The Robert Mueller Investigation

[jimmyjazz 46996]

2 minutes ago, ulukinatme said:

You do realize they're never going to get the full report, right?  They've already said that certain confidential parts can't be released by law, so at best they're going to get a partial report.  The Dems and the media know that, but they keep saying "Full report!"  Why?  Because it's just one more thing they can add to the witch hunt by saying "They're hiding something, we didn't get the full report!"  Another low for them.

The House & Senate Judiciary Committees can receive the full report.  Are you sure this is the tack you want to take?

[JimmyJames 12271]

11 minutes ago, tjhooker said:

Yeah but in general gluten free people are really annoying and most dont have celiac disease.  

Why are gluten free people really annoying? 

[Lagunamadre 1975]

5 minutes ago, ulukinatme said:

You do realize they're never going to get the full report, right?  They've already said that certain confidential parts can't be released by law, so at best they're going to get a partial report.  The Dems and the media know that, but they keep saying "Full report!"  Why?  Because it's just one more thing they can add to the witch hunt by saying "They're hiding something, we didn't get the full report!"  Another low for them.

Fortunately there are ways to declassify things. Seeing as how Trump said he wants the entire report released, I am sure he will act swiftly to get the report out to the public. #releasethememo

[JimmyJames 12271]

22 minutes ago, tjhooker said:

she checks a lot of boxes for an unbearable person

✔️NY'er. ✔️Proud Democrat & Hillary Campaign volunteer ✔️#ImWithHer. Animal Lover ✔️#Vegan. Celiac Disease ✔️#GlutenFree. Baseball ✔️#Yankees. ✔️Cats

 

You hate baseball and animals? What the fuck is wrong with you?? 

Edited March 25, 2019 by JimmyJames

[triplehorn 2664]

1 minute ago, ulukinatme said:

You do realize they're never going to get the full report, right?  They've already said that certain confidential parts can't be released by law, so at best they're going to get a partial report.  The Dems and the media know that, but they keep saying "Full report!"  Why?  Because it's just one more thing they can add to the witch hunt by saying "They're hiding something, we didn't get the full report!"  Another low for them.

It only follows that Mueller, having correctly identified Congress as the appropriate body to deliberate the evidence, especially the obstruction, prepared his report with that delivery in mind.

[retread 2951]

^ and that's why he needs to testify before Congress

Edited March 25, 2019 by retread

[JimmyJames 12271]

23 minutes ago, tjhooker said:

she checks a lot of boxes for an unbearable person

✔️NY'er. ✔️Proud Democrat & Hillary Campaign volunteer ✔️#ImWithHer. Animal Lover ✔️#Vegan. Celiac Disease ✔️#GlutenFree. Baseball ✔️#Yankees. ✔️Cats

 

People with Celiac disease are unbearable? What kind of a complete scumbag are you? 

[FondrenRoad 4378]

13 minutes ago, tjhooker said:

Yeah but in general gluten free people are really annoying and most dont have celiac disease.  

But she does have celiac disease and you chose gluten free as a reason you hate her. It was right there next to your check of hate. 

I can see why you love a president who made fun of someone in a wheelchair. 

[JimmyJames 12271]

Just now, tjhooker said:

Are those checked, moron?

Then why even even mention them? 

[InkaUtexas 26823]

1 minute ago, JimmyJames said:

People with Celiac disease are unbearable? What kind of a complete scumbag are you? 

A gay baker? 

[RDCanecutter 26858]

5 minutes ago, JimmyJames said:

Why are gluten free people really annoying? 

Because sometimes you just want gluten in your people.

[ulukinatme 1768]

They're certainly going to get at least a partial report, but until they're granted a release the full report will likely have to wait:

Quote

Vox

Who knows? Maybe never. Barr said his “goal and intent is to release as much of the Special Counsel’s report as I can consistent with applicable law, regulations, and Departmental policies.”

The applicable law, regulations, and departmental policies will be the tricky part. As mentioned above, the DOJ doesn’t typically release information about people who are not charged with crimes. Mueller also relied on confidential grand jury information, and Barr says he will need to work with Mueller to determine what information needs to be withheld.

Mueller also referred some cases to other federal prosecutors, which means some of his evidence in the final report is used in ongoing investigations and can’t be released to the public just yet.

All of this will likely prevent a full, unedited report from being made public in the immediate future. But Democratic lawmakers are almost certain to battle to get as much of it released as possible.

But if Trump is signaling that he's fine with the full thing getting released, maybe it'll happen and they can fast track it.  That doesn't bode well for the dems though if Trump is willing to have the full thing unleashed.  

[JimmyJames 12271]

1 minute ago, tjhooker said:

That is from her Twitter profile.  Some of you people are like talking to a really dumb 5 year old.  Scroll up and read things in context as to not look stupid.

So explain why gluten free people are “really annoying?” What are they doing to poor tj? 

Edited March 25, 2019 by JimmyJames

[Nivek 17358]

So when do we get to hold Republicans accountable for wasting all this money investigating the president?

We could have hade a parade!

[Lagunamadre 1975]

Just now, JimmyJames said:

So explain why gluten free peopl are “really annoying?” What are they doing to poor tj? 

I think both sides can come together on this issue and agree that gluten free people are really annoying. 

[ChiTownDoc 21326]

13 minutes ago, ulukinatme said:

You do realize they're never going to get the full report, right?  They've already said that certain confidential parts can't be released by law, so at best they're going to get a partial report.  The Dems and the media know that, but they keep saying "Full report!"  Why?  Because it's just one more thing they can add to the witch hunt by saying "They're hiding something, we didn't get the full report!"  Another low for them.

You’re a dumb motherfucker.  There’s multiple democrats in the house and senate that will see the full report.  Are you that stupid or trolling?  Both?

[DDD Dad 14592]

1 hour ago, jimmyjazz said:

So now the state is dictating to the press who they can interview and what boundaries should otherwise be put in place.  Totes norms.

That came from his campaign, not any governmental entity.  Stay in your lane, bro.

[JimmyJames 12271]

2 minutes ago, tjhooker said:

I've offended the gluten free nazis.

 

Nice deflection troll. 

You should go back in hibernation again. 

[ulukinatme 1768]

4 minutes ago, ChiTownDoc said:

You’re a dumb motherfucker.  There’s multiple democrats in the house and senate that will see the full report.  Are you that stupid or trolling?  Both?

Damn, you're just so smart...I'm powerless...

I have not seen anything that suggests the public, let alone the Judiciary committee, will get the full and unaltered report.  They can subpoena to have the full report released, but that doesn't mean they're going to get it.  It would go to the Supreme Court for a decision, and I can only imagine how that would go.  

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-much-of-the-mueller-report-will-the-public-see--and-when/2019/03/24/43a2ccc2-4e65-11e9-a3f7-78b7525a8d5f_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.3134b7754f8f

If you can find information that says otherwise, I'd like to see it because so far all I've seen is they'll probably get a partial report once Mueller decides what information can be released legally.  Otherwise, maybe you should quit believing what MSNBC feeds you.

[DDD Dad 14592]

I see this thread has made great strides in providing worthwhile information since I last checked in.  TJ you haven't been treated to a vacation yet?

[JimmyJames 12271]

1 minute ago, tjhooker said:

No, the liberals on here are offended I think gluten free people are annoying.  There is no consensus.

Explain why they annoy you? Do they make fun of you at work? Especially the lady with the disease you mocked. 

[FondrenRoad 4378]

1 minute ago, tjhooker said:

No, the liberals on here are offended I think gluten free people are annoying.  There is no consensus.

No, you thought it was annoying that a girl with celiac disease was gluten free. 

[JimmyJames 12271]

“I fucking hate people who like to eat bananas. Super annoying.”  - tjhooker

[David Dennison 19442]

1 minute ago, tjhooker said:

Watch the vid.  It contains a lot of the things many gluten free people do that annoy me.  BTW it was a joke you idiot troll.  You can't pick up on it though due to density.

You're getting worked up about people not being able to take a joke?

That's funny.

[Poolflood 845]

17 minutes ago, InkaUtexas said:

A gay baker? 

A gay baker did my wedding cake - it was FABULOUS!!!

 

[FondrenRoad 4378]

6 minutes ago, tjhooker said:

Deflection?  I am not sure you understand the definition of that word.  You're using it wrong.  Probably connected to your reading disability.

So now you're using all sorts of disabilities as insults.  Does attacking people with disabilities and disease make you feel better about your miserable existence?

[Onboard 2.0 9083]

15 minutes ago, ChiTownDoc said:

You’re a dumb motherfucker.  There’s multiple democrats in the house and senate that will see the full report.  Are you that stupid or trolling?  Both?

You know that won't stop some democrats from making that charge.  The same thing would happen on the other side of the aisle. . They call it pol-o-tics.  

The public should have access to the report in as complete a form as possible, won't happen probably.

[FondrenRoad 4378]

1 minute ago, tjhooker said:

so you are conceding Jimmy has a reading disability?

You're right I should not make fun of his disability.

Whether he does or not isn't relevant. You are a deplorable person who feels it is appropriate to use disabilities as an insult. 

[David Dennison 19442]

Just now, Onboard 2.0 said:

You know that won't stop some democrats from making that charge.  The same thing would happen on the other side of the aisle. . They call it pol-o-tics.  

The public should have access to the report in as complete a form as possible, won't happen probably.

I really don't care as long as Nancy Pelosi reads it.

[Onboard 2.0 9083]

Just now, David Dennison said:

I really don't care as long as Nancy Pelosi reads it.

Yeah a pillar of honesty she is....  she still hasn't read the ACA act

[FondrenRoad 4378]

2 minutes ago, Onboard 2.0 said:

You know that won't stop some democrats from making that charge.  The same thing would happen on the other side of the aisle. . They call it pol-o-tics.  

The public should have access to the report in as complete a form as possible, won't happen probably.

Just need a Snowden or Reality Winner type to get a hold of it. 

[Nivek 17358]

So two years and nothingburger.  All the Mueller investigation did was guarantee Trump gets reelected in 2020.  JFC, Brisket has been right all along.  We're truly fucked. 

A Republican with limits was to investigate another series of republicans and being overseen by republicans appointed by the the one worried most.

Seems as impartial as cops investigating themselves.

[DDD Dad 14592]

4 hours ago, immamac said:

Stay on topic. Final warning - off topic posts will result in having cloak room access revoked temporarily. I'm not going full on ban happy, but I'm tired of all these reports I'm getting for stupid unnecessary shit flinging in this thread. We get it, this is a fucking hot button issue - put your big boy pants on and debate or add commentary to it and stop personally attacking people.

 

[Poolflood 845]

19 hours ago, David Dennison said:

The FBI warned both campaigns that Russia was trying to influence the election.

So what's the general consensus on the Russian interference. 

Was Putin trying to steer for trump or just generally fuck with us. 

[jimmyjazz 46996]

17 minutes ago, ulukinatme said:

Damn, you're just so smart...I'm powerless...

I have not seen anything that suggests the public, let alone the Judiciary committee,

You're so smart you don't even know how to use the idiom "let alone".  Might want to sit this one out.

[FondrenRoad 4378]

Just now, tjhooker said:

It's relevant.  

BTW are you for real?  I feel like I am being trolled.

No the fact that he is right and you deflected is not relevant. In fact, you continue to deflect now.  What is relevant is that you used the term disability as an insult immediately after disparaging someone for eating a medically required diet. 

You're a shitty human being.

[DDD Dad 14592]

3 minutes ago, Poolflood said:

So what's the general consensus on the Russian interference. 

Was Putin trying to steer for trump or just generally fuck with us. 

[ulukinatme 1768]

3 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

You're so smart you don't even know how to use the idiom "let alone".  Might want to sit this one out.

I'm sorry, I am stupid after all.  Are you able to refute the statement though?  You also seemed to think that the Judiciary committee would receive the full report, without question.  As it stands it looks like they'll get a partial report unless the Dems subpoena and the Supreme Court gives the okay.  I'm guessing you can't provide evidence otherwise, which is why you chose to hang your hat on my faux pas instead. 

[jimmyjazz 46996]

29 minutes ago, DDD Dad said:

That came from his campaign, not any governmental entity.  Stay in your lane, bro.

Please.  You think that wasn't sanctioned by Donald?

[jimmyjazz 46996]

Just now, ulukinatme said:

I'm sorry, I am stupid after all.  Are you able to refute the statement though?  You also seemed to think that the Judiciary committee would receive the full report, without question.  As it stands it looks like they'll get a partial report unless the Dems subpoena and the Supreme Court gives the okay.  I'm guessing you can't provide evidence otherwise, which is why you chose to hang your hat on my faux pas instead. 

I absolutely think both Judiciary committees will get the whole, unredacted report.  They should.  It would be wrong if they didn't.

[David Dennison 19442]

16 minutes ago, Onboard 2.0 said:

Yeah a pillar of honesty she is....  she still hasn't read the ACA act

She's the smartest politician in Washington. So I'll trust her instincts.

[DDD Dad 14592]

Please.  You think that wasn't sanctioned by Donald?

It doesn’t matter. This isn’t the battlefield worth dying on.

[ulukinatme 1768]

Just now, jimmyjazz said:

I absolutely think both Judiciary committees will get the whole, unredacted report.  They should.  It would be wrong if they didn't.

What you think, and what will happen, are two different things though.  Based on the WaPo and Vox articles it'll be a partial report.  That could very well change if they get the go ahead to release the confidential testimony, or it goes to the Supreme Court and they give the go ahead, but that remains to be seen.

[Hugo Stiglitz 23367]

The counterintelligence side of the investigation is where the juicy stuff is and we’re likely not going to see much of it.  I was hoping to see some Mueller conclusions and analysis in that area.

Edited March 25, 2019 by Hugo Stiglitz

[David Dennison 19442]

Just now, ulukinatme said:

What you think, and what will happen, are two different things though.  Based on the WaPo and Vox articles it'll be a partial report.  That could very well change if they get the go ahead to release the confidential testimony, or it goes to the Supreme Court and they give the go ahead, but that remains to be seen.

That would be politically beneficial for Democrats. 

It's in the administration's best interest to release the full report. If they don't, it looks like they are hiding something.

[retread 2951]

1 minute ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

The counterintelligence side of the investigation is where the juicy stuff is and we’re likely not going to see much of it.  I was just hoping to see some Mueller conclusions on that part. 

Quote

Julia E. Ainsley✔@JuliaEAinsley

Breaking: @KenDilanianNBC reports that the FBI is prepared to brief the Gang of 8 on the findings of Mueller's counterintelligence investigation into Trump (i.e. whether the president is under the influence of a foreign power)

 2:31 PM - Mar 25, 2019

 

[ulukinatme 1768]

2 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

That would be politically beneficial for Democrats. 

It's in the administration's best interest to release the full report. If they don't, it looks like they are hiding something.

Yup, I agree, and maybe that's why Trump is advocating to have the full thing released.  You would think if there was something damning in there he would want it kept sealed, but if it's no more than we already know it's probably in his best interest to let them have the whole thing.

[Hugo Stiglitz 23367]

5 minutes ago, retread said:

 

Thanks.  I was thinking more along the lines of all the ways the Russians tried to penetrate the Trump campaign. There’s probably some contacts we don’t know about.  That kind of information could be useful to future campaigns not wanting to be investigated for coordinating with a foreign power. 

Edited March 25, 2019 by Hugo Stiglitz

[Bruh Man 3160]

 

[Hugo Stiglitz 23367]

Gotta appreciate the Rooskies ability to troll.   They’re not even subtle about it anymore.  I still think there’s some buyers remorse with Trump because he’s an unpredictable idiot that inadvertently blew the lid off their operation with Mueller.  

However, they’re getting their money’s worth with dotus.