Jump to content

Ken Paxton is dirty? NO FUCKING WAY!

Gil Bang

By Gil Bang
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Chewbacca
Chewbacca

Here's a hint - if you vote for someone, you support them.  Whether it's Paxton, Abbott, Trump, Cruz, your vote says you support their actions.

SydneyCarton
SydneyCarton

Ah, yes. The “I don’t like this guy, but voting for a a literal criminal into a position of power is better than voting for someone who fights for civil liberties. Because fuck democrats and people wh

BevoAbyss
BevoAbyss

Lulz. With all due respect, what this really means in 2023 GQP Texas is: "I lean hard fascist, but I've never been a fan of fascist Paxton. Of course, I am a fan of many other fascists and voted

Posted Images

miguelito

miguelito 11266

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Tick…tock…
 

 

37 minutes ago, Ghost of LL said:

 

I read some of those lines.  Which one of you nerds wants to explain what's between the lines?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31488

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
18 minutes ago, miguelito said:

 

I read some of those lines.  Which one of you nerds wants to explain what's between the lines?

There is a grand jury investigation of a certain Texas state agency and its high level officials.  The agency and officials have been attempting to avoid testifying and producing evidence on the ground of attorney-client privilege, because lawyer.  But not everything a government lawyer does is attorney-client privileged, And when that government lawyer is doing crimes, even if it was privileged, the crime-fraud exception vitiates or destroys the privilege.

The crime in question is aiding the obstruction and obstructing the criminal investigation of another party.

So, we know Paxton is being investigated, mostly likely in relation to Nate Paul.  And, as usual, he has shit to hide so he's trying to hide behind privilege.  And the august judges of the WD Tex aren't having it and neither is the Fifth Circuit.

  • Hook 'Em 11
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31488

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, Judge Roybeanbag said:

Yeah, but that whole explanation made my balls hurt.  So thanks but, damn!

I dunno whether to get excited about this or not.  That there's an investigation is nice.  That the person Paxton allegedly helped obstruct is currently under indictment is also nice.  Whether this actually leads to an indictment of Paxton is another question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89685

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, cactusflinthead said:

Don't you tease me 

8 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

I dunno whether to get excited about this or not.  That there's an investigation is nice.  That the person Paxton allegedly helped obstruct is currently under indictment is also nice.  Whether this actually leads to an indictment of Paxton is another question.

I’m kind of excited.  Paxton is sloppy as hell from what it looks like over the past few years, and his trying to go after the FBI agents/investigation probably crossed some lines.

I’m wondering if/how the actions of Brandon Cammack tie into this.

Edited by atomheartbevo
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tx 3 putt

tx 3 putt 76980

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

I’m kind of excited.  Paxton is sloppy as hell from what it looks like over the past few years, and his trying to go after the FBI agents/investigation probably crossed some lines.

I’m wondering if/how the actions of Brandon Cammack tie into this.

 

IMG_0693.jpeg

  • Haha 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Judge Roybeanbag

Judge Roybeanbag 11819

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

I dunno whether to get excited about this or not.  That there's an investigation is nice.  That the person Paxton allegedly helped obstruct is currently under indictment is also nice.  Whether this actually leads to an indictment of Paxton is another question.

In a perfect world, one would hope.  In this current reality, I’ll just deal with my balls hurting.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31488

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

I’m kind of excited.  Paxton is sloppy as hell from what it looks like over the past few years, and his trying to go after the FBI agents/investigation probably crossed some lines.

I’m wondering if/how the actions of Brandon Cammack tie into this.

Tend to agree on Paxton.  He probably can't politick his way out of this and he is a dumb, criming motherfucker.

I think Cammack himself operated mostly in good faith, not knowing what he was doing.  That whole appointment scheme by Paxton, though, is probably a big part of the investigation.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
YGIFS

YGIFS 19450

Posted
Posted

So Paxton is in trouble again.  5th Circuit Justice Don Willett, a former supporter of Paxton, has gone radio silent.  Nate Paul has punted another sentencing hearing, presumably out of having worked with both Willett and Paxton in the past, and donations of the same ilk.  Just when Trump has crossed off Ken's name as a potential AG.  Hmm, curious.  Nate has another hearing coming up with the SEC right around the convention.  

You'll start to hear Ken call all of this a 'Political Witchunt' within a few weeks time.  I know what happens to Ken.  What I am stumped over is how Abbott/Patrick respond to all of this.  

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kyrie Eleison

Kyrie Eleison 9312

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, YGIFS said:

So Paxton is in trouble again.  5th Circuit Justice Don Willett, a former supporter of Paxton, has gone radio silent.  Nate Paul has punted another sentencing hearing, presumably out of having worked with both Willett and Paxton in the past, and donations of the same ilk.  Just when Trump has crossed off Ken's name as a potential AG.  Hmm, curious.  Nate has another hearing coming up with the SEC right around the convention.  

You'll start to hear Ken call all of this a 'Political Witchunt' within a few weeks time.  I know what happens to Ken.  What I am stumped over is how Abbott/Patrick respond to all of this.

depends on how many times and in what context their names show up in the docs.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NAVY

NAVY 6741

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, YGIFS said:

So Paxton is in trouble again.  5th Circuit Justice Don Willett, a former supporter of Paxton, has gone radio silent.  Nate Paul has punted another sentencing hearing, presumably out of having worked with both Willett and Paxton in the past, and donations of the same ilk.  Just when Trump has crossed off Ken's name as a potential AG.  Hmm, curious.  Nate has another hearing coming up with the SEC right around the convention.  

You'll start to hear Ken call all of this a 'Political Witchunt' within a few weeks time.  I know what happens to Ken.  What I am stumped over is how Abbott/Patrick respond to all of this.  

Wait, Trump found a more corrupt AG than Ken? Wow 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
YGIFS

YGIFS 19450

Posted
Posted

When Alberto Gonzales is the best Republican A.G. of the last quarter century...that's saying something.  

Even if Trump pulls out a miracle and wins in November, Ken ain't getting the nod.  There's too much heat on Paxton, even for Trump.  

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89685

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Kyrie Eleison said:

depends on how many times and in what context their names show up in the docs.  

Yeah Abbott ain’t going to do shit to help Kenny Wayne Paxton out if the feds truly sink their teeth into him.  That means Nate Paul has fully turned (and he will) and they have the receipts. In fact, they would be doing what they could to distance themselves from him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
That Guy

That Guy 955

Posted
Posted

So how can Paxton continue to delay the grand jury? Does he go for a hearing en banc? If he is again denied where does it get appealed? Just wondering how long fuckkenpaxton can push this out? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
YGIFS

YGIFS 19450

Posted
Posted (edited)

image.png.cedae0ff00e75808cb75d6c5db2d7999.png

 

I admit I bloviate about Paul and Paxton.  But there is legitimate evidence connecting the two that even our State Government doesn't know.  Nate is gonna do his short stint and take one for the team, and then own up to the feds on SEC/FINRA stuff.  But Nate is facing far more serious trouble down the road with either serious prison time or death.  As AHB points out, it's just a question of when Nate gives everybody up, not IF.  Because look at this photograph, how do you think this guy is gonna do in federal prison for a few years?  He doesn't have bug-out money anymore.  His options will soon become witness protection, extended stay in federal lockup, or suicide.  And I don't think he has the horses for the last two.  

Abbott's sitting this one out.  Only head-scratcher is how they arrange it so that Nate takes down Dan Patrick along with him for being the biggest ball-licker of Ken Paxton of 'em all.  

Edited by YGIFS
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DDD Dad

DDD Dad 14339

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, YGIFS said:

image.png.cedae0ff00e75808cb75d6c5db2d7999.png

 

I admit I bloviate about Paul and Paxton.  But there is legitimate evidence connecting the two that even our State Government doesn't know.  Nate is gonna do his short stint and take one for the team, and then own up to the feds on SEC/FINRA stuff.  But Nate is facing far more serious trouble down the road with either serious prison time or death.  As AHB points out, it's just a question of when Nate gives everybody up, not IF.  Because look at this photograph, how do you think this guy is gonna do in federal prison for a few years?  He doesn't have bug-out money anymore.  His options will soon become witness protection, extended stay in federal lockup, or suicide.  And I don't think he has the horses for the last two.  

Abbott's sitting this one out.  Only head-scratcher is how they arrange it so that Nate takes down Dan Patrick along with him for being the biggest ball-licker of Ken Paxton of 'em all.  

This is some serious fan fiction.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brisketexan

Brisketexan 105152

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, YGIFS said:

When Alberto Gonzales is the best Republican A.G. of the last quarter century...that's saying something.  

Even if Trump pulls out a miracle and wins in November, Ken ain't getting the nod.  There's too much heat on Paxton, even for Trump.  

You discount the value of how deeply Ken gargles Trump's balls and chugs the gravy.  That is the only thing that matters.

4 minutes ago, DDD Dad said:

 

 

giphy.gif?cid=6c09b9529drud2njvhnfbnimad

And yeah, this.  Things advanced with this ruling....but it still has taken and will take forever.  And, it will be a "political witch hunt by the Biden DOJ that wants to stop us from Making America Great Again!"

My only hope is that the receipts are stout enough that more than one peer/underling says "I ain't getting buttfucked in prison for that wonky-eyed motherfucker," and they take a plea deal to completely throw him under the bus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brisketexan

Brisketexan 105152

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, YGIFS said:

Which part?  

The parts where Paxton faces justice and Abbott and Patrick somehow turn on him.

No GQP official in Texas will EVER turn on Paxton again.  He put a bullet in the back of the electoral head of three Ct. of Criminal Appeals Justices who went against him, then hung their bodies in the town square as a message to all the others.  Bow to Ken, or begone.  They all got that message, loud and clear.

That message will work even as he sits in a courtroom on trial.  He is bulletproof.  The MAGA timeline should have told you that.  Convictions only make them more powerful and beloved by their deranged voter base (also known as "the majority of Texas voters").

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
YGIFS

YGIFS 19450

Posted
Posted

Good to see you're off to an optimistic Summer, my friend.  Yeah, I don't think anybody in Texas does anything to him.  Shit, it was awkward to see Don Willett clam up about Paxton's issues before the 5th COA.  They used to be tight, and while Don's opinions can be pretty off-putting, he's a jovial guy.  To see him look like he just touched by a priest was weird as fuck.  But Ken is still gonna be approached by the Feds.  Not even Dan Patrick can save him from that.  

Every notice that every single statewide official over the last 3 year has visited the Texas/Mexico border for everything from town halls to photo ops?  Except for Ken Paxton.  Weird.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brisketexan

Brisketexan 105152

Posted
Posted

Too late to edit: Ken Paxton is the most powerful statewide official in our lifetime.

It's amazing and unbelievable, as he's also the absolute worst and most corrupt state official in our lifetime, but as mentioned above....this timeline.

YGIFs, you are at risk of thinking Paxton is "done for" right up to the moment he becomes POTUS.

You've never seen power like his in this state, and probably never will again.  It's staggering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
YGIFS

YGIFS 19450

Posted
Posted

What the fuck is that thing over his right shoulder?  Did Steve Bannon and Roseanne Barr have a black-faced love child back in Florida back in the 80's?  What in the fucking fuck with this simulation?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HalfSack Horn

HalfSack Horn 149

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, YGIFS said:

What the fuck is that thing over his right shoulder?  Did Steve Bannon and Roseanne Barr have a black-faced love child back in Florida back in the 80's?  What in the fucking fuck with this simulation?  

Pretty sure that is Snooki from Jersey Shore fame haha!

 

IMG_8710.jpeg

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ghost of LL

Ghost of LL 15531

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

The parts where Paxton faces justice and Abbott and Patrick somehow turn on him.

No GQP official in Texas will EVER turn on Paxton again.  He put a bullet in the back of the electoral head of three Ct. of Criminal Appeals Justices who went against him, then hung their bodies in the town square as a message to all the others.  Bow to Ken, or begone.  They all got that message, loud and clear.

That message will work even as he sits in a courtroom on trial.  He is bulletproof.  The MAGA timeline should have told you that.  Convictions only make them more powerful and beloved by their deranged voter base (also known as "the majority of Texas voters").

Frl frl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Paper_jam

Paper_jam 831

Posted
Posted

https://www.kxan.com/news/texas/judge-rejects-paxtons-efforts-to-shut-down-el-paso-migrant-shelter/

Judge Francisco Dominguez sided with the shelter, sharply criticizing Paxton’s legal action as “outrageous and intolerable,” accusing him of acting outside of his authority for political motivations.

“The Attorney General’s conduct in harassing and pursuing predetermined outcomes, without regard to the rights of Annunciation House’s employees and guests is imminent, ongoing and irreparable,” Dominguez wrote.

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tx 3 putt

tx 3 putt 76980

Posted
Posted
On 6/27/2024 at 9:42 AM, YGIFS said:

 

Even if Trump pulls out a miracle and wins in November, Ken ain't getting the nod.  There's too much heat on Paxton, even for Trump.  

 

trump can't be on camera with some crossed eyed inbred mofo, it's a bad look for the trump brand 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31488

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:


100%.

It was either post that, or the nekkid pics of @Ghost of LL texted me right before that. I was gonna share one of them right away. But I wanted to respect the theme of this board.

It's "I'd Pee In HER Butt" tyvm.  Not his.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
YGIFS

YGIFS 19450

Posted
Posted

I'm not saying I went to a very prestigious law school, it was 'average.'  And not everybody in the state government can pay their Yale Law student loans on that salary.  But Lesley French went to an online Christian law school-Regent University-which was her safety school because her reach school, American Samoan School of Law denied her application.  And Michelle barely finished community college before getting noticed by the Paxton team on her work with 'Concerned Women for America.  

So yeah no, these two dipshits aren't clever enough to fool the FBI.  

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pescado_Rojo

Pescado_Rojo 19416

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, YGIFS said:

I'm not saying I went to a very prestigious law school, it was 'average.'  And not everybody in the state government can pay their Yale Law student loans on that salary.  But Lesley French went to an online Christian law school-Regent University-which was her safety school because her reach school, American Samoan School of Law denied her application.  And Michelle barely finished community college before getting noticed by the Paxton team on her work with 'Concerned Women for America.  

So yeah no, these two dipshits aren't clever enough to fool the FBI.  

Regent's "About Us" Statement: Practice Ready. Purpose Driven. Our mission is to to provide excellent legal education from a Christian perspective, to nurture and encourage students toward spiritual maturity, and to engage the world through Christian legal thought and practice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
elfenix

elfenix 34266

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Pescado_Rojo said:

Regent's "About Us" Statement: Practice Ready. Purpose Driven. Our mission is to to provide excellent legal education from a Christian perspective, to nurture and encourage students toward spiritual maturity, and to engage the world through Christian legal thought and practice.

171212093159-01-kayla-and-roy-moore-1211.thumb.jpg.fccc1f49263fdd4c4899b45d1b61c476.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
YGIFS

YGIFS 19450

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Pescado_Rojo said:

Regent's "About Us" Statement: Practice Ready. Purpose Driven. Our mission is to to provide excellent legal education from a Christian perspective, to nurture and encourage students toward spiritual maturity, and to engage the world through Christian legal thought and practice.

"Spiritual Maturity" in lawyers?  Who the fuck wordsmith'd that?  All the best attorneys I know at least have the decency to admit they are flawed people but will kick ass for your Section 13 filing.  

Online, Christian-based law school to nurture Spiritual Maturity?  Is this like opposite timeline of 'Better Call Saul'?  And Ms. French decided the best way to demonstrate this "Christian Perspective to the Law" was to work for a philandering, money-laundering, walking ethics violation?  I mean at least his impeachment defense team had the transparency to sound and look like total douchebags.  But you Ms. French?  I'm curious which course at Regent University inspired you to apply such 'Christian Legal Thought' to such a piece of shit?  Oh, because he makes abortions harder to get?  Spoiler alert, Ms. French.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...