Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
28 minutes ago, Grade of D as in David said:

That may have actually hurt him in Florida.

This. That part of Florida is completely fucked up. Think about the end of True Detective Season 1. That is what they are like. And a bunch of Destin condos owned by out of staters.  

Posted

I guess I get it. As far as his constituents know it's just a smear campaign trying to discredit him. Until allegations become indictments they'll just shrug their shoulders and say to themselves, "well, at least he owns the libs."

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

 Rep. Matt Gaetz told a former White House aide that he was seeking a preemptive pardon from President Donald Trump regarding an investigation in which he is a target, according to testimony provided to the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Johnny McEntee, according to people familiar with his testimony, told investigators that Gaetz (R-Fla.) told him during a brief meeting “that they are launching an investigation into him or that there’s an investigation into him,” without specifying who was investigating Gaetz.

McEntee added that Gaetz told him “he didn’t do anything wrong but they are trying to make his life hell, and you know, if the president could give him a pardon, that would be great.” Gaetz told McEntee that he had asked White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows for a pardon.

Asked by investigators if Gaetz’s ask for a pardon was in the context of the Justice Department’s investigation into whether Gaetz violated federal sex trafficking laws, McEntee replied, “I think that was the context, yes,” according to people familiar with the testimony who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters.

The testimony is the first indication that Gaetz was specifically seeking a pardon for his own exposure related to the Justice Department inquiry into whether he violated sex trafficking laws. His public posture in the final months of the Trump presidency was much less specific, repeatedly calling for broad preemptive pardons to fend off possible Democratic investigations.

Read more by tapping the link in our profile.

Edited by Bullneck
Looks like Atom beat me to it, but I'll leave it up.
Posted
21 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Not only walking free but he spoke at a youth group conference in the Woodlands this weekend.

 

The Woodlands, going to Woodlands !

Posted

I think Gaetz probably paid off the witnesses.  This says that they were just not credible enough for a jury.

Quote

Investigators set out to determine if the congressman paid for sex in violation of federal sex-trafficking laws and have examined his dealings with the then-17-year-old, people familiar with the matter have said. Earlier this year, a federal grand jury in Orlando heard testimony from associates of Gaetz, including an ex-girlfriend.

The ex-girlfriend was among several women on a trip Gaetz allegedly took to the Bahamas in 2018 that has been of particular interest to investigators. The 17-year-old at issue in the investigation was also on that trip, though by that time she was already 18 or older, people familiar with the matter have said. She has been a central witness in the investigation, but people familiar with the case said she is one of two people whose testimony has issues that veteran prosecutors feel would not pass muster with a jury.

The other is a former friend of Gaetz’s, Joel Greenberg, a former tax collector for Seminole County, Fla. He pleaded guilty last year to sex trafficking of a minor and a host of other crimes as part of a cooperation deal with authorities.

 

  • Rage+1 1
Posted

Can’t be charged with sex trafficking because a victim of your sex trafficking isn’t “credible”.

IOW, women who have been victimized sexually can’t be seen as credible if they aren’t virgins.

I HATE IT HERE

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 2
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, A-Tex Devil said:

Well then go the civil route and put this shit on blast.  

Take that 5th Amendment right against self incrimination away as well. He can decline to answer, but his non-responsiveness can be presented to and considered by the jury.

Edited by Saint Tacky
Posted
3 hours ago, Bama Chick said:

Can’t be charged with sex trafficking because a victim of your sex trafficking isn’t “credible”.

IOW, women who have been victimized sexually can’t be seen as credible if they aren’t virgins.

I HATE IT HERE

Earth?

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I mean, that seems good right?  Like actually maybe something might happen to this fuckhead?  Not in the dotard sense, because nothing will ever happen to that goblin, but maybe this peon might get some real punishment?  Maybe?

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...


×
×
  • Create New...