Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm confused about the dismissed "illegal weapon" charge.  From what I've read (on the internet, so it has to be true), this would only apply if he was carrying a short barreled rifle.  Since they have the gun in their possession and knew it wasn't a SBR, how can they charge him with that? 

Posted
1 minute ago, MadBurgerMaker said:

I'm confused about the dismissed "illegal weapon" charge.  From what I've read (on the internet, so it has to be true), this would only apply if he was carrying a short barreled rifle.  Since they have the gun in their possession and knew it wasn't a SBR, how can they charge him with that? 

Because the prosecutor is an idiot.  That the weapons charge was dismissed first thing this morning.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, MadBurgerMaker said:

how can they charge him with that? 

They can charge him with assassinating Lincoln if they wanted to. Proving it is different. But prosecutors know that if they throw enough against the wall, something will stick.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Cheeseweasel said:

They can charge him with assassinating Lincoln if they wanted to. Proving it is different. But prosecutors know that if they throw enough against the wall, something will stick.

This is untrue.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Cheeseweasel said:

But prosecutors know that if they throw enough against the wall, something will stick.

There are downsides to that approach and competent defense counsel knows how to exploit those weaknesses.

I am not sure this defense attorney is who I would want representing someone I care about. But his style may be what works in Wisconsin. He only needs one juror to walk in lockstep with his arguments. 

Apparently, the Defense hired one of OJ's jury experts who claims they have a slam-dunk juror for not guilty. That was a sharp move by the defense to hire the OJ consultant.  Smart. The defense understands the dynamics in play.

Posted
Just now, Texaspython said:

Try it, seriously. Or, if you happen to know the truth then admit your statement is untrue and try again.

So they charged him with something that was not illegal but you are saying impossible. Cool. Try again.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Cheeseweasel said:

So they charged him with something that was not illegal but you are saying impossible. Cool. Try again.

I think you know that’s not what I’m referring to but maybe not. Either way, you aren’t honest.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Captainant said:

strangely though, they never seem able to indict a pig

I think that actually happened in one state. Not Arky though. An actual pig. 

Posted
24 minutes ago, washparkhorn said:

There are downsides to that approach and competent defense counsel knows how to exploit those weaknesses.

I am not sure this defense attorney is who I would want representing someone I care about. But his style may be what works in Wisconsin. He only needs one juror to walk in lockstep with his arguments. 

Apparently, the Defense hired one of OJ's jury experts who claims they have a slam-dunk juror for not guilty. That was a sharp move by the defense to hire the OJ consultant.  Smart. The defense understands the dynamics in play.

if the rifle dont fit you must acquit

  • Haha 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, 52-80 said:

if the rifle dont fit you must acquit

His testimony is hocus pocus and his picture is out of focus.

  • Haha 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, Moby Ric said:

Stop saying Havoc.  

Must be a cheese eating thing.

I would not have said kenosha is a community where you can shoot someone seven times and get away with it. That's the Blake case, which started this demonstration and counter-demonstration. Dumb.

Posted
1 minute ago, washparkhorn said:

Must be a cheese eating thing.

I would not have said kenosha is a community where you can shoot someone seven times and get away with it. That's the Blake case, which started this demonstration and counter-demonstration. Dumb.

Kenosha: Come for the rapists, molesters, and abusers, stay for the cheese. 

Posted

Kenosha:  I come here for the Knakworst.  

I would like to hear from the resident 1,370 Surly criminal attorneys.  And how this may alter case law with regard to justifiable homicides going forward. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Lobo said:

Kenosha:  I come here for the Knakworst.  

I would like to hear from the resident 1,370 Surly criminal attorneys.  And how this may alter case law with regard to justifiable homicides going forward. 

seinfeld GIF by hero0fwar

Posted

House.  

Roadhouse.

Rittenhouse. 

/Peter Griffin, Esq.

Posted
1 hour ago, MadBurgerMaker said:

I'm confused about the dismissed "illegal weapon" charge.  From what I've read (on the internet, so it has to be true), this would only apply if he was carrying a short barreled rifle.  Since they have the gun in their possession and knew it wasn't a SBR, how can they charge him with that? 

How could they charge with murder?

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, JBJ said:

As a left-handed shooter, I'm extremely pissed now.  There are definitely left-handed guns.

I'm a leftie too - with a coupla burn scars from hot shells on my forearm to prove it.  They make leftie guns, but for the longest time, they were hard as hell to find.  And I learned to operate a right-handed gun -- auto, bolt, doesn't matter -- as quickly and smoothly as a leftie, so it doesn't bother me.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

I'm a leftie too - with a coupla burn scars from hot shells on my forearm to prove it.  They make leftie guns, but for the longest time, they were hard as hell to find.  And I learned to operate a right-handed gun -- auto, bolt, doesn't matter -- as quickly and smoothly as a leftie, so it doesn't bother me.

I grew up preferring  an over-under shotgun with thumb safety because at least it is ambidextrous.  Got a left-handed shotgun and never looked back.  My rifle is still right (bolt-action), and I shoot it left.  I am a also left eye dominant and don't think I could change.

Posted
12 minutes ago, JBJ said:

I grew up preferring  an over-under shotgun with thumb safety because at least it is ambidextrous.  Got a left-handed shotgun and never looked back.  My rifle is still right (bolt-action), and I shoot it left.  I am a also left eye dominant and don't think I could change.

What is wrong with you people?

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Cheeseweasel said:

Point to the doll where the bad man touched you.

Huh? The kid brought an assault rifle to tussle with people who weren’t armed. I bet you find that heroic. You too, are a wimp.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Fuck You 1
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Texaspython said:

The kid brought an assault rifle to tussle with people who weren’t armed.

Really? Well one guy was armed, and one guy is one armed.

Edited by Bevo
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Texaspython said:

Huh? The kid brought an assault rifle to tussle with people who weren’t armed. I bet you find that heroic. You too, are a wimp.

You have a masterful command of the facts of this case.

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
51 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

I'm a leftie too - with a coupla burn scars from hot shells on my forearm to prove it.  They make leftie guns, but for the longest time, they were hard as hell to find.  And I learned to operate a right-handed gun -- auto, bolt, doesn't matter -- as quickly and smoothly as a leftie, so it doesn't bother me.

You are in luck….

https://www.gunsandammo.com/editorial/left-hand-ruger-1022-rifle/395682

  • Like 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, Bevo said:

What is wrong with you people?

Step back.  Look at the website you and we are on. Shake your head and say “Aaaah, now I get it.”

  • Like 1


×
×
  • Create New...