Jump to content

Matt Gaetz: ethics report to be released (soon?)


Gil Bang

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Lobo

"Yes, of course.  Imminent.  Like the domain.  I should know, I sold Manhattan real estate for 35 years."  /Donald Trump

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is just wrong. He reports back to Trump and they are using the same attorneys. I hate that the agreement that @Brisketexan has talked about before--the 'rules' that were understood to keep democratic principles, and civilization, and ethics are just ignored. That doing the right thing is simply the role of a sucker and that a man with ethics is a dead man walking. How I hate the Matt Gaetz's of the world.

 

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look, this is gonna sound insensitive...but we're all thinking it...

If this girl he drove to porn ends up doing a scene with Stormy Daniels, lie if you want to.....we're all gonna pay $39.95 to see it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

So something might possibly happen next month.  Shit's getting  kicked down the road more than dotard's infrastructure and health plans. 

I don't think that's the case here.  There's too many people around Gaetz who are cooperating.

If the feds lay charges on a sitting Congressman, they aren't going to fuck around and do it as quickly as possible - they are going to make sure it's airtight and that Gaetz's lawyers (some high-profile lawyers he recently hired) can't immediately shoot it down.

Keep in mind that this investigation started under Trump, and that Biden is not going to be looking out for Matt.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ChuckNorrisActionJeans said:

Gaetz all in on the "dopes and babies" Trump train.  Disgraceful.

The conservasphere is now just a pendulum of branding and then rebranding.  "We believe in nussing, Mr. Lebowski."  The pivot to nationalism and isolationism now affords them the ability to denigrate military commanders -- because military officers never swung wildly from one extreme to another, like they have.  Disagreeing with the "new them" means military officers have done nothing, ever, to deserve their respect. 

Eisenhower constantly warned of private contractors, the MIC and perpetually profiteering from unending conflict.  When these quotes surfaced in 2004 it was "liberal, soft on terror, pussy talk."  Now they cite these exact quotes verbatim as if they were their own thoughts all along.  They now even pretend that the intelligence communities, comprised overwhelmingly by former cops and military personnel, are all part of a "liberal cabal."  Federal prosecutors and conservative judges are now part of a clandestine deep state.  Whoever they deem infallible at one point and get placed on pedestals will be pelted with shit ten years later and be called traitors.  Because nobody can keep up with their wild-eyed, inconsistent bullshit.

"I support the troops!" -- only if they share my ideology in totality

"I back the blue!" -- except when "our side" kills them

 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Chuckie Finster said:

Something something respect the troops

We are not far away from Republicans questioning why we fought the Nazis in WWII or the Confederates in the Civil War, and asking if maybe the US was on the wrong side.  

Edited by atomheartbevo
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

We are not far away from Republicans questioning why we fought the Nazis in WWII or the Confederates in the Civil War, and asking if maybe the US was on the wrong side.  

The Nazi German State, or Greater German Reich lasted for 12 years.  Obviously it was an evil regime, but it had 12 years of staying power.  The cowardly and incompetent Confederacy lasted a mere 4 years. 

It was never about 'hatred', it was never about 'heritage', the Confederacy has 'history' because it was born from such gross idiocy and ineffectiveness that we study it as  stunned students of time.  But for some reason, our awe of this hiccup of humanity was taken as a reason to re-celebrate 'Empowered Stupidity' by some.  We study the Nazis because they conquered huge chunks of 3 continents in 12 years (6 years of buildup, 6 years of warfighting).  The Confederacy lost their war, their ideology, their grip on slavery, and their secession effort in matter of a couple years.  And why did that happen?  It wasn't the fighting spirit of the Union Army.  It wasn't because they weren't well-supplied (they were).  It wasn't politics or propaganda. 

The South lost for the same reason we have rebuilt most of Europe twice, Japan, the South Pacific, the Middle East, and huge swaths of Africa---infrastructure, robust economies, effective governments, militaries, judiciaries, educational systems, medical care, etc.  But in 150 years---from Louisiana to South Carolina and the states in between---the American South continues to languish in poverty, illiteracy, and corruption.  Why?  Because they celebrate and empower stupidity.  It's a virtue, not a liability.  So they can have Gaetz, and Trump, and DeSantis...and they can choke on the misery they have invited upon themselves.   Egg 'em on, let 'em rise up again so we can make a fucking mass grave the size of the Florida panhandle.  Fuck 'em all. 

 

Edited by Lobo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Lobo said:

The Nazi German State, or Greater German Reich lasted for 12 years.  Obviously it was an evil regime, but it had 12 years of staying power.  The cowardly and incompetent Confederacy lasted a mere 4 years. 

It was never about 'hatred', it was never about 'heritage', the Confederacy has 'history' because it was born from such gross idiocy and ineffectiveness that we study it as  stunned students of time.  But for some reason, our awe of this hiccup of humanity was taken as a reason to re-celebrate 'Empowered Stupidity' by some.  We study the Nazis because they conquered huge chunks of 3 continents in 12 years (6 years of buildup, 6 years of warfighting).  The Confederacy lost their war, their ideology, their grip on slavery, and their secession effort in matter of a couple years.  And why did that happen?  It wasn't the fighting spirit of the Union Army.  It wasn't because they weren't well-supplied (they were).  It wasn't politics or propaganda. 

The South lost for the same reason we have rebuilt most of Europe twice, Japan, the South Pacific, the Middle East, and huge swaths of Africa---infrastructure, robust economies, effective governments, militaries, judiciaries, educational systems, medical care, etc.  But in 150 years---from Louisiana to South Carolina and the states in between---the American South continues to languish in poverty, illiteracy, and corruption.  Why?  Because they celebrate and empower stupidity.  It's a virtue, not a liability.  So they can have Gaetz, and Trump, and DeSantis...and they can choke on the misery they have invited upon themselves.   Egg 'em on, let 'em rise up again so we can make a fucking mass grave the size of the Florida panhandle.  Fuck 'em all. 

 

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, atomheartbevo said:

We are not far away from Republicans questioning why we fought the Nazis in WWII or the Confederates in the Civil War, and asking if maybe the US was on the wrong side.  

National Socialist German Workers' Party  <<< had to beat those socialist !!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/23/2021 at 2:36 PM, Chuckie Finster said:

Something something respect the troops
 

Mark Milley is a BAMF.  To say Gaetz is out of his depth is a gross understatement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...