Jump to content

The Robert Mueller Investigation

Hugo Stiglitz

By Hugo Stiglitz
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 34.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Hugo Stiglitz

    3238

  • Anastasis

    2088

  • David Dennison

    1559

  • triplehorn

    1384

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Goredho
Goredho

Just to make sure I have the alternative facts straight...  Our government -- but I'm guessing only the deep state part of it --- is now guilty of torturing a poor, naive Russian exchange student who

Incredulity
Incredulity

liberals suddenly being terrified of Russia and manic for election integrity is just pure comedy gold.

Chooky
Chooky

I don't believe for a moment that any of this is entertaining to you.  I think it gives you a bit of anxiety knowing that your best weapon against a group who you despise is a bumbling fraud as a busi

Posted Images

FondrenRoad

FondrenRoad 4378

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Mojo Hand said:

But he's already said that he can't.   So you won't get an answer to that question. 

He hasn't said he can't specifically to that question.

The primary issue is that the Dems are pussies and they want him to give a judge/jury answer of "guilty" instead of a prosecutor answer of "would indict."  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DDD Dad

DDD Dad 14251

Posted
Posted
Just now, Pig Bellmont said:

Raskin walked Mueller through evidence and elements of witness tampering. So we’ve got more than just obstruction of justice on the record today 

Raskin is a smart guy.  I worked on a case with him years ago for Perot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 45554

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Anastasis said:

Tweet leaves off Bob's testimony after Lieu goes through the three elements wrt Trump.

02:23:13  

THE ONLY THING I WANT TO ADD IS GOING THROUGH THE ELEMENTS WITH YOU DOES NOT MEAN I SUBSCRIBE TO THE -- WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO PROVE THROUGH THOSE ELEMENTS.

. . . which is Mueller refusing to expound beyond what he said in the report.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RomaVicta

RomaVicta 29781

Posted
Posted

Thanks for the updates. Has anyone asked:

Mr. Muller, was your investigation a witch hunt?

Are you a Democrat?

Was your staff comprised of 17 angry Democrats?

Did your report declare that there was no obstruction of justice?

Did your report exonerate the president?

Would it be fair to say that anyone making these claims is lying?

Would you consider such a person doing so a liar?

If these lies were told by a person with high level executive power, might that prejudice the reception of a criminal investigation?

Could such acts, if proved, be viewed as obstructing justice?

Lastly, in your view, is there a call of duty to your country that can exceed the duty to follow the letter of the law? For instance, if there were an existential threat to the values and institutions that you have defended on the battlefield and the court room, might you see a reason to throw off the constraints of legal propriety and just say it like it is?

This may be moment to do so, Mr. Mueller. The legislative body of this country shies from their responsibilities-they are cowed by party on the one hand or fearful of losing votes on the other. Not enough people will stand up and call a spade a spade. I personally would honor any person who did so.

Thank you, sir, for your service to this country.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ted Lange

Ted Lange 16041

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Tweet leaves off Bob's testimony after Lieu goes through the three elements wrt Trump.

02:23:13  

THE ONLY THING I WANT TO ADD IS GOING THROUGH THE ELEMENTS WITH YOU DOES NOT MEAN I SUBSCRIBE TO THE -- WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO PROVE THROUGH THOSE ELEMENTS.

And?  He doesnt say Lieu is wrong (he isn't).  He is just punting obstruction due to the OLC.  This isnt complicated

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pig Bellmont

Pig Bellmont 8691

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Tweet leaves off Bob's testimony after Lieu goes through the three elements wrt Trump.

02:23:13  

THE ONLY THING I WANT TO ADD IS GOING THROUGH THE ELEMENTS WITH YOU DOES NOT MEAN I SUBSCRIBE TO THE -- WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO PROVE THROUGH THOSE ELEMENTS.

He’s simply not trying to fill the role of fact finder. The report laid out the elements of the crime and the evidence. Mueller then confirmed he did not indict because of the OLC opinion. What more do you want from him? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mojo Hand

Mojo Hand 4580

Posted
Posted
Just now, Pig Bellmont said:

He’s simply not trying to fill the role of fact finder. The report laid out the elements of the crime and the evidence. Mueller then confirmed he did not indict because of the OLC opinion. What more do you want from him? 

He wants Mueller to say both sides are equally criminal and that Trump is no different than every Dem that came before him. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...