Jump to content

Mark Meadows uses campaign funds to buy wife jewelry?

Gil Bang

By Gil Bang
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

Foosters

Foosters 17734

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, workswithseed said:

Definitely not good, but definitely not something that will be I'm people's radar of the worst thing that was used with campaign money.

You're a law and order poster. What he did is a crime. People's radar? Shouldn't he be prosecuted?

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
SydneyCarton

SydneyCarton 47885

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted (edited)
45 minutes ago, workswithseed said:

Now read the rest of the comment.

Now go back and re-read HIS comment and try to do a better job of understanding what he's saying. Nevermind, let me spell it out for you, son. 

therockchamp-298x381.jpg

It doesn't matter what the rest of your fucking sentence said! Because it's the first part of the sentence that is the fucking hallmark of the republican party. Let me illustrate:

"Definitely not good, but Obama initially put kids in cages."
"Definitely not good, but most of those people were going to die from Covid anyway."
"Definitely not good, but Biden also was rude to Trump at the debates."
"Definitely not good, but maybe George Floyd should have considered not being black."

The point is whatever follows the first part doesn't matter, because the first part is a an existing systemic poison of WhatAboutIsm that taints the modern Republican party and it's fanboys and allows that balming cognitive dissonance to exist where you don't have to be accountable for any of your own fucking behavior. It's fucking reprehenisble.

Edited by SydneyCarton
  • Hook 'Em 17
  • Like 7
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dnaguy

Dnaguy 11777

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, Gil Bang said:

 

Husband: What do you want?

Wife: Ann Hand necklace!

Husband. Ok. You mean a bracelet that goes around your hand.

Wife: No necklace.

Husband: Ohhhh.

Wife: Ann Hand necklace.

Hisband: But that’s a bracelet.

Wife: what is?

Husband: A hand necklace.

Wife: That’s who makes it.

Husband: Who?

Wife: Ann hand.

Husband: Well of course what else would. Their feet?!

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gil Bang

Gil Bang 25898

Posted
  • Author
Posted
34 minutes ago, workswithseed said:

Definitely not good, but definitely not something that will be I'm people's radar of the worst thing that was used with campaign money.

Well, I suppose Duncan Hunter using $650 in campaign cash to buy an airline seat for a fucking rabbit may have been worse, but so? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
workswithseed

workswithseed 2037

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, hayden_horn said:

nah, dude, he's got a point. define some of the things that are worse than using public campaign funds to buy your wife jewelry.

I said no one is going to really care. I'm glad you care, but if you think even most of the whole country will care, well I have a bridge to sell ya. This isn't a "Kids in cages." @SydneyCarton this is a guy using money, which is not even equal to that.

  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ndawg

ndawg 1242

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, workswithseed said:

I said no one is going to really care. I'm glad you care, but if you think even most of the whole country will care, well I have a bridge to sell ya. This isn't a "Kids in cages." @SydneyCarton this is a guy using money, which is not even equal to that.

The entire point of the replies to you was to state what should be obvious: the Republicans are once again hypocrites. Your "I've got my finger on the pulse of public opinion better than y'all" schtick is misplaced here.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hayden_horn

hayden_horn 11360

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, workswithseed said:

I said no one is going to really care. I'm glad you care, but if you think even most of the whole country will care, well I have a bridge to sell ya. This isn't a "Kids in cages." @SydneyCarton this is a guy using money, which is not even equal to that.

i mean, he's fucking stealing, but i get it, that doesn't seem to matter to people like you. 

when you continually hand wave away malfeasance, you normalize it. there are cut and dried campaign finance laws, and he appears to have violated them, if the reporting is to be believed.

"definitely not good, but" is on par with "i'm not a racist, but"

i'm just pointing out your hypocrisy. you side with corrupt republicans at every fucking turn. i want as much corruption out as possible. you evidently don't care. that's your problem. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SydneyCarton

SydneyCarton 47885

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, workswithseed said:

I said no one is going to really care. I'm glad you care, but if you think even most of the whole country will care, well I have a bridge to sell ya. This isn't a "Kids in cages." @SydneyCarton this is a guy using money, which is not even equal to that.

Again, you willfully dense motherfucker, it doesn’t matter what the second part of the sentence is, in this instance you chose kids with cages. It’s the fucking first part. I’ll assume at this point that you’re not missing the point, you just don’t fucking get it. The equivocation is the poison. Not jewelry that costs a few grand. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
workswithseed

workswithseed 2037

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, hayden_horn said:

i mean, he's fucking stealing, but i get it, that doesn't seem to matter to people like you. It's why I said that this is bad.

when you continually hand wave away malfeasance, you normalize it. there are cut and dried campaign finance laws, and he appears to have violated them, if the reporting is to be believed.

"definitely not good, but" is on par with "i'm not a racist, but" What?

i'm just pointing out your hypocrisy. you side with corrupt republicans at every fucking turn. i want as much corruption out as possible. you evidently don't care. that's your problem. I didn't, but you can believe that I said that I didn't care.

 

1 hour ago, SydneyCarton said:

Again, you willfully dense motherfucker, it doesn’t matter what the second part of the sentence is, in this instance you chose kids with cages. It’s the fucking first part. I’ll assume at this point that you’re not missing the point, you just don’t fucking get it. The equivocation is the poison. Not jewelry that costs a few grand. 

I wonder, would you care that $2,600 was stolen more than kids in cages then? I have a hard time that you'd care for them the same. 

Apparently I should have said "and", and not "but", since y'all stop reading after the but. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hayden_horn

hayden_horn 11360

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, workswithseed said:

 

I wonder, would you care that $2,600 was stolen more than kids in cages then? I have a hard time that you'd care for them the same. 

Apparently I should have said "and", and not "but", since y'all stop reading after the but. 

holy shit, dude. you know the same district attorney that handles murder cases also prosecutes petty theft? you are trying to say this doesn't matter, because worse shit is going on, and you're using it as an equivocation? stop and have a think.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
workswithseed

workswithseed 2037

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, hayden_horn said:

holy shit, dude. you know the same district attorney that handles murder cases also prosecutes petty theft? you are trying to say this doesn't matter, because worse shit is going on, and you're using it as an equivocation? stop and have a think.

I'm said the populace wouldn't give a shit. Legal will probably give a shit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SydneyCarton

SydneyCarton 47885

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, workswithseed said:

 

I wonder, would you care that $2,600 was stolen more than kids in cages then? I have a hard time that you'd care for them the same. 

Apparently I should have said "and", and not "but", since y'all stop reading after the but. 

Unlike you, many of us here have the capacity to not only a) read, but b) hold two or more different thoughts in our head at the same time. 

I read after the "but." I'll remind you in my OP I literally gave 4 sentences, all constructed by me, and they all had content after the "but." So yeah, I guess you failed to actually understand that I did indeed read the sentences I authored myself. I've been attempting to point out the fact that the first part of the sentence is indicative of a brain rot that is actually worse than the second half. 

That being said, feel free to expound to us how heartbroken and horrified you are over all the kids in cages. All Lives Matter, right? We'll wait. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DigglerontheHoof

DigglerontheHoof 21065

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, SydneyCarton said:

Now go back and re-read HIS comment and try to do a better job of understanding what he's saying. Nevermind, let me spell it out for you, son. 

therockchamp-298x381.jpg

It doesn't matter what the rest of your fucking sentence said! Because it's the first part of the sentence that is the fucking hallmark of the republican party. Let me illustrate:

"Definitely not good, but Obama initially put kids in cages."
"Definitely not good, but most of those people were going to die from Covid anyway."
"Definitely not good, but Biden also was rude to Trump at the debates."
"Definitely not good, but maybe George Floyd should have considered not being black."

The point is whatever follows the first part doesn't matter, because the first part is a an existing systemic poison of WhatAboutIsm that taints the modern Republican party and it's fanboys and allows that balming cognitive dissonance to exist where you don't have to be accountable for any of your own fucking behavior. It's fucking reprehenisble.

Yep, my pappy always said, when you hear a "but" in the sentence, listen to the second half, that's the part they mean. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pescado_Rojo

Pescado_Rojo 19331

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, hayden_horn said:

i mean, he's fucking stealing, but i get it, that doesn't seem to matter to people like you. 

when you continually hand wave away malfeasance, you normalize it. there are cut and dried campaign finance laws, and he appears to have violated them, if the reporting is to be believed.

"definitely not good, but" is on par with "i'm not a racist, but"

i'm just pointing out your hypocrisy. you side with corrupt republicans at every fucking turn. i want as much corruption out as possible. you evidently don't care. that's your problem. 

Theft only matters when they can dig up a previous conviction to justify killing an unarmed black man for driving while black. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89449

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, workswithseed said:

I wonder, would you care that $2,600 was stolen more than kids in cages then? I have a hard time that you'd care for them the same. 

The problem is that some politician who is completely comfortable with wrongly using $2,600, and is so comfortable with it that he'll let his wife parade that shit around in public, is probably going to be very comfortable with a lot of  shitty stuff.    It's a pretty arrogant and very bold thing to flaunt your misuse of funds so blatantly.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bullneck

Bullneck 18987

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

The problem is that some politician who is completely comfortable with wrongly using $2,600, and is so comfortable with it that he'll let his wife parade that shit around in public, is probably going to be very comfortable with a lot of  shitty stuff.    It's a pretty arrogant and very bold thing to flaunt your misuse of funds so blatantly.  

They're pikers.  THIS is how you grift:

b9a9b7ad69b256ad8eb234f95de4d9d8_xl.jpg

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TexArcher

TexArcher 37520

Posted
Posted

I swear to god, there could be video of Donald Trump selling our nuclear codes to Putin while Mitch McConnell snorted coke off a 12-year-old boy's dick in the background and members of their idiotic cult would be online going, "See, it's not as bad as it looks because..."

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Herpa Derpa

Herpa Derpa 6112

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, workswithseed said:

I said no one is going to really care. I'm glad you care, but if you think even most of the whole country will care, well I have a bridge to sell ya. This isn't a "Kids in cages." @SydneyCarton this is a guy using money, which is not even equal to that.

You can use a computer but are a dumb person.

6 hours ago, workswithseed said:

I wonder, would you care that $2,600 was stolen more than kids in cages then? I have a hard time that you'd care for them the same. 

Apparently I should have said "and", and not "but", since y'all stop reading after the but. 

You can use a computer and are a dumb person.

 

4 hours ago, Longhornfan1024 said:

You were trying to minimize it because it's a Republican who was caught doing it.  Stop being a pussy and just own it.  

He is a pussy, thus he will never own it.

 

9 minutes ago, Underdog said:

That necklace is worth $50 bucks in Philadelphia. 

I believe you're thinking of the price of an Ann Hand Job.  Though I didn't realize old Philly Ann had raised her prices.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 year later...
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...