Jump to content

The Robert Mueller Investigation

Hugo Stiglitz

By Hugo Stiglitz
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 34.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Hugo Stiglitz

    3238

  • Anastasis

    2088

  • David Dennison

    1559

  • triplehorn

    1384

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Goredho
Goredho

Just to make sure I have the alternative facts straight...  Our government -- but I'm guessing only the deep state part of it --- is now guilty of torturing a poor, naive Russian exchange student who

Incredulity
Incredulity

liberals suddenly being terrified of Russia and manic for election integrity is just pure comedy gold.

Chooky
Chooky

I don't believe for a moment that any of this is entertaining to you.  I think it gives you a bit of anxiety knowing that your best weapon against a group who you despise is a bumbling fraud as a busi

Posted Images

atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89405

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

I’m curious...how in the blue fuck is anyone declaring victory or defeat at this point? We literally have no clue what is in it, whether there are additional sealed indictments or not, etc.

Today is proof of one thing: that Mueller has completed his investigation. So...umm...yeah.

This is a pretty good start.  

mueller-trump-charges-promo-153496845259

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31259

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

I’m curious...how in the blue fuck is anyone declaring victory or defeat at this point? We literally have no clue what is in it, whether there are additional sealed indictments or not, etc.

Today is proof of one thing: that Mueller has completed his investigation. So...umm...yeah.

There are credible reports that there are no further indictments, sealed or otherwise, coming from SCO.  Also, I discovered that the final footnote of the DOJ policy pretty clearly forbids sealed indictment of the President, which kinda bummed me out.  I know you'll appreciate seeing that in the last footnote of a brief or opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JimmyJames

JimmyJames 12271

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, David Dennison said:

No one has seen anything from Mueller yet except indictments and convictions.

The sack doesn’t take those into account. Indictments and convictions are just the deep state trying to prevent the man from payin 10 large to watch rats fuck. First they outlawed dog fighting, next thing you know they’re going after the rat fucking too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
David Dennison

David Dennison 18647

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

I’m curious...how in the blue fuck is anyone declaring victory or defeat at this point? We literally have no clue what is in it, whether there are additional sealed indictments or not, etc.

Today is proof of one thing: that Mueller has completed his investigation. So...umm...yeah.

No one will know who won or lost until Donald Trump is no longer president.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SDG

SDG 3319

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Remember when we had that president everyone thought was a Russian asset and they appointed a special counsel only to find nothing?...except an enormous Russian criminal conspiracy to get that president elected involving his campaign staff and Russian spies.

Yeah, that was a complete waste of money and time. 

Remember when we had a certain candidate pay for a fake dossier that started said investigation...

 

*nothing is believable until at this point.  

 

 

  • Like 3
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hobbes2702

hobbes2702 12797

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Not yet on Flynn.  Kinda curious about that one.  Sentencing was just delayed again a few weeks ago, ostensibly to facilitate continued cooperation.  Maybe its with another USAO.  Maybe it's really to facilitate a hand off.  Some of these kind of loose ends are a tad perplexing.

I wanted to ask your perspective on that. I’m not sure what kinda law you practice but what’s your understanding of why the investigation would conclude with the case still at the Supreme Court and the other cases yet to finish sentencing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheFlyingBoat

TheFlyingBoat 906

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

I’m curious...how in the blue fuck is anyone declaring victory or defeat at this point? We literally have no clue what is in it, whether there are additional sealed indictments or not, etc.

Today is proof of one thing: that Mueller has completed his investigation. So...umm...yeah.

The only good take in this thread.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Johnny Sack

Johnny Sack 8397

Posted
Posted

');b.close();})(document);<\/script>","pos_list":["LDRB","MAST"],"transID":"darla_prefetch_1553297876511_695309289_3","k2_uri":"","fac_rt":"26183","spaceID":"2022718753","lookupTime":295,"procTime":297,"npv":1,"pvid":"eYoczTk4LjF3JzimW3s6dgZ1MzguMQAAAABYKJpZ","serveTime":-1,"ep":{"site-attribute":"","tgt":"_blank","secure":true,"ref":"https:\/\/forums.rivals.com\/threads\/unofficial-mueller-report-delivered-to-ag-william-barr-thread.871934\/","nopageview":true,"filter":"no_expandable;exp_iframe_expandable;","darlaID":"darla_instance_1553297876511_1514784238_2"},"pym":{".":"v0.0.9;;-;"},"host":"","filtered":[],"pe":""}}}

  1. [IMG]
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JimmyJames

JimmyJames 12271

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

No one will know who won or lost until Donald Trump is no longer president.

 

Yep. We will know our fate in less than 2 years. If trump wins again the country is fucked. 

But it wont happen. It doesn’t matter what the trolls or the “both sides” posters who stand for nothin or the ignorant or buried head in the sand “yeah I’m somehow still a Republican” people think. 

Trump will lose. And the trolls will disappear, at least the ones we currently got. New ones will emerge and the cycle of life will continue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DDD Dad

DDD Dad 14250

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Johnny Sack said:

');b.close();})(document);<\/script>","pos_list":["LDRB","MAST"],"transID":"darla_prefetch_1553297876511_695309289_3","k2_uri":"","fac_rt":"26183","spaceID":"2022718753","lookupTime":295,"procTime":297,"npv":1,"pvid":"eYoczTk4LjF3JzimW3s6dgZ1MzguMQAAAABYKJpZ","serveTime":-1,"ep":{"site-attribute":"","tgt":"_blank","secure":true,"ref":"https:\/\/forums.rivals.com\/threads\/unofficial-mueller-report-delivered-to-ag-william-barr-thread.871934\/","nopageview":true,"filter":"no_expandable;exp_iframe_expandable;","darlaID":"darla_instance_1553297876511_1514784238_2"},"pym":{".":"v0.0.9;;-;"},"host":"","filtered":[],"pe":""}}}

  1. [IMG]

FW:FW:FW:FW:FW:FW:FW:

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JimmyJames

JimmyJames 12271

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

 

That’s actually kind of funny. 

We have no idea what it says but one would think that it would be “very comprehensive” no matter what it concludes. Its not like he’s turning in some algebra paper. 

Edited by JimmyJames
Link to comment
Share on other sites
David Dennison

David Dennison 18647

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, JimmyJames said:

That’s actually kind of funny. 

We have no idea what it says but one would think that it would be “very comprehensive” no matter what it concludes. Its not like he’s turning in some algebra paper. 

I don't think it's going to conclude anything. I think it's going to lay out the evidence. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
EMAWesome

EMAWesome 101

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

That’s pretty much why Mueller had to wrap this up early this year or wait until after 2020 otherwise it would look political. 

It's looked political since the very first day it started.  Let me correct that.  It's been political since the very first day it started.

  • Like 2
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23356

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, Dbeasy said:

If Roger Stone were convicted, would that be the first conviction that is actually tied to collusion, and not perjury or other crimes?

They got Al Capone for tax evasion which is clear evidence he was innocent of being a gangster. 

/sarcasm 

The feds operate under a goal of getting the bad guys.  Doesn’t really matter how they get them when they are overt criminals and a threat to public safety. 

Manafort and Stone were the biggest bad guys on the Trump side of the Trump-Russia conspiracy.  

Mueller got them and both are likely spending significant time in prison. 

Jury is still out on Trump tho...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dbeasy

Dbeasy 14962

Posted
Posted
Yep. We will know our fate in less than 2 years. If trump wins again the country is fucked. 
But it wont happen. It doesn’t matter what the trolls or the “both sides” posters who stand for nothin or the ignorant or buried head in the sand “yeah I’m somehow still a Republican” people think. 
Trump will lose. And the trolls will disappear, at least the ones we currently got. New ones will emerge and the cycle of life will continue. 


Some of you guys are in danger of being reverse trolls. You may not agree with a lot of the posters, but I still don’t see a lot of purposeful trolling in this thread.

I see some ill informed perspectives, but not really trolling. I personally also don’t see how anyone can support Trump, but a lot of these posters aren’t supporting Trump, but are rather pointing out that there still hasn’t been any collusion convictions and it’s looking like there will be no other indictments. That’s not trolling.

Maybe a refresher on the definition of reverse troll is in order.

Reverse Trolling Definition

When someone of little or no intelligence on the internet gets into a discussion, debate, or argument that they cannot keep up with because of their inability to think and process information outside of their closed little mind, and respond by calling the other person more intelligent than them A TROLL!
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Johnny Sack

Johnny Sack 8397

Posted
Posted

Just would like to remind everyone, before you get so excited about the lack of indictments related to or evidence of any collusion with Russia, that Robert Mueller is a lifelong Republican. What did you expect, for him to actually put a president of his own party in prison? Thing was a sham from the start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
David Dennison

David Dennison 18647

Posted
Posted
Just now, EMAWesome said:

They will start screaming for impeachment based on him not apologizing for his white privilege now.

Or just wait to see what's in the report and then wait on the SDNY, the New York AG, and Congress.

We get at least two more years of this plus a presidential election.

It's gonna be great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Red Five

Red Five 40629

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Johnny Sack said:

Just would like to remind everyone, before you get so excited about the lack of indictments related to or evidence of any collusion with Russia, that Robert Mueller is a lifelong Republican. What did you expect, for him to actually put a president of his own party in prison? Thing was a sham from the start.

I think what you're trying to say is party over country. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...