Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 minutes ago, TornACL said:

Is anybody in the R party going to have the stones to primary this fucker?

Jeff Flake!

Oh wait no, he's going to wait until 2024 and swoop in to white-knight all the centrists and moderate Republicans back in the fold.

  • Like 1
Posted
to be fair, the Dems believe FOX to be fake news (which it is IMO), hyperbole and half-truths, the severe bias - so if the other side does it, then what? 


God you’re a beating
  • Like 6
Posted
39 minutes ago, HOOK'EMHOOAH said:

Do you know how I know you've never been to college station?

Don't tell me College Station is bigger than Jacksonville.    /wearegonnaneedabiggerjar

Posted
9 minutes ago, 4th&Five said:

 

No, no. It's just illegals they want to keep out of the country. They don't have a problem with legal immigrants. 


Again, Stephen Miller is first against the wall when I'm King. 

  • Like 4
Posted
9 minutes ago, mdmost said:

Again, Stephen Miller is first against the wall when I'm King. 

I'm staunchly against capital punishment, but I gotta admit, I might tune in if they broadcast it. 

Posted

The clock is ticking on getting those votes...um... immigrants in country...

Posted
39 minutes ago, Orca of Peace said:

to be fair, the Dems believe FOX to be fake news (which it is IMO), hyperbole and half-truths, the severe bias - so if the other side does it, then what? 

Substance: there is no "side" that does this. There is only one major news outlet (Buzzword alert: MSM) that has built its brand on opinion news and falsehoods. That is Fox News. Now Trump and Co will point to every little mistake a media outlet makes and point to it to say, "Look! They do it too! It's ok because both sides do it!". Not only is this disingenuous, it is right out of Russia's playbook for normalizing corruption and other bad acts. The difference being, other media outlets do not make mistakes out of strategy but out of a need of getting information out first for the profitability factors. They also make sure to do the right thing and publish corrections. Fox does it to force agendas by skewing the perspective of their viewers. Major difference in intent. 

But you knew that. 

  • Like 8
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

Do you realize how stupid you sound when you say this?

To y’all?  Of course.  That’s why I said it.

 

The real question is: Who gives a fuck about the processing of immigrants until they are actual citizens?  They can fucking wait.  Why the rush job?   

 

November is looming...

Edited by slorch
Posted

The EPA is opening the door to more Asbestos use in manufacturing and building, because, why not?

Quote

The U.S. is one of the only developed nations in the world that has placed significant restrictions on the substance without banning it completely.  New data revealed that asbestos-related deaths now total nearly 40,000 annually, with lung cancer and mesothelioma being the most common illnesses in association with the toxin.

https://archpaper.com/2018/08/epa-asbestos-manufacturing/

 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, 4th&Five said:

 

So... do the sanctions have a point? Like the whole point of the sanctions before was to bring them to the table. We did that, and we struck a deal with them. Now we back out of the deal and impose more sanctions. Does he see the point of sanctions as just having sanctions in place for their own sake?  Are we holding out until Iran can somehow deliver WORLD PEACE?

Edited by Thermos H. Christ
Posted
24 minutes ago, SmokeyTheBear said:

Substance: there is no "side" that does this. There is only one major news outlet (Buzzword alert: MSM) that has built its brand on opinion news and falsehoods. That is Fox News. Now Trump and Co will point to every little mistake a media outlet makes and point to it to say, "Look! They do it too! It's ok because both sides do it!". Not only is this disingenuous, it is right out of Russia's playbook for normalizing corruption and other bad acts. The difference being, other media outlets do not make mistakes out of strategy but out of a need of getting information out first for the profitability factors. They also make sure to do the right thing and publish corrections. Fox does it to force agendas by skewing the perspective of their viewers. Major difference in intent. 

But you knew that. 

MSNBC is far left, CNN is center left, so there is a bias there. I think we all agree on these 2 outlets. So what if the POTUS is bashing them all the time? So what if a Dem would bash FOX? I agree that FOX is blatantly and purposefully bias, the other side not so much but the bias is still there. To say the liberal media is not biased is out of touch with reality.

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Thermos H. Christ said:

So... do the sanctions have a point? Like the whole point of the sanctions before was to bring them to the table. We did that, and we struck a deal with them. Now we back out of the deal and impose more sanctions. Does he see the point of sanctions as just having sanctions in place for their own sake?  Are we holding out until Iran can somehow deliver WORLD PEACE?

The point is "be a dick".  That's as far as it goes.  Or there's money in it for him somehow.

  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

The point is "be a dick".  That's as far as it goes.  Or there's money in it for him somehow.

I agree 100% with this assessment, although I would probably reverse the two.  

Posted
7 minutes ago, Orca of Peace said:

MSNBC is far left, CNN is center left, so there is a bias there. I think we all agree on these 2 outlets. So what if the POTUS is bashing them all the time? So what if a Dem would bash FOX? I agree that FOX is blatantly and purposefully bias, the other side not so much but the bias is still there. To say the liberal media is not biased is out of touch with reality.

Everyone is biased by their own experiences in life. It is part of communication to understand that piece of information and vet it. There is a simple bias of stating your point of view and a whole other type of bias when creating a false reality. 

Posted
13 minutes ago, SmokeyTheBear said:

Everyone is biased by their own experiences in life. It is part of communication to understand that piece of information and vet it. There is a simple bias of stating your point of view and a whole other type of bias when creating a false reality. 

sure, MSNBC and CNN paint their own reality but not as blatantly as FOX.  Ever watch MSNBC? It's a collection of SJWs, kinda cute. 

  • Haha 1
  • Fuck You 2
Posted
The EPA is opening the door to more Asbestos use in manufacturing and building, because, why not?

The U.S. is one of the only developed nations in the world that has placed significant restrictions on the substance without banning it completely.  New data revealed that asbestos-related deaths now total nearly 40,000 annually, with lung cancer and mesothelioma being the most common illnesses in association with the toxin.

https://archpaper.com/2018/08/epa-asbestos-manufacturing/

 

Posted
18 minutes ago, Orca of Peace said:

sure, MSNBC and CNN paint their own reality but not as blatantly as FOX.  Ever watch MSNBC? It's a collection of SJWs, kinda cute. 

None seem to do it so well as you. Or perhaps you use other painters. Same difference, comrade.

Posted
32 minutes ago, slorch said:

The real question is: Who gives a fuck about the processing of immigrants until they are actual citizens?  They can fucking wait.  Why the rush job?   

 

As always, you completely miss the point.  And quite frankly, your question doesn't even make any sense whatsoever.  By the way, no one is proposing legislation to rush immigrants to citizenship. This proposed legislation is not in response to anything.

I mean this as a serious question. Do you take even 10 seconds to think about issues before you throw your kneejerk reactions onto this board?

Posted

Slorch? Think before he posts? Haha. What’s even funnier is that he claimed that this administration doesn’t want to limit legal immigration, only the evil illegals. Oops, that was wrong too. Poor slorchy. That red raider education really shines through on here. 

Posted
25 minutes ago, Orca of Peace said:

sure, MSNBC and CNN paint their own reality but not as blatantly as FOX.  Ever watch MSNBC? It's a collection of SJWs, kinda cute. 

One way to spot a tool is if they like to use the acronym "SJW." 

  • Like 8
  • Haha 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, TornACL said:

As always, you completely miss the point.  And quite frankly, your question doesn't even make any sense whatsoever.  By the way, no one is proposing legislation to rush immigrants to citizenship. This proposed legislation is not in response to anything.

I mean this as a serious question. Do you take even 10 seconds to think about issues before you throw your kneejerk reactions onto this board?

No. Just reflecting the typical responses by many on left. 

 

If it's an auto-neg, might as well make it worthy...

 

Y'all don't give a fuck about anything reasonable, so why do it?  

The high road matters in real life, but it damned sure diesnt matter in Surly politics. 

 

Fuck it. Y'all get what you want. Rock on, MFers.  

Posted
8 minutes ago, slorch said:

No. Just reflecting the typical responses by many on left. 

 

If it's an auto-neg, might as well make it worthy...

 

Y'all don't give a fuck about anything reasonable, so why do it?  

The high road matters in real life, but it damned sure diesnt matter in Surly politics. 

 

Fuck it. Y'all get what you want. Rock on, MFers.  

You're (intellectually) lazier than any immigrant I've ever met, that's for fucking sure.

Posted

I would love to know who these imaginary people rushed into citizenship are.  The immigrants I know who became citizens all had to be here for well over a decade before they could become citizens.  But Trump and Slorch have invented a solution in search of an imaginary problem.

Posted
7 minutes ago, lemonlime said:

I would love to know who these imaginary people rushed into citizenship are.  The immigrants I know who became citizens all had to be here for well over a decade before they could become citizens.  But Trump and Slorch have invented a solution in search of an imaginary problem.

and that shit is really expensive too

Posted
9 minutes ago, lemonlime said:

I would love to know who these imaginary people rushed into citizenship are.  The immigrants I know who became citizens all had to be here for well over a decade before they could become citizens.  But Trump and Slorch have invented a solution in search of an imaginary problem.

Slorch can't even properly understand or articulate his OWN position. Yet somehow he knows what all "the lefties" are going to say. Fucking clown show.

  • Haha 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, slorch said:

No. Just reflecting the typical responses by many on left. 

 

If it's an auto-neg, might as well make it worthy...

 

Y'all don't give a fuck about anything reasonable, so why do it?  

The high road matters in real life, but it damned sure diesnt matter in Surly politics. 

 

Fuck it. Y'all get what you want. Rock on, MFers.  

Keep an eye on those lefty libs you've been hearing about on the radio. They have agendas and want illegal immigrants here for their votes. They hate America and white people. They keep black people on the plantation. They're not fiscally responsible like the upstanding Christians of the right, you know, the adults who elected the most adultiest of adults: Donald Trump.

 

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, lemonlime said:

I would love to know who these imaginary people rushed into citizenship are.  The immigrants I know who became citizens all had to be here for well over a decade before they could become citizens.  But Trump and Slorch have invented a solution in search of an imaginary problem.

Not that he cares, or will acknowledge, but this "rush" - from filing your naturalization for citizenship application to being sworn in at an oath ceremony - up to 2 years in some cases. And this is AFTER they do their 5 (work-based) or 3 (family-based) time as green card holders.

Anyone wanting to be a citizen since Trump was elected - SO THE DEMS CAN MAKE GIVE THEM ALL THE RIGHT TO VOTE - won't even be able to vote until 2021 at the earliest.  Some of them will be lucky to be able to vote by 2022 midterms.

Edited by Js1
Posted
33 minutes ago, Orca of Peace said:

sure, MSNBC and CNN paint their own reality but not as blatantly as FOX.  Ever watch MSNBC? It's a collection of SJWs, kinda cute. 

where is the substance in this?

Posted
Keep an eye on those lefty libs you've been hearing about on the radio. They have agendas and want illegal immigrants here for their votes. They hate America and white people. They keep black people on the plantation. They're not fiscally responsible like the upstanding Christians of the right, you know, the adults who elected the most adultiest of adults: Donald Trump.


Oh, he didn’t vote for or support Trump. No sir
Posted
12 minutes ago, lemonlime said:

I would love to know who these imaginary people rushed into citizenship are.  The immigrants I know who became citizens all had to be here for well over a decade before they could become citizens.  But Trump and Slorch have invented a solution in search of an imaginary problem.

I was honored to witness a buddy in college become an American citizen.  He was born to Egyptian parents who lived in Beirut.  He was a super smart engineering student who has forged an incredible career in Colorado.

I wonder if he'll eventually be stripped of his citizenship and deported.

Posted
17 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Related image

Makng an honest living is so scary for the left.  Offensive, even.

 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...