Jump to content

Donald Trump 2018


TheFlyingBoat

Recommended Posts

  On 7/25/2018 at 6:57 PM, hobbes2702 said:

Sounds like he has a plan for firing Mueller

Expand  

If he could have fired Mueller and those above him, or rather, had the balls, they would have already started firing people.  The longer the “witch hunt” goes on, the more people will be indicted, which is not good for Trump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 7/25/2018 at 2:48 PM, SubliminalHorn said:

What about Dijon mustard? That was a scandal of the highest order. 

You sound completely out of touch. Either willingly because you can’t bear to come to grips with the fact you are a rube that was duped. Or you’re just stupid. 

Expand  

GRHorns reasonable as shit position is that the republicans freak out over Obama tan suit and mustard was no big deal and the libtards are deranged for even pointing it out but Trump sucking Putin’s cock and being a Russian controlled agent while acting as the president is evidence of libtard Trump derangement syndrome.

The GRhorn guy is totally reasonable and just wants to let you know he sees both sides of the issues. 

  • Like 5
  • Haha 2
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 7/25/2018 at 10:55 PM, Bruh Man said:

It's disturbing to think that he's setting the precedent for every future president to have this much leeway before being held accountable. The office has been diminished forever. 

Expand  

Bruh, you're crazy if you think a future Dem president will get away with half of this shit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 7/25/2018 at 10:55 PM, Bruh Man said:
It's disturbing to think that he's setting the precedent for every future president to have this much leeway before being held accountable. The office has been diminished forever. 


Meh. People said the same thing about Bill Clinton. “ZOMG blow jobs aren’t sex any more!!!” /pubs clutch pearls
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread has moved so fast lately I’ve had trouble keeping up.

Did anyone ever post the correction about the alleged “intentional” edit of the Putin question?

There was a fairy lengthy discussion by journalists on Twitter this morning hut all I saw was Hugo’s post taking the bait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 7/26/2018 at 12:13 AM, DDD Dad said:

There was a fairy lengthy discussion by journalists on Twitter this morning hut all I saw was Hugo’s post taking the bait.

Expand  

Yeah, well the White House took the bait first and put it up on their website.  Have you checked to see if they’ve corrected it? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. As I understand it WaPo explained that there were issues with the mic feeds.

 

Anyway there is so much to complain about with this administration we should be careful not to jump to conclusions over every issue immediately. Doing so in this instance diminishes the impact and credibility of really objectionable shit.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 7/26/2018 at 12:18 AM, DDD Dad said:

No. As I understand it WaPo explained that there were issues with the mic feeds.

 

Anyway there is so much to complain about with this administration we should be careful not to jump to conclusions over every issue immediately. Doing so in this instance diminishes the impact and credibility of really objectionable shit.

 

Expand  

The White House put up the transcript with a missing part.  They put up video missing the same part.  Wapo does some crazy plausible deniability gymnastics themselves for the White Houses’ mistake because they got their transcripts and video from the same place the White House did “Bloomberg Government” which had the mic problem.  

 

THIS IS ABSOLUTELY ON THE WHITE HOUSE FOR NOT FIXING THEIR SHIT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 7/26/2018 at 12:18 AM, DDD Dad said:

No. As I understand it WaPo explained that there were issues with the mic feeds.

 

Anyway there is so much to complain about with this administration we should be careful not to jump to conclusions over every issue immediately. Doing so in this instance diminishes the impact and credibility of really objectionable shit.

 

Expand  

Journalists made the WH aware of the incorrect transcript.  They chose to leave it as-is.  Draw your own conclusion.  Do you believe that somebody asked the question about who Putin preferred in the election?  Did it happen?  Is the WH aware that it happened?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 7/26/2018 at 12:56 AM, FondrenRoad said:

No they wont. They dont care. Never did.  

Expand  

They will care when the democratic socialists take over and they start complaining about tan suits and mustard again. 

Okay, they might not care but they will have to deal with “but Trump” shit anyway.

Edited by Hugo Stiglitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 7/26/2018 at 1:49 AM, Gil Bang said:
Trucks and guns IIRC


“I’m like Trump! Look at my guns! Blam blam! Check out my pickup, it holds lots of illegals for haulin’ back to the border! Blam blam! Did I mention I’m like Trump?”

I don’t think either candidate said one thing in any campaign ad about actual plans for the betterment of the state.

As a local radio host put it: it was Hillary Cagle vs Shotgun Goofball. SG won.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...