Donald Trump 2018

[Red Five 40,593]

A distant relative of mine was Indian. Feather.
Hahaha you’re full of shit Pocahontas! Go get in your teepee and smoke your pipe you fucking stupid dirty redskin!
Fine, here’s proof of exactly what I claimed.
Hahaha you’re still full of shit Pocahontas!!

Weird argument.

[jimmyjazz 45,513]

So is Donald gonna pony up the $1M or what?

Forget I asked that.

[Chrispy 132]

5 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

I'm pretty fucking sure she didn't check the "100% Native American" box you stooge.

Harvard’s employment diversity statistics were based on ethnic self-identification, so... 

[jimmyjazz 45,513]

Just now, Chrispy said:

Harvard’s employment diversity statistics were based on ethnic self-identification, so... 

WTF does that mean?

[Chrispy 132]

10 minutes ago, RPM said:

So that's a big, fat, you got nothing?

You give me the awful impression of someone that’s read nothing on this particular topic. 

[David Dennison 18,605]

1 minute ago, Chrispy said:

Harvard’s employment diversity statistics were based on ethnic self-identification, so... 

Chrispy is saying she identified as 100% NA.

That's not true. She checked a box saying she was part NA. That is true.

 

 

[sidis 9,713]

i just thought to myself...man, i am glad i am not wasting my life arguing about stupid shit like elizabeth warren's ethnicity and ancestry.  then i realized i am wasting my life reading other people doing it.

then i killed myself for completely wasting my life.

[RPM 26,185]

2 minutes ago, Chrispy said:

You give me the awful impression of someone that’s read nothing on this particular topic. 

You give me the impression of someone refusing to answer the question.

[Jack Burton 35]

Every fucking person from Oklahoma claims Native American heritage. Can you cock goblins move on?

[Chrispy 132]

2 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

WTF does that mean?

Really? Ok, I’ll explain. It means that during Warren’s tenure, Harvard claims to have a Native American woman in its senior ranks, and such statistics were based on how an individual described themself. So, your assertion appears to be incorrect. 

[David Dennison 18,605]

2 minutes ago, sidis said:

i just thought to myself...man, i am glad i am not wasting my life arguing about stupid shit like elizabeth warren's ethnicity and ancestry.  then i realized i am wasting my life reading other people doing it.

then i killed myself for completely wasting my life.

[Brisketexan 104,465]

I’m just glad that for Trumpkin trolls like Chrispy, even a single example of dishonesty is a complete disqualifier, rendering the person who acted dishonestly worthy only of mockery, and making them unsuitable for an office of public trust.

That’s the standard we’re applying, correct? I just want the record to be clear.

[Chrispy 132]

4 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

Chrispy is saying she identified as 100% NA.

That's not true. She checked a box saying she was part NA. That is true.

 

 

Well, not 100%, but sure as hell more than .5%. That’s a joke. 

[HenryJames 65,868]

2 minutes ago, Jack Burton said:

Every fucking person from Oklahoma claims Native American heritage. Can you cock goblins move on?

Let's talk about Asian chicks with green eyes.

[David Dennison 18,605]

Just now, Chrispy said:

Really? Ok, I’ll explain. It means that during Warren’s tenure, Harvard claims to have a Native American woman in its senior ranks, and such statistics were based on how an individual described themself. So, your assertion appears to be incorrect. 

So what percentage is the cutoff?

Half? Quarter? Eighth?

Do you have to "look" like the ethnicity you claim?

What say the wypipo who decide these things?

[DixonHur 11,074]

Crispy is Surly's CGM (Chief Goal Post Mover).

Says Harvard PROMOTED Warren as Native American...provides a link that clearly states that Warren TOLD Harvard she was Native American, not Harvard promoting anything.  Then changes tack to say she should have told them the exact amount of generations between her and the last full-blooded Native American in her family.  Because, you know, that often comes up in conversation.

[David Dennison 18,605]

Just now, Chrispy said:

Well, not 100%, but sure as hell more than .5%. That’s a joke. 

Did you even read the articles about this?

[jimmyjazz 45,513]

Part is part.  In the interest of no more suicides by respected posters, I'll move on.

[Jack Burton 35]

When Warren is technically correct, she's a liar. When Trump brazenly lies every day, crickets.

[DixonHur 11,074]

13 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

So is Donald gonna pony up the $1M or what?

Forget I asked that.

With Cohen cooperating with Mueller, I'm not sure Russia is really in a position to give him the money.

[Grade of D as in David 13,253]

52 minutes ago, SameSame said:

This situation would be a lot different if a video of the killing somehow surfaced.

You mean like the Ray Rice video

[HenryJames 65,868]

5 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Part is part.  In the interest of no more suicides by respected posters, I'll move on.

I think you and Chrispy should bury the hatchet.

[Chrispy 132]

11 minutes ago, RPM said:

You give me the impression of someone refusing to answer the question.

Well, in reading a bit further, she even claimed to be Cherokee because of her high cheek bones, wow. 

[Fozzz 152]

18 minutes ago, Asithappens said:

And... the US should care about Yemen why? Because it's the moral thing to do? And it's not unanimous that what's happening in Yemen is a genocide.

Rwanda? Cambodia? Darfur? The Yazidis? Rohingyas?

It's all bad, no doubt. But that's not why the US should go to the mat. 

Because the US is arming the KSA.  Was the US selling machetes to the Hutus during the Rwandan genocide?  

[Chrispy 132]

10 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

I’m just glad that for Trumpkin trolls like Chrispy, even a single example of dishonesty is a complete disqualifier, rendering the person who acted dishonestly worthy only of mockery, and making them unsuitable for an office of public trust.

That’s the standard we’re applying, correct? I just want the record to be clear.

God no, I’m hoping she makes a run for 2020. 

[Chrispy 132]

10 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

So what percentage is the cutoff?

Half? Quarter? Eighth?

Do you have to "look" like the ethnicity you claim?

What say the wypipo who decide these things?

Good question, but I think we can all agree that less than 1% is automatic disqualification. 

[retread 2,951]

 

[Jack Burton 35]

1 minute ago, Chrispy said:

Good question, but I think we can all agree that less than 1% is automatic disqualification. 

You don't care about this

[Grade of D as in David 13,253]

17 minutes ago, Chrispy said:

Well, not 100%, but sure as hell more than .5%. That’s a joke. 

Your orange god claims to be a billionaire many times over. I'm guessing his actual net worth is closer to .5% of his claim. Do you have a problem with that?

Edited October 15, 2018 by Grade of D as in David
Autocorrect

[David Dennison 18,605]

Just now, Chrispy said:

Good question, but I think we can all agree that less than 1% is automatic disqualification. 

Can we?

This is America, after all.

And besides, it's more like 3%, but who's counting?

[Brisketexan 104,465]

God no, I’m hoping she makes a run for 2020. 

Is dishonesty a negative for a potential political leader?

Please state the standard that you believe should apply. Please. I had a crappy weekend, I need the laugh.

[jimmyjazz 45,513]

2 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

I had a crappy weekend, I need the laugh.

Hey, we beat the tar out of our arch rival Baylor.

[Chrispy 132]

12 minutes ago, DixonHur said:

Crispy is Surly's CGM (Chief Goal Post Mover).

Says Harvard PROMOTED Warren as Native American...provides a link that clearly states that Warren TOLD Harvard she was Native American, not Harvard promoting anything.  Then changes tack to say she should have told them the exact amount of generations between her and the last full-blooded Native American in her family.  Because, you know, that often comes up in conversation.

Yes, I’m sure Harvard didn’t wear the “Native American woman in their senior ranks badge” with their head held high. They were conned and it’s too bad. 

[David Dennison 18,605]

2 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Hey, we beat the tar out of our arch rival Baylor.

That was a good win. We've become accustomed to losing that game.

But we won. 

[Brisketexan 104,465]

Yes, I’m sure Harvard didn’t wear the “Native American woman in their senior ranks badge” with their head held high. They were conned and it’s too bad. 

Got an answer, troll?

Let us know where you stand, gutless wonder.

[Chrispy 132]

5 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Is dishonesty a negative for a potential political leader?

Please state the standard that you believe should apply. Please. I had a crappy weekend, I need the laugh.

No, I expect dishonesty. I would just relish a year of her holding up her Ancestry chart to prove her Native American experience, pure comedy gold. 

[David Dennison 18,605]

Just now, Chrispy said:

No, I expect dishonesty. I would just relish a year of her holding up her Ancestry chart to prove her Native American experience, pure comedy gold. 

Why are you being dishonest about it?

[Chrispy 132]

10 minutes ago, Grade of D as in David said:

Your orange god claims to be a billionaire many times over. I'm guessing his actual net worth is closer to .5% of his claim. Do you have a problem with that?

He’s only a millionaire? Well that does it, I’m not voting for him in 2020.

[David Dennison 18,605]

1 minute ago, Chrispy said:

He’s only a millionaire? Well that does it, I’m not voting for him in 2020.

There are some astonishingly good odds that you might not get to.

Ahhhh, Murica.

[Brisketexan 104,465]

No, I expect dishonesty. I would just relish a year of her holding up her Ancestry chart to prove her Native American experience, pure comedy gold. 

If you expect it, do you think it’s a problem? I mean, why make fun of something that you expect, and don’t find to be a problem?

[Chrispy 132]

11 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

Can we?

This is America, after all.

And besides, it's more like 3%, but who's counting?

I didn’t actually read her chart, are they saying it’s 3%? Anything after 7 generations is usually 1% or less. 

[Chrispy 132]

1 minute ago, Brisketexan said:

If you expect it, do you think it’s a problem? I mean, why make fun of something that you expect, and don’t find to be a problem?
 

A problem? No, not particularly for myself. I do think it’s distasteful to mention your unverified ancestry and claim to be a minority under such circumstances, however.

[scottsins 1,953]

Let's talk about Asian chicks with green eyes.

 

I’m pos repping this, assuming that it’s a Big Trouble In Little China reference.

[Brisketexan 104,465]

A problem? No, not particularly for myself. I do think it’s distasteful to mention your unverified ancestry and claim to be a minority under such circumstances, however.

How distasteful is it to lie about multiple things every single day? I mean, so we can get an idea of your tastes.

[David Dennison 18,605]

5 minutes ago, Chrispy said:

A problem? No, not particularly for myself. I do think it’s distasteful to mention your unverified ancestry and claim to be a minority under such circumstances, however.

So what? People like you don't care if a candidate you support does something distasteful.

Edited October 15, 2018 by David Dennison

[wildcat09 29,187]

Just now, Brisketexan said:

How distasteful is it to lie about multiple things every single day? I mean, so we can get an idea of your tastes.

Why are you engaging with such an obvious troll?

[Mapache 1,117]

This is now hanging in the White House. what a narcissistic prick. He's much fatter and "oranger" in reality. 

 

Pesident Trump’s latest addition to White House decor is a kitschy fantasy painting that shows him relaxing with Republican presidents of the past—an update to a best-selling image commonly found in tourist gift shops and online galleries. 

The artwork, “The Republican Club” by Andy Thomas, could be seen in the background of a photo tweeted by 60 Minutes, which aired an interview with Trump on Sunday night. 

It shows a slimmed-down Trump sandwiched between Presidents Eisenhower and Nixon, directly across from Abraham Lincoln. Teddy Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower, Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan, and both Bushes are also in the imaginary scene. 

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-hangs-tacky-fantasy-painting-of-himself-with-gop-presidents-in-white-h

 

Edited October 15, 2018 by Mapache

[Chrispy 132]

1 minute ago, Brisketexan said:

How distasteful is it to lie about multiple things every single day? I mean, so we can get an idea of your tastes.

It’s distasteful, but it really comes down to our alignment of goals. Trump is a means to an end in many ways. 

[David Dennison 18,605]

1 minute ago, Mapache said:

This is now hanging in the White House. what a narcissistic prick. He's much fatter an "oranger" in reality. 

I would love to look at that with the Donald and see if he has any idea who the two men over Roosevelt's left shoulder are.

[horncyclist 1,384]

This is now hanging in the White House. what a narcissistic prick. He's much fatter an "oranger" in reality. 

Not sure if anyone in that painting would be at the table other than Trump. Teddy, GHWB, Lincoln and Ike wouldn't be within 10 miles of this monstrosity. Is this by the guy that painted Obama trampling the constitution?