Jump to content

The Robert Mueller Investigation

Hugo Stiglitz

By Hugo Stiglitz
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

SubliminalHorn

SubliminalHorn 6674

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, American Swindle said:

 


Maybe tell that to the people who are clamoring to impeach Trump over “obstruction” rather than impeaching him for violating the War Crimes act when he vetoed the War Resolution Bill to stop our involvement in the Saudi-led war in Yemen.
 

 

Oh honey, there are lots of impeachable offenses. Like, a lotttttt

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 34.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Hugo Stiglitz

    3238

  • Anastasis

    2088

  • David Dennison

    1559

  • triplehorn

    1384

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Goredho
Goredho

Just to make sure I have the alternative facts straight...  Our government -- but I'm guessing only the deep state part of it --- is now guilty of torturing a poor, naive Russian exchange student who

Incredulity
Incredulity

liberals suddenly being terrified of Russia and manic for election integrity is just pure comedy gold.

Chooky
Chooky

I don't believe for a moment that any of this is entertaining to you.  I think it gives you a bit of anxiety knowing that your best weapon against a group who you despise is a bumbling fraud as a busi

Posted Images

Enchubben

Enchubben 5509

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, SubliminalHorn said:

Have you read the report?

Trump is still our president so either the evidence isn’t what democrats think it is, or there isn’t enough of it. Either way America was sold a bunch of bullshit by the media and dipshits like Adam Schiff.

Whether you, I, or any other internet joe blow has read it cover to cover doesn’t matter. If you want to give yourself a hardest worker in the room sticker for reading the entire thing I won’t stop you.

  • Fuck You 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
David Dennison

David Dennison 18656

Posted
Posted
Just now, Enchubben said:

Trump is still our president so either the evidence isn’t what democrats think it is, or there isn’t enough of it. Either way America was sold a bunch of bullshit by the media and dipshits like Adam Schiff.

Whether you, I, or any other internet joe blow has read it cover to cover doesn’t matter. If you want to give yourself a hardest worker in the room sticker for reading the entire thing I won’t stop you.

Do you understand why Mueller didn't indict him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SubliminalHorn

SubliminalHorn 6674

Posted
Posted
Just now, Enchubben said:

Trump is still our president so either the evidence isn’t what democrats think it is, or there isn’t enough of it. Either way America was sold a bunch of bullshit by the media and dipshits like Adam Schiff.

Whether you, I, or any other internet joe blow has read it cover to cover doesn’t matter. If you want to give yourself a hardest worker in the room sticker for reading the entire thing I won’t stop you.

So you haven’t, ok cool. You’re like a child wandering into an adult conversation, then. Go ahead and see yourself out, adults are talking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SubliminalHorn

SubliminalHorn 6674

Posted
Posted
Just now, Enchubben said:

I understand that after a two year investigation he is still our president.

Do you understand how the impeachment process works? You haven’t read the report so you are clearly ignorant in that area, but what about the Constitution? You ever read that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bama Chick

Bama Chick 28596

Posted
Posted
You guys need to come up with new material. You are stepping all over each other. 


I usually don’t join in the pile ons when people razz you for your both sides nonsense.

But THAT post coming from you is just so breathtakingly hilarious I need a moment to catch my breath from laughing so hard.

Telling others to come up with new material?

Hypocrite, heal thyself.
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Enchubben

Enchubben 5509

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, SubliminalHorn said:

Do you understand how the impeachment process works? You haven’t read the report so you are clearly ignorant in that area, but what about the Constitution? You ever read that?

I don’t recall reading the full constitution word for word so I’m probably not allowed to comment on that, right?

I think I did read somewhere that Trump is still in office, and based on recent polls for who the democrat favorite is going to be is likely to be re-elected. I’d assume if the report says what you think it says that wouldn’t be the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
David Dennison

David Dennison 18656

Posted
Posted
Just now, Enchubben said:

I don’t recall reading the full constitution word for word so I’m probably not allowed to comment on that, right?

I think I did read somewhere that Trump is still in office, and based on recent polls for who the democrat favorite is going to be is likely to be re-elected. I’d assume if the report says what you think it says that wouldn’t be the case.

Actually, based on the polls, he's likely to lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SubliminalHorn

SubliminalHorn 6674

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Enchubben said:

I don’t recall reading the full constitution word for word so I’m probably not allowed to comment on that, right?

I think I did read somewhere that Trump is still in office, and based on recent polls for who the democrat favorite is going to be is likely to be re-elected. I’d assume if the report says what you think it says that wouldn’t be the case.

So you’re just a moron that doesn’t understand the impeachment process. It’s ok, just let the adults talk now. But do read the report if you can manage it. The lawlessness outlined it in is breathtaking. Should be furrow your brow quite a bit since you support the rule of law since you’re a republican 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captainant

Captainant 27451

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Enchubben said:

I don’t recall reading the full constitution word for word so I’m probably not allowed to comment on that, right?

I mean, if you're trying to make an argument about the base content and information and conclusions of a document and you haven't read it... Yes? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bozo_Casanova

Bozo_Casanova 26279

Posted
Posted

They found this another old hippie named Sleepy John
He claimed to be the one from the Robert Earl song
So they gave him all the cash, he bought 'em some brooze
Was a beautiful day out in Santa Cruz
They were feelin' so good it shoulda been a crime
The crowd was cool and the band was prime
They made it back up front to their seats just in time
To sing with all their friends

The road goes on forever and the party never ends...


Bum bum bum

...
B double E double R, U-N
BEER RUN!
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 45557

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Enchubben said:

Trump is still our president so either the evidence isn’t what democrats think it is, or there isn’t enough of it. Either way America was sold a bunch of bullshit by the media and dipshits like Adam Schiff.

Whether you, I, or any other internet joe blow has read it cover to cover doesn’t matter. If you want to give yourself a hardest worker in the room sticker for reading the entire thing I won’t stop you.

Jesus Christ.  This is quite possibly the most poorly imagined "argument" I've read in a year.  Gold medal, dude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Enchubben

Enchubben 5509

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, SubliminalHorn said:

So you’re just a moron that doesn’t understand the impeachment process. It’s ok, just let the adults talk now. But do read the report if you can manage it. The lawlessness outlined it in is breathtaking. Should be furrow your brow quite a bit since you support the rule of law since you’re a republican 

Lol. Ok bud. So breathtaking that impeachment is near, correct? I mean democrats own the house, so what’s the hold up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SubliminalHorn

SubliminalHorn 6674

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Enchubben said:

Lol. Ok bud. So breathtaking that impeachment is near, correct? I mean democrats own the house, so what’s the hold up?

Your party no longer believes in the rule of law. That’s basically it. Quite shameful. How embarrassed you should be. But you aren’t. You keep parroting your party’s bullshit and a 4 page memo that everyone knows was a lie. But again, try reading the report. In fact, it’s also on tape now, maybe that will be easier for your trumpkin brain

Edited by SubliminalHorn
Typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GW Hayduke

GW Hayduke 1952

Posted
Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, Enchubben said:

I understand that after a two year investigation he is still our president.

There is DOJ policy that they can’t indict a sitting president. Per their policy, they have to wait to indict for obstruction until he leaves office through impeachment or after his term.

Edited by GW Hayduke
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DanRydell

DanRydell 799

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Enchubben said:

I don’t recall reading the full constitution word for word so I’m probably not allowed to comment on that, right?

I think I did read somewhere that Trump is still in office, and based on recent polls for who the democrat favorite is going to be is likely to be re-elected. I’d assume if the report says what you think it says that wouldn’t be the case.

You care enough about American politics to post incessantly on here and you've never even read the Constitution? It's only 7,500 words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
EuroHorn

EuroHorn 3204

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, Bama Chick said:

 


I usually don’t join in the pile ons when people razz you for your both sides nonsense.

But THAT post coming from you is just so breathtakingly hilarious I need a moment to catch my breath from laughing so hard.

Telling others to come up with new material?

Hypocrite, heal thyself.

 

Please remind us that you have a vagina.  And that your dad is a racist...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JimmyJames

JimmyJames 12271

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

I still can’t help but wonder what motivated Bill Barr to take this job.  

Everyone says he’s playing politics but that really begs the question, “who is he playing politics for?”  He’s not running for any elections or trying to land some super job post administration. 

 I have to think no reputable legal mind would want to hitch their professional career to Donald Trump.  

I guess Bill Barr just has an enormous ego to think he could pull this off without taking serious shit.

Not ego. He’s getting paid somehow for this on the backend. Same with good old Rod. No other explanation makes sense. Stability trumps even the trump. Got to keep the spice flowing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Enchubben

Enchubben 5509

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, DanRydell said:

You care enough about American politics to post incessantly on here and you've never even read the Constitution? It's only 7,500 words.

Fair comment. If I read it front to end is it ok with mommy dearest above that I continue to post?  

Thinking back, i probably have actually read the entire thing in school, but I’ve slept since then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anastasis

Anastasis 23395

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Bama Chick said:

 


I usually don’t join in the pile ons when people razz you for your both sides nonsense.

But THAT post coming from you is just so breathtakingly hilarious I need a moment to catch my breath from laughing so hard.

Telling others to come up with new material?

Hypocrite, heal thyself.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Satchel

Satchel 6908

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

I still can’t help but wonder what motivated Bill Barr to take this job.  

Everyone says he’s playing politics but that really begs the question, “who is he playing politics for?”  He’s not running for any elections or trying to land some super job post administration. 

 I have to think no reputable legal mind would want to hitch their professional career to Donald Trump.  

I guess Bill Barr just has an enormous ego to think he could pull this off without taking serious shit.

There are some unsubstantiated rumors that he is 300,000 in debt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Satchel

Satchel 6908

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

I still can’t help but wonder what motivated Bill Barr to take this job.  

Everyone says he’s playing politics but that really begs the question, “who is he playing politics for?”  He’s not running for any elections or trying to land some super job post administration. 

 I have to think no reputable legal mind would want to hitch their professional career to Donald Trump.  

I guess Bill Barr just has an enormous ego to think he could pull this off without taking serious shit.

There are some unsubstantiated rumors that he is 300,000 in debt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anastasis

Anastasis 23395

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Texas73 said:

Mueller disagreeing with Barr's 4 page summary is new material.

Does he also disagree with the redacted version of his own report?

This is shit ginned up on the eve of Barr's senate testimony.  Amazing that people here dont understand how politics in played. 

Edited by Anastasis
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
henrygandorf

henrygandorf 29175

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

This is shit ginned up on the eve of Barr's senate testimony.  Amazing that people here dont understand how politics in played. 

the letter was written over a month ago.

i agree the timing is bad.  for barr.

looks really bad considering the shit that's come out of his mouth since reading mueller's letter/talking to him on the phone.

mueller documented things in letter form for a reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captainant

Captainant 27451

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Does he also disagree with the redacted version of his own report?

This is shit ginned up on the eve of Barr's senate testimony.  Amazing that people here dont understand how politics in played. 

Mueller did disagree with not releasing the summaries his team wrote and even supplied suggested redactions for

"The letter made a key request: that Barr release the 448-page report’s introductions and executive summaries, and it made initial suggested redactions for doing so, according to Justice Department officials." (Per the wapo article)

So arguably, yes. Mueller does disagree with the redacted report that was released, because it left out material that Mueller specifically wanted the American people to know and went to lengths to enable

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
henrygandorf

henrygandorf 29175

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Captainant said:

Mueller did disagree with not releasing the summaries his team wrote and even supplied suggested redactions for

"The letter made a key request: that Barr release the 448-page report’s introductions and executive summaries, and it made initial suggested redactions for doing so, according to Justice Department officials." (Per the wapo article)

So arguably, yes. Mueller does disagree with the redacted report that was released, because it left out material that Mueller specifically wanted the American people to know and went to lengths to enable

he also clearly was pissed at the way barr mischaracterized the findings thru the press - knowing that most people wouldn't actually read the entire report.  barr continued to misrepresent the findings even after mueller first showed his displeasure with his summary.

according to people who would know, the fact that mueller spoke up, thru a letter and over the phone, is very out of character for him, and he did it for a reason.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
David Dennison

David Dennison 18656

Posted
Posted
Just now, Anastasis said:

Are the intros and summaries not basically fully released in the final redacted report as released? 

They are, but Barr completely misrepresented what they said (twice) before the report was released in an effort to protect the president.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captainant

Captainant 27451

Posted
Posted
Just now, Anastasis said:

Are the intros and summaries not basically fully released in the final redacted report as released? 

"Basically fully release" is not what mueller intended and worked to provide with respect to his teams executive summaries. We don't know what's in them, but it's not unthinkable that it was his teams "big picture" with respect to the central tentpoles of their investigation

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captainant

Captainant 27451

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Thetexashammer said:

I was unaware that he has spoken publicly on the matter.

His letter sent on March 27 makes that clear. And it's also clear that Barr perjured himself when he said under oath on April 9 and 10 that he didn't know how mueller felt about the 4 page summary he wrote. 

Edited by Captainant
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...