The Robert Mueller Investigation

[JimmyJames 12,271]

Ok since Anastasia refused to tell me I went and read the CNN article and sure enough, there’s an investigation into an allegedly forged document. Loud fart noise. 

Theres also an ongoing investigation into the alleged size of my dick. I’ll let you know the results soon. 

 

[JimmyJames 12,271]

1 minute ago, Anastasis said:

Troll gif number 4, and counting...

[Anastasis 23,469]

6 minutes ago, seven said:

Happy for Anastasis here. Have fun bud 

You are still on the list.

On 5/9/2019 at 11:27 AM, seven said:

I'm not the ana basher a lot of the surl is, but dude, the obsession with this dossier and the FISA warrant is hugoesque

 

[jimmyjazz 45,939]

 

[seven 1,367]

I can accept it 

[JimmyJames 12,271]

Anastasia will not rest until the surly board has finally eliminated FISA warrant abuses. So you motherfuckers better step up your game, right quick. 

[Anastasis 23,469]

6 minutes ago, JimmyJames said:

Anastasia will not rest until the surly board has finally eliminated FISA warrant abuses. So you motherfuckers better step up your game, right quick. 

I would settle for simply not being called things like a traitor and a pathological liar when I point out the propensity for these abuses at the intersection between the surveillance state and the political apparatus. 

ETA: I note that FISA extension was agreed to in a bipartisan fashion this week, under cloak of a CR. Nobody really cares. 

Edited November 22, 2019 by Anastasis

[jimmyjazz 45,939]

I believe that extension was discussed on another thread.

[JimmyJames 12,271]

1 minute ago, Anastasis said:

I would settle for simply not being called things like a traitor when I point out the propensity for these abuses at the intersection between the surveillance state and the political apparatus. 

Done. Pretty sure I haven’t called you a traitor for pointing out your pet project but I will make a formal resolution at the next meeting of the surly liberal cabal to put a stop to this practice. That is if we can ever finally organize a meeting that is. 

[Anastasis 23,469]

14 minutes ago, JimmyJames said:

Done. Pretty sure I haven’t called you a traitor for pointing out your pet project but I will make a formal resolution at the next meeting of the surly liberal cabal to put a stop to this practice. That is if we can ever finally organize a meeting that is. 

Nobody is referencing a liberal cabal other than you. The reality is that both so called liberals and so called conservatives entrenched in the political apparatus wipe their ass repeatedly with the constitution and our 4th amendment protections. You are less than a court jester. At least a clown is amusing. 

[Loch Ness Monster 3,533]

So many idiots in today's climate. Glad I don't have kids.

GL to yall's grandkids. 

[David Dennison 18,856]

24 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Nobody is referencing a liberal cabal other than you. The reality is that both so called liberals and so called conservatives entrenched in the political apparatus wipe their ass repeatedly with the constitution and our 4th amendment protections. You are less than a court jester. At least a clown is amusing. 

What side are you on?

[JimmyJames 12,271]

24 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Nobody is referencing a liberal cabal other than you. The reality is that both so called liberals and so called conservatives entrenched in the political apparatus wipe their ass repeatedly with the constitution and our 4th amendment protections. You are less than a court jester. At least a clown is amusing. 

Good thing we got trump as the president then to fix all that for you.

But oh yeah. Both sides are always to blame. Thankfully we’ve always got you around to point that out for us. 

Yawn. 

[Biff Tannen 45,683]

2 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

What side are you on?

Both sides. 

[David Dennison 18,856]

1 minute ago, Biff Tannen said:

Both sides. 

That is the correct answer.

Well done, sir.

[Anastasis 23,469]

The side that thinks thinks that wide scale government surveillance of law abiding Americans is problematic, and that in particular when the surveillance state intersects with politics that heightened level of scrutiny is appropriate. 

[JimmyJames 12,271]

1 minute ago, Anastasis said:

The side that thinks thinks that wide scale government surveillance of law abiding Americans is problematic, and that in particular when the surveillance state intersects with politics that heightened level of scrutiny is appropriate. 

Trump is a law abiding American now? 

[JimmyJames 12,271]

The trump abides. 

[David Dennison 18,856]

3 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

The side that thinks thinks that wide scale government surveillance of law abiding Americans is problematic, and that in particular when the surveillance state intersects with politics that heightened level of scrutiny is appropriate. 

Who is directing the heightened level of scrutiny?

[JimmyJames 12,271]

Far out man. 

[Anastasis 23,469]

Just now, JimmyJames said:

Trump is a law abiding American now? 

I know that paying attention is not your strength. 

Perhaps maybe look into the the mass surveillance operations that have been disclosed as result of various whistleblowers.  You will probably call them traitors. 

[Anastasis 23,469]

2 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

Who is directing the heightened level of scrutiny?

Preferably a strong advocate for constitutional rights. 

[JimmyJames 12,271]

1 minute ago, Anastasis said:

I know that paying attention is not your strength. 

Perhaps maybe look into the the mass surveillance operations that have been disclosed as result of various whistleblowers.  You will probably call them traitors. 

Not answering the question posed to you is one of your strengths. 

[David Dennison 18,856]

1 minute ago, Anastasis said:

I know that paying attention is not your strength. 

Perhaps maybe look into the the mass surveillance operations that have been disclosed as result of various whistleblowers.  You will probably call them traitors. 

 What do you propose?

[David Dennison 18,856]

Just now, Anastasis said:

Preferably a strong advocate for constitutional rights. 

And who in the current administration would that be?

 

[JimmyJames 12,271]

1 minute ago, Anastasis said:

Preferably a strong advocate for constitutional rights. 

Like trump? 

[Anastasis 23,469]

1 minute ago, JimmyJames said:

Not answering the question posed to you is one of your strengths. 

Asking a relevant question is apparently not one of yours.

[David Dennison 18,856]

Just now, Anastasis said:

Asking a relevant question is apparently not one of yours.

It's completely relevant considering Donald Trump is the president.

[Anastasis 23,469]

1 minute ago, JimmyJames said:

Like trump? 

[JimmyJames 12,271]

1 minute ago, Anastasis said:

Asking a relevant question is apparently not one of yours.

So many insults tonight. Watcha mad about bud? Trump plight got ya down? 

[David Dennison 18,856]

So you have no idea.

Cool.

[JimmyJames 12,271]

Just now, Anastasis said:

Troll gif number 5. Of course I’m too dumb to get it. Sorry. 

[Anastasis 23,469]

Yes. Watching posters come up with various rhetorical holes to crawl in to is fascinating. Cheers. 

[David Dennison 18,856]

1 minute ago, Anastasis said:

Yes. Watching posters come up with various rhetorical holes to crawl in to is fascinating. Cheers. 

So in order to combat mass surveillance operations perpetrated by the government, you want us to trust the government?

Do I have that right?

[JimmyJames 12,271]

2 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Yes. Watching posters come up with various rhetorical holes to crawl in to is fascinating. Cheers. 

How exactly does one crawl into various rhetorical holes? 

Is that Latin? 

[Anastasis 23,469]

[JimmyJames 12,271]

1 minute ago, Anastasis said:

Oh you..

[JimmyJames 12,271]

Someone post a clever gif. Stat! 

[Anastasis 23,469]

Just now, JimmyJames said:

Oh you..

[JimmyJames 12,271]

I meant besides you. 

Fuck it. I give up. You are the king troll. I bow to you, oh king of trolls. 

[David Dennison 18,856]

Just now, JimmyJames said:

I meant besides you. 

Fuck it. I give up. You are the king troll. I bow to you, oh king of trolls. 

He is this close to telling us Bill Barr has it all under control.

[Anastasis 23,469]

Just now, JimmyJames said:

I meant besides you. 

Fuck it. I give up. You are the king troll. I bow to you, oh king of trolls. 

 

[UpperWestside 6,163]

22 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

 What do you propose?

He proposed nothing. He never does. His entire life's work is built around being a contrarian because being one gets you attention, even if it is negative. I put him on ignore because reading his posts is like reading fozzz or Emaw. Who wants to waste part of their day doing that?

Edited November 22, 2019 by UpperWestside

[Anastasis 23,469]

1 minute ago, UpperWestside said:

He proposed nothing. He never does. His entire life's work is built around being a contrarian because being one gets you attention, even if it is negative. 

A simple proposition. How about we don't build a massive surveillance state that can be deployed for political ends. Maybe we throw up some red flags when political opposition research intersects with the surveillance state apparatus. Maybe we actually try to vociferously defend our constitutional rights without regard to political winds. Crazy shit. Right. 

[David Dennison 18,856]

1 minute ago, Anastasis said:

A simple proposition. How about we don't build a massive surveillance state that can be deployed for political ends. Maybe we throw up some red flags when political opposition research intersects with the surveillance state apparatus. Maybe we actually try to vociferously defend our constitutional rights without regard to political winds. Crazy shit. Right. 

Do you even 9/11, bro?

[Anastasis 23,469]

1 minute ago, David Dennison said:

Do you even 9/11, bro?

It's funny cause the formulation was similar. Taibbi did a piece in rolling stone regarding the similarities. 

[David Dennison 18,856]

Just now, Anastasis said:

It's funny cause the formulation was similar. Taibbi did a piece in rolling stone regarding the similarities. 

Of course he did.

[Anastasis 23,469]

Just now, David Dennison said:

Of course he did.

Do you even 9/11, bro?

[David Dennison 18,856]

2 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Do you even 9/11, bro?

It's funny because the formulation was similar. Taibbi did a piece in rolling stone regarding the similarities.

[Anastasis 23,469]

2 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

It's funny because the formulation was similar. Taibbi did a piece in rolling stone regarding the similarities.