Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 2:44 AM, Bama Chick said:

Yeahhhhh, public opinion looks like it’s GREAT for Mein Trumpf!
 

 


PS - the mods have asked over and over to quit the off topic, personal attacks and bullshittery in this thread. It’s aggravating and juvenile and it’s the same handful of people over and over - from BOTH SIDES.

So I may or may not have just reported a few of y’all.

And I definitely reported the crazy person on their 93rd username.

Just wanted to be transparent. I’m tired of coming here to see 150 new posts and 113 of them are the same 7 people quoting each other and arguing and sniping like cunts over nothing.
 

 

Expand  

But, Mom, he started it first!

In other news, 90% of Democrats, 54% of Republicans, and 74% of Independents want the full Mueller report to be made public.

http://maristpoll.marist.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/NPR_PBS-NewsHour_Marist-Poll_USA-NOS-and-Tables_1903251153.pdf#page=3

The majority of every demographic group wants it released but if we exclude explicitly identified Republicans the weakest support is found among (under 70%):

  • Men - White - Not College Graduate
  • Baby Boomers (54-72)
  • Silent-Greatest (Over 72)
  • White Evangelical Christians
  • Rural

Not a surprise, but again we see exactly who "the base" is. What will it take to reach these people?

Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 11:46 AM, bolverk said:

Not a surprise, but again we see exactly who "the base" is. What will it take to reach these people?

Expand  

According to Yuri Bezmenov circa 1983, nothing.  But that analysis was before the internet and Fox News, so it’s probably worse today.

Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 7:52 AM, Jack Straw said:

You don’t get free reign to be a racist piece of low life white trash simply by virtue of posting on the politics board.  Sorry.  It appears that you’re also a whiny cunt who can’t take the consequences of posting hateful, treasonous garbage.  

Expand  

Racist?  Fuck you.  

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 12:36 PM, tjhooker said:

The collective calling you that affects you still?  I got over that a while back.  I've challenged countless posters who say that to find one post that is racist.  Never has someone found anything. Not once but they still say it.  Just ignore it. 

Expand  

I won’t be seeing any more of that loser’s posts.  

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 12:41 PM, tjhooker said:

That's one way.  I just think it is this bucket thinking which is prevalent here.  All Rs are racist bucket.  You have to be thrown in it because in their mind all Rs are racist.  No specific proof needed just you are.  Makes it easier for them to hate you. 

Expand  

That’s the modern left.  Everyone that disagrees with them is a racist, sexist, homophobe.  They get that from their childish leaders.  

  • Like 4
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 12:44 PM, Johnny Sack said:

That’s the modern left.  Everyone that disagrees with them is a racist, sexist, homophobe.  They get that from their childish leaders.  

Expand  

The best way to combat this is to stop doing and saying things that are racist, sexist, and homophobic. Oh, and to support policies that are not racist, sexist, and homophobic.

Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 3:19 AM, jimmyjazz said:

It wouldn't be the worst thing in the world if the powers that be said "no new accounts" for a few weeks.

Expand  

That’s not going to happen. But there could be a post-number requirement before gaining access to this forum. That’d force someone to make 50 or so quality posts elsewhere before getting in here. 

Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 7:26 AM, notre dame joe said:

She's just fine a 20th Century career politician, the demagoguery and flip flops are just stock and trade.  

 

Both parties equally polite?  Compile a list of Obama assassination fantasies and we'll compare.

Expand  

Still strange.

Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 11:29 AM, Tom said:

 

Thanks Obama.

Expand  

The only POTUS in the history of GDP to fail to achieve 3% growth in any one year. 

When you couple that with deficit spending 9 trillion dollars,

printing 2 trillion dollars, (to buy bonds to prop up equities)

keeping interest rates artificially low at 0% for Obama's first 7 years in office (only time that's ever happened in history) 

 

Economically, if you truly examine everything, Obama was a bumbling idiot at best.  

  • Fuck You 4
Posted

The supposed money shot from Barr’s memo:

“[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

The bracket [T] indicates that’s not the beginning of that key sentence.  I wonder why Barr chose to omit the first part of the quoted sentence?  It certainly stands to change the meaning in context.

A full week has passed and they’re still hiding the Mueller report.

Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 12:28 PM, tjhooker said:

Watch this.  It will be the Obama economy until it starts to dip then it won't be anymore.  I see how this works.  It's his economy for years on end apparently.  

BTW the president has little affect on the economy regardless of party.  Doesn't matter.  Economy is going to do what it is going to do.  Presidents can help congress pass policy that can massage the edges but overall a president doesn't make or break an economy.  If you have to assign credit Congress has the power of the purse.  I don't even give them that much credit either way.  The fed chairman may have more impact than all of them. 

Expand  

Well, based on, say, third grade arithmetic, when the recovery gets to be about 15 years old, and if Trump is still president, then it will be the mostly Trump recovery/economy.  No need to "watch".

Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 2:54 PM, XingTheRubicon said:

The only POTUS in the history of GDP to fail to achieve 3% growth in any one year. 

When you couple that with deficit spending 9 trillion dollars,

printing 2 trillion dollars, (to buy bonds to prop up equities)

keeping interest rates artificially low at 0% for Obama's first 7 years in office (only time that's ever happened in history) 

Economically, if you truly examine everything, Obama was a bumbling idiot at best.  

Expand  

Donald Trump has continued the trend of sub 3% growth.

Donald Trump has increased deficit spending to record levels.

Donald Trump has overseen the highest trade deficit in U.S. history.

All during an decade long economic expansion that began under his predecessor.

Donald Trump is kind of fucking it up.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
  On 3/29/2019 at 3:03 PM, David Dennison said:

Donald Trump has continued the trend of sub 3% growth.

Expand  
 
  Quote

 

That's because the 3.1 percent measure more directly looks at growth in 2018. The 2.9 percent measure, on the other hand, is impacted by the GDP number from way back in the first quarter of 2017.  The 2 most common ways of measuring GDP averaged 3%, with 2018 alone finishing at 3.1%.

 

Expand  
 
 

Far better GDP growth than ANY of Obama's 8 years, especially that piece of shit 1.9% in his last year.

 

**Keep in mind, that's without quantitative easing and artificially suppressing interest rates.

Edited by XingTheRubicon
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 3:40 PM, XingTheRubicon said:

Far better GDP growth than ANY of Obama's 8 years, especially that piece of shit 1.9% in his last year.

 

**Keep in mind, that's without quantitative easing and artificially suppressing interest rates.

Expand  

This is some third rate sophistry here. Obama inherited an economic disaster and had to take steps to address the calamity. He did so at political risk. The economy did recover. Yet you roll out a narrow line of evidence to claim he was a failure.

You ignore context and hope your audience does the same. We know that works with about 35% of the electorate, but it's still basically lying. You good with that?

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)
  On 3/29/2019 at 3:45 PM, RomaVicta said:

This is some third rate sophistry here. Obama inherited an economic disaster and had to take steps to address the calamity. He did so at political risk. The economy did recover. Yet you roll out a narrow line of evidence to claim he was a failure.

You ignore context and hope your audience does the same. We know that works with about 35% of the electorate, but it's still basically lying. You good with that?

Expand  

The economic disaster is precisely why there was so much opportunity for growth.  The Dow was at 6,500 in March of 2009.  I can find someone at Kroger that could have achieved 3% GDP with those starting parameters.  You understand, the economy is like a rubber band, right?  You stretch it one way and it always eventually comes back.  I hope you understand that.

I noticed you didn't address the whole 'printing 2 trillion' or training wheel interest rates.  If John McCain had those numbers, you might see it differently, I'm guessing.  Economy-wise, Trump will compare to Clinton and Reagan when all is said and done.  Obama was a naive amateur, at best...ask a business owner/your boss, etc.

 

In summation, averaging only 2.1% GDP growth while deficit spending 9 trillion, unprecedented training wheel interest rates, 2 trillion QE, is hapless by any metric...well, unless you're a complete shill.

Edited by XingTheRubicon
  • Fuck You 1
Posted

The POTUS gets far to much credit/blame for.the economy. Trump better hope the next recession is after 2020 after all the crowing he’s been doing.

Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 3:55 PM, XingTheRubicon said:

The economic disaster is precisely why there was so much opportunity for growth.  The Dow was at 6,500 in March of 2009.  I can find someone at Kroger that could have achieved 3% GDP with those starting parameters.  

I noticed you didn't address the whole 'printing 2 trillion' or training wheel interest rates.  If John McCain had those numbers, you might see it differently, I'm guessing.  Economy-wise, Trump will compare to Clinton and Reagan when all is said and done.  Obama was a naive amateur, at best...ask a business owner/your boss, etc.

Expand  

You think you know me, but you project partisan hackism. Go kowtow to the almighty business owner who knows what is best for all. You have your boilerplate religion down pat. 

9a52cb80f4ac267521c18dd2f4ceab4f.gif

 

Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 3:45 PM, RomaVicta said:

This is some third rate sophistry here. Obama inherited an economic disaster and had to take steps to address the calamity. He did so at political risk. The economy did recover. Yet you roll out a narrow line of evidence to claim he was a failure.

You ignore context and hope your audience does the same. We know that works with about 35% of the electorate, but it's still basically lying. You good with that?

Expand  

Obama also had a GOP House doing everything it could to sabotage the economy for 6 of his 8 years in office.

Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 4:02 PM, RomaVicta said:

You think you know me, but you project partisan hackism. Go kowtow to the almighty business owner who knows what is best for all. You have your boilerplate religion down pat. 

 

 

Expand  
1

I like your posts, we just see things differently, that's all.

 

and you calling me partisan is chortle-worthy 

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 2:42 AM, Gil Bang said:

Do you believe that he's corrupt as POTUS?  

Do you think it's OK that people doing business before the government (T Mobile for one), and foreign govts spend shitloads of money at Trump properties?  Do you think it's OK that he goes to one of his properties frequently, and the secret service has to pay him in order to protect him?   These types of questions can go on and on. 

Bottom line...does he get your vote again?

Expand  

He probably doesn't get my vote again. He wouldn't have gotten my vote if just about any other democrat had run in 2016.  That the DNC hooked their Wagon to Hillary was as sleazy as it gets.  Party uber alles was (and still is ) their motto I believe.

I don't know if he's been corrupt as POTUS (meaning he's an agent for Russia or is sympathetic to them). I do know he's been successful at some things that have helped the economy (that's taken right from folks on NPR syndicated shows).

 I want to know what's actually in the Mueller report to make a definitive statement about his corruption as POTUS. I've stated that pretty clearly here the past several days. I want an independent accounting of what's in it.  Impeachment doesn't bother me if he's guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors. 

Mr. Obama had IRS "issues" (and other issues ACA blatant lies, fast and furious, etc.),  those were all pretty damned bad, and those kinds of actions don't happen without approval from the highest placed power.

 

 

Posted

The job of the party out of office is to become the party in office. (GOP strategy)


(National Journal): What’s the job?
The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president.

-Mitch McConnell.

Fortunately, he doesn't waste any of his wind even mentioning the country. He doesn't care about the country. He is the leader of his party, the only thing that matters except for likely personal enrichment.

Go cash that NRA check, Mitch, you great American, you.

Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 4:10 PM, RomaVicta said:

The job of the party out of office is to become the party in office. (GOP strategy)


(National Journal): What’s the job?
The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president.

-Mitch McConnell.

Fortunately, he doesn't waste any of his wind even mentioning the country. He doesn't care about the country. He is the leader of his party, the only thing that matters except for likely personal enrichment.

Go cash that NRA check, Mitch, you great American, you.

Expand  

What was that about partisan hackery?

 

Do you honestly think if Dems were fed truth serum, they want Trump and America's economy to succeed right now?

 

and, I agree with you about McConnell...good lord, he's embarrassing 

Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 4:06 PM, Onboard 2.0 said:

He probably doesn't get my vote again. He wouldn't have gotten my vote if just about any other democrat had run in 2016.  That the DNC hooked their Wagon to Hillary was as sleazy as it gets.  Party uber alles was (and still is ) their motto I believe.

I don't know if he's been corrupt as POTUS (meaning he's an agent for Russia or is sympathetic to them). I do know he's been successful at some things that have helped the economy (that's taken right from folks on NPR syndicated shows).

 I want to know what's actually in the Mueller report to make a definitive statement about his corruption as POTUS. I've stated that pretty clearly here the past several days. I want an independent accounting of what's in it.  Impeachment doesn't bother me if he's guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors. 

Mr. Obama had IRS "issues" (and other issues ACA blatant lies, fast and furious, etc.),  those were all pretty damned bad, and those kinds of actions don't happen without approval from the highest placed power.

 

 

Expand  

You do know that there are more corrupt possibilities than simply being an agent for Russia?  Take his hotel in DC for instance which is always filled up with foreign and domestic lobbyists who are staying there intentionally to gain favor from Trump by fattening his pockets.  Take the fact that when traveling, he doesn't get bids for accommodations from multiple hotels.  Instead, he stays at his own hotels and has the government pay market rate for them.

It also wouldn't be beneath him to quietly try to push federal funds into all types of personal business interests via no-bid contracts.  Grift is his game.  Always has been.

I've never thought he was an intentional traitor.  At worst, I've always thought he is an accidental traitor.  His singular goal is self enrichment.  How he achieves that is inconsequential to him.  If anything, he is such a conman that in a deal with Putin, I'd expect him to promise Putin something, let Putin deliver his side, and then renege on his promise to Putin.  Historically, that's the way he's tried to conduct business with everyone forever.  Its why he had to go to Russia to get lending in the first place.  Western banks wanted nothing to do with him anymore.

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 4:14 PM, XingTheRubicon said:

What was that about partisan hackery?

 

Do you honestly think if Dems were fed truth serum, they want Trump and America's economy to succeed right now?

 

and, I agree with you about McConnell...good lord, he's embarrassing 

Expand  

Sorry quoting McConnell to support a post about obstructionism seems like partisan hackery to you. McConnell said it and did it. 

You presume to know how I would react to an issue if McCain were its supporter. You presume to know what the Dems would say under truth serum. Those aren't substantial arguments. Those are guesses that support what appears to be a dogmatic political view.

The only concerns I've read about Trump's economic policies are that they favor the rich with tax breaks, burden farmers and business men with tariffs, and he fails to see the economic opportunities for the economy in renewable resource technology growth. That's just for starters. He rabble rouses about the dead coal industry and alienates long time trade partners and allies.

Is that sound economic policy? Do you suppose that I would applaud it were they promoted by a Dem president?

I appreciate the comment that you like my posts. Thanks.

Posted (edited)
  On 3/29/2019 at 4:24 PM, FondrenRoad said:

You do know that there are more corrupt possibilities than simply being an agent for Russia?  Take his hotel in DC for instance which is always filled up with foreign and domestic lobbyists who are staying there intentionally to gain favor from Trump by fattening his pockets.  Take the fact that when traveling, he doesn't get bids for accommodations from multiple hotels.  Instead, he stays at his own hotels and has the government pay market rate for them.

It also wouldn't be beneath him to quietly try to push federal funds into all types of personal business interests via no-bid contracts.  Grift is his game.  Always has been.

I've never thought he was an intentional traitor.  At worst, I've always thought he is an accidental traitor.  His singular goal is self enrichment.  How he achieves that is inconsequential to him.  If anything, he is such a conman that in a deal with Putin, I'd expect him to promise Putin something, let Putin deliver his side, and then renege on his promise to Putin.  Historically, that's the way he's tried to conduct business with everyone forever.  Its why he had to go to Russia to get lending in the first place.  Western banks wanted nothing to do with him anymore.

Expand  

Nothing you say negates the facts that Hillary Clinton, and her husband are just as if not more corrupt, as they did most if not all of their shit while in the service of the US  Gov't. If you don't recognize that, please stop addressing my posts with your but ... but... buts.

Edited by Onboard 2.0
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 4:27 PM, Onboard 2.0 said:

Nothing you say negates the facts that Hillary Clinton, and her husband are just as if not more corrupt, as they did most if not all of their shit while in the service of the US  Gov't. If you recognize that, please stop addressing my posts with your but ... but... buts.

Expand  

While the Clintons are corrupt, they are in no way as corrupt as Trump.  The real problem that you are having though is that most of the things you believe the Clintons did, they didn't actually do.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Explaining the significance of the Russian Interference to Republicans

Yesterday I tried to explain the significance of the Russia interference to a Trumpish associate  of mine and I felt like I got somewhere so I’ll try to lay it out here:

First, you HAVE to FORGET the election is Hillary vs Trump and you have to forget political parties exist.

No matter what, the US Presidential election will be:

Candidate A vs Candidate B

These are both Americans attempting to lead and presumably work in the interests of America.

  Reveal hidden contents
Edited by Hugo Stiglitz
  • Like 2
Posted

Article made me appreciate the problems with Barr's summary.  Not the collusion angle given Mueller addressed that (assuming Barr didn't mislead or misquote) but the obstruction angle.  Also, being relieved/happy that Mueller didn't find collusion doesn't make one a Trumpkin.  The alternative was not palatable for the country or globe.

"Bill Barr’s understanding of presidential power (he comes close to believing it’s absolute) makes his interpretation of whether Trump obstructed justice highly unreliable."  I had not thought of it from that angle and while I'm sure mentioned in here, the poo flinging is making this thread unreadable.  

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 4:30 PM, FondrenRoad said:

While the Clintons are corrupt, they are in no way as corrupt as Trump.  The real problem that you are having though is that most of the things you believe the Clintons did, they didn't actually do.

Expand  

Uh huh, when Trump has served in the go'tv as many years as they did, and done what they did then he'll be on par with them. Corruption in the private sector is bad and he's probably enriched himself thru his gov;t service. Show me a poor congressman .

The Clintons did it for decades while in the service of taxpayers. They're far worse.

Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 4:33 PM, Onboard 2.0 said:

Uh huh, when Trump has served in the go'tv as many years as they did, and done what they did then he'll be on par with them. Corruption in the private sector is bad and he's probably enriched himself thru his gov;t service. Show me a poor congressman .

The Clintons did it for decades while in the service of taxpayers. They're far worse.

Expand  

Did what exactly?  Lay out all the things you believe the Clintons did.

Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 4:31 PM, babysdaddy said:

Article made me appreciate the problems with Barr's summary.  Not the collusion angle given Mueller addressed that (assuming Barr didn't mislead or misquote) but the obstruction angle.  Also, being relieved/happy that Mueller didn't find collusion doesn't make one a Trumpkin.  The alternative was not palatable for the country or globe.

"Bill Barr’s understanding of presidential power (he comes close to believing it’s absolute) makes his interpretation of whether Trump obstructed justice highly unreliable."  I had not thought of it from that angle and while I'm sure mentioned in here, the poo flinging is making this thread unreadable.  

Expand  

Sensible post. I would be happier if the president was not colluding with the Russians, and I am certainly someone who despises Trump. However, since the report has not been released, I find it difficult to think the president is exonerated. 

Barr's summary does not erase what we know to be true about meetings, contacts, and all the lying about it. Chairman Schiff summarized all of that very well in his "think it's okay" remarks to his committee.

The poo flinging when it comes to name-calling (even when it's accurate) muddies the waters. The spin from Trumpists muddies the waters. Anti-Trumpists rising to the bait muddies the waters, too. 

Still, the key points remain. We've seen enormous amounts of evidence of corruption that the summary cannot hide. Will the electorate stay focused long enough to thwart what appears to be a cover-up? That's a key question, I believe.

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 4:35 PM, FondrenRoad said:

Did what exactly?  Lay out all the things you believe the Clintons did.

Expand  

You wanna start with White water (pre federal gov't service) or the Chinese national  campaign funds they received (no controlling legal authority, "listen we were going up against a juggernaut") ? I'm sure you don't think they were guilty of either of those. 

The Rose Law firm billing reports just magically showing up hours after the investigation was over just outside the doors of the Clintons private quarters.  Private meetings on a tarmac between the AG and Bill Clinton (baby talk to be sure), Culminating with 30,00 destroyed e mails regarding weddings and yoga classes.

Mrs. Clinton has written how many minutia filled books of her time in Washington, but whenever questioned under oath has had early onset alzhiemers regarding facts or any issue for that matter.  

And just because you don't get caught doesn't mean you didn't do it.  Smokey, I hope you're more intelligent than that.   The Clintons are very smart and insulated people, that's never been argued otherwise.  I think we're going to see trump skate the same way in all probability.

Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 4:49 PM, Onboard 2.0 said:

You wanna start with White water (pre federal gov't service) or the Chinese national  campaign funds they received (no controlling legal authority, "listen we were going up against a juggernaut") ? I'm sure you don't think they were guilty of either of those. 

The Rose Law firm billing reports just magically showing up hours after the investigation was over just outside the doors of the Clintons private quarters.  Private meetings on a tarmac between the AG and Bill Clinton (baby talk to be sure), Culminating with 30,00 destroyed e mails regarding weddings and yoga classes.

Mrs. Clinton has written how many minutia filled books of her time in Washington, but whenever questioned under oath has had early onset alzhiemers regarding facts or any issue for that matter.  

And just because you don't get caught doesn't mean you didn't do it.  Smokey, I hope you're more intelligent than that.   The Clintons are very smart and insulated people, that's never been argued otherwise.  I think we're going to see trump skate the same way in all probability.

Expand  

It says a lot about Republican and conservative incompetence that they could commit so many nefarious deeds and never get pinned for any of it.

 

Posted

Imagine if there was a cable news network, a series of talk radio hosts, and elected representatives from a particular party that all parroted for a decade the same talking point that Hillary was corrupt. Then, imagine that the closest they ever got to proving any actual corruption was an email server. At some point, folks should hope that some degree of self-awareness would take hold or they would move on, and then they would be able to see what their party is doing today, right now. 

  • Like 6
Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 4:27 PM, Onboard 2.0 said:

Nothing you say negates the facts that Hillary Clinton, and her husband are just as if not more corrupt, 

Expand  

Well, no, that's just not true.  You should be ashamed for believing it, though.  It speaks to your intellect.

Posted (edited)
  On 3/29/2019 at 4:49 PM, Onboard 2.0 said:

You wanna start with White water (pre federal gov't service) or the Chinese national  campaign funds they received (no controlling legal authority, "listen we were going up against a juggernaut") ? I'm sure you don't think they were guilty of either of those. 

The Rose Law firm billing reports just magically showing up hours after the investigation was over just outside the doors of the Clintons private quarters.  Private meetings on a tarmac between the AG and Bill Clinton (baby talk to be sure), Culminating with 30,00 destroyed e mails regarding weddings and yoga classes.

Mrs. Clinton has written how many minutia filled books of her time in Washington, but whenever questioned under oath has had early onset alzhiemers regarding facts or any issue for that matter.  

And just because you don't get caught doesn't mean you didn't do it.  Smokey, I hope you're more intelligent than that.   The Clintons are very smart and insulated people, that's never been argued otherwise.  I think we're going to see trump skate the same way in all probability.

Expand  

Would you put that same perspective on the current Trump mess? And if so, is it somewhat ok then?

 

Politics is far too dirty and opaque for my comfort level. Made worse by policies like Citizens United. Love or hate the Clintons, they are masters at playing the LEGAL game of politics. I personally am not a fan that to succeed, you have to get in the muck of Washington but comparing the Clintons with Trump is intellectually dishonest. Trump built his life on playing in the shadows. Clintons have been in the public eye since day one. 

Edited by SmokeyTheBear
Posted
  On 3/29/2019 at 4:55 PM, GW Hayduke said:

Imagine if there was a cable news network, a series of talk radio hosts, and elected representatives from a particular party that all parroted for a decade the same talking point that Hillary was corrupt.

Expand  

A lot of people get honorable mention, but Rush single-handedly wrote that script and beat that drum for 2 decades, with a lot of success.

  • Like 1
Posted

A two year investigation that compiled over 300 pages in a final report is reduced to a four-sentence summary by a guy who was appointed within the last couple of months by the people being investigated naturally compels one to look further into Clinton real estate deals 30 years ago and Benghazi and Chinese donors.  Dumb is the new smart and orange is the new Caucasian.  I have to get creative in finding new ways to keep laughing at watching the world's greatest democracy finger itself in the ass.  But witnessing people like Onboard justify everything by comparing two unscrupulous hordes like the Clintons and the Trumps into a compatible, net positive helps with the laughing part.   

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1


×
×
  • Create New...