Jump to content

2020 Presidential Election -- Biden v Trump: Sleepy Joe vs Dopey Don [Results begin on page 409]


Patrick Bateman

Recommended Posts

What’s the fraud, specifically?  That people were allowed to vote by mail?  Are you suggesting there was a massive coordinated effort which would require hundreds of people to be in on, none of whom would spill the beans, to fraudulently manipulate the vote?  And your evidence is what?  Because Premier Trump says so?

The part of this fraud story is this - the Dems managed to commit super-shifty, partial fraud. See, they had to set things up so 1) they have fraudulent ballots to vote for Biden, but 2) they DIDN’T have fraudulent ballots to keep seats in the house or pick up any senate seats.

It’s masterful, really. Use fraudulent ballots to destroy yourself in every race but POTUS, but then bubble in that one race in your favor. GENIUS.
  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re Nate Silver pictogram, he follows up: "I'm not sure it's really sunk in yet, even among reporters, that we're probably going to get 2 runoffs in Georgia on Jan. 5 that will determine control of the Senate."

Last two pics are run-off.  First two are something like bee-sea (busy).  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Brisketexan said:


The part of this fraud story is this - the Dems managed to commit super-shifty, partial fraud. See, they had to set things up so 1) they have fraudulent ballots to vote for Biden, but 2) they DIDN’T have fraudulent ballots to keep seats in the house or pick up any senate seats.

It’s masterful, really. Use fraudulent ballots to destroy yourself in every race but POTUS, but then bubble in that one race in your favor. GENIUS.

 

EDB40A59-F1B3-44E9-9850-5C7667EEE9FD.gif

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, triplehorn said:

Re Nate Silver pictogram, he follows up: "I'm not sure it's really sunk in yet, even among reporters, that we're probably going to get 2 runoffs in Georgia on Jan. 5 that will determine control of the Senate."

Last two pics are run-off.  First two are something like bee-sea (busy).  

 

Hive Sea Knee off

I've seen enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, BradInATX said:

As much as it sucks to admit, Trump could very likely get a big ownership stake in OANN bringing no cash to the table, just by giving them the Trump TV brand and becoming the face of the company. Make him the brand, give him the prime time slot or whatever, bring all of his trailer park rabble over, and keep him out of the actual management of the company.

This may be pretty close to reality.  Hicks Equity Partners (owned by former Rangers/Stars owner and UT grad Tom Hicks) is exploring a majority stake; his son Tommy Hicks is RNC chair and close with DTJ.  

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/the-real-reason-fox-news-needs-trump-to-win/2020/11/03/909b6400-1de2-11eb-ad53-4c1fda49907d_story.html

 

 

 

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re Nate Silver pictogram, he follows up: "I'm not sure it's really sunk in yet, even among reporters, that we're probably going to get 2 runoffs in Georgia on Jan. 5 that will determine control of the Senate."
Last two pics are run-off.  First two are something like bee-sea (busy).  
 
Hive (I've) Sea (See) Knee. (n En) On-Off. (ough).

Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re Nate Silver pictogram, he follows up: "I'm not sure it's really sunk in yet, even among reporters, that we're probably going to get 2 runoffs in Georgia on Jan. 5 that will determine control of the Senate."
Last two pics are run-off.  First two are something like bee-sea (busy).  
 


This interpretation is incorrect. He made the “sunk in” statement hours ago.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Brisketexan said:


The part of this fraud story is this - the Dems managed to commit super-shifty, partial fraud. See, they had to set things up so 1) they have fraudulent ballots to vote for Biden, but 2) they DIDN’T have fraudulent ballots to keep seats in the house or pick up any senate seats.

It’s masterful, really. Use fraudulent ballots to destroy yourself in every race but POTUS, but then bubble in that one race in your favor. GENIUS.

They walked in to the biggest casino in Vegas with a brand new, completely undetectable strategy for counting cards and... deliberately decided to underperform the statistical odds that the polls gave them at just about every table.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, TtomTerrific said:

Pelosi held up the Covid Relief funding that actually did make it to the people who paid for it in the first place until such election fraud restrictions were eased to make it possible for any of this in the first place.

Of course you’ll be sued and of course this will be decided in court.

Maybe after dec 1 because y’all insisted that Wisconsin would need to include all ballots mailed and post marked for weeks to “count”. and thus being re-counted.



Thanks again assholes!

Get healthy buddy.  You need to get back on your meds and quit self medicating.  You are an incoherent mess.  There is no way that you are financially or emotionally supporting your kids right now.  You are a fucking mess.  I hope when you sober up/get medicated,  you are terribly embarrassed by this period of your life and you make it up to your kids. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, triplehorn said:

Re Nate Silver pictogram, he follows up: "I'm not sure it's really sunk in yet, even among reporters, that we're probably going to get 2 runoffs in Georgia on Jan. 5 that will determine control of the Senate."

Last two pics are run-off.  First two are something like bee-sea (busy).  

 

Dude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, triplehorn said:

Re Nate Silver pictogram, he follows up: "I'm not sure it's really sunk in yet, even among reporters, that we're probably going to get 2 runoffs in Georgia on Jan. 5 that will determine control of the Senate."

Last two pics are run-off.  First two are something like bee-sea (busy).  

 

You are bad at this. It’s “I’ve seen enough”

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone adjust your expectations accordingly. 

“Women just arrived at the Clark County election department. They tell me they’re praying justice will be done and that righteousness prevails.”

Yeah....Trumpkins need to be REAL careful with that shit. The last thing they want is for justice and righteousness to prevail. That would leave them proper fucked.
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude married into money and has a beautiful family. He doesn’t have to be doing any of this. I respect his work ethic. He’s trying, which is more than many can say. 
Yeah, and I did some phone banking he organized this cycle and he had me right there ready to run through a wall like it was Oct 2018 again.
Despite his gun gaffes in 2020
  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sasquatch69 said:

This may be pretty close to reality.  Hicks Equity Partners (owned by former Rangers/Stars owner and UT grad Tom Hicks) is exploring a majority stake; his son Tommy Hicks is RNC chair and close with DTJ.  

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/the-real-reason-fox-news-needs-trump-to-win/2020/11/03/909b6400-1de2-11eb-ad53-4c1fda49907d_story.html

 

 

 

Blow me, fuck face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

How is asking you to acknowledge the role that right out nonsense, engaged by partisan politicians and the media nonstop for three years, played in crafting the Russia narrative responsive to a thread of discussion jumping off from "give me a single thing that is remotely as meaningful rooted in anything evidentiary or tangible that is causing actual u.s. senators to go on t.v. and declare to their braindead audience that there is fraud and impropriety at play..."? 

That's not a serious question sidis. 

 

of course it is.  i have never denied that the russia "narrative" was exacerbated and leveraged by partisan players and acknowledged it.  however, it is not relevant at all.  and to call the foundation of it "nonsense" is simply untrue as i have repeatedly stated as there was enough evidence to necessitate a special counsel who never really reached a dispositive conclusion despite endless obstruction of justice from the subject of investigation and numerous convictions of close advisers. 

conversely, you have ignored and refused to acknowledge that this evidence existed...the meeting and emails from trump jr. alone, not to mention the convictions and unapologetic acknowledgments from guys like roger stone are substantially more than anything tangible that has been set forth by trump campaign and its surrogates in its efforts to undermine this election.  this is simply not analogous unless you either a) believe that this evidence was not real, or b) think there is some actual evidence of electoral fraud.  if you believe a, then i am not interested in that discussion because you can't acknowledge things are prima facie true.  if it is b, then i am interested in what that is.

it appears you are upset i used colorful language to describe these hypocritical pieces of shit.  this caused you to lash out with a terrible analogy on a number of levels including the fact that clinton's campaign conceded in the first morning, did not seek to cast an air of fraud over the actual electoral counting process, sue to stop counts, declare victory without basis, bully senators into trying to undermine american faith in the process that results in the transfer of power.  they simply utilized some oppo research that rubio developed in its campaign, were part of a post-mortem on data influence campaigns and then, well after the election was determined, there was enough smoke surrounding a character who plays the perfect useful idiot that the justice dept decided it necessitated an investigation.

my interest has waned at this point so i will let you finish the discussion.

either way, while joe biden is a centrist, life-long political creature that will not really move this country in any real direction that moves the needle to better the majority of people's lives, i will fucking celebrate with the most insane people in this country that "the circus" is over...because we both know what the circus actually represented.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sidis said:

of course it is.  i have never denied that the russia "narrative" was exacerbated and leveraged by partisan players and acknowledged it.  however, it is not relevant at all.  and to call the foundation of it "nonsense" is simply untrue as i have repeatedly stated as there was enough evidence to necessitate a special counsel who never really reached a dispositive conclusion despite endless obstruction of justice from the subject of investigation and numerous convictions of close advisers. 

conversely, you have ignored and refused to acknowledge that this evidence existed...the meeting and emails from trump jr. alone, not to mention the convictions and unapologetic acknowledgments from guys like roger stone are substantially more than anything tangible that has been set forth by trump campaign and its surrogates in its efforts to undermine this election.  this is simply not analogous unless you either a) believe that this evidence was not real, or b) think there is some actual evidence of electoral fraud.  if you believe a, then i am not interested in that discussion because you can't acknowledge things are prima facie true.  if it is b, then i am interested in what that is.

it appears you are upset i used colorful language to describe these hypocritical pieces of shit.  this caused you to lash out with a terrible analogy on a number of levels including the fact that clinton's campaign conceded in the first morning, did not seek to cast an air of fraud over the actual electoral counting process, sue to stop counts, declare victory without basis, bully senators into trying to undermine american faith in the process that results in the transfer of power.  they simply utilized some oppo research that rubio developed in its campaign, were part of a post-mortem on data influence campaigns and then, well after the election was determined, there was enough smoke surrounding a character who plays the perfect useful idiot that the justice dept decided it necessitated an investigation.

my interest has waned at this point so i will let you finish the discussion.

either way, while joe biden is a centrist, life-long political creature that will not really move this country in any real direction that moves the needle to better the majority of people's lives, i will fucking celebrate with the most insane people in this country that "the circus" is over...because we both know what the circus actually represented.

That's a shitload of words to say FUCK DONALD TRUMP. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sidis said:

of course it is.  i have never denied that the russia "narrative" was exacerbated and leveraged by partisan players and acknowledged it.  however, it is not relevant at all.  and to call the foundation of it "nonsense" is simply untrue as i have repeatedly stated as there was enough evidence to necessitate a special counsel who never really reached a dispositive conclusion despite endless obstruction of justice from the subject of investigation and numerous convictions of close advisers. 

conversely, you have ignored and refused to acknowledge that this evidence existed...the meeting and emails from trump jr. alone, not to mention the convictions and unapologetic acknowledgments from guys like roger stone are substantially more than anything tangible that has been set forth by trump campaign and its surrogates in its efforts to undermine this election.  this is simply not analogous unless you either a) believe that this evidence was not real, or b) think there is some actual evidence of electoral fraud.  if you believe a, then i am not interested in that discussion because you can't acknowledge things are prima facie true.  if it is b, then i am interested in what that is.

it appears you are upset i used colorful language to describe these hypocritical pieces of shit.  this caused you to lash out with a terrible analogy on a number of levels including the fact that clinton's campaign conceded in the first morning, did not seek to cast an air of fraud over the actual electoral counting process, sue to stop counts, declare victory without basis, bully senators into trying to undermine american faith in the process that results in the transfer of power.  they simply utilized some oppo research that rubio developed in its campaign, were part of a post-mortem on data influence campaigns and then, well after the election was determined, there was enough smoke surrounding a character who plays the perfect useful idiot that the justice dept decided it necessitated an investigation.

my interest has waned at this point so i will let you finish the discussion.

either way, while joe biden is a centrist, life-long political creature that will not really move this country in any real direction that moves the needle to better the majority of people's lives, i will fucking celebrate with the most insane people in this country that "the circus" is over...because we both know what the circus actually represented.

The Simpsons GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, FondrenRoad said:

If faithless electors flip the election, we are really gonna be getting Civil War 2.  

This talk about faith and faithless electors just tells me that the Two Corinthians were prophetic in their outlook about Liberty. The Philadelphia (and Pennsylvania) decision may end up with Trump getting his bell rung. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Irish guy pretending to be Mexican so he can scream “institutional racism”at Americans who want their Second Amendment preserved while their police are defunded and their cities are burned?

I’m sure he’s wildly popular here.

Gotta admire his political chops, though. Sure knows how to gin up his base.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Fuck You 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...