Jump to content

Donald Trump 2018

TheFlyingBoat

By TheFlyingBoat
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

Brisketexan

Brisketexan 106900

Posted
Posted
I want to be clear that I'm not advocating this in any way, regardless of how I feel about the jackass.
But...
Is anyone else thinking it's becoming increasingly likely that Trump is going to get shot?  
 
 

I think it’s even less likely. Because he’s just not worth it.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 44.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Hugo Stiglitz

    3593

  • retread

    1324

  • Brisketexan

    1195

  • jimmyjazz

    1186

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

M12BH
M12BH

SInce y'all seem to be my clearinghouse for all things political, let me tell a story.  A couple of them, actually.  Three, if you want to be specific. When I was 14 I went with a family frien

ConferenceRoom
ConferenceRoom
brown water
brown water

Slocum’s Razor

Mojo Hand

Mojo Hand 4580

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, bad_teammate said:

 

There’s nothing on this earth sexier, believe me gentlemen, than a woman you have to salute in the morning. Promote ‘em all, I say, ‘cause this is true. If you haven’t gotten a blow job from a superior officer, well, you’re just letting the best in life pass you by...

Edited by Mojo Hand
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DixonHur

DixonHur 11959

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Gil Bang said:

We KNOW that they're Army. It's been widely reported, And the C in C most certainly fucking knows, but he doesn't give a flying fuck because he's a draft-dodging piece of shit, and doesn't have the decency to describe them properly.

 

And I don't get the "to be fair" part.  "Servicemen" doesn't make a distinction to their branch. 

Oops, I misread your post.  I didn't pay that close attention to his Tweet and was trying to be sarcastic because I thought you were saying Trump called them soldiers.  

The dangers of reading while intoxicated.

Edited by DixonHur
Link to comment
Share on other sites
FondrenRoad

FondrenRoad 4378

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Brisketexan said:


I think it’s even less likely. Because he’s just not worth it.

Yep. He really is too fucking stupid to be an effective authoritarian.  World leaders are largely ignoring or trolling him. Our military leaders think he is a joke. Even Pruitts shit only means something if companies are stupid enough to lower their own standards knowing the hammer will come down in 2020.  But hell, even Exxon and the rest of Big Oil are on the climate change train. The real damage is to the office itself. Folks are learning that the office is easy to bypass. Its almost a guarantee that the next Pres, either Dem or GOP, will come in on day 1 with backroom deals already ready to go and in some cases with US industry already in compliance.  You can see this already with GDPR. Strongest law wins for multinationals. 

We will also probably validate the NK regime in return for nothing, but that's probably fine. Economic opening always works better even if you hate to give a shitstain dictator a dime.  Nearly all of world communism fell or reformed except the one country we embargoed. That Moscow McDs worked. 

Edited by FondrenRoad
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Michael Knight

Michael Knight 13224

Posted
Posted

What Happens When a Bad-Tempered, Distractible Doofus Runs an Empire?

 

Quote

One of the few things that Kaiser Wilhelm II, who ruled Germany from 1888 to 1918, had a talent for was causing outrage. A particular specialty was insulting other monarchs. He called the diminutive King Victor Emmanuel III of Italy “the dwarf” in front of the king’s own entourage. He called Prince (later Tsar) Ferdinand, of Bulgaria, “Fernando naso,” on account of his beaky nose, and spread rumors that he was a hermaphrodite.

Quote

The real lesson of Kaiser Wilhelm II, however, may be that Trump’s leaving office might not be the end of the problems he may bring on or exacerbate—it may be only the beginning.

https://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/what-happens-when-a-bad-tempered-distractible-doofus-runs-an-empire?mbid=social_facebook

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Horn Dog

Horn Dog 10158

Posted
Posted

But Giuliani’s comments went beyond ......

“I respect all human beings. I even have to respect, you know, criminals”. “But I’m sorry, I don’t respect a porn star the way I respect a career woman, or a woman of substance, or a woman who has great respect for herself as a woman, and as a person. And isn’t going to sell her body for sexual exploitation. “She has no reputation. If you’re going to sell your body for money, you just don’t have a reputation.”

 

So now they are going after Melania...  sad!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
brown water

brown water 3788

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, TexArcher said:

I want to be clear that I'm not advocating this in any way, regardless of how I feel about the jackass.

But...

Is anyone else thinking it's becoming increasingly likely that Trump is going to get shot?  

 

 

When was the last time he visited a school?  

Also, stoking his concern of that is probably the most likely path to gun reform. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 47205

Posted
Posted

Latest scuttlebutt surrounds his directive to the EPA to relax asbestos regulations, which is something he's been banging on for at least 2 decades.  I'll send a slightly stale donut to the first person who correctly guesses where 55% of world's asbestos materials are mined.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23367

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Latest scuttlebutt surrounds his directive to the EPA to relax asbestos regulations, which is something he's been banging on for at least 2 decades.  I'll send a slightly stale donut to the first person who correctly guesses where 55% of world's asbestos materials are mined.

Russia 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bolverk

bolverk 30325

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Latest scuttlebutt surrounds his directive to the EPA to relax asbestos regulations, which is something he's been banging on for at least 2 decades.  I'll send a slightly stale donut to the first person who correctly guesses where 55% of world's asbestos materials are mined.

Where is Russia?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 90650

Posted
Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, Skyline said:

PHRASING

Trump: You are going to have to give up your nuclear weapons, stop abusing your people, and stop supplying weapons to bad people. 

Lil Kim: I am keeping my nuclear weapons, I’m going to send weapons to ISIS for free, you have insulted me so I’m going to have 1,000 people killed in your name by drowning them, and you must give me $1 billion to cover the costs. 

Trump: You know, that’s a fair deal, I know you are fighting starvation in your country and getting rid of a 1,000 people could help.  Now people know why I’m such a great negotiator. 

Edited by atomheartbevo
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Native Horn

Native Horn 3581

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, DixonHur said:

To be fair, they probably are Army.

I just can't believe the president of the USA sends out Tweets like this without knowing how to spell the name of the country he's talking about.  If you can't spell it, fucking ask someone before sending that shit out.  Goddamn I hate this guy.

6D Ches

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tuco

Tuco 5093

Posted
Posted
Latest scuttlebutt surrounds his directive to the EPA to relax asbestos regulations, which is something he's been banging on for at least 2 decades.  I'll send a slightly stale donut to the first person who correctly guesses where 55% of world's asbestos materials are mined.

I’m guessing most of the regs that Donnie John has come against regarding asbestos has been from OSHA, not the EPA. Not that he knows the difference. (There are some regs in both, so I could be wrong.) Also, I doubt much of the issues are with regard to new asbestos products, but rather remediation of existing ones.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TahoeHorn

TahoeHorn 107

Posted
Posted (edited)
Quote

U.S. President Donald Trump showed up late to this morning's working breakfast on empowering women. Justin Trudeau had completed his opening remarks, and the co-chair of the meeting was in the middle of her remarks when Trump arrived. http://www.cbc.ca/1.4699374  #hw #cdnpoli

Is that good or bad?

You know, you can find Senate subcommittee hearings on topics like that.  Guess how many of, say, 21 Senators on the committee will be there? 

 

If they come at all they give a speech and leave.  On or two are designated to do their turn in the barrel and conduct the meeting.  You will not see 21 Senators in rapt attention.

Anyone want to take bets on attendance this coming Wednesday on "Confronting Sexual Harassment and Other Workplace Misconduct in the Federal Judiciary"?

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/confronting-sexual-harassment-and-other-workplace-misconduct-in-the-federal-judiciary

 

Edited by TahoeHorn
  • Haha 1
  • Fuck You 15
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Michael Knight

Michael Knight 13224

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, TahoeHorn said:

Is that good or bad?

You know, you can find Senate subcommittee hearings on topics like that.  Guess how many of, say, 21 Senators on the committee will be there? 

 

If they come at all they give a speech and leave.  On or two are designated to do their turn in the barrel and conduct the meeting.  You will not see 21 Senators in rapt attention.

 

Fuck off fuck face

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tuco

Tuco 5093

Posted
Posted

Jesus Tahoe, this isn’t the Senate. The exchange of information is irrelevant. The only way you can conclude it is good is if you think diplomacy is bad. Which explains why it doesn’t matter to Trump.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bolverk

bolverk 30325

Posted
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, TahoeHorn said:

Is that good or bad?

You know, you can find Senate subcommittee hearings on topics like that.  Guess how many of, say, 21 Senators on the committee will be there? 

 

If they come at all they give a speech and leave.  On or two are designated to do their turn in the barrel and conduct the meeting.  You will not see 21 Senators in rapt attention.

Anyone want to take bets on attendance this coming Wednesday on "Confronting Sexual Harassment and Other Workplace Misconduct in the Federal Judiciary"?

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/confronting-sexual-harassment-and-other-workplace-misconduct-in-the-federal-judiciary

 

Wtf are you talking about? This isn't some quotidian subcommittee meeting.

Edited by bolverk
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TahoeHorn

TahoeHorn 107

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Tuco said:

Jesus Tahoe, this isn’t the Senate. The exchange of information is irrelevant. The only way you can conclude it is good is if you think diplomacy is bad. Which explains why it doesn’t matter to Trump.

 

The meeting is not diplomacy.  Diplomacy on an issue like this is conducted four levels down, out of public view.  This is show.

  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Lagunamadre

Lagunamadre 1975

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
10 minutes ago, TahoeHorn said:

Is that good or bad?

You know, you can find Senate subcommittee hearings on topics like that.  Guess how many of, say, 21 Senators on the committee will be there? 

 

If they come at all they give a speech and leave.  On or two are designated to do their turn in the barrel and conduct the meeting.  You will not see 21 Senators in rapt attention.

 

BREAKING NEWS - "President Trump has removed his pants and defecated on the G7 conference table" 

Tahoe: "So what, I take shits all the time, everybody poops, it's part of being human, you liberals will make a big deal out of anything" 

  • Like 19
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SameSame

SameSame 1752

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, TahoeHorn said:

Is that good or bad?

You know, you can find Senate subcommittee hearings on topics like that.  Guess how many of, say, 21 Senators on the committee will be there? 

 

If they come at all they give a speech and leave.  On or two are designated to do their turn in the barrel and conduct the meeting.  You will not see 21 Senators in rapt attention.

Anyone want to take bets on attendance this coming Wednesday on "Confronting Sexual Harassment and Other Workplace Misconduct in the Federal Judiciary"?

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/confronting-sexual-harassment-and-other-workplace-misconduct-in-the-federal-judiciary

 

This is what it is when dealing with Trumpers.  Either you bend over to make a nonsensical unequal excuse for him, or you set the bar so close to the floor that if he literally doesn't fall on his face you declare a win.  And even if he did, they would have an excuse for that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 47205

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, Tuco said:


I’m guessing most of the regs that Donnie John has come against regarding asbestos has been from OSHA, not the EPA. Not that he knows the difference. (There are some regs in both, so I could be wrong.) Also, I doubt much of the issues are with regard to new asbestos products, but rather remediation of existing ones.

EPA, and yes, it is about existing asbestos.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...