Jump to content

Kamala Harris 2020

Hugo Stiglitz

By Hugo Stiglitz
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 614
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Hank Kingsley
Hank Kingsley

"Haven't a clue who this person is and I really don't care as long as he said something that fits my argument" is definitely on brand for Republicans these days.  It's interesting that the curren

SDG
SDG

Hate to spoil your fun, but some “Trumpkins” don’t give a shit about race. Thier voting motive is based on jobs and the economy, MAGA, until you, and the dems, can make that realization you’ll continu

SDG
SDG

How many “why” or “I don’t understand” post did you make on FB after the election results came in?  Maybe try not demonizing those who disagree with you.  As far as election results, claiming victory

Posted Images

SDG

SDG 3319

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, Pancho Negro said:

Yes, because Republicans don't do the same???

"They're coming for your guns!"

"Babies!"

"OBAMA!  PELOSI!"

 

Read the rest of my post instead of selectively quoting.  Your the same guy who posted some bullshit article as fact even though the census bureau data shows otherwise.  Not to mention you called out “Republicans” because Starbucks, one of the most liberal companies in America does dumb shit..  As you claim, you’re a PHD student, so be smarter than that by agreeing you’re a political cuck or shut the fuck up...   

  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23367

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
59 minutes ago, Pancho Negro said:

  But back to the original topic....

I think Harris will put out feelers, but I don't think she'll run.  She has support doe...

She’s going to run.  All the signs point to it.

Everyone that’s going to run has already decided.  

We’re within a year when they start declaring.

 

 

Edited by Hugo Stiglitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SubliminalHorn

SubliminalHorn 6781

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, deac_tracy said:

Call me crazy but I don’t think flyover country would get behind a black chick from California with an Islamic sounding first name.

Could be wrong though!

Like I said, trumpkin heads will explode if she is the democratic nominee. Fox News will have them scared out of their partially intact minds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ChiTownDoc

ChiTownDoc 21139

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, SDG said:

Hate to spoil your fun, but some “Trumpkins” don’t give a shit about race. Thier voting motive is based on jobs and the economy, MAGA, until you, and the dems, can make that realization you’ll continue to wonder why Hillary lost and probably make the same mistakes...

LOL, since "some" of them manage to vote on actual issues, we should give credence to their entire movement.  Good people on both sides...it must be said!

And in case you haven't noticed there's plenty of Republicans who think Trump is a fucktard.  Just like there's shitloads of Democrats who don't 'wonder why Hillary lost'.  Seriously, who is out there wondering why she lost?  She's fucking terrible.  90% of America knows this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23367

Posted
  • Author
Posted
15 minutes ago, Pancho Negro said:

I’ve said before that u could see something like Biden running with Harris then stepping aside and her becoming president.  Seems like something he’d do.

 

i just want to see him debate dotard. 

I give it a 10% chance we see Dotard debate anyone again.  He hasn’t done a true press conference in 428 days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89618

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, SubliminalHorn said:

Like I said, trumpkin heads will explode if she is the democratic nominee. Fox News will have them scared out of their partially intact minds. 

One benefit, the closet racists will come out in droves, and will be easy to identify.  And the chances of Trump and others royally fucking up (way beyond his breeding tweet) will greatly increase. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BYG Jacob

BYG Jacob 47

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, SDG said:

How many “why” or “I don’t understand” post did you make on FB after the election results came in?  Maybe try not demonizing those who disagree with you.  As far as election results, claiming victory early worked so well for you last time...

Negs away you reich wing cunt

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SDG

SDG 3319

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, BYG Jacob said:

Don't look through my profile to find posts to neg, and don't be a right wing cunt.

You keep following me around negging. I’m in you head which makes you my bitch.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23367

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Guys, I’m going humbly request that we not neg posters in the cloak room.  

I’d like this to be a place where people feel like they can speak freely without fear of getting negged, regardless of how offensive their opinions might be.

Negging posts you don’t like is counterproductive and moves this forum closer to an echo chamber which I don’t think any of us wants.

Peace and love.

 

 

Edited by Hugo Stiglitz
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gil Bang

Gil Bang 25907

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, Message Board User said:

I'll be surprised if the Dems ever run a ticket without at least one minority.  They absolutely have to have enthusiastic minority turnout to win.

I'll be surprised if the GOP ever runs a ticket without an old, white, racist asshole.  They absolutely have to have and enthusiastic old, white, racist asshole turnout to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TDunk

TDunk 590

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Guys, I’m going humbly request that we not neg posters in the cloak room.  

I’d like this to be a place where people feel like they can speak freely without fear of getting negged, regardless of how offensive their opinions might be.

Negging posts you don’t like is counterproductive and moves this forum closer to an echo chamber which I don’t think any of us wants.

Peace and love.

 

 

 

 

Bigger hands than DOTUS

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pancho

Pancho 44687

Posted
Posted
On 4/20/2018 at 10:59 PM, SDG said:

Read the rest of my post instead of selectively quoting.  Your the same guy who posted some bullshit article as fact even though the census bureau data shows otherwise.  Not to mention you called out “Republicans” because Starbucks, one of the most liberal companies in America does dumb shit..  As you claim, you’re a PHD student, so be smarter than that by agreeing you’re a political cuck or shut the fuck up...   

Okay. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FondrenRoad

FondrenRoad 4378

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

I give it a 10% chance we see Dotard debate anyone again.  He hasn’t done a true press conference in 428 days.

Yep, I can see him missing all the primary and general debates and opting to tweet attack debate points made by opponents. Its actually smart too since he gets destroyed in direct debates every time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23367

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Aqua Buddha said:

 

Kristen Gillibrand beats Harris in the primaries.  Mark it down.

 

I’d take that bet.

Gillibrand might be the better candidate but I think Harris will outdo her in the primaries.

Why?  Harris will perform better in the Southern States...if they get that far.

Edited by Hugo Stiglitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23367

Posted
  • Author
Posted

 

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) said Monday she will no longer accept donations from corporate PACs, the latest in a string of progressive Democrats who have vowed to do so.

Harris told the hosts of "The Breakfast Club" radio show in New York that she was caught off guard when asked recently at a town hall about accepting corporate donations. She said at the time it "depends."

"So I've actually made a decision since I've had that conversation that I'm not going to accept corporate PAC checks," she said Monday.

"We're all supposed to have an equal vote, but money has now really tipped the balance between an individual having equal power in an election to a corporation," she added.

Harris said the Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Citizens United v. FEC, which allowed corporations to make unlimited political contributions, has resulted in an "outsized influence" on politics.

Harris joins Sens. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Kirsten Gillibrand(D-N.Y.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in pledging not to accept corporate PAC donations.

Harris is considered a potential candidate for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination. She demurred when asked about that possibility on Monday. 

"Right now, I'm just focused on what's in front of me," she said, adding that she'll be working to turn out Democratic voters in this year's midterm elections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pancho

Pancho 44687

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

 

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) said Monday she will no longer accept donations from corporate PACs, the latest in a string of progressive Democrats who have vowed to do so.

Harris told the hosts of "The Breakfast Club" radio show in New York that she was caught off guard when asked recently at a town hall about accepting corporate donations. She said at the time it "depends."

"So I've actually made a decision since I've had that conversation that I'm not going to accept corporate PAC checks," she said Monday.

"We're all supposed to have an equal vote, but money has now really tipped the balance between an individual having equal power in an election to a corporation," she added.

Harris said the Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Citizens United v. FEC, which allowed corporations to make unlimited political contributions, has resulted in an "outsized influence" on politics.

Harris joins Sens. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Kirsten Gillibrand(D-N.Y.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in pledging not to accept corporate PAC donations.

Harris is considered a potential candidate for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination. She demurred when asked about that possibility on Monday. 

"Right now, I'm just focused on what's in front of me," she said, adding that she'll be working to turn out Democratic voters in this year's midterm elections.

I listened to this interview on the way to work.  Harris seemed like she was in campaign mode.  Very real when answering questions, and when pressed, she gave very vague responses.

I think she’s running now.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brandywine

Brandywine 1316

Posted
Posted
On 4/21/2018 at 1:05 PM, Hugo Stiglitz said:

I give it a 10% chance we see Dotard debate anyone again.  He hasn’t done a true press conference in 428 days.

Well, he’s gotten away with not doing most things that Presidents in the past have done as part of the job of being or getting to be President. So, yep, I think you’re right. He won’t hear any complaints from the GOP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...