Jump to content

Fitlump fucking won a Austin City Council seat, Now on to Congress 2026!


atomheartbevo

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, Cheeseweasel said:

Whoever is running her Social Media isn't very sharp. (I'm assuming it's her or Romeo)

Or maybe she is coordinating this entire thing with Rex and Ramjet. She's long-game Ricky, right? She doesn't want some iddy biddy Austin seat. She wants Dolezal-style fame minus the racial or human component.

5D Lumpchess.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looked into this. Apparently, it's a free four-hour, once-a-week class on either a Tuesday or Thursday. I can't imagine why something whose schedule is like that of an out-patient rehab program would necessitate a "class president" but they do have an alumni association with zero mention Ms. Kelly.

One would think a former class president running for office and who proudly and vocally touts her police academics so strongly would have some sort of residual involvement in its alumni association - at least be on the board or something. I wonder if their membership records are open to the public.

http://austincpaaa.org/about-acpaaa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Dr. Beeper said:

What exactly is a cam girl?  Do they actually get naked on camera?  Regardless I know it’s not the most prestigious of professions; I’d just like to know exactly what she did. 

Somebody who can expose themselves online and who doesn't get a fucking restraining order against them, and who doesn't have to register as a sex offender, which is a bunch of fucking bullshit.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

Somebody who can expose themselves online and who doesn't get a fucking restraining order against them, and who doesn't have to register as a sex offender, which is a bunch of fucking bullshit.

Get  a good lawyer, it will all work out for you. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no desire for my kids to go to the same schools as I did.  Mainly because I don't have any desire to live in fucking Sugar Land, or the four other states besides Texas that I attended school as a kid, but I digress.   

The answer is the same fucking hurdles we went through back in the spring.

I'm sure she has a plan for all of this if she somehow became a member of the Austin City Council.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, atomheartbevo said:

I have no desire for my kids to go to the same schools as I did.  Mainly because I don't have any desire to live in fucking Sugar Land, or the four other states besides Texas that I attended school as a kid, but I digress.   

The answer is the same fucking hurdles we went through back in the spring.

I'm sure she has a plan for all of this if she somehow became a member of the Austin City Council.

 

Damn that lighting and side angle Really accentuate the lump. I keep expecting something to pop out of it like a baby chicken. Or the chest burster from aliens. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, atomheartbevo said:

I have no desire for my kids to go to the same schools as I did.  Mainly because I don't have any desire to live in fucking Sugar Land, or the four other states besides Texas that I attended school as a kid, but I digress.   

I'm legit surprised she can afford to live near CVMS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GhostOfTomJoad said:

Child is from her previous marriage. The ex-husband has custody & by most appearances does a great job providing for her. Lump just brings her out to use her as a prop for her pics.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the judge order the child be turned over to the father? Or did Lump abandon her?

I question the entire story. That kid could be a prop.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Cheeseweasel said:

I question the entire story. That kid could be a prop.

 a search for:

"mackenzie kelly" "patrick osborn"

returns 10 results, none of which are the "normal" types of results when doxing someone.  no marriage records.  completely unable to find a record on an -ex or the "father" of the "child".  no divorce records.  other tools at hand are coming up snake eyes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Hagbard Celine said:

 a search for:

"mackenzie kelly" "patrick osborn"

returns 10 results, none of which are the "normal" types of results when doxing someone.  no marriage records.  completely unable to find a record on an -ex or the "father" of the "child".  no divorce records.  other tools at hand are coming up snake eyes.

you forgot the ! after "kelly"

Edited by strangulation!
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Hagbard Celine said:

 a search for:

"mackenzie kelly" "patrick osborn"

returns 10 results, none of which are the "normal" types of results when doxing someone.  no marriage records.  completely unable to find a record on an -ex or the "father" of the "child".  no divorce records.  other tools at hand are coming up snake eyes.

I think this who thing is a simulation.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...