Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, Chuckie Finster said:

Not to create a ton more work, but do you happen to have the totals for non-con/bowl games?  Would be interesting if these seemingly very undisciplined Longhorn teams suddenly get it under control when the crew isn't from the Big 12.

I think I did actually look at this last year. And I’m pretty sure that the calls weren’t nearly as lopsided in non-conference games. Like I remember there being a definite difference. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Chuckie Finster said:

Not to create a ton more work, but do you happen to have the totals for non-con/bowl games?  Would be interesting if these seemingly very undisciplined Longhorn teams suddenly get it under control when the crew isn't from the Big 12.

Looking at the stats for the years listed in that chart, and without consideration of the timing of the penalty (did it extend opponent's drive? Did it kill a Texas one?) we were penalized more against La Tech, Rice, Colorado, Louisiana. We had the same number of penalties against LSU and Arkansas. Utah, UTEP, and Rice (2021) were penalized more than us.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, Foosters said:

This is me. Any offensive play over 15 yards, and any defensive play which results in a loss of yards for the offense, I immediately fix my eyes to the bottom of the screen and just wait for the yellow box to show up.

exactly

Posted
1 minute ago, ultimaton said:

Looking at the stats for the years listed in that chart, and without consideration of the timing of the penalty (did it extend opponent's drive? Did it kill a Texas one?) we were penalized more against La Tech, Rice, Colorado, Louisiana. We had the same number of penalties against LSU and Arkansas. Utah, UTEP, and Rice (2021) were penalized more than us.

Huh.  The seemingly even distribution that you would expect to see.  Imagine that?

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

Once again, said this last year…the chart is simply for comic relief. I know it doesn’t factor in the timing of the calls. The number of times we’ve been screwed on phantom calls or non-calls over the past decade or so is too many to remember at this point. In summary, of course the chart doesn’t tell the whole story…but it definitely tells A STORY.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
On 9/13/2022 at 4:45 PM, JBJ said:

The NFL rule is that a QB already affected by a defender before starting his throwing motion is fully responsible for the ball regardless.  NCAA isn't as clear.

Dead horse but I found it.  Play #1. 

 

  • Rage+1 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, Dennis Taylor said:

Well now I'm pissed off all over again.  

Young was either down or he grounded it. There's no other possible outcome 

there was a receiver at the goal line on the young play which allowed them to negate the grounding   but yes he was down and it was a safety.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, dcar00 said:

there was a receiver at the goal line on the young play which allowed them to negate the grounding   but yes he was down and it was a safety.

The deflection is not considered part of the pass.  You can actually catch an intentionally grounded pass off deflection and it's still a penalty.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 hours ago, JBJ said:

Dead horse but I found it.  Play #1. 

 

"When we remove pass interference calls against UT, the number drops from 1.6 calls per game to 1.4."

  • Like 1
Posted

Booth initiated review in the ISU/Baylor game.  ISU gets fucked on the targeting call and goes apeshit.  No call on the field.  Big 12 booth bullshit call.  Everybody going to get fucked this year except OU and Baylor.  

Posted
14 minutes ago, Fastbreak said:

Another bullshit targeting in the BU\ISU game.

Followed by another 15 yarder for touching too hard.

Who the fuck asked for these stupid rules?

The rules aren't the problem. 

Posted

 

If you were going to teach young players what is/is not targeting, you'd show them how to keep their face up (like Overshown) and not to lower your head and launch (like what we just watched).

 

Just completely arbitrary enforcement... no attachment at all to the wording of the rule.

 

Posted

Watching the Mizzou game and an obvious PI gets ignored the ball is spiked and an Auburn player catches its runs it back and lowers his helmet and the crown hits the ear hole of a Mizzou tackle and lays him out.

It seems both Alabama schools are dirty fucks.

Posted (edited)

The targeting thing wouldn't even be hard to solve.  Set up a run of the mill targeting penalty, then set up a unsportsmanlike conduct targeting penalty.  Both are 15 yards in the game.  Then set up an unsportsmanlike conduct "accumulation" system and once you get your third you sit the next game etc.  

Could still keep the system where if you get two unsportsmanlike penalties in one game you are kicked out of that game.

Edited by Surly Bevo
  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...