Jump to content

Amy Coney Barrett

Anastasis

By Anastasis
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

ousuxndallas
ousuxndallas

Will the left come up with a liar like Blasey Ford accusing her off rape at an undisclosed location and undisclosed date /time?

Continental Op
Continental Op

Everyone's answer to the question of "Am I in favor of the death penalty?" should be the same as the answer to the question of "Would I feel really good about being tried by a Williamson County jury f

Tom
Tom

Oh go fuck yourself, you intellectual pussy and your both sides bullshit.  Your party coalesced around the idea that a supreme court judge shouldn't be confirmed in an election year just a few years a

Posted Images

workswithseed

workswithseed 2037

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Well, except we aren't hypersensitive to racism, especially, or fascism, because they are both the order of the day.

Rand herself is an example of an upperclass Soviet refugee with a violent adverse reaction to socialism/communism.

People have been calling Republicans litteral hitler since Bush (that I can remember). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
workswithseed

workswithseed 2037

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Well, except we aren't hypersensitive to racism, especially, or fascism, because they are both the order of the day.

Rand herself is an example of an upperclass Soviet refugee with a violent adverse reaction to socialism/communism.

Well, that sucks. 4 extra meaningless posts. Here's some shit posts after this one.

Edited by workswithseed
Link to comment
Share on other sites
workswithseed

workswithseed 2037

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Well, except we aren't hypersensitive to racism, especially, or fascism, because they are both the order of the day.

Rand herself is an example of an upperclass Soviet refugee with a violent adverse reaction to socialism/communism.

 

Edited by workswithseed
Link to comment
Share on other sites
workswithseed

workswithseed 2037

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Well, except we aren't hypersensitive to racism, especially, or fascism, because they are both the order of the day.

Rand herself is an example of an upperclass Soviet refugee with a violent adverse reaction to socialism/communism.

 

Edited by workswithseed
Link to comment
Share on other sites
workswithseed

workswithseed 2037

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Well, except we aren't hypersensitive to racism, especially, or fascism, because they are both the order of the day.

Rand herself is an example of an upperclass Soviet refugee with a violent adverse reaction to socialism/communism.

 

Edited by workswithseed
Link to comment
Share on other sites
orangecat92

orangecat92 306

Posted
Posted

Both ladies catholic, both with children.  Both would fire up evangelicals, but Florida!  I think it will be Lagoa. 

Look forward to seeing Harris vs Logoa.  Wonder how strong Harris comes?  She promised to prosecute the case against Trump.  This is as close as she is going to get.  If Harris comes too hard, could backfire.  Lagoa only had 15 votes against her last time.  I think Harris did not vote because she was on campaign trail.  Not sure.  Both ladies FBI investigations should be updated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
orangecat92

orangecat92 306

Posted
Posted

Seven of 15 votes against Logoa cast by....women.  26 women in senate.  Over 25 % female senators voted against her.     No vote by Harris, Warren, klobuchar.   5 senators did not vote.  Counted 16 women voted yea.  Looks like 69.5% of women voted yea.  Far less than total %...84 % yea.  

Expect a cat fight.... no doubt.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bullneck

Bullneck 18987

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, workswithseed said:

People have been calling Republicans litteral hitler since Bush (that I can remember). 

But you assume they are wrong, of course, and there's nothing to it.  You must be right.  In spite of your limited knowledge of the subject at hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
washparkhorn

washparkhorn 9935

Posted
Posted

Amy Coney Barrett on what to do when the law and the faith of a judge clash - https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/527/

Quote

 

The Catholic Church's opposition to the death penalty places Catholic judges in a moral and legal bind. While these judges are obliged by oath, professional commitment, and the demands of citizenship to enforce the death penalty, they are also obliged to adhere to their church's teaching on moral matters.

Although the legal system has a solution for this dilemma by allowing the recusal of judges whose convictions keep them from doing their job, Catholic judges will want to sit whenever possible without acting immorally. However, litigants and the general public are entitled to impartial justice, which may be something a judge who is heedful of ecclesiastical pronouncements cannot dispense.

Therefore, the authors argue, we need to know whether judges are legally disqualified from hearing cases that their consciences would let them decide. While mere identification of a judge as Catholic is not sufficient reason for recusal under federal law, the authors suggest that the moral impossibility of enforcing capital punishment in such cases as sentencing, enforcing jury recommendations, and affirming are in fact reasons for not participating.

 

Sticky wicket when that judge is a Justice on the Supreme Court. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hayden_horn

hayden_horn 11360

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, washparkhorn said:

Amy Coney Barrett on what to do when the law and the faith of a judge clash - https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/527/

Sticky wicket when that judge is a Justice on the Supreme Court. 

every justice is going to come to the court with their conscience. they are actually people with actual beliefs. any religious person will bring their world view with them on the court. as long as they rule in good faith and on the basis of the actual law. i hated some of the decisions scalia authored, but he was a legal giant. he was also catholic, and he was confirmed 98-0. again, different time and all that.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pescado_Rojo

Pescado_Rojo 19331

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

Texas fraternity types are going to be so pissed when they have to drive their fat little girlfriends to New Mexico to get an abortion.

Who wants to invest in Pescado Rojo's "Women's Health" clinic and spa, coming soon to Playa Del Carmen? Ask about our complementary spa services with the purchase of a women's health procedure! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Neonmoon

Neonmoon 38127

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Pescado_Rojo said:

Who wants to invest in Pescado Rojo's "Women's Health" clinic and spa, coming soon to Playa Del Carmen? Ask about our complementary spa services with the purchase of a women's health procedure! 

Just going to open up a huge clinic in Jal, New Mexico. Closest town in New Mexico to Dallas (6 hours), Houston (9.5 hours), San Antonio (6 hours), and Austin (6.5 hours)

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
washparkhorn

washparkhorn 9935

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, High Plains Drifter said:

he says with a gmail account and an amazon prime account and a cell phone less than two feet away

That is one front in a much larger battle. It is pathetic how little privacy is valued in this nation of laws. On its current trajectory, the right to be left alone will become more and more difficult - and unprotected by the Constitution. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Parliament

Parliament 14138

Posted
Posted



every justice is going to come to the court with their conscience. they are actually people with actual beliefs. any religious person will bring their world view with them on the court. as long as they rule in good faith and on the basis of the actual law. i hated some of the decisions scalia authored, but he was a legal giant. he was also catholic, and he was confirmed 98-0. again, different time and all that.


Yeah. Once you try to divide "beliefs" from "dogma," you have a problem.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Neonmoon

Neonmoon 38127

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Mapache said:

Such hypocrisy

 

She makes a great point. RBG shouldn’t be replaced by someone that would dramatically flip the balance of power. Unless...she said these things because of her partisan beliefs and doesn’t in fact believe them. If she doesn’t believe them, what else is she willing to profess for the sake of her party 

 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anastasis

Anastasis 23394

Posted
  • Author
Posted
8 minutes ago, JimmyJames said:

She’s a subservient woman who will vote to overturn roe v wade and whatever else her white male leaders tell her they want her to do.

If that’s what you want on the Supreme Court then by all means support her. Just stop pretending like it’s anything else besides that. 


Perhaps the board’s resident misogyny expert gonna chime in here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
workswithseed

workswithseed 2037

Posted
Posted (edited)
39 minutes ago, JimmyJames said:

Who knew that the boards self appointed both sides libertarian was such a big proponent of overturning Roe v. Wade? 
 

Seems like an odd stance for a libertarian but these are some strange times. 

Why? If you think a fetus is a human, then it's not that hard to say you're killing someone who's innocent.

Edited by workswithseed
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JimmyJames

JimmyJames 12271

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Fuck.  I think Lagoa might have actually been ok.  LOTS of potential for being a "switch in time."  Also, rather atypically broad judicial experience.

Barrett not so much.

Trump thinks Barrett is gonna help him steal the election. That’s all he cares about. 
 

The anti abortion crowd thinks she will vote to overturn Roe v Wade. They’re right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anastasis

Anastasis 23394

Posted
  • Author
Posted
34 minutes ago, JimmyJames said:

Who knew that the boards self appointed both sides libertarian was such a big proponent of overturning Roe v. Wade? 
 

Seems like an odd stance for a libertarian but these are some strange times. 

Do your parents make you wear a helmet when you go outside?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...