Jump to content

Several shot during 3rd night of Kenosha riots

clapclapclap

By clapclapclap
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Poe It Up
Poe It Up

The “I used to vote Republican” line is the CR’s version of “I have a black friend.”   

hayden_horn
hayden_horn

so, yeah, this is the problem writ large. unarmed black dude, may be a threat, shot several times in the back. armed white dude, with an assault rifle present and visible, who just shot some people, w

CORN
CORN

Kenosha's very own Sweet Corn Fest, held every August Jerry Smith Produce and Pumpkin Farm (7150 18th St.), would like you to know that they are here to support you during this difficult time. Wh

Posted Images

Harrison Bergeron

Harrison Bergeron 1798

Posted
Posted (edited)

I get the sense that Rittenhouse is a naive, well intentioned kid ... kid being the operative word. I agree with the above that he wants to speak for himself and set the record straight. Too bad he is not old enough to realize that is not really possible in our system. The CNN headline will be: "White Supremacist who Stormed the Capitol Tells Jury He Wanted to Fight for Trump When He Killed Three Peaceful Protesters Who were Standing Up for Racial Equality."

Edited by Harrison Bergeron
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captainant

Captainant 27667

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Moby Ric said:

He was put in put himself in a position that nobody wants to be in

ftfy.

Rittenhouse CHOSE TO BE THERE. He's in an interview mere minutes before he was attacked saying with a big smile and rifle in hand that he's there to run towards danger.

He should not have been there. He should not have been encouraged by the police to be there. He gets to live with blood on his hands because of everyone's bad decisions that day.

I was wrong with respect to his self defense claim, by the letter of the law he was justified in defending himself. The prosecution should not have proceeded to trial with this case if they hadn't even interviewed their own witnesses prior to the trial. It was a huge waste of taxpayer money and it's clear that the prosecution team didn't know their ass from their elbow. They didn't even bother to bring evidence to support some of their charges lol.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Fuck You 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JBJ

JBJ 3654

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Incredulity said:

This fucking prosecutor.  my lord.

It was certainly on purpose.  A mistrial looks better on him right now.  He did it again after the judge warned him.

Edited by JBJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JBJ

JBJ 3654

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Moby Ric said:

My God this DA is flat out awful.  

He's arguing with Wisconsin's possession laws.  Judge had to remind jury that the DA doesn't decide what the law says.

Edited by JBJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harrison Bergeron

Harrison Bergeron 1798

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, Captainant said:

ftfy.

Rittenhouse CHOSE TO BE THERE. He's in an interview mere minutes before he was attacked saying with a big smile and rifle in hand that he's there to run towards danger.

He should not have been there. He should not have been encouraged by the police to be there. He gets to live with blood on his hands because of everyone's bad decisions that day.

I was wrong with respect to his self defense claim, by the letter of the law he was justified in defending himself. The prosecution should not have proceeded to trial with this case if they hadn't even interviewed their own witnesses prior to the trial. It was a huge waste of taxpayer money and it's clear that the prosecution team didn't know their ass from their elbow. They didn't even bother to bring evidence to support some of their charges lol.

He chose to be there. His presence did not violate any laws. He did not choose to be attacked. I have not seen any evidence that points to his provoking attack.

If that is going to be your standard, fair. Now apply it equally not only to this case but to all cases as well as other issues where people put themselves in bad situations. I would be willing to bet you would not apply this standard across the board, i.e. if someone puts themself in a bad situation "they get what they deserve."

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hate

Hate 20108

Posted
Posted
ftfy.
Rittenhouse CHOSE TO BE THERE. He's in an interview mere minutes before he was attacked saying with a big smile and rifle in hand that he's there to run towards danger.
He should not have been there. He should not have been encouraged by the police to be there. He gets to live with blood on his hands because of everyone's bad decisions that day.
I was wrong with respect to his self defense claim, by the letter of the law he was justified in defending himself. The prosecution should not have proceeded to trial with this case if they hadn't even interviewed their own witnesses prior to the trial. It was a huge waste of taxpayer money and it's clear that the prosecution team didn't know their ass from their elbow. They didn't even bother to bring evidence to support some of their charges lol.

As a sometimes critic of your opinions on this thread, I very much appreciate your honesty in this post. No, he should not have been there and I imagine he’ll spend the rest of his life wishing he hadn’t been there.
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BabaYaga

BabaYaga 15297

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Harrison Bergeron said:

He chose to be there. His presence did not violate any laws. He did not choose to be attacked. I have not seen any evidence that points to his provoking attack.

If that is going to be your standard, fair. Now apply it equally not only to this case but to all cases as well as other issues where people put themselves in bad situations. I would be willing to bet you would not apply this standard across the board, i.e. if someone puts themself in a bad situation "they get what they deserve."

Did you see what she was wearing?  Basically asking for it........

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
52-80

52-80 19157

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

He's a really good actor if that breakdown wasn't genuine.

well, we were told by The Others that he is a genius mastermind for faking the medical kit and the graffiti cleaning weeks before, just as a cover for shooting people at the riot...

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...