Jump to content

Donald Trump 2018


TheFlyingBoat

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, hobbes2702 said:

Sounds like he has a plan for firing Mueller

If he could have fired Mueller and those above him, or rather, had the balls, they would have already started firing people.  The longer the “witch hunt” goes on, the more people will be indicted, which is not good for Trump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Francisco 2.0 said:

That ain't happening.  Moose out front should have told you.

It's disturbing to think that he's setting the precedent for every future president to have this much leeway before being held accountable. The office has been diminished forever. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, SubliminalHorn said:

What about Dijon mustard? That was a scandal of the highest order. 

You sound completely out of touch. Either willingly because you can’t bear to come to grips with the fact you are a rube that was duped. Or you’re just stupid. 

GRHorns reasonable as shit position is that the republicans freak out over Obama tan suit and mustard was no big deal and the libtards are deranged for even pointing it out but Trump sucking Putin’s cock and being a Russian controlled agent while acting as the president is evidence of libtard Trump derangement syndrome.

The GRhorn guy is totally reasonable and just wants to let you know he sees both sides of the issues. 

  • Like 5
  • Haha 2
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bruh Man said:

It's disturbing to think that he's setting the precedent for every future president to have this much leeway before being held accountable. The office has been diminished forever. 

He's cementing his place as the worst president in American history.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bruh Man said:

It's disturbing to think that he's setting the precedent for every future president to have this much leeway before being held accountable. The office has been diminished forever. 

Bruh, you're crazy if you think a future Dem president will get away with half of this shit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's disturbing to think that he's setting the precedent for every future president to have this much leeway before being held accountable. The office has been diminished forever. 


Meh. People said the same thing about Bill Clinton. “ZOMG blow jobs aren’t sex any more!!!” /pubs clutch pearls
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

 

They’ve been sitting on this for many weeks.  The ‘now’ of it prob is a preemptive move to counter something imminent and big.  Due process will draw out impeachment from the House, so this is more about just “DO SOMETHING!!!”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread has moved so fast lately I’ve had trouble keeping up.

Did anyone ever post the correction about the alleged “intentional” edit of the Putin question?

There was a fairy lengthy discussion by journalists on Twitter this morning hut all I saw was Hugo’s post taking the bait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DDD Dad said:

There was a fairy lengthy discussion by journalists on Twitter this morning hut all I saw was Hugo’s post taking the bait.

Yeah, well the White House took the bait first and put it up on their website.  Have you checked to see if they’ve corrected it? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. As I understand it WaPo explained that there were issues with the mic feeds.

 

Anyway there is so much to complain about with this administration we should be careful not to jump to conclusions over every issue immediately. Doing so in this instance diminishes the impact and credibility of really objectionable shit.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DDD Dad said:

No. As I understand it WaPo explained that there were issues with the mic feeds.

 

Anyway there is so much to complain about with this administration we should be careful not to jump to conclusions over every issue immediately. Doing so in this instance diminishes the impact and credibility of really objectionable shit.

 

The White House put up the transcript with a missing part.  They put up video missing the same part.  Wapo does some crazy plausible deniability gymnastics themselves for the White Houses’ mistake because they got their transcripts and video from the same place the White House did “Bloomberg Government” which had the mic problem.  

 

THIS IS ABSOLUTELY ON THE WHITE HOUSE FOR NOT FIXING THEIR SHIT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, DDD Dad said:

No. As I understand it WaPo explained that there were issues with the mic feeds.

 

Anyway there is so much to complain about with this administration we should be careful not to jump to conclusions over every issue immediately. Doing so in this instance diminishes the impact and credibility of really objectionable shit.

 

Journalists made the WH aware of the incorrect transcript.  They chose to leave it as-is.  Draw your own conclusion.  Do you believe that somebody asked the question about who Putin preferred in the election?  Did it happen?  Is the WH aware that it happened?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FondrenRoad said:

No they wont. They dont care. Never did.  

Fucking this. W was arguably the worst president since the civil war and Republicans won an enormous wave election two years after he left office. The GOP is Teflon.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, FondrenRoad said:

No they wont. They dont care. Never did.  

They will care when the democratic socialists take over and they start complaining about tan suits and mustard again. 

Okay, they might not care but they will have to deal with “but Trump” shit anyway.

Edited by Hugo Stiglitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

Fucking this. W was arguably the worst president since the civil war and Republicans won an enormous wave election two years after he left office. The GOP is Teflon.

Exactly.  They were complaining in 2009 that Obama hadn't fixed everything fast enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 


Kemp’s opponent was also caught on tape saying that he would go against his principles and support policies detrimental to the state to get elected. But the endorsement didn’t hurt.

You should’ve seen the campaign ads. Hi-larity.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Buzzrock said:

 


Kemp’s opponent was also caught on tape saying that he would go against his principles and support policies detrimental to the state to get elected. But the endorsement didn’t hurt.

You should’ve seen the campaign ads. Hi-larity.

 

Trucks and guns IIRC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trucks and guns IIRC


“I’m like Trump! Look at my guns! Blam blam! Check out my pickup, it holds lots of illegals for haulin’ back to the border! Blam blam! Did I mention I’m like Trump?”

I don’t think either candidate said one thing in any campaign ad about actual plans for the betterment of the state.

As a local radio host put it: it was Hillary Cagle vs Shotgun Goofball. SG won.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...