Goodbye Quarks: The Onium Theory, My New Book

[RayDog 682]

After 32 months of research and writing I finished my new book Goodbye Quarks: The Onium Theory. In the onium theory I extend the relativistic positronium solution of Feynman and Sternglass to all particles and resonances such that all of them can be shown to be made of only electrons, protons, and their antiparticles. This theory accounts for the decay products, unlike the quark model. And it explains the masses, above and beyond the masses of the component electrons, protons, and neutrons as relativistic mass.

I also use basic quantum field theory to examine the structure and properties of electrons and protons to show that they have the same basic structure and should be thought of as two different charge-matter variations of the same basic type of particle. So my claim is that there is only one particle.

I started this as a test to see if such a model could be done and the results were even better than I imagined. The precise match of most of the masses makes me confident that the basic theory is correct even though it still needs work in some areas. The Bohr-Sommerfeld solutions on which it is based are acknowledged to be overly simplified, while still frequently within 0.5% of the correct mass.

For example rho and omega mesons are made of 4 pion group resonances which is why their masses are approximately equal to the combined masses of two pions and a kaon. Compare that to the irrational formulas used by the quark model for the neutral rho and omega.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0897JYYLG/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=ray+fleming+goodbye+quarks&qid=1590625411&sr=8-1

 

View full article

[heso 2785]

I was good for the first sentence of that post. After that I was lost. 

[Austinvines 316]

That’s cool, Ray. You are obviously quite the theorist. Is there any way an experimentalist can prove your theories?

[El Diablo 4232]

I come up with some of my best ideas while banging the LBFMs. 

[Handcruser 2805]

Dude you just wasted a bunch of time. It’s all about ball bearings these days. And hydraulics.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[futureman 22440]

and just as I was growing fond of quarks.  sad. 

[Willfully Horn 8000]

Interesting. But I don’t have the chops to speak to your theory. Just saying shuffling this post into your stories from the field Is interesting.

 

I plan to run it by folks who can explain it to me.

[Sbbruin 21829]

I was just having this same conversation with my dog the other day.  Weird.

[Bookman 4638]

I think I watched one of your YouTube videos a while back.

[Willfully Horn 8000]

I’m curious how the book was received.

[DoobieWah 1435]

I know this book!

Your conclusions were all wrong. Halsey acted stupidly.

[Armybrat 40820]

Here it is in layman terms...

 

[Doc Holliday 199]

I'm curious how observation is measured and controlled as a factor within this theory.  It makes sense to some degree to me, however, in dealing with the quantum realm, I also have to scrutinize the environment and observation controls.  

Same time, what behaviors are seen to illustrate that their individual breakdowns of matter reflect the frequencies if they are one and the same? 

The breakdown of atoms and this science is never ending, imo.  Meaning, there are infinite findings to breakdown matter into smaller forms, just as there are infinite findings to exploration of space and the physics there.  The system is designed as such.  

Too bad op disappeared, yes? 

[thunderlounge 7813]

What if “c a t” really spelled dog. 
 

 

That’s all I got for now. Need a different elevation to get all deep into the good stuff.

 

You’re right though. Too bad ol @RayDog hasn’t been on it a bit. I wanted to see what he thought about Gates and Bezos backing the fusion tech deal, and if it had any legs. Seemed intriguing, but most articles can be that way if the author wants. 
 

This is what I had came across on the fusion thing:

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2021/02/12/commonwealth-fusion-backed-by-gates-bezos-for-unlimited-clean-energy.html

 

Commonwealth Fusion Systems, looks to make fusion possible, power cities, super duper safe, blah blah. 

Edited February 28, 2021 by thunderlounge

[NotActuallyALonghorn 4974]

11 hours ago, Doc Holliday said:

I'm curious how observation is measured and controlled as a factor within this theory.  It makes sense to some degree to me, however, in dealing with the quantum realm, I also have to scrutinize the environment and observation controls.  

Same time, what behaviors are seen to illustrate that their individual breakdowns of matter reflect the frequencies if they are one and the same? 

The breakdown of atoms and this science is never ending, imo.  Meaning, there are infinite findings to breakdown matter into smaller forms, just as there are infinite findings to exploration of space and the physics there.  The system is designed as such.  

Too bad op disappeared, yes? 

Your talking at someone who doesn't understand how a top doesn't fall over. Best of luck.

[Bookman 4638]

Fucking magnets, how do they work?

[Homercles 10205]

 

[High Plains Drifter 11024]

On 7/10/2020 at 12:56 AM, Sbbruin said:

I was just having this same conversation with my dog the other day.  Weird.