Jump to content
Required Reading for any Longhorn ×

Fuck Big 12 refs

taybo20

By taybo20
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Bshep
Bshep

Media is just hung up on the 14-0 difference in penalties stat. The first flag of the game was a holding call on the OSU RT. The dumbass UT coaches declined the penalty, basically giving OSU 3 pts bec

DeadArmadillo
DeadArmadillo
ChiTownDoc
ChiTownDoc

I don’t have any UT fans I hate…  Live in a bubble.  Hell I have many more UT friends/family vs OU.  I’m saying all that to preface this: I’ll happily root for UT in the championship, if/when they mak

Posted Images

Samson's Wig

Samson's Wig 3194

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Brian Fantana said:

Refs have let go at least 2 very obvious defensive PI calls that should have gone against Bama. I don't think there's any way to argue against that.

They also called two (one questionable) PI calls to give us a shot at a TD before half. This crew isn't any good, but some Longhorn fans whine about refs way more than is justified.  It's like a doctor's kid whining that the free pills he steals from his parents aren't brand name.

  • Fuck You 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nivek

Nivek 16992

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, Samson's Wig said:

Complaining about the refs when Bama has all the penalties takes some serious mental gymnastics.

Its not just the number of flags, it is the impact.  So far in a well officiated game it is 14-0 even with the missed XP.   The holdings, PIs, delay of game all missed count.   They called 2 PIs back to back against them with time running out to make it look good knowing we have a back up QB and are very limited.   

Conspiracy brother Horn out.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
taybo20

taybo20 2878

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, Samson's Wig said:

They also called two (one questionable) PI calls to give us a shot at a TD before half. This crew isn't any good, but some Longhorn fans whine about refs way more than is justified.  It's like a doctor's kid whining that the free pills he steals from his parents aren't brand name.

By your own admission they suck… and this is the Fuck Big 12 refs thread… are you stupid or something?

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Billy Pilgrim

Billy Pilgrim 1985

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Samson's Wig said:

They also called two (one questionable) PI calls to give us a shot at a TD before half. This crew isn't any good, but some Longhorn fans whine about refs way more than is justified.  It's like a doctor's kid whining that the free pills he steals from his parents aren't brand name.

That’s a weird analogy

Link to comment
Share on other sites
utee94

utee94 15869

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, notre dame joe said:

they initially called 'targeting' on arms to the chest of a qb who wasn't even down. 

In a nutshell, this summarizes what happened to Texas throughout the entire game.

If he was down, it's a safety.  If he's not down, then not only can there be no possible chance of roughing, but it's intentional grounding, inside the endzone, which is also a safety.  And then there's the bullshit "targeting" when a player put his arms to the chest of a player that the refs deemed not to be down.

So, it was a safety.  Someone remind me whether or not two points (and possession) might have made a difference at the end?

 

Fuck everything.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
troph

troph 24914

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, utee94 said:

In a nutshell, this summarizes what happened to Texas throughout the entire game.

If he was down, it's a safety.  If he's not down, then not only can there be no possible chance of roughing, but it's intentional grounding, inside the endzone, which is also a safety.  And then there's the bullshit "targeting" when a player put his arms to the chest of a player that the refs deemed not to be down.

So, it was a safety.  Someone remind me whether or not two points (and possession) might have made a difference at the end?

 

Fuck everything.

he threw it hard, motion was down field and it ricocheted off Overshown's helmet and flew backward.  that has to be the logic for why it wasn't intentional grounding. I actually think they may have stumbled on the right call there in the end after a total clusterfuck.

Edited by troph
Link to comment
Share on other sites
utee94

utee94 15869

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, troph said:

he threw it hard, motion was down field and it ricocheted off Overshown's helmet and flew backward.  that has to be the logic for why it wasn't intentional grounding. I actually think they may have stumbled on the right call there in the end after a total clusterfuck.

If Overshown were an Alabama receiver then it wouldn't be grounding.  He's not, so it is.  Determining intent isn't their job there, and if that's what they attempted to do, then then they fucked up.

 

Intentional grounding, safety, game over, Texas wins.

 

Before this game I actually had respect for Sabana'sAlabama teams.  Turns out they're a massive bunch of cheap-shotting cheater fuckstains.  Fuck them.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
troph

troph 24914

Posted
Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, utee94 said:

If Overshown were an Alabama receiver then it wouldn't be grounding.  He's not, so it is.  Determining intent isn't their job there, and if that's what they attempted to do, then then they fucked up.

 

Intentional grounding, safety, game over, Texas wins.

 

Before this game I actually had respect for Sabana'sAlabama teams.  Turns out they're a massive bunch of cheap-shotting cheater fuckstains.  Fuck them.

Yeah but if the defensive player bats down a pass it's not intentional grounding.  I'm being genuine here, I'm not sure it was a safety. I went back and rewatched it, he was not down, he threw the ball forward with velocity and it ricocheted off O's helmet.  I think there is a judgment call there, not sure it was as egregious as initially thought.  the targeting was dumb, possibly criminal.

 

he's also possibly outsidde the tackle box, he threw it forward, there was an eligible receiver near the goal line (#2 WR), the defense batted it down (with their helmet)... I'm honestly having a hard time seeing it as a clear IG call that was missed.

 

whole play - ignore the penalty, focus on it simply as a pass:

 

 

Edited by troph
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...