Jump to content

Attorney General Nominee and underage poon aficionado Matt Gaetz

Gil Bang

By Gil Bang
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

DigglerontheHoof
DigglerontheHoof
NorthLoop
NorthLoop
Beau Vine
Beau Vine

Posted Images

YGIFS

YGIFS 19449

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand said:

Well, there was a Round 2 for Epstein as well. 

KennyBania, “the noose is round, the knot is round.  Shouldn’t we call him Epstine?”  GoldJerryGold

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
South Austin

South Austin 52144

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Fudge Nuggets said:

Meh.  Looks like we're rolling out the greatest hits with 3putt's earlier post about a chance for TX to turn blue and now Gaetz is in trouble again.

There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on . . . shame on you. Fool me . . . you can't get fooled again.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BamaATL

BamaATL 16592

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, South Austin said:

There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on . . . shame on you. Fool me . . . you can't get fooled again.

How that man never won a spoken word Emmy is beyond me.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hayden_horn

hayden_horn 11360

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, South Austin said:

There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on . . . shame on you. Fool me . . . you can't get fooled again.

man the halcyon prosaic days of a folksy war criminal

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
C-Man

C-Man 27054

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, Gil Bang said:

no link, but I read today that McCarthy is coming for Gaetz, Mace, and a few others.  He's got a ton of dough to throw around.

I read that yesterday too and am thinking the same thing. I fully support McCarthy in this endeavor and wish him luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
dieucla98

dieucla98 2937

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Neonmoon said:

They ain’t doing shit. She could have text messages where he admits it and they’re not expelling him

I think there are plenty of McCarthy loyalists who are still pissed at how things went down that are chomping at the bit to knock a few foreheads off this guy. If they did it to a cross dresser, they can do it to a backstabbing 6 head.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Js1

Js1 85110

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, dieucla98 said:

I think there are plenty of McCarthy loyalists who are still pissed at how things went down that are chomping at the bit to knock a few foreheads off this guy. If they did it to a cross dresser, they can do it to a backstabbing 6 head.

Yeah, they will time it up to expel right before October recess since everyone will be out campaigning.  There won't be much new business after the summer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89447

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Neonmoon said:

They ain’t doing shit. She could have text messages where he admits it and they’re not expelling him

14 minutes ago, dieucla98 said:

I think there are plenty of McCarthy loyalists who are still pissed at how things went down that are chomping at the bit to knock a few foreheads off this guy. If they did it to a cross dresser, they can do it to a backstabbing 6 head.

They got their impeachment, he’s in a safe district, and yeah, plenty of R’s want to make an example of somebody in the House, because under McCarthy, things were happening, lobbyists were satisfied, etc.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Dog

The Dog 43805

Posted
Posted
Just now, atomheartbevo said:

They got their impeachment, he’s in a safe district, and yeah, plenty of R’s want to make an example of somebody in the House, because under McCarthy, things were happening, lobbyists were satisfied, etc.

This.

They expelled Santos knowing they'd lose the seat. They'll have no problem expelling a dude from an R +19 district.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
deech

deech 2251

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, dieucla98 said:

I think there are plenty of McCarthy loyalists who are still pissed at how things went down that are chomping at the bit to knock a few foreheads off this guy. If they did it to a cross dresser, they can do it to a backstabbing 6 head.

So now all of a sudden they are going to grow a backbone?  OK.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Dog

The Dog 43805

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

If they expel him, can they prevent him from running again? And most likely winning.

He can run again and it has happened when someone expelled won their seat back - Adam Clayton Powell. His case went before the Supreme Court who ruled that Congress had to seat him and couldn't override the will of the voters (Powell v McCormack)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89447

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, locodos said:

They'll do what Trump tells them to do.  He is the heart and soul of the gop.

If Lara Trump gets her fingers on the GQP finances, the rest of the GQP won’t get any of that money regardless of their fealty to him.  At that point he becomes a liability to them over certain issues and the fact that he is taking money that would normally help them.  Some will turn on him fairly fast if he drags them down.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Horn Under a Bad Sign

Horn Under a Bad Sign 20344

Posted
Posted
On 2/16/2024 at 10:49 AM, Gengs1 said:

Hey will expel him with the slim margins they have now in the house?

 

Donald Duck Lol GIF


Presumably, all the Dems will vote for it and a some Republicans who see how dangerous the MAGA 8 are will cross over and have moral cover because the Bible says that "paying young girls for sex and drugs just ain't right." 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Paul Wesley

Paul Wesley 3277

Posted
Posted

So I’m genuinely curious how a story like this is reported by Daily Beast on a Friday, and then it just disappears.   If the bigger media outlets reported it, I didn’t see it.  (Of course, I understand that Fox isn’t going to tell their viewers)
 

Why does that happen?

I just missed the stories from other outlets?

The whole thing was bullshit?

Daily Beast has a leaker that they trust, but no other organizations can confirm it?

Seems like someone would run a “daily beast is reporting that…” story.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...