Jump to content

Hunter “Big Gun In His Pants” Biden - Mastermind of the Biden Family Crime Syndicate

Hanrahan

By Hanrahan
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

HenryJames
HenryJames
Loather
Loather

Well boys, it turns out the laptop is real. I realize you liberals are generally dishonest and hypocritical, and will proudly boast that you don't care about any of this, but for that small fraction o

TexArcher
TexArcher

It's amazing how stupid 21st Century Republicans are. Fox News has actually convinced you that this story about a private citizen matters right now.  While an ex-president is being investigated f

Posted Images

Js1

Js1 85689

Posted
Posted (edited)

Why would the House Oversight committee need to include someone who served in the military?  Which includes the ever distinguished non-veterans Gym Jordan, Nancy Mace, Marge and Boobert.  Though I'm sure Boobs have given a handy in a Humvee before.

There's a whole fucking committee for that already - ARMED SERVICES, which includes:

Ruben Gallego (US Marine)
Seth Moulton (US Marine)
Chrissy Houlahan (Air Force)
Elissa Slotkin (CIA)
Mikie Sherrill (US Navy)
Salud Carbajal (Marine Corps Reserve)
Jared Golden (Marine Corp)
 

Edited by Js1
  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89994

Posted
Posted

This thread continues to remind us that they have nothing to really go after Joe Biden with to help Trump in November, and the fact that they won’t put it to a vote proves it - instead they are just going to try and drag this stuff, all the while it doesn’t change anybody’s mind.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mdhorn

Mdhorn 6075

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

This thread continues to remind us that they have nothing to really go after Joe Biden with to help Trump in November, and the fact that they won’t put it to a vote proves it - instead they are just going to try and drag this stuff, all the while it doesn’t change anybody’s mind.

It's Benghazi all over again.  It won't stop until the election, and then, only if a Republican wins.  

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Horn Dog

Horn Dog 10008

Posted
Posted (edited)

laugh.thumb.jpg.d201c8f1e2260e25045c819a020b0e43.jpg

On 3/20/2024 at 11:45 PM, tx ind said:

Holy fuck, dare anyone to watch Raskin's face and try not to laugh

 

The woman's expression may be even better.  

Edited by Horn Dog
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhatTheBuck

WhatTheBuck 28825

Posted
Posted
21 hours ago, atomheartbevo said:

This thread continues to remind us that they have nothing to really go after Joe Biden with to help Trump in November, and the fact that they won’t put it to a vote proves it - instead they are just going to try and drag this stuff, all the while it doesn’t change anybody’s mind.

Just like Benghazi.

It’s political theater intended to affect Biden’s polling numbers, nothing more. Donald Trump was impeached twice so the more they can expose the American public to messages where the words “Biden” and “impeachment” are heard in the same sentence, the more they can create the illusion that there’s no difference between the two. “Both sides!” Ah, fuck it, everybody does it.

The problem is that it works.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
C-Man

C-Man 27315

Posted
Posted

Hunter's gearing up to sue Fox News: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/rcna149707

Quote

Lawyers for Hunter Biden plan to sue Fox News “imminently,” according to a letter sent to the network and obtained by NBC News. 

The letter, dated April 23, puts the Fox News Channel and Fox News Digital on notice for litigation claims arising from the network’s alleged “conspiracy and subsequent actions to defame Mr. Biden and paint him in a false light, the unlicensed commercial exploitation of his image, name, and likeness, and the unlawful publication of hacked intimate images of him.” 

Biden has hired attorney Mark Geragos and his firm to represent him in the Fox litigation efforts. The letter is the second outreach to Fox this month. An earlier letter was hand-delivered to Fox’s counsel two weeks ago, and the network asked for more time to respond, according to a source familiar with Biden’s legal efforts. The network has not yet responded to the letter sent April 23, which included a Friday evening, April 26, deadline to respond, according to Geragos. The letter is signed by Tina Glandian, a partner at Geragos & Geragos working on the case.

President Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden departs a court appearance on July 26, 2023, in Wilmington, Del.Jabin Botsford / The Washington Post via Getty Images file

Fox News did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The new threat of litigation comes almost a year after Fox News agreed to pay almost $800 million to Dominion Voting Systems to settle defamation claims related to Fox’s airing of election fraud claims in the 2020 election. Fox News also agreed to a $12 million settlement with a former employee who alleged she was pressured to provide misleading information as part of the Dominion case. 

Fox is currently facing a $2.7 billion lawsuit brought by Smartmatic, another voting system company that was the focus of Fox News coverage, as well as suits brought by shareholders against directors of the company for allowing the channel to air the allegations during its 2020 election coverage. Fox said in its latest financial disclosures that it will contest the lawsuits, but acknowledges that there could be a “material” adverse impact on the company’s business and financial position. 

The plan for Hunter Biden to pursue legal action against Fox News has been in the works for over a year, according to sources familiar with Biden's legal efforts, and was inspired in part by the success of the Dominion lawsuit and the ongoing Smartmatic lawsuit. The effort took on new importance with the revelations that the bribery allegations cited on air originated from the FBI informant Alexander Smirnov, who was indicted by special counsel David Weiss in February.

In a statement, Geragos said: “For the last five years, Fox News has relentlessly attacked Hunter Biden and made him a caricature in order to boost ratings and for its financial gain. The recent indictment of FBI informant Smirnov has exposed the conspiracy of disinformation that has been fueled by Fox, enabled by their paid agents and monetized by the Fox enterprise. We plan on holding them accountable.”

Hunter Biden has been a focus of Fox News coverage for the last several years. A review of network transcripts by the group Media Matters cites at least 13,440 mentions of Hunter Biden since January 2023. Biden’s legal team believes the number of mentions over many years makes the potential case as significant if not more so than the Dominion case, according to sources familiar with the legal strategy.

The Biden letter specifically cites Fox’s advancement of bribery allegations by Smirnov, who was indicted in February on charges of making false statements about the Bidens to the FBI. “Smirnov and the post indictment revelations basically closed the loop on the conspiracy,” Geragos told NBC News.

The letter alleges that Fox News knew that the bribery allegations were unverified at the time but continued to report that the source was “highly credible,” and demands corrections and retractions — including on-air statements by television hosts “including Sean Hannity, Jesse Watters, and Maria Bartiromo, to inform their viewers on air that they have been sharing a debunked allegation from a source who has been federally indicted.”

The letter also alleges that Fox’s airing of “intimate images” belonging to Hunter Biden that his lawyers claim were “hacked, stolen, and/or manipulated” violates Biden’s civil rights as well as copyright law. Much of the letter is focused on a six-part “mock trial” titled “The Trial of Hunter Biden” that aired in October 2021, described by Fox as what a trial might look like if Biden was charged with Foreign Agents Registration Act or bribery charges — neither of which Biden has been charged with. “While using certain true information, the series intentionally manipulates the facts, distorts the truth, narrates happenings out of context, and invents dialogue intended to entertain. Thus, the viewer of the series cannot decipher what is fact and what is fiction,” the letter says. The letter demands that the series be removed from all streaming services. 

This new litigation push comes as Biden prepares for a summer of criminal trials. His trial on gun charges in Delaware starts June 3, and his tax case is expected to go to trial in August. He’s pleaded not guilty in both cases.

  • Drool 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Horn Dog

Horn Dog 10008

Posted
Posted

I would like to pitch a new Netflix series called "The Treason Trials of Fox News".  A fictional account what a trial would look like if Murdock and his children were charged with being foreign spies/traitors, who aired fictitious "news" stories intended to inflame the lizard brain of it's views strictly for profit, to sew division/conflict in the American populous, and to help foreign adversaries diminish the influence of America throughout the world.  The last episode titled "Gory Decapitations" would be rated NC-17

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Red Five

Red Five 41036

Posted
Posted

A six part series. 

""The Trial of Hunter Biden" on Fox Nation offered a fictionalized version of what a trial against the younger Biden might look like. The television personality overseeing it, Judge Joe Brown, warned viewers that what they were seeing was not a real trial and that Hunter Biden was not facing charges."

Must be some slow news days over there. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
YGIFS

YGIFS 19453

Posted
Posted

Always wondered as a kid when they'd start the show "The People's Court" with Judge Wopner (sp?).  They'd say that through some special arrangement with the State, what we were about to see was an actual legal proceeding and legally binding.  My kid brain thought, "it seems like a game show, how can it be a real court?"  But I was like 8yo and home sick from school.  But there's millions of adults who now watch fictionalized criminal  trials about Hunter, and they think are real and then take to the interwebs and streets demanding the sentence handed down to Hunter begin immediately?  WTF? 

These are the same people who need to be told, in writing at the top of the page, "This is a Paid Advertisement, Not a News Article" when they read the Epoch Time story on male enhancement pills.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 45761

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, YGIFS said:

Always wondered as a kid when they'd start the show "The People's Court" with Judge Wopner (sp?).  They'd say that through some special arrangement with the State, what we were about to see was an actual legal proceeding and legally binding.  My kid brain thought, "it seems like a game show, how can it be a real court?"  But I was like 8yo and home sick from school.  But there's millions of adults who now watch fictionalized criminal  trials about Hunter, and they think are real and then take to the interwebs and streets demanding the sentence handed down to Hunter begin immediately?  WTF? 

These are the same people who need to be told, in writing at the top of the page, "This is a Paid Advertisement, Not a News Article" when they read the Epoch Time story on male enhancement pills.  

image.gif.0d149bb79e6e6d06b47fbbd68a049d75.gif

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fudge Nuggets

Fudge Nuggets 19270

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Red Five said:

A six part series. 

""The Trial of Hunter Biden" on Fox Nation offered a fictionalized version of what a trial against the younger Biden might look like. The television personality overseeing it, Judge Joe Brown, warned viewers that what they were seeing was not a real trial and that Hunter Biden was not facing charges."

Must be some slow news days over there. 

 

Fucking great, all I’m going to hear about at the office tomorrow is how Hunter Biden and his Wonder Dong are on trial and this is going to lead to the rightful return of dotard to office. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31672

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Fudge Nuggets said:

Fucking great, all I’m going to hear about at the office tomorrow is how Hunter Biden and his Wonder Dong are on trial and this is going to lead to the rightful return of dotard to office. 

Except Fox pulled it after Hunter threatened a defamation suit.

Sweet Jesus, can you imagine NBC, CBS, ABC, or even CNN staging a mock trial for something like this and letting an e-list celebrity preside over it?

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Js1

Js1 85689

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Except Fox pulled it after Hunter threatened a defamation suit.

Nu-uh, it was that senile fascist Biden and the liberal cabal. Obviously  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
Horn Dog

Horn Dog 10008

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

where are the window lickers to come tell us how serious this Hunter Bidenn trial is?

They will be around just as soon as they finish taking their drugs and shooting their guns

Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89994

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, Js1 said:

VICTIMLESS CRIMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Lindsey thinks so

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/lindsey-graham-defends-hunter-biden-federal-gun-charges_n_665e56d0e4b022af97dd4a36

Quote

“I think any average American who’s done their taxes like Hunter Biden would have probably faced prosecution, however, I don’t think the average American would have been charged with the gun thing,” Graham told HuffPost. “I don’t see any good coming from that.”

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
immamac

immamac 43482

Posted
Posted
On 4/17/2024 at 3:13 PM, Smax said:

 

 

Yes, yes he does 😂

 

Get this guy his own thread. 

Should we change the name of this thread? I think I have a good one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • immamac changed the title to Hunter “Big Gun In His Pants” Biden - Mastermind of the Biden Family Crime Syndicate
Nice Guy Eddie

Nice Guy Eddie 13537

Posted
Posted

GQP predicted response to the verdict:

If Hunter is found not guilty - see it's the proof that Biden is manipulating the DOJ.

If Hunter is found guilty - see it's proof that Biden is manipulating the DOJ by appearing to be fair until the morning after the election when Biden pardons Hunter. 

If no jury verdict - see it's proof that Biden got to the jury.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Drool 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31672

Posted
Posted

Well, you see, it's a very complicated plot to indict and convict Hunter so the Gym Jordan committee will not impeach Joey Two Scoops.

Joe, despite his senility, or maybe it's ObamaKamala, is playing 4D chess here.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DixonHur

DixonHur 11551

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

I agree with him on Hunter Biden, but the right's attempt to equate the 2 cases is laughable at best.

One is a private citizen who may or may not have lied on an application to buy a gun, and the other was the GOP nominee for President falsifying a hush money payment as "legal expenses" in an attempt to win the election.

Hunter's case would be more akin to Trump being tried for solicitation of a prostitute. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Red Five

Red Five 41036

Posted
Posted
I agree with him on Hunter Biden, but the right's attempt to equate the 2 cases is laughable at best.
One is a private citizen who may or may not have lied on an application to buy a gun, and the other was the GOP nominee for President falsifying a hush money payment as "legal expenses" in an attempt to win the election.
Hunter's case would be more akin to Trump being tried for solicitation of a prostitute. 

…. If he had never run for president.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...