Jump to content

The Robert Mueller Investigation


Hugo Stiglitz

Recommended Posts

lol I'm a bit behind

"we have a chart!"

why the fuck didn't Mueller just move forward if there was substantial evidence of obstruction of justice, that was his job correct? He had no "collusion conclusion" - what a waste of fucking time and money.

Edited by Zavala
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Zavala said:

lol I'm a bit behind

"we have a chart!"

why the fuck didn't Mueller just move forward if there was substantial evidence of obstruction of justice, that was his job correct? He had no finding either way on conclusion - what a waste of fucking time and money.

Jeeeeeesus. He couldn't/wouldn't because there is a standard (for lack of a better term) that states that the current President cannot be indicted. Pay attention. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Zavala said:

lol I'm a bit behind

"we have a chart!"

why the fuck didn't Mueller just move forward if there was substantial evidence of obstruction of justice, that was his job correct? He had no "collusion conclusion" - what a waste of fucking time and money.

He did. He acted like the Marine/DOJ by the book guy he is. He had faith in the system to do right and then Barr.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SmokeyTheBear said:

Jeeeeeesus. He couldn't/wouldn't because there is a standard (for lack of a better term) that states that the current President cannot be indicted. Pay attention. 

You are talking in circles bub. They accused the President of Treason, then high ranking Democrats said there was evidence. Report comes out, doesn't have shit. Now he obstructed justice by being the President because there's a standard?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Winona's Big Orange Bevo said:

He did. He acted like the Marine/DOJ by the book guy he is. He had faith in the system to do right and then Barr.

He didn't have a conclusion on obstruction, so no, he didn't. Why?

This was sadly done to keep the Russia narrative alive for the Media/Democrat. Pathetic. 

  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Zavala said:

lol I'm a bit behind

"we have a chart!"

why the fuck didn't Mueller just move forward if there was substantial evidence of obstruction of justice, that was his job correct? He had no "collusion conclusion" - what a waste of fucking time and money.

Part 2 of the Mueller report is sufficient to support impeachment in the House. Mueller did his job.  The Democrats don't like the political calculus of doing their's in the House because the GOP in the Senate will not remove over marginal obstruction conclusions without corresponding evidence that there was coordination to interfere in the election.  Some fucking asshole liar predicted that. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Zavala said:

He didn't have a conclusion on obstruction, so no, he didn't. Why?

This was sadly done to keep the Russia narrative alive for the Media/Democrat. Pathetic. 

DOJ policy not to indict president. He did his work and handed off to congress but doubt he expected the AG to run interference for the president.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Zavala said:

lol I'm a bit behind

"we have a chart!"

why the fuck didn't Mueller just move forward if there was substantial evidence of obstruction of justice, that was his job correct? He had no "collusion conclusion" - what a waste of fucking time and money.

Hey look, another dipshit who hasn't read the report and doesn't understand DOJ policy.  Thanks for your contributions!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Part 2 of the Mueller report is sufficient to support impeachment in the House. Mueller did his job.  The Democrats don't like the political calculus of doing their's in the House because the GOP in the Senate will not remove over marginal obstruction conclusions without corresponding evidence that there was coordination to interfere in the election.  Some fucking asshole liar predicted that. 

Well, no, but you keep on.  "Marginal" in your world only, you being a Trumpkin and all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...