Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
22 minutes ago, conVINCEd said:

Can we start a new thread for FISA warrants?

If we do, how else will anastasis try to distract from the cover up happening right in front of our eyes?

  • Like 1
Posted

Holy shit. So glad Howley was able to highlight that a Special Counsel can be appointed to investigate the President and a giant FBI inquiry could be launched all because ONE FBI agent didn't like the President. 

Posted

As a member of Josh's constituency, I also take offense to trump voters smelling like Wal mart (chicken/egg situation). 

Posted (edited)

lol I'm a bit behind

"we have a chart!"

why the fuck didn't Mueller just move forward if there was substantial evidence of obstruction of justice, that was his job correct? He had no "collusion conclusion" - what a waste of fucking time and money.

Edited by Zavala
Posted (edited)

[quoted]If someone wants a good internet domain to own, www.msnbcatthismomentintime.com is a good investment.[/quoted]

Quoted for emphasis.

 

Edited by Hugo Stiglitz
Just making sure someone keeps digging
Posted
Just now, Zavala said:

lol I'm a bit behind

"we have a chart!"

why the fuck didn't Mueller just move forward if there was substantial evidence of obstruction of justice, that was his job correct? He had no finding either way on conclusion - what a waste of fucking time and money.

Jeeeeeesus. He couldn't/wouldn't because there is a standard (for lack of a better term) that states that the current President cannot be indicted. Pay attention. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Zavala said:

lol I'm a bit behind

"we have a chart!"

why the fuck didn't Mueller just move forward if there was substantial evidence of obstruction of justice, that was his job correct? He had no "collusion conclusion" - what a waste of fucking time and money.

He did. He acted like the Marine/DOJ by the book guy he is. He had faith in the system to do right and then Barr.

Posted
Just now, SmokeyTheBear said:

Jeeeeeesus. He couldn't/wouldn't because there is a standard (for lack of a better term) that states that the current President cannot be indicted. Pay attention. 

You are talking in circles bub. They accused the President of Treason, then high ranking Democrats said there was evidence. Report comes out, doesn't have shit. Now he obstructed justice by being the President because there's a standard?

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Winona's Big Orange Bevo said:

He did. He acted like the Marine/DOJ by the book guy he is. He had faith in the system to do right and then Barr.

He didn't have a conclusion on obstruction, so no, he didn't. Why?

This was sadly done to keep the Russia narrative alive for the Media/Democrat. Pathetic. 

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Zavala said:

lol I'm a bit behind

"we have a chart!"

why the fuck didn't Mueller just move forward if there was substantial evidence of obstruction of justice, that was his job correct? He had no "collusion conclusion" - what a waste of fucking time and money.

Part 2 of the Mueller report is sufficient to support impeachment in the House. Mueller did his job.  The Democrats don't like the political calculus of doing their's in the House because the GOP in the Senate will not remove over marginal obstruction conclusions without corresponding evidence that there was coordination to interfere in the election.  Some fucking asshole liar predicted that. 

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Chuckie Finster said:

Oh shit, Hirono coming in hard.

Repeating the same script as the last few Ds. Just with a bit more dramatic delivery. Serious bidness. 

Posted

is anyone else imagining a scene where trump is sitting there with his remote, watching barr, and saying, "ok, i don't like where this is going.  go ahead and pull him."

as useless staffers stand by and say, "yeah, that's not how this works."

Posted
1 minute ago, Zavala said:

He didn't have a conclusion on obstruction, so no, he didn't. Why?

This was sadly done to keep the Russia narrative alive for the Media/Democrat. Pathetic. 

DOJ policy not to indict president. He did his work and handed off to congress but doubt he expected the AG to run interference for the president.

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Zavala said:

lol I'm a bit behind

"we have a chart!"

why the fuck didn't Mueller just move forward if there was substantial evidence of obstruction of justice, that was his job correct? He had no "collusion conclusion" - what a waste of fucking time and money.

Hey look, another dipshit who hasn't read the report and doesn't understand DOJ policy.  Thanks for your contributions!

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Part 2 of the Mueller report is sufficient to support impeachment in the House. Mueller did his job.  The Democrats don't like the political calculus of doing their's in the House because the GOP in the Senate will not remove over marginal obstruction conclusions without corresponding evidence that there was coordination to interfere in the election.  Some fucking asshole liar predicted that. 

Well, no, but you keep on.  "Marginal" in your world only, you being a Trumpkin and all.



×
×
  • Create New...