China's numbers are fake."
"It's going to disappear, like a miracle, soon."
"Biden wants to ban fracking!"
"My rallies have the most beautiful people."

All of those, abjectly are fucking lies. The assault on truth is just phenomenal, and it starts with just the smallest little shit but like water will destroy everything given enough time. "The numbers aren't real." "Masks don't help." "Child sacrificing satanists." 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tuco

Tuco 5076

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, Wulaw Horn said:

But that wasn’t what originally started this. It was kids in cages.

I started this.  And you left out "...as a deterrent."  I put that in there, because I have run into enough disingenuous fucktards who will "but-Obama" this topic, using the same stale bullshit you are using.  It's neither insightful nor original.  It's just the standard attempt to muddy the water, so you don't have to address the fact that the political party (or political faction) you support is morally bankrupt.  I'm sure you consider yourself as some sort of free thinker, but the reality is you are just regurgitating the same bullshit that every other Trump apologist does without actually researching it or examining it under the light of critical thought.  

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 45554

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Tuco said:

I started this.  And you left out "...as a deterrent."  I put that in there, because I have run into enough disingenuous fucktards who will "but-Obama" this topic, using the same stale bullshit you are using.  It's neither insightful nor original.  It's just the standard attempt to muddy the water, so you don't have to address the fact that the political party (or political faction) you support is morally bankrupt.  I'm sure you consider yourself as some sort of free thinker, but the reality is you are just regurgitating the same bullshit that every other Trump apologist does without actually researching it or examining it under the light of critical thought.  

I know you know this, but most of them only get their "news" from FOX, and they're told that "Trump is simply continuing Obama's policies".  They truly believe it.  They wouldn't fact-check because they don't believe any other media source is legitimate.  This goes for sites like snopes & politifact as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Left Coast

Left Coast 863

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Voldemort86 said:

This man has no shame. If I was a farmer, I’d be smart enough to see through it, but I just don’t think the farmers of America are very intelligent.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-funnels-record-subsidies-farmers-120926107.html
 

He’s trying to buy your votes you fucking idiots.

But remember: socialism is bad, mmmkay?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BehoId, The Underminer!

BehoId, The Underminer! 11668

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Hank Kingsley said:

I know the polling numbers say otherwise, but I almost have more faith in Texas going blue this year than Florida. 

 

Florida was really eye opening in 2018.  Even in the midst of a blue wave, and even after correcting for the errors of 2016, DeSantis and Scott both won, even though polls said both would lose.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
UncleSonny

UncleSonny 6552

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, BehoId, The Underminer! said:

Florida was really eye opening in 2018.  Even in the midst of a blue wave, and even after correcting for the errors of 2016, DeSantis and Scott both won, even though polls said both would lose.

Didn't Florida pass that re-enfranchisement of felons measure in 2018? I haven't really seen any discussion of the number of voters back on the rolls as a result or any potential impact but it seems like it was being framed as a huge deal at the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Herpa Derpa

Herpa Derpa 6112

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Dark Horse said:

Yes, but Desantis actually did the right thing and extended it. 

Don't give credit where it is not due.  The Florida Secretary of State extended the deadline AFTER a lawsuit had been filed.  DeSantis had jack shit to do with the decision.

https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/tlhelections2020/2020/10/06/election-2020-florida-secretary-state-registration-register-vote-website-crashes-voters-laurel-lee/3636730001/

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Red Five

Red Five 40646

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, bolverk said:

Based on this morning's 538 analysis, this is where things currently stand. Toss-ups are those states where the polls show the margin to be 3.0% or less.

XN0Ge.png

 

So you could give Dotard every toss-up state there, including Arizona, and then also give him Florida.... and he still loses? Is that right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lemonlime

lemonlime 5503

Posted
Posted
59 minutes ago, UncleSonny said:

Didn't Florida pass that re-enfranchisement of felons measure in 2018? I haven't really seen any discussion of the number of voters back on the rolls as a result or any potential impact but it seems like it was being framed as a huge deal at the time. 

Not that many.  The state has worked overtime to stop them from voting. By such measures as insisting that all fines be paid before voting rights can be restored, but not having an accurate, easily accessible record of the amount of the fine.

For example, https://www.tampabay.com/news/florida-politics/elections/2020/10/07/florida-ruled-felons-must-pay-to-vote-now-it-doesnt-know-how-many-can/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dark Horse

Dark Horse 2263

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Herpa Derpa said:

Don't give credit where it is not due.  The Florida Secretary of State extended the deadline AFTER a lawsuit had been filed.  DeSantis had jack shit to do with the decision.

https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/tlhelections2020/2020/10/06/election-2020-florida-secretary-state-registration-register-vote-website-crashes-voters-laurel-lee/3636730001/

Ah, my bad

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gap03

Gap03 3284

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Red Five said:

So you could give Dotard every toss-up state there, including Arizona, and then also give him Florida.... and he still loses? Is that right?

Yes, if Biden wins PA + WI + MI + MN + NV + NH, that puts him at 278.  That's why the Rs have been jacking with PA so much - they really need to be able to contest one or more of those states.  Of course, the fact that Biden is also leading in AZ, FL and NC means that they're going to have to unveil some master class fuckery pre- and post-election.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
conVINCEd

conVINCEd 21468

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, lemonlime said:

Not that many.  The state has worked overtime to stop them from voting. By such measures as insisting that all fines be paid before voting rights can be restored, but not having an accurate, easily accessible record of the amount of the fine.

For example, https://www.tampabay.com/news/florida-politics/elections/2020/10/07/florida-ruled-felons-must-pay-to-vote-now-it-doesnt-know-how-many-can/

Wouldn’t criminals be more likely to vote for one of their own?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...