Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Chad Fuck said:

Helsinki was such a success, he's ready for round two! 

 

NATO is a bunch of freeloaders, but let’s keep sending money and guns hands over fist to Israel.

Edited by Fudge Nuggets
  • Like 1
Posted

I am really curious as to how Trump thinks NATO spending works. I think he thinks that it's one big pool of money that NATO as an organization then spends and the US is just putting way more than their fair share into.

I think... I think he's dumb? 

Posted
Just now, longhornmatt said:

Oh, so you think fiscal conservatism means what it meant in the 1930s and not what it means now.  Well, your posts make more sense.  You’re just a troll.

I think progressive means the same as it did in the Woodrow Wilson era, which is when that term was invented.  So, clearly one of your movement’s priorities, bad_teammate, is social Darwinism and using eugenics to weed our minorities and the handicapped.  My God, how do you sleep?

And for God’s sake, Republican means what it originally meant, so it’s the party of Lincoln!  Why do you hate abolitionists, bad_teammate?

I mean, first of all... bravo for this rage post. Just top shelf outrage over something really minor and dumb.

But what does "it mean(s) now"?

 

HOW DO YOU SLEEP, SIR!?!?! lol

Posted
8 minutes ago, Grandioso said:

I was about to say, what's $400,000 to Browder? That's a tip for the uber driver. 

it's also still a lie. Browder never gave Hillary a dime. The great lie of $400 million was to sell the real lie that Browder supported Hillary when they "apologized" about their mistake.

Posted
Just now, jimmyjazz said:

It would be nice if you'd put a disclaimer on your posts you feel are really minor and dumb.

All of them. When I'm feeling important and smart I use my Huckleberry sock.

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, DefinitelyNotHollywoodColt said:

that's a close as b_t gets to ceding the point.

What point, that people who call themselves "fiscal conservative" can't actually define it in a coherent way, and that when I define it by its actual historical definition I get a bunch of pissy replies?

Consider me owned.

Posted
I am really curious as to how Trump thinks NATO spending works. I think he thinks that it's one big pool of money that NATO as an organization then spends and the US is just putting way more than their fair share into.
I think... I think he's dumb? 


I’m certain this is what he thinks. His team won’t correct him because it’s useful for Trumpkins to misunderstand it as well
Posted
4 minutes ago, Bevo VIII said:

You could just post less. Don’t need a thread for every fucking little thing.

We do when I have to wade through two pages of fiscal conservatism debate in the Donald Trump thread.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, atomheartbevo said:

We aren’t there yet, but my wife can get Canadian or UK citizenship thanks to her parents.  

The last 2 years have me already at that point. Have been making long term plans to live the rest of my life outside of the US.

Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

I’m starting a fiscal conservativism thread because this is getting out of hand.

Start one for personal grudges, too. This shit is killing my only pleasure in watching my country transformed into a banana republic. That pleasure being an occasional laugh in the virtual TV lounge that I come to this thread to share.

Edited by RomaVicta
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, bad_teammate said:

The movement that started in opposition to the New Deal.

- no taxes raised to ensure social safety nets

- no government debt to ensure social safety nets

- little-to-no government regulation of industry (economic or environment regulations)

I'd say that those are 3 things all flavors of "fiscal conservative" can agree on.

 

Wrong.

Posted
24 minutes ago, Bevo VIII said:

You could just post less. Don’t need a thread for every fucking little thing.

No and yes. These pages of semantics and sniping are tedious.

Posted

I’m wonder if some clockwork orange type treatment would work on Trump.  Like can Mattis and Kelly just take him down to the basement of the Pentagon and force him to watch Schindler’s List and Red Dawn 10 times in a row?

1475162151199

Posted
3 minutes ago, Pescado_Rojo said:

do we need to bring back douchebag central? 

Just read 80% of the last 8 pages; we're there. 

Or maybe you meant to post on the vision for America's future thread in which case my post semicolon statement still stands.

Posted
Just now, Hugo Stiglitz said:

I’m wonder if some clockwork orange type treatment would work on Trump.  Like can Mattis and Kelly just take him down to the basement of the Pentagon and force him to watch Schindler’s List and Red Dawn 10 times in a row?

1475162151199

They'd have to tie down his hands to keep him from jacking off and throwing semen at the screen.

  • Like 3
  • Haha 2
Posted
2 hours ago, softlynow said:

I’m beginning to consider moving to Belize. 

If you are over 50 and can prove a $2K monthly income, you can live there with no Belize taxes. Need to hurry though, the Chinese are buying up everything in sight.

Posted

There are times when self-preservation and overall decorum prevent me from saying what I'd like to say, and I'm not exactly known for having a strong filter.

This is one of those times.

Posted
1 minute ago, jimmyjazz said:

There are times when self-preservation and overall decorum prevent me from saying what I'd like to say, and I'm not exactly known for having a strong filter.

This is one of those times.

[Nixon]That would be wrong.[/Nixon]

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Pancho Negro said:

 

Odds are strong that a former KGB officer will be in the Oval Office with the President and Russian translator, and no one else.

Yeah, totally normal.  

Edited by Francisco 2.0
Posted
Just now, Francisco 2.0 said:

Odds are strong that a former KGB officer will be in the Oval Office with the President alone, with a Russian translator.

Yeah, totally normal.  

Well...

Posted
1 minute ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

I don’t think Putin wants to come to Washington D.C. 

It's not often I use the Meteor bullshit outside of the sports forums, but if there was ever a time...

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Hornius Emeritus said:

What would happen if Putin came, Mueller issued indictments, and we arrested him?

He comes with diplomatic immunity, so no dice.

Putin is a paranoid motherfucker so I seriously don’t see him setting foot on U.S. soil anytime soon.

Edited by Hugo Stiglitz
Posted
9 minutes ago, Jive Turkey said:

Supposed to happen in the fall. October surprise?  Geez, Trump must think he’s untouchable if he wants this to happen so close to midterms. 

Maybe Putin didn’t give him a choice.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Hornius Emeritus said:

What would happen if Putin came, a grand jury  issued indictments, and we arrested him?

We'd have a few hundred nukes headed our way.  

Posted
12 minutes ago, Jive Turkey said:

Supposed to happen in the fall. October surprise?  Geez, Trump must think he’s untouchable if he wants this to happen so close to midterms. 

I don't think there is any way trump views the midterms as anything related to him since he's not on the ballot. 

Posted
1 minute ago, ChiTownDoc said:

We'd have a few hundred nukes headed our way.  

No way. There would more likely be a power struggle in the Kremlin.  Very few love Putin in that government. 

Posted

Let's just file this in the *no shit* column and move on:

 

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/397955-dni-coats-theres-a-risk-that-putin-recorded-meeting-with-trump

 

Quote

Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats said Thursday that it's possible Russian President Vladimir Putin recorded his meeting Monday in Helsinki, Finland, with President Trump, adding that he didn't know the specifics of what happened during the two leaders' private meeting.

Asked by MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell whether Putin could have recorded the meeting without Trump's knowledge, Coats hesitated before responding: "That risk is always there."

"You're right, I don't know what happened in that meeting," Coats added during the interview at the Aspen Ideas Festival. "I think as time goes by — and the president has already mentioned some things that happened in that meeting — I think we will learn more. But that is the president's prerogative."

Quote

Later in Mitchell's interview with Coats, she broke the news to him that Trump is working to invite Putin to visit Washington, D.C., in the next few months.

“We have some breaking news, the White House has announced on Twitter that Vladimir Putin is coming to the White House in the fall,” Mitchell said.

“Say that again?” Coats replied, before laughing.

“Did I hear you right?” he jokingly asked. “OK, that’s gonna be special.”

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

No way. There would more likely be a power struggle in the Kremlin.  Very few love Putin in that government. 

KGB doesn't fuck around.  And Putin would make sure he has his house in order when he comes here - part of that means motherfuckers barricaded in a room with the red buttons.  And guess who will be 'watching' their families while they're in that room?  Come on, this is Putin you're dealing with...he doesn't leave shit to chance. 

Posted
1 minute ago, ChiTownDoc said:

KGB doesn't fuck around.  And Putin would make sure he has his house in order when he comes here - part of that means motherfuckers barricaded in a room with the red buttons.  And guess who will be 'watching' their families while they're in that room?  Come on, this is Putin you're dealing with...he doesn't leave shit to chance. 

He wouldn’t fuck with the nukes because of MAD.  It would be a suicidal move. I have no doubt he would have contingency plans but not the nukes.  

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Hornius Emeritus said:

What would happen if Putin came, a grand jury  issued indictments, and we arrested him?

Nuclear war. And fully justified, really.

Edited by bad_teammate
Posted
1 minute ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

He wouldn’t fuck with the nukes because of MAD.  It would be a suicidal move. I have no doubt he would have contingency plans but not the nukes.  

You vastly underestimate how a sociopath operates. 

Posted

Imagine a nation that elects Donald Trump to the presidency thinking it has the moral authority to detain, try, and convict the democratically (lol) elected leader of another nation who is visiting on a diplomatic trip.

Just who the hell do we think we are?

Posted
31 minutes ago, Red Five said:

He’s gonna give him Alaska isn’t he.

Congress wouldn't allow that.  Not because they give a shit about its reserves or strategic location, but because it has 2 GOP Senators.  Putin will get Hawaii instead.

  • Like 2
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...