Jump to content

The Robert Mueller Investigation

Hugo Stiglitz

By Hugo Stiglitz
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 34.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Hugo Stiglitz

    3238

  • Anastasis

    2088

  • David Dennison

    1559

  • triplehorn

    1384

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Goredho
Goredho

Just to make sure I have the alternative facts straight...  Our government -- but I'm guessing only the deep state part of it --- is now guilty of torturing a poor, naive Russian exchange student who

Incredulity
Incredulity

liberals suddenly being terrified of Russia and manic for election integrity is just pure comedy gold.

Chooky
Chooky

I don't believe for a moment that any of this is entertaining to you.  I think it gives you a bit of anxiety knowing that your best weapon against a group who you despise is a bumbling fraud as a busi

Posted Images

David Dennison

David Dennison 19568

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, lemonlime said:

And fuck.  Just got a news alert that RBG had 2 malignant nodules removed from her lung.

If he gets to appoint another justice, there's nothing Democrats can do about it.

RBG probably should have stepped down four or five years ago, but even then, her replacement would have had to get confirmed by a Republican Senate.

Harsh politics.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jack

Jack 51

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Bama Chick said:

Sounds like the nodules were only discovered when she was being treated for her earlier fall and there’s currently no other cancer.

Thank goodness for that fall I guess.

And protect RBG at all costs!

"Nodules" is a nice way of saying she has lung cancer.  Playing the odd, she has a 47% chance of dying over the next year.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Degenerate Gardner

Degenerate Gardner 4160

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Anastasis said:

Cause Putin had a grunge, believing that Clinton had tried to interfere in Russian domestic politics. Or maybe he was just really pissed off that she misspelled the Russian word on the reset button. 

Grunges notwithstanding, maybe, just maybe, Putin knew Trump was a compromised, amoral dolt who could be told to do ANYTHING. Putin owned Trump, then and now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
triplehorn

triplehorn 2664

Posted
Posted (edited)

DB isn't a state owned corp, which this one apparently is per the relevant filing.  Qatar Sovereign Wealth Fund is a better bet, imo.  Rosneft 19.5% stock sale, Kushner 666 loan, Trump Tower meeting with Flynn, Michael Cohen, and head of Qatar SWF - all involve Qatar Sovereign Wealth Fund and apply to things of interest to Mueller or other Fed prosecutors.

Edited by triplehorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 46199

Posted
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, triplehorn said:

DB isn't a state owned corp, which this one apparently is per the relevant filing.  Qatar Sovereign Wealth Fund is a better bet, imo.  Rosneft 19.5% stock sale, Kushner 666 loan, Trump Tower meeting with Flynn, Michael Cohen, and head of Qatar SWF - all involve Qatar Sovereign Wealth Fund and apply to things of interest to Mueller or other Fed prosecutors.

I've kept up with this whole shit show as best I can for over 2 years and I've never heard of the Qatar Sovereign Wealth Fund.  I have no idea how Mueller is going to explain this to the general public who a) pays attention about 2% of the time and b) is about as smart as the average rock.

Edited by Biff Tannen
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thetexashammer

Thetexashammer 1062

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

And this is the cognitive dissonance main course for the Trumpsters.

If Hillary was such an awful candidate, why was Russia spending millions of dollars spreading propaganda convincing Americans she was such an awful candidate?

Do you have any evidence of this? Wikipedia doesn't show anything about hating Hillary.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_interference_in_the_2018_United_States_elections

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thetexashammer

Thetexashammer 1062

Posted
Posted

I looked on the correct page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_elections#Putin_and_Clinton

It talks about the DNC hack, but that's it. And last I heard, and here's why I don't pay attention to all the details, but half of the shit that gets reported is fake, but there was an attempted hack on the RNC as well. They went after both parties was what I had last heard.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23367

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, Thetexashammer said:

I looked on the correct page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_elections#Putin_and_Clinton

It talks about the DNC hack, but that's it. And last I heard, and here's why I don't pay attention to all the details, but half of the shit that gets reported is fake, but there was an attempted hack on the RNC as well. They went after both parties was what I had last heard.

Here you go.

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

CE8ADEDE-4A93-4B30-A208-E5EEAFD14282_zps

344D898F-82C2-4C05-8C27-79A0CE0F34D8_zps

Edited by Hugo Stiglitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thetexashammer

Thetexashammer 1062

Posted
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Here you go.

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

The two data points listed in that pdf are (1) RT was mean to Clinton, and (2) Russia hacked the DNC but the report snarkily states that they went after Republican targets too.

Do I summarize correctly?

From my own recollection, they took out some facebook ads targeting Baltimore and Missouri.

https://money.cnn.com/2017/09/27/media/facebook-black-lives-matter-targeting/index.html

Just saw your post above. I'm not interested in opinions, I want to know what they did. You know, facts. 

Edited by Thetexashammer
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doc Reeves

Doc Reeves 6434

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Biff Tannen said:

How the fuck does Tom Arnold fit into all this?

 

The ridiculous thing is that good 'ol crazy Tom is actually the only one doing serious investigation of how the "media" that trump hates so much is willfully and immortally covering up proof of very serious allegations. 

He's alone, crazy and he's not wrong.  Makes for great TV.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mack Tripper

Mack Tripper 708

Posted
Posted
Why is a private company, owned by a foreign country, allowed to proceed with appeals up to the Supreme Court but allowed to remain anonymous?   Is it because mueller supports them being anonymous at this time in order to not tip off Individual __?
 

Because the appeal is from a grand jury proceeding, which are always secret, not from a filed case.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mdhorn

Mdhorn 6166

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 12/21/2018 at 9:04 PM, Lurch said:

Troll, poor reader or simple moron?

More interested in asking fake questions over real evidence or even logic.  Alternative facts in the beginning told us that.  

Edited by Mdhorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...