Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
19 minutes ago, GSU&UT said:

This probably needs it's own thread, but ICE abd the Border Patrol are basically the Gestapo at this point.

 

 

 

Who cares? That underage girl probably raped someone to make an anchor baby anyways. /s

Posted
1 minute ago, Judge Roybeanbag said:

Somebody please kill this motherfucker already.

It is starting to seem like it would be justifiable homicide at this point.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

DeCHYM3W4AAYxkJ?format=jpg&name=small

How cool would it be if Lee Greenwood has performed that fucking song so many times, that something snapped in his brain and he can only speak using that song’s lyrics?

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)

 I signed up for Twitter a couple years ago and literally never tweeted one time. I just  logged on to tell him that his spy gate theory is idiotic. What a world we live in. I get to call the president to his face* a dopey moron. Very cathartic.  

Edited by SuingToGetAMessageBoard?
Posted
10 hours ago, David Dennison said:

I wonder what the actual vote count is. There are a lot of people in San Francisco, Atlanta, DC, and New York. There's a whole lot of nothing in a lot of those red counties.

Especially in the brains of the people who live in those red counties.

Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

 

Sorry, this it too fucking pizzagate-y, and I think it is counter-productive to engage in such what-if conspiracy shit.  This is Alex Jones territory, man.  Sometimes, he's right (blind squirrel, nut, etc.), but I wait for real third party proof first.  Same here.

This isn't even healthy ground for speculation, in my opinion.

I think it's good to slow the roll, but this isn't Pizzagate level.  In Pizzagate there was no accuser, no one who claimed they observed a crime, and the closest connection to a known sexual predator was a rugby player who one of Alentis's (sp?) social media friends took a picture with once. 

This is closer to Juanita Broaddrick's accusations against Bill Clinton.  Happened in the past, but there is actually someone who claims to have direct knowledge of a crime.  And it involved someone who we know couldn't get his dick in his pants. 

I don't find Broaddrick's claims to be compelling, and I haven't looked at this one in any level of detail, so I certainly wouldn't suggest pushing it.  But let's not dilute the absurdity of Pizzagate with any unproven legitimate investigation.   

Edited by Tuco
  • Like 2
Posted

Currently OT because it's not yet directly Trump-related, but damn if this story isn't his wet dream.  It checks so many boxes for demonization targets: welfare fraud, NAACP, sneaky bleks, and women in leadership.  Fox and Trump will surely giving this heavy play.  Red meat!

Quote

Former NAACP official Rachel Dolezal, a white woman who posed as African American for years, is now facing charges of welfare fraud after investigators say she illegally received thousands of dollars in public assistance.

Dolezal, who legally changed her name to Nkechi Diallo in 2016, is accused of stealing $8,847 in food and child care assistance dating back to August 2015, according to court documents obtained by KHQ-TV. She is charged as “Nkechi Diallo also known as Rachel A. Dolezal” with first-degree theft by welfare fraud, second-degree perjury and false verification for public assistance.

wapo

Posted
10 minutes ago, Degenerate Gardner said:

Currently OT because it's not yet directly Trump-related, but damn if this story isn't his wet dream.  It checks so many boxes for demonization targets: welfare fraud, NAACP, sneaky bleks, and women in leadership.  Fox and Trump will surely giving this heavy play.  Red meat!

wapo

It’s hard to imagine that woman would be dishonest.  

  • Haha 1
Posted

^

Federal Agencies Lost Track of Nearly 1,500 Migrant Children Placed With Sponsors
The Department of Health and Human Services learned of the missing children only after calling people who took responsibility for the youths when they were released ...

nytimes.com https://t.co/Qb6CGQEKnM

Posted
21 minutes ago, Degenerate Gardner said:

Currently OT because it's not yet directly Trump-related, but damn if this story isn't his wet dream.  It checks so many boxes for demonization targets: welfare fraud, NAACP, sneaky bleks, and women in leadership.  Fox and Trump will surely giving this heavy play.  Red meat!

wapo

I don't know, he might find her to be a kindred spirit.  After all, they both lie a lot, they're both grifters, they're both like to pretend they're someone they're not, and they're both orange.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, kevwun said:

McConnell said he supports Mueller's investigation after the Gang of Eight briefing.  Republicans are beginning to sharpen their knives.

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/389314-mcconnell-says-he-backs-mueller-probe-after-classified-briefing?rnd=1527209812

No they aren't.  McConnell has been consistent in that statement.  Don't look at one guy -- count the GOP heads and see which way they're going on this.  The vast majority are in Trump's corner, all the way -- THIS WITCH HUNT MUST END!

The current GOP is an organized entity conspiring against the United States.  It really has become that clear.

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, DixonHur said:

I don't know, he might find her to be a kindred spirit.  After all, they both lie a lot, they're both grifters, they're both like to pretend they're someone they're not, and they're both orange.

It would be easier for him if she was a black woman. Since she's only pretending, he doesn't know what to think. He can't get past, given a choice, why would anyone choose to be black? Then his brain shuts down. 

Posted

Not a single mention of Trump or urging Mueller to wrap up the investigation.  He and Burr pushed for the Gang of Eight briefing instead of the Republican only one the White House wanted.  I agree with you about the House, but the Senate has handled the investigation much more appropriately.

Posted
Just now, kevwun said:

Not a single mention of Trump or urging Mueller to wrap up the investigation.  He and Burr pushed for the Gang of Eight briefing instead of the Republican only one the White House wanted.  I agree with you about the House, but the Senate has handled the investigation much more appropriately.

Handling the investigation better than the House only requires that the Senate not repeatedly and actively attempt to sabotage it -- not a very high bar.

And the Senate doesn't have to sabotage anything, when they already know how they're going to vote: "There were many things revealed by the investigation and during these proceedings that are very disturbing and cause us deep concern.  We hope that the President now realizes that these actions were unacceptable, and he cannot and will not engage in them again.  But in the end, we cannot ignore the fact that he was duly elected, and we must decline to convict in this impeachment trial."

That's it.  Their statement has already been written.  It doesn't matter what the charges are, or what the evidence is.  That's the answer.  So, why would they bother to interfere?  They're the fucking JUDGE AND JURY at the trial.  And they've already decided.

Posted
Just now, Brisketexan said:

Handling the investigation better than the House only requires that the Senate not repeatedly and actively attempt to sabotage it -- not a very high bar.

And the Senate doesn't have to sabotage anything, when they already know how they're going to vote: "There were many things revealed by the investigation and during these proceedings that are very disturbing and cause us deep concern.  We hope that the President now realizes that these actions were unacceptable, and he cannot and will not engage in them again.  But in the end, we cannot ignore the fact that he was duly elected, and we must decline to convict in this impeachment trial."

That's it.  Their statement has already been written.  It doesn't matter what the charges are, or what the evidence is.  That's the answer.  So, why would they bother to interfere?  They're the fucking JUDGE AND JURY at the trial.  And they've already decided.

But Hillary, on the other hand, she should definitely be locked up. What she did was serious.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Handling the investigation better than the House only requires that the Senate not repeatedly and actively attempt to sabotage it -- not a very high bar.

And the Senate doesn't have to sabotage anything, when they already know how they're going to vote: "There were many things revealed by the investigation and during these proceedings that are very disturbing and cause us deep concern.  We hope that the President now realizes that these actions were unacceptable, and he cannot and will not engage in them again.  But in the end, we cannot ignore the fact that he was duly elected, and we must decline to convict in this impeachment trial."

That's it.  Their statement has already been written.  It doesn't matter what the charges are, or what the evidence is.  That's the answer.  So, why would they bother to interfere?  They're the fucking JUDGE AND JURY at the trial.  And they've already decided.

We just got a D Senator in AL and are contemplating a D Senator in Texas and you can’t imagine the political process of impeachment going any way but subservient to Trump. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, SuingToGetAMessageBoard? said:

We just got a D Senator in AL and are contemplating a D Senator in Texas and you can’t imagine the political process of impeachment going any way but subservient to Trump. 

It takes 67 votes to convict in an impeachment trial.

Do you see 67 seats going non-GOP?  Nope.

I'm good with my call.

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, JohnRedHorn said:

It's like we're in a twilight zone episode where after WW2 we got so smug and  ignorant feasting on pro US propaganda that we dont realize we've replaced Hitler as the biggest evil monster in the world. 

We have our problems, but that isn't even remotely true. 

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
Just now, Mojo Hand said:

We have our problems, but that isn't even remotely true. 

Did you click the link or read Hugo's tweet? Our government is separating children from their mothers then just losing track of them to be harmed or done with whatever anyone wants. That's on a strong path towards Holocaust activity because it's treating humans as non human. Our government is that evil and we are shamed into supporting it with political propaganda. 

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, JohnRedHorn said:

Did you click the link or read Hugo's tweet? Our government is separating children from their mothers then just losing track of them to be harmed or done with whatever anyone wants. That's on a strong path towards Holocaust activity because it's treating humans as non human. Our government is that evil and we are shamed into supporting it with political propaganda. 

Yes, I read it.  It's terrible.  It also doesn't make us the biggest evil monster in the world since Hitler.

Posted
6 minutes ago, JohnRedHorn said:

Did you click the link or read Hugo's tweet? Our government is separating children from their mothers then just losing track of them to be harmed or done with whatever anyone wants. That's on a strong path towards Holocaust activity because it's treating humans as non human. Our government is that evil and we are shamed into supporting it with political propaganda. 

Cash tied to human trafficking, for another.

Posted
1 minute ago, Mojo Hand said:

Yes, I read it.  It's terrible.  It also doesn't make us the biggest evil monster in the world since Hitler.

The evil we bring in the middle east on a 17 year and counting continuous war. The evil we perpetrate on Asia with the Vietnam/Korea debacles and continuous threat of nuclear war. The evil we bestow on people in our own borders. 

We're not at full Nazi genocide level yet but name a world power that has destroyed more lives within and outside it's own borders in the last 70 years. 

  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, JohnRedHorn said:

Did you click the link or read Hugo's tweet? Our government is separating children from their mothers then just losing track of them to be harmed or done with whatever anyone wants. That's on a strong path towards Holocaust activity because it's treating humans as non human. Our government is that evil and we are shamed into supporting it with political propaganda. 

CBP also murdered a child today in Rio Bravo.  All of these institutions (CBP, ICE, etc.) need to be taken apart.  

https://twitter.com/aurabogado/status/999886278580551681

Posted
22 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

I'm not too concerned with the Senate vote to remove.

I just want to see Trump put on trial in the Senate.

 Talk about MUST SEE TV.

The problem is, that event will be the nail in the coffin of the Rule of Law vs. Rule of the Fist.

When a clear case of criminal conduct by the executive is laid out -- the kind of case where any other citizen would be convicted -- and the Senate acquits NOT because "not guilty," but because of political power, that's when it's over.  That's when it is literally written into the books that "the laws don't apply to those in power."

Once that happens, we are officially another banana republic, albeit with better roads (for the time being).

The GOP is conspiring to commit homicide against the Rule of Law, nobody can stop them, and they will thus succeed.  Our system has a fatal flaw in it, it is being exploited as we watch, and the result is something we can never walk back from.

  • Like 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, JohnRedHorn said:

Did you click the link or read Hugo's tweet? Our government is separating children from their mothers then just losing track of them to be harmed or done with whatever anyone wants. That's on a strong path towards Holocaust activity because it's treating humans as non human. Our government is that evil and we are shamed into supporting it with political propaganda. 

I'm not downplaying the horror of losing track of over 1,500 children, but it seems you are distorting the truth a bit.  The article states that the children in question all showed up at the border alone.

That said, we are separating some children from parents, the justification for which I cannot fathom.

Posted

Without researching but just based on guesstimates I'd throw out the following for consideration:

USSR/Russia

Serbia/Bosnia

Rwanda

and probably a handful of others.

Posted
30 minutes ago, JohnRedHorn said:

Did you click the link or read Hugo's tweet? Our government is separating children from their mothers then just losing track of them to be harmed or done with whatever anyone wants. That's on a strong path towards Holocaust activity because it's treating humans as non human. Our government is that evil and we are shamed into supporting it with political propaganda. 

Humans?  I was told these people were animals.

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...