Jump to content

The Robert Mueller Investigation

Hugo Stiglitz

By Hugo Stiglitz
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23367

Posted
Posted (edited)

A2FB85D5-8F0F-45F9-AEA6-1EAF8EBA8292_zps

https://www.justice.gov/sco

 

Mueller’s Charges:
 
18 U.S. Code § 1001 - False Statements
Paul Manafort 
Rick Gates
Alex van der Zwaan
Michael Flynn
George Papadopoulus
 
 

18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to defraud the United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/371

Paul Manafort 
Rick Gates 
Konstantin Kilimnik 
26 Russians
 
 
18 U.S. Code § 981 - Civil forfeiture
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/981
Paul Manafort 
Konstanstin Kilimnik 
 
 
18 U.S. Code § 982 - Criminal forfeiture
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/982
Paul Manafort 
Konstantin Kilimnik 
 
 
18 U.S. Code § 1956 - Laundering of monetary instruments
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1956
Paul Manafort
Konstanstin Kilimnik 
 
 
18 U.S. Code § 1349 - Conspiracy 
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1349
Paul Manafort
Rick Gates 
26 Russians
 
 
18 U.S. Code § 1344 - Bank fraud Conspiracy 
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1344
Paul Manafort 
Rick Gates
 
 
18 U.S. Code § 1028 - Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents, authentication features, and information.  Identity theft/fraud.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1028
26 Russians
Richard Pinedo

 
Edited by Hugo Stiglitz
  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
  • Fuck You 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 34.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Hugo Stiglitz

    3238

  • Anastasis

    2088

  • David Dennison

    1559

  • triplehorn

    1384

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Goredho
Goredho

Just to make sure I have the alternative facts straight...  Our government -- but I'm guessing only the deep state part of it --- is now guilty of torturing a poor, naive Russian exchange student who

Incredulity
Incredulity

liberals suddenly being terrified of Russia and manic for election integrity is just pure comedy gold.

Chooky
Chooky

I don't believe for a moment that any of this is entertaining to you.  I think it gives you a bit of anxiety knowing that your best weapon against a group who you despise is a bumbling fraud as a busi

Posted Images

Pods

Pods 7637

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, CrownKing said:

I hope the other smokey gets lost in the woods. 

 

Trampled in the stampede. 

1 hour ago, Jimbaround said:

Already over 700 users.  Shouldn't take too long to get back to normal.

Edited by Pods
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23367

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

From all the recent news to break, it’s remarkable Cambridge Analytica behaved EXACTLY like a sophisticated Kremlin covert influence operation:  Bribery/blackmail tactics, nefarious data/info acquisition, fake news proliferation, plausible deniability with third party front accounts and organizations.  And they operated on a global scale subverting democracy for profit.

Edited by Hugo Stiglitz
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Swam@Texas

Swam@Texas 112

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

From all the recent news to break, it’s remarkable Cambridge Analytica behaved EXACTLY like a sophisticated Kremlin covert influence operation:  Bribery/blackmail tactics, nefarious data/info acquisition, fake news proliferation, plausible deniability with third party front accounts and organizations.  And they operated on a global scale subverting democracy for profit.

And did exactly what the Barack Hussein Obama, II campaign was hailed as being a technological visionary for doing in 2012. (But they pinky-swore to not do it again and nobody raised an eyebrow because, well, the results justified the behavior.)

  • Like 3
  • Fuck You 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gil Bang

Gil Bang 26230

Posted
Posted

 

9 minutes ago, Swam@Texas said:

And did exactly what the Barack Hussein Obama, II campaign was hailed as being a technological visionary for doing in 2012. (But they pinky-swore to not do it again and nobody raised an eyebrow because, well, the results justified the behavior.)

New board, same bleeding cunt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DixonHur

DixonHur 11959

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Swam@Texas said:

And did exactly what the Barack Hussein Obama, II campaign was hailed as being a technological visionary for doing in 2012. (But they pinky-swore to not do it again and nobody raised an eyebrow because, well, the results justified the behavior.)

The fact that you can't see the difference between the two is mind boggling, but par for the course with you, so not unexpected. 

1. Obama launched an app called something like "Obama 2012" to support...well, Obama vs. Cambridge Analytics used data gathered from a generic "personality quiz"

2. Obama's use of the data collected from HIS app was legal....Cambridge Analytics acquired the data from a 3rd party, which breached Facebook's user agreement, and failed to delete it when asked by Facebook.  That is what's called an illegal use of the collected data.

BTW, good to see the wi-fi's back up.  Must have been that increase in military spending that did the trick.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CowboyFred

CowboyFred 1162

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, Swam@Texas said:

And did exactly what the Barack Hussein Obama, II campaign was hailed as being a technological visionary for doing in 2012. (But they pinky-swore to not do it again and nobody raised an eyebrow because, well, the results justified the behavior.)

QA82k11.gif

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
VRHorn

VRHorn 732

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, Swam@Texas said:

And did exactly what the Barack Hussein Obama, II campaign was hailed as being a technological visionary for doing in 2012. (But they pinky-swore to not do it again and nobody raised an eyebrow because, well, the results justified the behavior.)

At least this bit moved over to the new board - I was worried that some personal growth might take place.

Any comparison between 2012 and 2016 is suspect because there were fundamentally different processes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
yaqdum

yaqdum 182

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

From all the recent news to break, it’s remarkable Cambridge Analytica behaved EXACTLY like a sophisticated Kremlin covert influence operation:  Bribery/blackmail tactics, nefarious data/info acquisition, fake news proliferation, plausible deniability with third party front accounts and organizations.  And they operated on a global scale subverting democracy for profit.

yes, and after learning from taped comments from the chief of CA how committed they are to gaining kompromat that we have a house and senate that mostly fears taking one step off the path dictated for them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BYG Jacob

BYG Jacob 47

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Swam@Texas said:

And did exactly what the Barack Hussein Obama, II campaign was hailed as being a technological visionary for doing in 2012. (But they pinky-swore to not do it again and nobody raised an eyebrow because, well, the results justified the behavior.)

BUT OBAMA!!eleventyone.!.!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmokeyTheBear

SmokeyTheBear 5569

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Swam@Texas said:

And did exactly what the Barack Hussein Obama, II campaign was hailed as being a technological visionary for doing in 2012. (But they pinky-swore to not do it again and nobody raised an eyebrow because, well, the results justified the behavior.)

confused.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Clearlakehorn

Clearlakehorn 8

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Swam@Texas said:

And did exactly what the Barack Hussein Obama, II campaign was hailed as being a technological visionary for doing in 2012. (But they pinky-swore to not do it again and nobody raised an eyebrow because, well, the results justified the behavior.)

Yes sir this is 100% correct. They were the EXACT same thing. Completely the same. Hacking third parties to illegally gain information to use against the American electoral system on the behest of a presidential candidate? What? That was all Hillary! She hired Steele and paid for the dossier! The dossier that is completely fake news because it doesn't exist. 

Now the Dems are preparing for the next election hacking by taking 17 year old kids who will be old enough to vote and brainwashing them with their garbage/paying them with that plutonium money to March against our right to own assault weapons! It's all happening brother and it stinks. 

They are even getting that little bald illegal Mexican lesbian to be the face of their corruption and attempts to overthrow the greatest part of the Constitution. 

Edited by Clearlakehorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BYG Jacob

BYG Jacob 47

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Clearlakehorn said:

Yes sir this is 100% correct. They were the EXACT same thing. Completely the same. Hacking third parties to illegally gain information to use against the American electoral system on the behest of a president candidate? What? That was all Hillary! She hired Steele and paid for the dossier! The dossier that is completely fake news because it doesn't exist. 

Now the Dems are preparing for the next election hacking by taking 17 year old kids who will be old enough to vote and brainwashing them with their garbage/paying them with that plutonium money to March against our right to own assault weapons! It's all happening brother and it stinks. 

They are even getting that little bald illegal Mexican lesbian to be the face of their corruption and attempts to overthrow the greatest part of the Constitution. 

Alright, who are you and why did you snipe clh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23367

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

“I asked Olson about being recruited for Trump’s squad. He rolled his eyes, suggesting that this was never going to happen and that it was not just a matter of conflicts. (Though a conservative stalwart, Olson has in recent years enhanced his reputation by becoming a forceful advocate for gay marriage. Associating with Trump could well tarnish that shine.)

So this didn’t get too far? I queried. Olson shrugged in an I’m-not-getting-into-details way. “Who knows how these trial balloons happen?” he said, in a manner that definitely suggested he knows how they happen. He then joked, “Joe [diGenova] lasted longer. At least two days.” 

So is Trump going to have trouble finding attorneys? Olson shrugged again. “Let me ask this a different way,” I said. “In the last few days has any lawyer come up to you and said, ‘I’m willing to work for Trump?'”

Without hesitation, Olson said, “No.” Not at all? “Not at all.”

Washington, I noted, is full of Republican lawyers who generally do not mind being in the middle of headline-generating scandals and earning a bit of notice. Olson laughed: “That’s right.” And not one of them had contacted him to say he or she was willing to sign up? “No,” he repeated.

Edited by Hugo Stiglitz
  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...