Jump to content

Ken Paxton is dirty? NO FUCKING WAY!

Gil Bang

By Gil Bang
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

troph

troph 24562

Posted
Posted (edited)

you think that's big, he's on record (last day or so) wanting to prosecute gay sex and sodomy.  not fucking kidding. though I'm pretty sure blow jobs from cis gender female hookers will probably still be allowed.

Edited by troph
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 3.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Chewbacca
Chewbacca

Here's a hint - if you vote for someone, you support them.  Whether it's Paxton, Abbott, Trump, Cruz, your vote says you support their actions.

SydneyCarton
SydneyCarton

Ah, yes. The “I don’t like this guy, but voting for a a literal criminal into a position of power is better than voting for someone who fights for civil liberties. Because fuck democrats and people wh

BevoAbyss
BevoAbyss

Lulz. With all due respect, what this really means in 2023 GQP Texas is: "I lean hard fascist, but I've never been a fan of fascist Paxton. Of course, I am a fan of many other fascists and voted

Posted Images

Captainant

Captainant 27446

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, troph said:

you think that's big, he's on record (last day or so) wanting to prosecute gay sex and sodomy.  not fucking kidding. though I'm pretty sure blow jobs from cis gender female hookers will probably still be allowed.

Can I get a link on that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
troph

troph 24562

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Captainant said:

Can I get a link on that?

Anchor: Would you, as Attorney General, be comfortable defending a law that once again outlawed sodomy? That questioned Lawrence again, or Griswold or gay marriage that came from the state legislature? To put to the test what Justice Thomas said?

Paxton: Yeah, I mean, there’s all kinds of issues here. But certainly, the Supreme Court has stepped into issues that I don’t think there was any constitutional provision dealing with, they were legislative issues. And this is one of those issues and there may be more.

his own fucking words, no link needed.

I have no constitutional right to fuck my fiance. none. 

Edited by troph
  • Rage+1 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
elfenix

elfenix 34171

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, troph said:

you think that's big, he's on record (last day or so) wanting to prosecute gay sex and sodomy.  not fucking kidding. though I'm pretty sure blow jobs from cis gender female hookers will probably still be allowed.

@Captainant i think this is what you're looking for

 

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89413

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, troph said:

folks we are deep, deep shit.  not only am I in trouble, your wives now have one more reason to claim they can't go down on you.  can we all finally stand up to these assholes?

Saying the quiet parts out loud.  We need Paxton to also go after birth control.  Need Republicans to make a full-court press on birth control.  Let them fuck around and find out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
troph

troph 24562

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

Saying the quiet parts out loud.  We need Paxton to also go after birth control.  Need Republicans to make a full-court press on birth control.  Let them fuck around and find out.

well if contraception is outlawed then you get butt sex and blow jobs back?  this is quite difficult to figure out which side to be on anymore.

  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
royiv

royiv 9152

Posted
Posted

I hope someone is turning Paxton's words into a campaign ad for Garza right now. Dems have to get the vote out for this race. The fact that he's saying the quiet parts out has to GOTV. Maybe it can even help Betto against Greg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
troph

troph 24562

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, royiv said:

I hope someone is turning Paxton's words into a campaign ad for Garza right now. Dems have to get the vote out for this race. The fact that he's saying the quiet parts out has to GOTV. Maybe it can even help Betto against Greg.

It needs to I mean if we can’t win on blow jobs butt sex and lesbian porn what can we win on?

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
  • Drool 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brisketexan

Brisketexan 104573

Posted
Posted

I was literally explaining this to another lawyer (!!) friend of mine this morning.  Dobbs came up, and he said "I'm ambivalent on abortion, and I don't see what the big deal is about Dobbs."  I reminded him of the right to privacy, and the kind of things that 1) it has been held to protect that 2) it no longer protects and the states are free to act on and 3) still have laws on the books about.  I reminded him that his right to go home and get a blowjob was squarely in the crosshairs and under the reasoning Thomas espoused, could absolutely be criminalized and nothing would protect him.

That actually got his attention, and he realized he hadn't really given it much thought.

  • Fuck Around and Find Out 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captainant

Captainant 27446

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

he realized he hadn't really given it much thought.

This is really what it boils down to with the people who are still acting like everything is fine. They just don't look at the ugly or think about it. My in-laws are really smart folks but also are sooooo prone to just turn their brains off the second they hear politics. They say it makes them sad so they ignore it and act like it's not happening. They even have the "what about" talking points down for everything from the child concentration camps at the border to firing on peaceful protesters in Jun'20, etc etc. 

Folks - boomers - are too fucking comfortable. They don't need to think about things much. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
troph

troph 24562

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

I was literally explaining this to another lawyer (!!) friend of mine this morning.  Dobbs came up, and he said "I'm ambivalent on abortion, and I don't see what the big deal is about Dobbs."  I reminded him of the right to privacy, and the kind of things that 1) it has been held to protect that 2) it no longer protects and the states are free to act on and 3) still have laws on the books about.  I reminded him that his right to go home and get a blowjob was squarely in the crosshairs and under the reasoning Thomas espoused, could absolutely be criminalized and nothing would protect him.

That actually got his attention, and he realized he hadn't really given it much thought.

Right to privacy is in the fucking constitution it ain’t no penumbra it’s screaming out loud at us throughout, the first amendment, the third amendment, the fourth amendment, the fifth amendment, privileges and immunities clauses and the liberty clause in the 14th amendment and the fucking list goes on and on. Mother fucker I’m worked up. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89413

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Captainant said:

This is really what it boils down to with the people who are still acting like everything is fine. They just don't look at the ugly or think about it.

"Oh, the neighbor's house is on fire, how upsetting, would somebody please close the curtains so I don't have to see and think about it. Surely somebody else will come along and put the fire out."

"Oh, our yard is burning? Well, it's not the house, so please, close the curtains so I don't have see how ugly it's making our lawn. I'm sure the fire department will be here any minute."

"Oh, the bushes up against our house are on fire? Well, I never really liked those bushes anyways, but I'm sure somebody else will be along to deal with it so that I don't have to."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mrs Whiggins

Mrs Whiggins 13049

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

I was literally explaining this to another lawyer (!!) friend of mine this morning.  Dobbs came up, and he said "I'm ambivalent on abortion, and I don't see what the big deal is about Dobbs."  I reminded him of the right to privacy, and the kind of things that 1) it has been held to protect that 2) it no longer protects and the states are free to act on and 3) still have laws on the books about.  I reminded him that his right to go home and get a blowjob was squarely in the crosshairs and under the reasoning Thomas espoused, could absolutely be criminalized and nothing would protect him.

That actually got his attention, and he realized he hadn't really given it much thought.

Especially if there is video. Who gets the ten grand for turning him in?

Some of the anti-contraception folks are worked up about declining birth rates more than they are about 'pro-life'. The parallels between old fascism and new fascism are too on point these days.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 45492

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Captainant said:

This is really what it boils down to with the people who are still acting like everything is fine. They just don't look at the ugly or think about it. My in-laws are really smart folks but also are sooooo prone to just turn their brains off the second they hear politics. They say it makes them sad so they ignore it and act like it's not happening. They even have the "what about" talking points down for everything from the child concentration camps at the border to firing on peaceful protesters in Jun'20, etc etc. 

Folks - boomers - are too fucking comfortable. They don't need to think about things much. 

Holy fucking shit this is basically identical to mine.  They claim they are "checked out", but 100% know all of the talking points.  If it is anyone but Dotard in 2024 (and probably him too - I'm starting to think they lied about voting Biden in 20) they will be pulling that R lever like they are starting a mower.  Glad my wife and I get to cancel their votes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89413

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, Mrs Whiggins said:

Especially if there is video. Who gets the ten grand for turning him in?

Some of the anti-contraception folks are worked up about declining birth rates more than they are about 'pro-life'. The parallels between old fascism and new fascism are too on point these days.

I believe there is 100% overlap with the anti-contraception Republicans, and the white replacement idiots.

But for all of the ramblings of the anti-contraception and white replacement idiots, I don't see any of them with like 10 kids, and very few of them with more than 3-4 kids.  If these motherfuckers were so concerned, they should have their own "Umpteen Kids and Counting" shows on TLC.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
TexasHooch

TexasHooch 5117

Posted
Posted

Well how about this one:

 

https://texas.votebeat.org/2022/8/24/23320771/ken-paxton-ballots-public-records-election-security

Ken Paxton bucks legal precedent and secretary of state’s advice in letting anyone examine ballots right after elections

Attorney general’s opinion invites lawsuits over long-established ballot security and subjects election officials for possible criminal charges.

Quote

A legal opinion released by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton last week will almost certainly throw county elections offices into chaos after November, experts say, exposing election clerks to possible criminal charges and materially reducing the security of every ballot cast in the state. 

Federal and state law require that ballots be kept secure for 22 months after an election to allow for recounts and challenges — a timeframe Texas counties have had set in place for decades. Paxton’s opinion, which doesn’t stem from any change to state law,  theoretically permits anyone —  an aggrieved voter, activist, or out-of-state entity — to request access to ballots as soon as the day after they are counted. Such requests have been used by activists all over the country as a way to “audit” election results. 

 

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brisketexan

Brisketexan 104573

Posted
Posted
Well how about this one:
 
https://texas.votebeat.org/2022/8/24/23320771/ken-paxton-ballots-public-records-election-security

Ken Paxton bucks legal precedent and secretary of state’s advice in letting anyone examine ballots right after elections

Attorney general’s opinion invites lawsuits over long-established ballot security and subjects election officials for possible criminal charges.

A legal opinion released by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton last week will almost certainly throw county elections offices into chaos after November, experts say, exposing election clerks to possible criminal charges and materially reducing the security of every ballot cast in the state. 
Federal and state law require that ballots be kept secure for 22 months after an election to allow for recounts and challenges — a timeframe Texas counties have had set in place for decades. Paxton’s opinion, which doesn’t stem from any change to state law,  theoretically permits anyone —  an aggrieved voter, activist, or out-of-state entity — to request access to ballots as soon as the day after they are counted. Such requests have been used by activists all over the country as a way to “audit” election results. 
 

The Dems better be ready to file an immediate TRO if any suck illegal ballot tampering is requested. Because that’s literally what he is proposing to allow.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Satchel

Satchel 6908

Posted
Posted

He’s an expensive criminal too!

Private law firms have charged the state more than half a million dollars to defend Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton against lawsuits that question his actions as a lawyer and a boss.

Paxton, a Republican up for reelection in November, is facing allegations that he retaliated against employees who accused him of bribery. A disciplinary committee of the state bar also filed a lawsuit seeking to sanction Paxton for his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

Instead of relying solely on staff attorneys to handle the cases, Paxton’s agency brought in three private firms that have already billed the state a combined total of $507,000 for their work, according to documents obtained by The Dallas Morning News.

The cases are nowhere near resolution, meaning the expense to taxpayers is expected to grow. In addition to the whistleblower and election suits, Paxton was indicted on fraud charges seven years ago but has not faced a jury. Taxpayers also footed the bill for that prosecution.

While an expert said it’s not unusual for attorneys general to rely on private lawyers for these kinds of challenges, he said the sheer volume of Paxton’s legal troubles is unique.

A spokeswoman for the attorney general’s office did not answer questions about why or how the outside firms were chosen, but called the two lawsuits “bogus.”

 

  • Rage+1 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tx 3 putt

tx 3 putt 76334

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, TexasHooch said:

Well how about this one:

 

https://texas.votebeat.org/2022/8/24/23320771/ken-paxton-ballots-public-records-election-security

Ken Paxton bucks legal precedent and secretary of state’s advice in letting anyone examine ballots right after elections

Attorney general’s opinion invites lawsuits over long-established ballot security and subjects election officials for possible criminal charges.

 

 

how can there be a recount if ballots have been tampered with ?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ChuckNorrisActionJeans

ChuckNorrisActionJeans 2659

Posted
Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, Satchel said:

He’s an expensive criminal too!

Private law firms have charged the state more than half a million dollars to defend Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton against lawsuits that question his actions as a lawyer and a boss.

Paxton, a Republican up for reelection in November, is facing allegations that he retaliated against employees who accused him of bribery. A disciplinary committee of the state bar also filed a lawsuit seeking to sanction Paxton for his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

Instead of relying solely on staff attorneys to handle the cases, Paxton’s agency brought in three private firms that have already billed the state a combined total of $507,000 for their work, according to documents obtained by The Dallas Morning News.

The cases are nowhere near resolution, meaning the expense to taxpayers is expected to grow. In addition to the whistleblower and election suits, Paxton was indicted on fraud charges seven years ago but has not faced a jury. Taxpayers also footed the bill for that prosecution.

While an expert said it’s not unusual for attorneys general to rely on private lawyers for these kinds of challenges, he said the sheer volume of Paxton’s legal troubles is unique.

A spokeswoman for the attorney general’s office did not answer questions about why or how the outside firms were chosen, but called the two lawsuits “bogus.”

 

This is possibly #1 of things that make me so angry that I have to just step away for the sake of my mental health.  Since R's are so "concerned" about paying for things, this needs to be plastered on billboards all across the state. And yet, the one-eyed crime spree would still win. 

Edited by ChuckNorrisActionJeans
can't grammar
  • Rage+1 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
wreckatx

wreckatx 141

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, Satchel said:

He’s an expensive criminal too!

Private law firms have charged the state more than half a million dollars to defend Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton against lawsuits that question his actions as a lawyer and a boss.

Paxton, a Republican up for reelection in November, is facing allegations that he retaliated against employees who accused him of bribery. A disciplinary committee of the state bar also filed a lawsuit seeking to sanction Paxton for his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

Instead of relying solely on staff attorneys to handle the cases, Paxton’s agency brought in three private firms that have already billed the state a combined total of $507,000 for their work, according to documents obtained by The Dallas Morning News.

The cases are nowhere near resolution, meaning the expense to taxpayers is expected to grow. In addition to the whistleblower and election suits, Paxton was indicted on fraud charges seven years ago but has not faced a jury. Taxpayers also footed the bill for that prosecution.

While an expert said it’s not unusual for attorneys general to rely on private lawyers for these kinds of challenges, he said the sheer volume of Paxton’s legal troubles is unique.

A spokeswoman for the attorney general’s office did not answer questions about why or how the outside firms were chosen, but called the two lawsuits “bogus.”

 

https://localtoday.news/la/texas-ag-ken-paxtons-legal-troubles-cost-more-than-500000-documents-show-2-19437.html

He's spent nearly $450k on the whistleblower suit alone. 

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 45492

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, TexasHooch said:

Well how about this one:

 

https://texas.votebeat.org/2022/8/24/23320771/ken-paxton-ballots-public-records-election-security

Ken Paxton bucks legal precedent and secretary of state’s advice in letting anyone examine ballots right after elections

Attorney general’s opinion invites lawsuits over long-established ballot security and subjects election officials for possible criminal charges.

 

This man must be stopped

Link to comment
Share on other sites
B00M

B00M 6280

Posted
Posted
On 6/28/2022 at 3:59 PM, troph said:

well if contraception is outlawed then you get butt sex and blow jobs back?  this is quite difficult to figure out which side to be on anymore.

You get no sex at all unless it is exclusively for the purposes of procreation. The insane Catholics are winning

Link to comment
Share on other sites
B00M

B00M 6280

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Biff Tannen said:

So this somehow just occurred to me.  Paxton has been under indictment for like 5 years right?  What makes anyone think that dotard being indicted will stop him from being president?  

Or if we gotta keep seeing this cocksucker, can somebody run a stitch through his eye lid to pull that up so he doesn't always look shit faced? Thanks in advance

Link to comment
Share on other sites
troph

troph 24562

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, B00M said:

You get no sex at all unless it is exclusively for the purposes of procreation. The insane Catholics are winning

The situation has evolved that’s for sure. Sodomy was the forbidden pleasure then it was legal for a few years now it’s headed back to forbidden but this time with real jail time. Everyone is impacted. We should like vote or something. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Willfully Horn

Willfully Horn 7913

Posted
Posted
On 6/28/2022 at 8:03 PM, troph said:

Right to privacy is in the fucking constitution it ain’t no penumbra it’s screaming out loud at us throughout, the first amendment, the third amendment, the fourth amendment, the fifth amendment, privileges and immunities clauses and the liberty clause in the 14th amendment and the fucking list goes on and on. Mother fucker I’m worked up. 

The ninth. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
Satchel

Satchel 6908

Posted
Posted

Will be the first to have an AG wear an ankle monitor?
 


DMN: Paxton will be deposed in fraud case after election, lawyer says
Dallas Morning News reporter Lauren McGaughy: 
Lawyers representing the men who accused Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton of securities fraud say they will be able to question him under oath but not until after the election.
Collin County District Court Judge Cynthia Wheless ordered Paxton to sit for a one-hour deposition on Nov. 28, according to attorneys representing former GOP Rep. Byron Cook of Corsicana and Florida billionaire businessman Joel Hochberg. Terry Jacobson, who represents the two men along with Alex More of Dallas, confirmed the date but declined to comment further. Paxton's agency and campaign staff, as well as his attorney, Mitch Little, did not respond to a request for comment.
http://www.quorumreport.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...