Jump to content

The Robert Mueller Investigation

Hugo Stiglitz

By Hugo Stiglitz
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 34.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Hugo Stiglitz

    3238

  • Anastasis

    2088

  • David Dennison

    1559

  • triplehorn

    1384

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Goredho
Goredho

Just to make sure I have the alternative facts straight...  Our government -- but I'm guessing only the deep state part of it --- is now guilty of torturing a poor, naive Russian exchange student who

Incredulity
Incredulity

liberals suddenly being terrified of Russia and manic for election integrity is just pure comedy gold.

Chooky
Chooky

I don't believe for a moment that any of this is entertaining to you.  I think it gives you a bit of anxiety knowing that your best weapon against a group who you despise is a bumbling fraud as a busi

Posted Images

Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand

Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand 13586

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, JimmyJames said:

I don’t get it. 

It means morons whose attention spans render them incapable of considering the Conservaverse's historical batting average when it comes to the carpet bombing of accusations parlayed into indictments/pleas/convictions are always ready to give the Birther-In-Chief a fresh new benefit of a doubt when he feels something nefarious is afoot.

 

In this particular case, the Conservaverse and their Mendoza line aspirations are trying to manufacture outrage by claiming a campaign and administration, already rife with indictments, pleas, and convictions, should be able to hide and lie about their business and financial dealings with their foreign criminal cartel business partners free from the prying eyes of the intelligence community whom was aleady invesigating said criminal cartel's efforts to subvert our democratic institutions before presidential campaign was even announced.

 

Intelligence community shouldn't do that, mmmkay. That would be bad.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zavala

Zavala 1384

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, JimmyJames said:

Has anyone noticed how much trump and his followers like to make fun of other people’s medical conditions?

I mean it’s almost like they’re complete pieces of shit and absolute garbage. 

How many times have you tried to make fun of Trump or his supporters again? 

1 hour ago, jimmyjazz said:

Well, I wasted time scrolling through Zavala's post of "Cody's" tweet.  I'm sorry, but those are some really fucking stupid people.  It makes sense that you follow them.

I don't have twatter

 

Are you the Krassenstein brothers? Always posting back-to-back lol

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 46006

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, notre dame joe said:

How about the DNC for smuggling her debate questions in advance?  Does that reach the elevel of election meddling?

No, you dumbass.  You don't even have the story right, but even if you did, a primary is not an election.  The DNC can appoint whatever candidate they want -- as was commonly done until recently.

I do respect your concern for the Democratic Party.  Big heart you got there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JimmyJames

JimmyJames 12271

Posted
Posted
43 minutes ago, Poolflood said:

Sorry, late to the party.  Is this because you're not very intelligent?

How is this in any way a party?

And yes, the reason I don’t get it is because I’m dumb and has nothing to do with the fact that the humor from the cartoon is missing. 

Or maybe your big brain on Brad can explain it to us. Because the rest of the trolls won’t. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JimmyJames

JimmyJames 12271

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Zavala said:

How many times have you tried to make fun of Trump or his supporters again? 

I don't have twatter

 

Are you the Krassenstein brothers? Always posting back-to-back lol

I make fun of trump and his supporters a lot, because they’re are corrupt and evil assholes.

Are you claiming it’s because they have a medical condition? If so I guess I’ll have to re-evaluate my making fun of them. 

and who in the fuck are the krassenstein brothers? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zavala

Zavala 1384

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, JimmyJames said:

I make fun of trump and his supporters a lot, because they’re are corrupt and evil assholes.

Are you claiming it’s because they have a medical condition? If so I guess I’ll have to re-evaluate my making fun of them. 

and who in the fuck are the krassenstein brothers? 

The right thinks the left is wrong, the left thinks the right is evil. So simple. It is why it's pointless to argue with ya.

You know, the guys that used fake accounts to get their snarky comments to the top of EVERY Trump tweet. They are famous for it, recently it caught up with them. 

https://encyclopediadramatica.rs/The_Krassenstein_Brothers

323-tl-182-3-0k-brian-krassenstein-krass

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
triplehorn

triplehorn 2664

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, JimmyJames said:

How is this in any way a party?

And yes, the reason I don’t get it is because I’m dumb and has nothing to do with the fact that the humor from the cartoon is missing. 

Or maybe your big brain on Brad can explain it to us. Because the rest of the trolls won’t. 

My takeaway is how consistent it that Trump retweeted it.  When every accusation of his is a confession, the cartoon fits perfectly with his internal rules of blame shifting.  

‘It’s not me shifting blame, it’s them.”

Donald Trump is a lying, criminal, piece of shit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hornius Emeritus

Hornius Emeritus 12480

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, triplehorn said:

My takeaway is how consistent it that Trump retweeted it.  When every accusation of his is a confession, the cartoon fits perfectly with his internal rules of blame shifting.  

‘It’s not me shifting blame, it’s them.”

Donald Trump is a lying, criminal, piece of shit.



Thanks for explaining the cartoon. I am one of the stupid people who didn't get it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
triplehorn

triplehorn 2664

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Hornius Emeritus said:



Thanks for explaining the cartoon. I am one of the stupid people who didn't get it.

 

More to the point, I think cartoon is trying to show a triangle guilty conscience around the inception of the Trump/Russia investigation.  It’s not funny because it’s pure fantasy with no hidden truth.  It’s dumb.

There was no “attempted coup”, as Trump likes to say, by an investigation initiated several months before the election, and at the same time the Clinton Foundation was under investigation by the same entities Trump is attacking.  

Again, Trump is a lying, criminal piece of shit.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23367

Posted
  • Author
Posted

People are starting to figure out how bad the democrats are getting played. 

(Continued)

not getting the mueller report was part of the plan? stop telling me there is plan. we are just being reactive. that is not a plan. there is absolutely no evidence at all that there is or ever has been a plan.

want me to believe there was an actual plan? show me where the democrats, in january when they took the house, proposed a repeal of the tax bill so that there would have been a legislative purpose to asking for trumps taxes???

want me to believe that people think moving for impeachment would be too divisive and hurtful for america? SHOW ME WHERE THEY DIDNT SHUT THE GOVERNMENT DOWN FOR 35 DAYS

show me fucking anything that makes it look like there is a plan instead of us just doing our best to react to complete insanity from a criminal wanna be dictator?

what i dont get is, EVEN DEM LEADERSHIP ISNT SAYING THEY HAVE A PLAN SO WHY THE FUCK ARE U SAYING IT?

weve decided on ur own that this president is impeachable, and since he isnt being impeached, instead of just admitting that maybe congressional dems dont know what to do, uve decided it must be because they have a plan. i get it, its not fun to admit we dont know what were doing

it feels unsafe and uncomfortable. but its the truth. we dont have a plan. it would be impossible to have a plan to deal with this kind of bat shit crazy. we need to admit that we dont have a plan and we can move forward on dealing with this, together.

oh hey, btw, a lot of times when people dont outwardly do the right thing because of some backroom strategy, a lot of times...im not saying thats whats happening here, but a lot of times, thats called corruption.

dont accept that there is some plan that there is no evidence of. we need to do everything we can as a people. register more voters. fight voter suppression. help build the publlic pressure for impeachment, all of it.

believing that there is no plan and doing everything u can accordingly, can not hurt us. it can only help us. believing there is a plan when there isnt, can hurt us. so do what u can whenever u can, as if there is no plan. BE UNCOMFORTABLE. WE HAVE A MADMAN RUNNING OUR COUNTRY.

also...love yall

/end

Link to comment
Share on other sites
David Dennison

David Dennison 18941

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

People are starting to figure out how bad the democrats are getting played. 

(Continued)

not getting the mueller report was part of the plan? stop telling me there is plan. we are just being reactive. that is not a plan. there is absolutely no evidence at all that there is or ever has been a plan.

want me to believe there was an actual plan? show me where the democrats, in january when they took the house, proposed a repeal of the tax bill so that there would have been a legislative purpose to asking for trumps taxes???

want me to believe that people think moving for impeachment would be too divisive and hurtful for america? SHOW ME WHERE THEY DIDNT SHUT THE GOVERNMENT DOWN FOR 35 DAYS

show me fucking anything that makes it look like there is a plan instead of us just doing our best to react to complete insanity from a criminal wanna be dictator?

what i dont get is, EVEN DEM LEADERSHIP ISNT SAYING THEY HAVE A PLAN SO WHY THE FUCK ARE U SAYING IT?

weve decided on ur own that this president is impeachable, and since he isnt being impeached, instead of just admitting that maybe congressional dems dont know what to do, uve decided it must be because they have a plan. i get it, its not fun to admit we dont know what were doing

it feels unsafe and uncomfortable. but its the truth. we dont have a plan. it would be impossible to have a plan to deal with this kind of bat shit crazy. we need to admit that we dont have a plan and we can move forward on dealing with this, together.

oh hey, btw, a lot of times when people dont outwardly do the right thing because of some backroom strategy, a lot of times...im not saying thats whats happening here, but a lot of times, thats called corruption.

dont accept that there is some plan that there is no evidence of. we need to do everything we can as a people. register more voters. fight voter suppression. help build the publlic pressure for impeachment, all of it.

believing that there is no plan and doing everything u can accordingly, can not hurt us. it can only help us. believing there is a plan when there isnt, can hurt us. so do what u can whenever u can, as if there is no plan. BE UNCOMFORTABLE. WE HAVE A MADMAN RUNNING OUR COUNTRY.

also...love yall

/end

Are they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jhawkmvp

Jhawkmvp 1489

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, notre dame joe said:

How about the DNC for smuggling her debate questions in advance?  Does that reach the elevel of election meddling?

It's kind of shitty,  just like the Trump re-election campaign and the RNC merging their field and fundraising programs into a joint program called "Trump Victory"? Wonder how much fairness Weld and any other candidates who might announce will be shown by the RNC.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
notre dame joe

notre dame joe 191

Posted
Posted

 

13 hours ago, Jhawkmvp said:

It's kind of shitty,  just like the Trump re-election campaign and the RNC merging their field and fundraising programs into a joint program called "Trump Victory"? Wonder how much fairness Weld and any other candidates who might announce will be shown by the RNC.

For taking sides against the family to guarantee a President Biden?  Barr should fairly tell Weld the party will be going fishing, two a boat, on a quiet lake. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 46006

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, notre dame joe said:

 

For taking sides against the family to guarantee a President Biden?  Barr should fairly tell Weld the party will be going fishing, two a boat, on a quiet lake. 

So it's fine when the RNC picks their guy but it's a fucking crime when the DNC does?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hornius Emeritus

Hornius Emeritus 12480

Posted
Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, Jhawkmvp said:

It's kind of shitty,  just like the Trump re-election campaign and the RNC merging their field and fundraising programs into a joint program called "Trump Victory"? Wonder how much fairness Weld and any other candidates who might announce will be shown by the RNC.

 

 

I've been thinking about Weld. He's the only announced Republican candidate running against Trump. Given Trump's diet and his lifestyle, there's a decent chance that Trump actually won't be around or that he will be physically incapacitated in some way between, say, now and next year at this time, and won't be able to campaign. At that point, the only other Republican candidate is Weld. He's the only one with any ground game at all right now.  He's probably got about as good a chance to be his party's nominee as almost any of the Dems do. 

Edited by Hornius Emeritus
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 46006

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, henrygandorf said:

a little different for a sitting president. 

Then why go through the motions with a primary?  In the end, both the RNC and the DNC pick their presidential candidate however they like, and all this "concern" by the right and the Berners about Hillary getting the nod in 2016 is silly.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TtomTerrific

TtomTerrific 200

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, jimmyjazz said:

Then why go through the motions with a primary?  In the end, both the RNC and the DNC pick their presidential candidate however they like, and all this "concern" by the right and the Berners about Hillary getting the nod in 2016 is silly.

light coming on.

Wasserman-Shultz might be the most responsible for this orange idiot being our President...and every libtard fuck here LOVED her schtick. 

This is what I mean about the left creating our situation.  Of course, Jimmy here is following along and sucking the Dem cock wherever and whenever he can...that was never going change and his vote doesn't really matter......but the otherwise disinterested "deplorables" were instantly mobilized and (oh m'God) Red Baseball Caps popped up everywhere because most of the people aren't as stupid as the liberal elite care to treat them, and the liberal elite aren't NEARLY as "smart" as they keep telling themselves that they are.  So they keep losing. 

You have done this, and you keep doing this.

You "militant" dork fuck nerds have driven this country into a flat spin and you STILL won't admit it, change it, or do anything but more of it.

That gay mayor dude with no shot actually gets it....it's too bad that y'all don't see it and won't give him a shot, because he is spot on about how to take leadership and move forward.  He will get buried by the Jimmies. 

Can't wait for Trump's daughter to win this thing in 2024.....at least she's hot.

 

Edited by TtomTerrific
apostrophe
  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
henrygandorf

henrygandorf 29194

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, jimmyjazz said:

Then why go through the motions with a primary?  In the end, both the RNC and the DNC pick their presidential candidate however they like, and all this "concern" by the right and the Berners about Hillary getting the nod in 2016 is silly.

i haven't been involved with this whole back and forth re:weld, but i'm saying i think it's pretty normal for the rnc/dnc to throw full support behind a sitting president (even this one).  i'm in no way defending the actions of the dnc in 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 46006

Posted
Posted (edited)
Quote

Of course, Jimmy here is following along and sucking the Dem cock wherever and whenever he can

 

Damn but you are one utterly unaware and relentlessly presumptive imbecile.  Tell me, TTomp, who do I support for 2020?

Edited by jimmyjazz
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SKJ

SKJ 1311

Posted
Posted
48 minutes ago, TtomTerrific said:

...Because most of the people aren't as stupid as the liberal elite care to treat them, and the liberal elite aren't NEARLY as "smart" as they keep telling themselves that they are.  So they keep losing. 

You have done this, and you keep doing this.

You "militant" dork fuck nerds have driven this country into a flat spin and you STILL won't admit it, change it, or do anything but more of it.

 

We're talking about Trump voters... They're about the dumbest humans on the planet.

And as to the rest of the post.... ¿Que?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ChickenSandwich

ChickenSandwich 9845

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, SKJ said:

We're talking about Trump voters... They're about the dumbest humans on the planet.

And as to the rest of the post.... ¿Que?

Lol. On cue. I think you mean “not Hillary” voters as you march down the same path to a “not socialist” voter. 

He's exactly right. You still haven’t taken ownership of why you lost. Couldn’t be a deplorable candidate who rigged her own primary???  Has to be the Russians or American white nazi coming out of the closet and electing their savior. 

Instead of some hard self realization that you lost the middle and the middle class, you double down with Russia/ racists to explain your own failures instead of fixing the problem. 

And when “not socialist” loses to Trump you will have no one to blame but yourselves.    

Edited by ChickenSandwich
  • Like 5
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SKJ

SKJ 1311

Posted
Posted
Just now, ChickenSandwich said:

Lol. On cue. I think you mean “not Hillary” voters as you march down the same path to a “not socialist” voter. 

Hes exactly right. You still haven’t taken ownership of why you lost. Couldn’t be a deplorable candidate who rigged her own primary???  Has to be white nazi coming out of the closet and electing their savior. 

Instead of some hard self realization that you lost the middle and the middle class, you double down with Russia/ racists to explain your own failures instead of fixing the problem. 

And when “not socialist” loses to Trump you will have no one to blame but yourselves.    

It's like you have no idea with whom you are speaking.

Or no idea about whom you are speaking.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TtomTerrific

TtomTerrific 200

Posted
Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, ChickenSandwich said:

Lol. On cue. I think you mean “not Hillary” voters as you march down the same path to a “not socialist” voter. 

He's exactly right. You still haven’t taken ownership of why you lost. Couldn’t be a deplorable candidate who rigged her own primary???  Has to be the Russians or American white nazi coming out of the closet and electing their savior. 

Instead of some hard self realization that you lost the middle and the middle class, you double down with Russia/ racists to explain your own failures instead of fixing the problem. 

And when “not socialist” loses to Trump you will have no one to blame but yourselves.   

Pujols Gif 

Edited by TtomTerrific
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 46006

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, TtomTerrific said:

Pujols Gif 

Here's a tip:  when you're aligning with Nuggets, you've lost the argument.  (I recommend you read this again tomorrow morning, on the off chance you might have sobered up by then.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TtomTerrific

TtomTerrific 200

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, SKJ said:

Yeah, he hit that dumbass shit out of the park.

What you all don't get us that it isn't one side that has lost, it's our whole country.

I didn't lose, WE lost

this is exactly what I have said. 

 

the Jimmies here still defending the rigging of the primary process, bitching about Trump while never, ever considering their own culpability (and, in Jimmy's case... screeching "racist" while all else fails) 

Please stop doing this 

 

WE ALL LOSE 

 

my point from the beginning. 

I wanted Jim Webb to be President, and posted about it often.. but the Jimmy Jazzes assured that he had no shot, got this ignoramus reality show star elected, and are doing it again. 

Meanwhile, referring to anyone else as "imbecilic".. crying out for racism where it does not exist and turning to personal attacks as he doesn't quite understand why the majority can't "get with his enlightenment" is the perfect performance art for this forum. 

Almost like he does it on purpose. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
David Dennison

David Dennison 18941

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, ChickenSandwich said:

Lol. On cue. I think you mean “not Hillary” voters as you march down the same path to a “not socialist” voter. 

He's exactly right. You still haven’t taken ownership of why you lost. Couldn’t be a deplorable candidate who rigged her own primary???  Has to be the Russians or American white nazi coming out of the closet and electing their savior. 

Instead of some hard self realization that you lost the middle and the middle class, you double down with Russia/ racists to explain your own failures instead of fixing the problem. 

And when “not socialist” loses to Trump you will have no one to blame but yourselves.    

Well, and also because the Russia and racist stuff is true.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
notre dame joe

notre dame joe 191

Posted
Posted

 

2 hours ago, henrygandorf said:

i haven't been involved with this whole back and forth re:weld, but i'm saying i think it's pretty normal for the rnc/dnc to throw full support behind a sitting president (even this one).  i'm in no way defending the actions of the dnc in 2016.

I always wondered why high school history books don't even explain the few times it happened.  I think Franklin Pierce was a sitting President who didn't get renominated by his party and could do nothing about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...