Jump to content

Fuck Big 12 refs

taybo20

By taybo20
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

AUS-97HORN

AUS-97HORN 11654

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, texastroubadour said:

Stud 🙄

you know how I know you arent a man yet?

 

... cause you dont know the greatness of Polk High and a single RB getting 4 TD in 1 game and being the single game scoring leader since 1966

 

you have to be this old to ride that train:

63c7aa0fe81ba.image.jpg?resize=1200,693

Edited by AUS-97HORN
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 6.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Bshep
Bshep

Media is just hung up on the 14-0 difference in penalties stat. The first flag of the game was a holding call on the OSU RT. The dumbass UT coaches declined the penalty, basically giving OSU 3 pts bec

DeadArmadillo
DeadArmadillo
ChiTownDoc
ChiTownDoc

I don’t have any UT fans I hate…  Live in a bubble.  Hell I have many more UT friends/family vs OU.  I’m saying all that to preface this: I’ll happily root for UT in the championship, if/when they mak

Posted Images

PvilleStang

PvilleStang 2843

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, WinningIsHard said:

I still can't wrap my brain around how the best DT in the country with possibly the second best DT in the country right next to him never get held by, checks notes, smaller and inferior talented guards/centers. Shitstain, I'd love to listen to your logic on that one. 

DUDE, stop calling him back in here.  Just when he's gone, you go and summon the shit-stain...

  • Like 2
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Knoxtnhorn

Knoxtnhorn 5928

Posted
Posted

This is what I can't get past.

  1. Texas' front 7 and backups have several NFL prospects - some possibly 1st day picks.
  2. Texas has played 10 games w/ Big 12 refs.  (I think this is correct.  Taking out Bama as I know that was SEC.)
  3. OU ran 80 plays against us, so I'm going with an average of 80 defensive plays a game.
  4. On any given play, there are between 3 and 10/11 blocks.  So, I'll go with an average of 6 blocks a play.
  5. 10 games X 80 plays X 6 blocks = 4,800 potential blocks.
  6. Apparently, *4,799 of them have been clean.

* I can't recall the exact # of holds called.  I know one was offsetting against Baylor.  I only recall one hold that was called and accepted.  

I'm sure my effort and math can be picked apart.  Regardless, there is no excuse for our team - giving 100% - to have to play above and beyond the 11 on the other side of the line.

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JGrayDBU

JGrayDBU 334

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Knoxtnhorn said:

This is what I can't get past.

  1. Texas' front 7 and backups have several NFL prospects - some possibly 1st day picks.
  2. Texas has played 10 games w/ Big 12 refs.  (I think this is correct.  Taking out Bama as I know that was SEC.)
  3. OU ran 80 plays against us, so I'm going with an average of 80 defensive plays a game.
  4. On any given play, there are between 3 and 10/11 blocks.  So, I'll go with an average of 6 blocks a play.
  5. 10 games X 80 plays X 6 blocks = 4,800 potential blocks.
  6. Apparently, *4,799 of them have been clean.

* I can't recall the exact # of holds called.  I know one was offsetting against Baylor.  I only recall one hold that was called and accepted.  

I'm sure my effort and math can be picked apart.  Regardless, there is no excuse for our team - giving 100% - to have to play above and beyond the 11 on the other side of the line.

okay, now do the same calculation for our peers, as in the top 4 contenders in the Big 12.    If our opponents' percentage of good blocks is 99.6% or something like that, get the same number for the peers.

I would imagine the % of peers' opponents would be something like 98% or less.  

Then, and this is drawing from my Stat for Paych class at UT in spring 1986, run a T-test based on the idea of disproving the null hypothesis, null hypothesis being the % should be within the standard error margin, etc.  (That old man was a pretty good stat. professor, but of course I've forgotten most of it.)

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TrashMaster G

TrashMaster G 17379

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, Knoxtnhorn said:

This is what I can't get past.

  1. Texas' front 7 and backups have several NFL prospects - some possibly 1st day picks.
  2. Texas has played 10 games w/ Big 12 refs.  (I think this is correct.  Taking out Bama as I know that was SEC.)
  3. OU ran 80 plays against us, so I'm going with an average of 80 defensive plays a game.
  4. On any given play, there are between 3 and 10/11 blocks.  So, I'll go with an average of 6 blocks a play.
  5. 10 games X 80 plays X 6 blocks = 4,800 potential blocks.
  6. Apparently, *4,799 of them have been clean.

* I can't recall the exact # of holds called.  I know one was offsetting against Baylor.  I only recall one hold that was called and accepted.  

I'm sure my effort and math can be picked apart.  Regardless, there is no excuse for our team - giving 100% - to have to play above and beyond the 11 on the other side of the line.

There is no mystery. Big XII refs let our opposing OLines hold with impunity. It is known.

Our guys still manage to wreck shop. They are that good.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Knoxtnhorn

Knoxtnhorn 5928

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, JGrayDBU said:

okay, now do the same calculation for our peers, as in the top 4 contenders in the Big 12.    If our opponents' percentage of good blocks is 99.6% or something like that, get the same number for the peers.

I would imagine the % of peers' opponents would be something like 98% or less.  

Then, and this is drawing from my Stat for Paych class at UT in spring 1986, run a T-test based on the idea of disproving the null hypothesis, null hypothesis being the % should be within the standard error margin, etc.  (That old man was a pretty good stat. professor, but of course I've forgotten most of it.)

 

I thought about that.  Holding is called less overall in the Big 12 as compared to most conferences.  My argument is that it's going to have a far more negative effect on a team like TX.  Hence, point #1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chooky

Chooky 13292

Posted
Posted

These motherfuckers. I once scoffed at people who believed there was some kind of collective agenda by officials to fuck over a team. Incompetent shit happens and people would take it personally. But this has been overt. Mar and his crew are openly antagonistic. They don't screw you by throwing the flag, although occasionally that's the case. But the most efficient way are the non calls, particularly interference and holding and spots. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...