Jump to content

2020 Presidential Election -- Biden v Trump: Sleepy Joe vs Dopey Don [Results begin on page 409]

Patrick Bateman

By Patrick Bateman
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 39k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Bama Chick
Bama Chick

I am so thrilled tonight! I spoke with my mom and asked her how my dad was taking the election. She said after every network declared Biden the winner, he turned off Fox News and said “Well, glad t

HenryJames
HenryJames
Thatguy
Thatguy

This was my experience in Galveston County, except for one thing. I came in and presented my ID to the geriatric at the front who printed out my pin number. I took my pin number to a table where two B

Posted Images

Longhornmaniac8

Longhornmaniac8 255

Posted
Posted

Here's the deal about the "military" ballots. First, they're not just military. They're military and overseas ballots. I think it's Maine that segregates them and this voting bloc actually tends to skew D. And the ones that have already come in have been counted. I believe I read they have until 5 PM tomorrow to get in, and that there are 8800 that *could* come in, but the likelihood of that many coming is practically zero. I suspect that's the delta between the requested and unreturned. Not predictive. Most who intended to return one will have done so long ago.

Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captainant

Captainant 27450

Posted
Posted
Just now, Anastasis said:

Of course you don't acknowledge the well established actions of your partisan compatriots wrt developing their narrative.  Willful blind spots and all. 

Annie, don't you have some healthcare to optimize profits on, or some intellectually dishonest water to carry?

Fuck off with your schitck, there's an election on. Go shit in your hole

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89424

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mdhorn said:

I'm wondering if some of this is just a stall tactic to involve the Supreme Court.  There's no reason I can understand why Arizona and Nevada are taking this long.  

Arizona and Nevada are probably making sure their shit is squared away when they make the announcement, both in terms of protecting certain officials/buildings/etc. if they think the rabble will start shit, but more importantly, if they are forced into a recount.  Probably briefing everybody as well to deal with the media and potential legal onslaught.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SimonBolivar

SimonBolivar 10920

Posted
Posted

Embarrassed 

 

https://digital.elmercurio.com/mobile

 

https://www.lemonde.fr/

 

https://elpais.com/

 

https://m.bild.de/###wt_ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F&wt_t=1604633645683

 

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/

 

https://www.irishtimes.com/

 

https://www.smh.com.au/breaking-news

 

The joke of the world.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BradInATX

BradInATX 9208

Posted
Posted

So with the reports of Trump and his team being furious at Fox News and all that... 

Is the safe assumption that Trump thought they entirety of FNC was going to go along with the "stolen election" ruse and refuse to call a winner or declare Trump the winner? 

That's just mind-blowing. Not surprising. But mind-blowing that that's where we are today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
'stache

'stache 21772

Posted
Posted
Just now, BradInATX said:

So with the reports of Trump and his team being furious at Fox News and all that... 

Is the safe assumption that Trump thought they entirety of FNC was going to go along with the "stolen election" ruse and refuse to call a winner or declare Trump the winner? 

That's just mind-blowing. Not surprising. But mind-blowing that that's where we are today.

Well its now the primetime sycophant hour on fox news so I"m sure he's happy again and ready to keep up his lies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
wildcat09

wildcat09 29239

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
20 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Yeah, I concede that legislators overruling the will of voters would probably do it.  But I find that exceedingly unlikely. Some 2020 shit with the elect croaking causing chaos among electors seems more likely imo. 

Motherfucker, take a night off your bullshit.

  • Hook 'Em 10
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fudge Nuggets

Fudge Nuggets 19151

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, SimonBolivar said:

Embarrassed 

 

https://digital.elmercurio.com/mobile

 

https://www.lemonde.fr/

 

https://elpais.com/

 

https://m.bild.de/###wt_ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F&wt_t=1604633645683

 

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/

 

https://www.irishtimes.com/

 

https://www.smh.com.au/breaking-news

 

The joke of the world.

My Kiwi buddy sent a message asking what kind of third world shithole election we were running over here.  I had to tell him I was in full agreement.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
sidis

sidis 9748

Posted
Posted
Just now, Anastasis said:

Of course you don't acknowledge the well established actions of your partisan compatriots wrt developing their narrative.  Willful blind spots and all. 

huh?  how is this responsive to the post your quoted?

be specific. i set forth actual evidence of potential wrongdoing for "there's always russia."  your false equivalence is belied by that evidence.

are you referring to marco rubio or something?  as i said, there was actual tangible evidence of russian collaboration with the trump campaign to investigate it according to the department of justice.  regardless of how that was exacerbated, leveraged, or exaggerated by partisan players for political purposes (something that is certainly not in dispute), it was an accusation that was far more rooted in evidence than any of the accusations being made by cruz and graham tonight.  it led to a special counsel, impeachment, and a partisan cover by the senate. you've trotted out your throwaway line humor for yourself in the wrong context on this one as a response to my post.  you are resorting to vagueness and implication for a reason.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
conVINCEd

conVINCEd 21468

Posted
Posted
Just now, Mrs Whiggins said:

Why would anyone expect the military ballots to come in when DeJoy has been sitting on mail and ignoring the orders of a federal judge? DeJoy’s only chance to save himself is to sit on anything not already delivered.

Because, if you want to go down this path, the post office knows where the mail is coming from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TXSG8R

TXSG8R 3360

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, BradInATX said:

So with the reports of Trump and his team being furious at Fox News and all that... 

Is the safe assumption that Trump thought they entirety of FNC was going to go along with the "stolen election" ruse and refuse to call a winner or declare Trump the winner? 

That's just mind-blowing. Not surprising. But mind-blowing that that's where we are today.

I think Trump, like most of the republican rubes, mistook the opinion shows like Hannity and Tucker for actual news. The news arm of FN has to maintain some semblance of journalism standards or they risk losing lawsuits. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fudge Nuggets

Fudge Nuggets 19151

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, sidis said:

huh?  how is this responsive to the post your quoted?

be specific. i set forth actual evidence of potential wrongdoing for "there's always russia."  your false equivalence is belied by that evidence.

are you referring to marco rubio or something?  as i said, there was actual tangible evidence of russian collaboration with the trump campaign to investigate it according to the department of justice.  regardless of how that was exacerbated, leveraged, or exaggerated by partisan players for political purposes (something that is certainly not in dispute), it was an accusation that was far more rooted in evidence than any of the accusations being made by cruz and graham tonight.  it led to a special counsel, impeachment, and a partisan cover by the senate. you've trotted out your throwaway line humor for yourself in the wrong context on this one as a response to my post.  you are resorting to vagueness and implication for a reason.

Will both of you fucksticks take it to one of the other Russia / Mueller Report threads.  Seriously.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mrs Whiggins

Mrs Whiggins 13049

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, conVINCEd said:

Because, if you want to go down this path, the post office knows where the mail is coming from.

I’d like to think that the overseas military ballots were sacrosanct, but I also watched the President of the United States of America give a speech this evening where he basically threw up his dinner all over our Republic and then slunk off to his room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...