Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, 52-80 said:

well, we were told by The Others that he is a genius mastermind for faking the medical kit and the graffiti cleaning weeks before, just as a cover for shooting people at the riot...

Or that he's a crazy, mouth-breathing racist, MAGA deplorable ... depends on the hour.

Posted
1 minute ago, Cheeseweasel said:

Asking questions related to issues that he was told in pretrial not to ask.

Whats the problem?

Posted
1 minute ago, BlueGreySky said:

I'm not a lawyer - somehow still ended up on here and TOS.  Guess I'm just an average asshole.

What was the DA doing to provoke a mistrial?

Commenting on the exercise of the defendant's consitutional rights.

Ignoring/challenging prior rulings of the court.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Cheeseweasel said:

Judge Judy out.

Judge Schroeder in.

 

Get this man a TV show!

I dunno, could you imagine JJudy presiding over the trial? Would be incredible TV

  • Haha 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Doc Reeves said:

God. This is the future of entertainment. If found guilty, he’ll need to be shot by firing squad immediately, you know, for ‘continuity’

Hallow point, or fmj?

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, Cheeseweasel said:

Why are we discussing ammo? 

Do you even America, bro?  The only thing more measurable than bullets spent, is the amount of time spent talking about said bullets. 

Only time I know a shooting trial is over is when they quit  talking about the weapons and ammo involved.  That's when you know the jury is actually ready to come back with a verdict.  

Or when you hear this, "Certainly, the questionable contest among the defendants didn't sit well with this small town jury."  

Posted
1 minute ago, washparkhorn said:

Establishing intent to cause death or serious bodily harm.  It's an element of the charges the prosecution must prove. 

He didn't use hollow point ammo. If you wanted to kill someone, that would have been a better choice. 

Regardless, he's not a weapons/ballistics expert. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, washparkhorn said:

Establishing intent to cause death or serious bodily harm.  It's an element of the charges the prosecution must prove. 

It's actually not because it's not in dispute.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Cheeseweasel said:

I used to make a decent annual donation to the ACLU before they stopped being for Civil Liberties.. I will honestly consider the innocence project as a replacement. 

It does great work ... although I wish it would avoid the high profile, money raising cases of people so obviously guilty.

Posted
Just now, Harrison Bergeron said:

It does great work ... although I wish it would avoid the high profile, money raising cases of people so obviously guilty.

We continue to advocate for wrongly convicted people like Pervis Payne and Rodney Reed.

https://innocenceproject.org/reflecting-on-the-year-past-i-am-proud-grateful-and-even-more-fired-up-to-advance-the-innocence-projects-work/

 

Well, shit. Any other suggestions?

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Cheeseweasel said:

Risky given that the scumbag DA might want a retrial. 

Can't.  If the prosecutor causes a mistrial, the case can't be retried.

  • Hook 'Em 3


×
×
  • Create New...