Jump to content
Required Reading for any Longhorn ×

The Robert Mueller Investigation

Hugo Stiglitz

By Hugo Stiglitz
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 34.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Hugo Stiglitz

    3238

  • Anastasis

    2088

  • David Dennison

    1559

  • triplehorn

    1384

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Goredho
Goredho

Just to make sure I have the alternative facts straight...  Our government -- but I'm guessing only the deep state part of it --- is now guilty of torturing a poor, naive Russian exchange student who

Incredulity
Incredulity

liberals suddenly being terrified of Russia and manic for election integrity is just pure comedy gold.

Chooky
Chooky

I don't believe for a moment that any of this is entertaining to you.  I think it gives you a bit of anxiety knowing that your best weapon against a group who you despise is a bumbling fraud as a busi

Posted Images

Anastasis

Anastasis 23,490

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, SimonBolivar said:

It'll go like the rest of them go where we say "omg this fucking guy is president?!?" And Republicans say it's a big nothing burger. Just a waste of time until the primaries.

Remember when muellers team dropped that letter the day before Barr’s testimony. Yeah. I bet Barr does too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DigglerontheHoof

DigglerontheHoof 21,254

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, bolverk said:

I'm of the mind that we probably shouldn't neg people for their opinions in here, but I'd make an exception for out-right lies.

Those and outright racist comments.  If someone said some of the shit that comes out of Chrispy's, et al, while they were standing in front of them, I'd slap them down like the bitch they are.  Since we're online, I feel an interweb slap will have to suffice. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
safe sex

safe sex 11,792

Posted
Posted (edited)

I have absolutely no problem giving negs in this forum, especially for a lot of the subtle racism/homophobia/transphobia that also pervades. Or really anything I think is lame and awful. For some reason, a little red icon next to a post of theirs really bothers them, sooooo go wild when appropriate imo

Edited by trauma babe
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SubliminalHorn

SubliminalHorn 6,811

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, trauma babe said:

I have absolutely no problem giving negs in this forum, especially for a lot of the subtle racism/homophobia/transphobia that also pervades. Or really anything I think is lame and awful. For some reason, a little red icon next to a post of theirs really bothers them, sooooo go wild when appropriate imo

Slorch is the king of the neg rep snowflakes

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chooky

Chooky 13,319

Posted
Posted

I think it's important to hear from Kelly Osbourne. A brash, mid twenties British kid with purple hair raised by the extravagance of rockstar levels of neverending cash flow. She really has her index finger on the pulse of 2/3 of the American mindset. Let her foibles represent an entire political class. Makes sense. 

Zavala, can you link any editorial essays authored by Ashley Simpson? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 45,750

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Chooky said:

I think it's important to hear from Kelly Osbourne. A brash, mid twenties British kid with purple hair raised by the extravagance of rockstar levels of neverending cash flow. She really has her index finger on the pulse of 2/3 of the American mindset. Let her foibles represent an entire political class. Makes sense. 

Zavala, can you link any editorial essays authored by Ashley Simpson? 

She's 34 brah

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 46,222

Posted
Posted
On 6/25/2019 at 10:58 AM, Anastasis said:

Trump is an authoritarian fascist and an immediate threat to the constitution and our nation. Also, who cares if the executive branch cuts a few corners from time to time when deploying the most invasive surveillance techniques against American citizens in general or political targets in particular. 

Well, let's start with evidence that corners were cut, and your Defcon 1 knee-jerk panic button hysteria doesn't count as evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
notre dame joe

notre dame joe 197

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Chooky said:

I think it's important to hear from Kelly Osbourne. A brash, mid twenties British kid with purple hair raised by the extravagance of rockstar levels of neverending cash flow. She really has her index finger on the pulse of 2/3 of the American mindset. Let her foibles represent an entire political class. Makes sense. 

Zavala, can you link any editorial essays authored by Ashley Simpson? 

Only because Rapino is busy.  We'd learn as much new information from her as we will from Mueller's AI approved sound bytes next month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anastasis

Anastasis 23,490

Posted
Posted
51 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Well, let's start with evidence that corners were cut, and your Defcon 1 knee-jerk panic button hysteria doesn't count as evidence.

How about this. If the OIG report finds that all policies and procedures relating to the use of sources and/or FISA applications were adequately and appropriately followed, I take a 6 month holiday from the politics board. If on the other hand there are findings that the relevant  policies and procedures were not adequately followed, you take the vacation.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anastasis

Anastasis 23,490

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, BrickHorn said:

Typical Anastasis.  “Trump is a menace!  Something simply must be done to stop Obama in retrospect!!!”  

I haven’t made Obama a meaningful component of my criticisms, but good for you trying to deflect. Your previous deflections directed at me (#bothsides have been to Prague!) aged so well. I am sure this one turns out better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DDD Dad

DDD Dad 14,352

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

How about this. If the OIG report finds that all policies and procedures relating to the use of sources and/or FISA applications were adequately and appropriately followed, I take a 6 month holiday from the politics board. If on the other hand there are findings that the relevant  policies and procedures were not adequately followed, you take the vacation.

 

Y'all should just go ahead and fuck already.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 46,222

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

How about this. If the OIG report finds that all policies and procedures relating to the use of sources and/or FISA applications were adequately and appropriately followed, I take a 6 month holiday from the politics board. If on the other hand there are findings that the relevant  policies and procedures were not adequately followed, you take the vacation.

Well, that's all kinds of stupid.  An investigation can overstep bounds without rendering all conclusions moot.  "Hey, you didn't initial paragraph 9 of the addendum to the arrest warrant, so too bad, Jeffrey Dahmer walks".  Yeah, no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anastasis

Anastasis 23,490

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, jimmyjazz said:

Well, that's all kinds of stupid.  An investigation can overstep bounds without rendering all conclusions moot.  "Hey, you didn't initial paragraph 9 of the addendum to the arrest warrant, so too bad, Jeffrey Dahmer walks".  Yeah, no.

I was told everything was by the book. Same wager offered to the other posters that have claimed the same. I doubt any take it. I mean, I wouldn’t either. Auditors gonna audit. Just 4th amendment protections. Initials by paragraph 9. Same difference. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 46,222

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

I was told everything was by the book. Same wager offered to the other posters that have claimed the same. I doubt any take it. I mean, I wouldn’t either. Auditors gonna audit. Just 4th amendment protections. Initials by paragraph 9. Same difference. 

Who the fuck said "everything was by the book"?  You're throwing shade on the discussion.  I defy you to identify any criminal investigation involving dozens of people that has, without a doubt, done everything "by the book".  I'm sure it happens, but not all the time.  It doesn't render all law enforcement activities moot.

Should we encourage law enforcement to operate outside the bounds of the law?  Hell no.  But you're doing something else -- you're intentionally trying to cast doubt on the process because you don't like the LAW.  Well, fuck that.  You'd be against the outcome even IF law enforcement was 100% successful in toeing the line (and for all I know they were).

You really need to find a new angle, because this one is tired and transparent.   You're wasting everybody's time.  You're like Chrispy, but more malicious.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anastasis

Anastasis 23,490

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, jimmyjazz said:

Who the fuck said "everything was by the book"?

So you concede it was not by the book? Or you just posturing around how many posters I can directly quote? Am I allowed to also include paraphrase or does it need to be a direct quote?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...