Donald Trump 2018

[SameSame 1692]

1 minute ago, AtticusFinch said:

Did he touch her after she initiated contact?

STFU,  Your entire premise is dishonest.   You can't start from a position of dishonesty, then try to make everything fit into your lies.  STFU

[Brisketexan 104604]

Just now, AtticusFinch said:

Did anything shown in the video not happen regardless of the speed of the video?

Yes.  He did not contact her at that speed.

See, if I contact you with my hand at one speed, that is a touch.  If I contact you with my hand at higher speed, that is a strike.

So, it's a fucking lie.  Which is the only currency of the realm in Trumpland.  Fuck off.

[Celery Man 20886]

8 minutes ago, AtticusFinch said:

No, you would slow it down.  The accusation is the video was slowed down to make the act by Acosta seem worse than it was.

dipshit - it's not a slowed down version of the video, selective parts of it are slowed down, and then (relative to that slowing) sped up, in order to make the video appear different than it is.  Choose a less obvious lie.

[HenryJames 65890]

[BurntOrange&White 39655]

Moral of the story is he should have just reached down and got a handful of pussy.

[jimmyjazz 45557]

1 minute ago, AtticusFinch said:

Did anything shown in the video not happen regardless of the speed of the video?

I made this statement probably 20 minutes ago, and you continue to ignore it.  I fucking dare you to step up and claim that this is not "doctoring" the video.

Quote

There are are least 3 frames in that video that were held still, with subsequent frames deleted, to make it appear as if Acosta's hand moved down with more force than it did.  

 

[AtticusFinch 155]

2 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

Of course. If someone touches you, you touch them.

It's going to be hilarious when he gets his credentials back.

So if you get grabbed by police you hit them?

[Brisketexan 104604]

Just neg the lying troll and be done with it.  No more replies to lies.

[David Dennison 18656]

Just now, AtticusFinch said:

He has no constitutional right to his credentials 

Floyd Abrams thinks he and CNN have a good case.

We'll see.

[staboner 4958]

17 minutes ago, AtticusFinch said:

So I guess we need to take away slow motion replay in football games since those videos are "altered" and therefore a lie to what really happened 

texas A&M ladies and gentlemen. where amazing happens. 

[4th&Five 41459]

guys, he'll let us know when it's bad.  i feel better.

 

[Chooky 13302]

Just now, SameSame said:

STFU,  Your entire premise is dishonest.   You can't start from a position of dishonesty, then try to make everything fit into your lies.  STFU

Enough with responding to the poster who is just needing attention, for whatever reason.  It's obvious trolling.  If he can operate a keyboard there's no way he's too dumb to not see how a video from fucking INFOWARS was altered.  That level of stupidity is rare if not impossible.

[David Dennison 18656]

2 minutes ago, AtticusFinch said:

So if you get grabbed by police you hit them?

Are you retarded?

[The People’s Elbow 707]

Just now, Brisketexan said:

Just neg the lying troll and be done with it.  No more replies to lies.

This. The troll’s job is to create cognitive noise and plausible deniability around this incident, not engage in any good faith conversation. 

[staboner 4958]

1 minute ago, Brisketexan said:

Just neg the lying troll and be done with it.  No more replies to lies.

yeah agreed. my bad. just jumped in with a laugh. 

oh

iz we winning yet?

[DigDug 1649]

Did wez scort?

[AtticusFinch 155]

24 minutes ago, kevwun said:

Other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how did you enjoy the play?

Well, Lincoln did close hundreds of newspapers and jailed reporters and publishers for promoting simply peace.  I'm waiting for all of you to go tear down the Lincoln Memorial 

[ShaggyBevo RIP 3868]

40 minutes ago, AtticusFinch said:

It's not an altered video.  It is just a close up of the altercation.  Further, revoking a press pass isnt a good argument when there are a hundred other members of the press reporting on the daily activities.  There is no constitutional requirement that the WH even give briefings.  This whole thing is stupid and a publicity stunt by CNN

A long time Hollywood video editor ran it thru his software and his computer/software determined 3 frames were altered via holding part of the image still for 3 frames.

There are all kinds of risk management articles out this week about how do you counter a 'deep fake' attack.

[Bama Chick 28596]

Why are you refuting arguments no one has made?

No one said it was a “fake video with re-enactment”.

The altered video was posted by the official Twitter account of the White House Press Secretary.

The altered video originated from a guy at fucking InfoWars who has a history and pattern of behavior of pushing lies and fabrications.

The guy who altered the video busted himself by posting a screenshot of the altered frames in question from his desktop. He was using a video editing program at the time.

He altered the video by extending three frames of the contact while speeding it up and zooming in on the contact to remove and isolate the contact from the rest of the context of the encounter.

Then the altered video replayed the manipulated moment of contact over and over and over again, slightly zooming in more tightly with each zoom to end the video.

So, yes, you Sarah Huckabee Sanders fanboi, The Office of The White House Press Secretary knowingly posted an altered video from a dubious source to bolster their fascist tactics and suppression of the free press. And to cover up their lies about Acosta “putting his hands on a woman”.

And we’re not even touching on the reports that the whole shameful shitshow may have been a set up from the get go to take the midterms off the front pages.

Now, please, try and explain again how this video wasn’t altered and this is just some librul nothingburger, you pants shitting liar.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Brisketexan 104604]

Just now, Bama Chick said:

Why are you refuting arguments no one has made?

No one said it was a “fake video with re-enactment”.

The altered video was posted by the official Twitter account of the White House Press Secretary.

The altered video originated from a guy at fucking InfoWars who has a history and pattern of behavior of pushing lies and fabrications.

The guy who altered the video busted himself by posting a screenshot of the altered frames in question from his desktop. He was using a video editing program at the time.

He altered the video by extending three frames of the contact while speeding it up and zooming in on the contact to remove and isolate the contact from the rest of the context of the encounter.

Then the altered video replayed the manipulated moment of contact over and over and over again, slightly zooming in more tightly with each zoom to end the video.

So, yes, you Sarah Huckabee Sanders fanboi, The Office of The White House Press Secretary knowingly posted an altered video from a dubious source to bolster their fascist tactics and suppression of the free press. And to cover up their lies about Acosta “putting his hands on a woman”.

And we’re not even touching on the reports that the whole shameful shitshow may have been a set up from the get go to take the midterms off the front pages.

Now, please, try and explain again how this video wasn’t altered and this is just some librul nothingburger, you pants shitting liar.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Don't engage the troll.  Just neg him and be done.  He is not interested in an honest conversation, so fuck him.

[AtticusFinch 155]

6 minutes ago, The People’s Elbow said:

This. The troll’s job is to create cognitive noise and plausible deniability around this incident, not engage in any good faith conversation. 

Who said I wouldn't engage in a good faith conversation.   I was immediately called names and told to go die

[Hefeweizen 5307]

The irony of his user name is the only good thing about this retarded troll.

[BurntOrange&White 39655]

Who said I wouldn't engage in a good faith conversation.   I was immediately called names and told to go die

While you’re off doing that please eat shit as well dumb bitch

[AtticusFinch 155]

11 minutes ago, AtticusFinch said:

He has no constitutional right to his credentials 

This is a true statement 

[bad_teammate 13132]

Hover over the username. When you get the pop-up, click "Ignore User". Click all the check boxes. Click "Update Preferences".

Life improves.

[Captainant 27450]

Just now, AtticusFinch said:

Who said I wouldn't engage in a good faith conversation.   I was immediately called names and told to go die

Because you didn't engage in a good faith conversation while also declaring you were discussing in good faith. We don't like liars, we don't like trolls. Go to the shag if you want uninformed, factually incorrect discussion. Fuck off, aggy. 

[Biff Tannen 45494]

Yep, ignore function is lovely.

[AtticusFinch 155]

3 minutes ago, AtticusFinch said:

Well, Lincoln did close hundreds of newspapers and jailed reporters and publishers for promoting simply peace.  I'm waiting for all of you to go tear down the Lincoln Memorial 

This is also a true statement 

[Chooky 13302]

2 minutes ago, bad_teammate said:

Hover over the username. When you get the pop-up, click "Ignore User". Click all the check boxes. Click "Update Preferences".

Life improves.

All of that.

[yoladu 4067]

13 minutes ago, 4th&Five said:

guys, he'll let us know when it's bad.  i feel better.

 

Good Lord. No one trusts this fat fuck to tell us anything that doesn't shine light up his own ass.

[Blotto 23432]

10 minutes ago, Chooky said:

Enough with responding to the poster who is just needing attention, for whatever reason.  It's obvious trolling.  If he can operate a keyboard there's no way he's too dumb to not see how a video from fucking INFOWARS was altered.  That level of stupidity is rare if not impossible.

Not for aggy. Stupidity and a staggering capacity for delusion is the hallmark of their fan base. It's why they support Trump at probably a 90+% approval rate. He is them and they are him.

[retread 2951]

Try to imagine what fighting WWIII will be like with Cheeto as CIC. :popcorn::

[Chad Fuck 17565]

1 minute ago, retread said:

Try to imagine what fighting WWIII will be like with Cheeto as CIC. :popcorn::

There would be no fighting.  Just pure submission by Dotus.

:

[Captainant 27450]

2 minutes ago, retread said:

Try to imagine what fighting WWIII will be like with Cheeto as CIC. :popcorn::

Probably much shorter than if a competent commander was in place to be honest lol

[Hank Kingsley 20685]

14 minutes ago, Chooky said:

Enough with responding to the poster who is just needing attention, for whatever reason.  It's obvious trolling.  If he can operate a keyboard there's no way he's too dumb to not see how a video from fucking INFOWARS was altered.  That level of stupidity is rare if not impossible.

Chooky, I respectfully disagree.  Calling people trolls is giving them the benefit of the doubt. That's counterproductive IMO.  Atticus is a dumb, lying piece of shit, but don't bail him out by calling him a troll.  His disingenuousness mimics the other tens of millions of shitty Trump supporters. These people are a threat to our country in their own way, and should be treated as such. 

 

[retread 2951]

1 minute ago, Captainant said:

Probably much shorter than if a competent commander was in place to be honest lol

 

There are ICBMs inbound and we're taking a look at it. We'll have something for you by Friday...

Edited November 13, 2018 by retread

[Mo Horn 8807]

 

[AtticusFinch 155]

5 minutes ago, retread said:

Try to imagine what fighting WWIII will be like with Cheeto as CIC. :popcorn::

How can this happen.  Trump is an agent of the Kremlin according to most on this board.

[AtticusFinch 155]

3 minutes ago, Mo Horn said:

 

This is genius.  5 million units sold for Christmas 

[Judge Roybeanbag 11810]

31 minutes ago, AtticusFinch said:

This is also a true statement 

Lincoln was trying to win a civil war, not start one.  Don't try again.

[Eskimohorn 5615]

Macron can ride standing up to an Ugly American for a long, long time. See Hugh Grant’s “Love Actually” press conference.

[Fudge Nuggets 19151]

26 minutes ago, Mo Horn said:

 

Looks too complicated for the average Trumpkin.

[SubliminalHorn 6674]

1 hour ago, AtticusFinch said:

No need for the bad language.  Which part is a lie?  Is there another person or act that is deleted from the video that helps the position of CNN?  Something added? What is the alteration?

How bout this language: fuck off

[Eskimohorn 5615]

Who said I wouldn't engage in a good faith conversation.   I was immediately called names and told to go die

But Acosta is left-handed. He could not have struck the intern because the creases in her blouse were on HER left side.

[Captainant 27450]

4 minutes ago, Judge Roybeanbag said:

Lincoln was trying to win a civil war, not start one.  Don't try again.

Never ceases to make me laugh how the party of Lincoln embraces confederacy I MEAN southern heritage and defends it while praising Lincoln's leadership lol. Such cognitive dissonance

[jimmyjazz 45557]

5 minutes ago, Captainant said:

Never ceases to make me laugh how the party of Lincoln embraces confederacy I MEAN southern heritage and defends it while praising Lincoln's leadership lol. Such cognitive dissonance

Hey, did you know Lincoln was a Republican?

[hayden_horn 11360]

37 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

Chooky, I respectfully disagree.  Calling people trolls is giving them the benefit of the doubt. That's counterproductive IMO.  Atticus is a dumb, lying piece of shit, but don't bail him out by calling him a troll.  His disingenuousness mimics the other tens of millions of shitty Trump supporters. These people are a threat to our country in their own way, and should be treated as such. 

 

this is where i vacillate as a mod. on the one hand, it looks clear to me that atticus is not posting in good faith. 

on the other hand, there is a significant part of the electorate that acts and thinks like this poster, so banning him would be counter-productive. yall are well on your way to crowd sourcing him, though, and his history has been less than stellar overall, so i'm fine letting that be the outcome.

but it's definitely something for me to think about. 

[staboner 4958]

is the ignore function new? 

that helps

Edited November 13, 2018 by staboner

[Celery Man 20886]

no, it's just fairly hidden unless you follow the steps bt posted

[High Plains Drifter 10976]

5 minutes ago, hayden_horn said:

this is where i vacillate as a mod. on the one hand, it looks clear to me that atticus is not posting in good faith. 

on the other hand, there is a significant part of the electorate that acts and thinks like this poster, so banning him would be counter-productive. yall are well on your way to crowd sourcing him, though, and his history has been less than stellar overall, so i'm fine letting that be the outcome.

but it's definitely something for me to think about. 

So, just to be clear, posting obvious lies, then defending those lies, repeatedly, after being called out, is not subject to banning. Got it.

 

edit to add: Don't ignore him, fellow surls. Neg him repeatedly to bring the crowd source ban.

Edited November 13, 2018 by High Plains Drifter